Twenty years on

Twenty years ago I was still in the UK, having spent my vacation time with Sandra trying to stop the War on Iraq when the news came through that we had failed.

lunchtime protest in Plymouth

It had been clear from the start that the war was inevitable, that it was going to happen regardless of how many of us marched or protested against it. Bush and Blair had decided they wanted it and damn the consequences. If I had any illusions left at how politics worked in the “free west”, they were gone now. Nothing in the twenty years since have brought them back. Democracy only matters if you stay within the lines of what your rulers decide and any horribly destructive project they want can be realised by the simple expedient of lying your face off and smearing any opposition to it. The victims don’t matter, those are just statistics, the only things that matters is if you get your way.

lunchtime protest in Plymouth. The banner reads: stop the war by stopping work. Drop Blair not Bombs.

At the time it still felt like we could achieve something, if not prevent the war, limit the damage. In hindsight Sandra was right when she remarked later that only if the big demonstration in London on the 15th February had marched straight to Parliament and seized power there and then the war could’ve been stopped.

students protesting against the war

Nobody responsible for the war has had to account for it. Alistair Campbell gets to play the wizened political commentator on BBC television, Bush is rehabilitated as a kindly old grandpa making bad self portraits and even Blair is still seen as somebody to respect. For all the pious press coverage this deeply sad anniversary will get, any desire to dig for the truth behind the war will be limited. As with every disaster that followed it, the media and politicians, in the UK, US and elsewhere were equally guilty in making it into a reality. Everybody else who could see it coming?

Well, we don’t matter. We never have.

Highway of Death revisited

The latest Call of Duty has taken the infamous massacre of fleeing Iraqi soldiers and civilians from Kuwait back in 1991 and made it into a war crime perpetrated by the Russians.

Call of Duty screenshot:

Only a few weeks ago I watched Rambo for the first time. I’d watched First Blood years ago and that turned out to be a decent if rightwing revenge fantasy that made sure to show how hollow revenge was and had Rambo lose at the end. I’d never watched Rambo because, well, it looked like it was a dumb power fantasy about going back to ‘Nam and finally get to kick commie butt without any of the complexities that made the first movie so interesting. And indeed Rambo turned out to be just what I expected, except much dumber. The enemy is cartoonishly evil, a beautiful Vietnamese ally dies to underscore Rambo’s greatness and lines like “Do we get to win this time” are uttered with a hilarious sincirity by Stallone. the only thing funnier in all of this was knowning Rambo III was dedicated to the people who’d blow up the WTC two decades later.

Obviously silly as Rambo was, it’s Nobel Prize material compared to what Call of Duty did. To just boldly take one of the most notorious war crimes of the first Gulf War, fictionalise it and flip it so that it was the old Cold War enemy did it is dumber than anything the Rambo series ever got up to. Even for a brogamer first person shooter like Call of Duty it’s beyond the pale. Bad enough to have the developers recycle other people’s suffering as background material for your game. But blatantly rewriting your own war crimes so you can still be the good guys? That’s disgusting on a whole other level.

Thirteen years later we finally know

Too late we get the establishment acknowledgment of what we knew already. There was a reason that two million marched in London against the war, millions more worldwide to try and stop it. We knew it was pointless and would only lead to more misery, that the reasons for it were lies, that it couldn’t stop, wouldn’t stop terrorism and –surprise surprise– it didn’t.

London antiwar protesters. From Wikipedia

When we marched we were told we were fools at best, naive idiots, complicit in Saddam’s crimes. The low end estimate of the excess deaths caused by the War on Iraq is in the neighbourhood of 1-1.5 million; considering what happened after the war and occupation ended, that is probably far too low. How much better would Iraq and the world be off right now had the sensible people not listened to and enabled the warmongering duo of Bush and Blair?

Norm Geras is dead

So it turns out Norm Geras has died. To be honest this wouldn’t matter to me one way or another, if not for the fact that his death has caused otherwise sensible people to behave as if a great intellectual has passed away (reaching dizzying heights here). It’s a repeat of what happened when Hitchens died, with even less justification.

Even the backhanded compliment flyingrodent gave that he “can’t imagine blogs without the Professor — Normblog really should be seen as the archetype of the form” is giving him too much credit. What Norm Geras did is no different from what the rightwing and “decent left” US warbloggers did and do: smear, lie, distort to manufacture outrage. The only thing Geras added was to play up his seventies marxist credentials to imagine how Marx and Engels would’ve totes supported the War on Iraq. Oh, and of course a certain sort of (imagined) upperclass English loquaciousness (e.g.).

In short, my opinion of Geras remains unchanged after his death, a bullshitter who used his writing talents to help make the world slightly worse, though only a minor offender compared to people like Hitchens.