Short SF marathon Day 1: Anders, Arnason, Bailey

One of the impetuses behind this little project was reading Jonathan McCalmont’s series of posts about the state of short story SFF, especially his theory that it has shifted from being idea driven to emotionally driven:

In each of these stories, the genre elements sit somewhere between the metaphorical and the literal; aspects of a fictional world that seem to mirror the contours of real emotional lives whilst leaving the world unchanged and the metaphor unresolved and shrouded with the kind of ambiguity that renders precision anathema[…]

Gradually, and with almost no discussion, the aesthetics of genre short fiction appear to be shifting away from stories that explore ideas and towards stories that seek to use genre elements as a way of encouraging readers to feel a particular way. In this bold new world, genre elements are easily excised or subsumed because the emphasis is always upon the characters’ emotional lives.

From my limited foray in reading the Hugo nominees last year, I can’t deny that he has a bit of a point here — a story like Wakulla Springs has no real genre elements but does evoke the right sort of emotion, was written by the right sort of people to be taken into science fiction. But what I wonder is a) how pervasive this really is and b) if this is anything new. In some ways it’s understandable if science fiction and fantasy writers feel comfortable with writing stories in which the fantastic elements are no longer the point, twohundred years after Shelley and ninety after Gernsback. There isn’t much that you can do with pure idea driven stories in SFF that hasn’t been done before, but there’s plenty of emotional terrain still largely unexplored.

And if science fiction is about metaphors made concrete, something like The Water that Falls on You from Nowhere, which could have easily been written as a memetic, coming out story is still made different by its fantastic elements, even if its consequences aren’t explored much beyond what John Chu needed to tell the story. That’s not particularly new in science fiction after all; take “The Cold Equations” frex, which also built its world up around the morality it attempted to sell rather than really explore the ramifications of its setting.

Charlie Jane Anders, “The Unfathomable Sisterhood of Ick.” Lightspeed, June 2014 (“Women Destroy Science Fiction!” special issue); reprinted at Tor.com.

Roger, Mary’s boyfriend has broken up with her, her best friend Stacia suggests she should ask for his memories of their love together, from before it turned sour, then steals them and uses them on herself out of jealousy or a misguided attempt to understand their love. Mary cuts off contact with Stacia, finds a new potential boyfriend, then Stacia starts stalking them…

Now here you do have a story that does depend on a sfnal gimmick, the ability to copy and absorb other people’s memories, to drive what’s essentially a memetic plot revolving around relationship issues that could’ve been set at any time since the fifties. This is a smart drug, bio-engineering future but with what look a bit too much like mid-20th century gender relations and dating rituals, but it is undeniably science fiction. I liked it, perhaps because of its mundanity, but also for its humanist core: these are actually nice people.

Eleanor Arnason, “The Scrivener.” Subterranean, Winter 2014.

I never parables or allegories and this story has a bit of that here, inspired by a discussion whether a plot and such is really necessary for a story. So here we have a Scrivener who names his three daughters Imagination, Ornamentation and Plot, which, ugh, is a bit too much on the nose. It also started off arch and with that sense of knowning that it is telling a story which has to do a lot to win me over. In the end however Arnason does do something mildly interesting with this, but it’s a slight story nonetheless.

Dale Bailey, “The End of the End of Everything.” Tor.com, April 23, 2014.

Now if we do want to talk about science fiction aping memetic, mainstream fiction, the worst it could do is to ape that cliched standby of fanboy sneers, the English professor with a midlife crisis contemplating infidelity. It’s the end of the world, the Ruin is creeping up on the artist colony Ben and his wife Lois have been invited to, but he can’t help thinking of his friend’s gorgous new wife or the mutilation artist living a couple of houses over. Bailey does have a way with a turn of phrase, but the dillemma at the heart of the story didn’t convince me, the allure of torture, death and mutilation was too bland, too safe when it doesn’t matter anymore because the world is ending anyway.

2 Comments

  • MC

    February 6, 2015 at 1:58 am

    Good analyses–100% agreement on these.

  • Jonathan M

    February 6, 2015 at 6:27 am

    Hi Martin :-)

    Re-reading the bit you quoted, I think I possibly over-stated my case. In truth, it’s not that all genre short fiction has started to obsess over subjectivities… it’s more that a particular set of literary techniques have begun to be used quite widely and the field’s filtering mechanics (magazine editors, award short lists etc) have spent the last couple of years disproportionately rewarding those types of story. Hopefully this year’s shortlists will break the pattern but I am certainly ambivalent about the work said techniques have yielded and think that the techniques are now sufficiently popular that they no longer merit particular attention.

    You raise an interesting point though:

    “There isn’t much that you can do with pure idea driven stories in SFF that hasn’t been done before, but there’s plenty of emotional terrain still largely unexplored. ”

    I think the exact opposite is true. We have thousands of years’ worth of literature chronicling the emotional contours of the human experience and, to quote your fanboys, the world simply does not need another book about an academic trying to write a novel while going through a divorce. There’s still stuff to write about but why bother going over old ground when the world forever changing and throwing up new ideas and situations that are crying out for artistic consideration?

    My problem with a lot of these stories is not that they use genre tropes in stories with mainstream trajectories but that the stories explore emotional terrain that is so well-trodden as to be almost featureless.

    For example, I don’t think that any of the stories that use these techniques to shine a light on the LGBT experience compare at all well to mainstream LGBT works either in fiction or in film. I watch films like Weekend and the works of Jacques Nolot, Celine Sciamma and Lisa Cholodenko and I see not only emotional complexity but also ideas, issues, and contexts that are uniquely LGBT. Then I read a story like The Water The Falls On You From Nowhere and it could just as easily have been about anything an adult child was keeping from his parents.

    I have no problem with stories that map emotional ground either inside or outside of genre, but I do have a problem with maps that are so imprecise and featureless that they could pass as maps of anywhere on Earth.

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.