Blair’s Wars — John Kampfner

Cover of Blair's Wars


Blair’s Wars
John Kampfner
401 pages including index
published in 2004

Tony Blair is the first UK prime minister to take his country to war five times in six years. It’s this for which he will be remembered, especially for the last war he started, the War on Iraq. Yet, ccording to John Kampfner in Blair’s Wars, Blair was never that much interested in foreign policy until well after he became prime minister. It’s this seeming contradiction that forms the heart of this book, an examination of what drove Blair to go to war so often and how he managed his wars.

John Kampfner is the current editor of the New Statesman and before that was a longtime foreign correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, chief political correspondent for the Financial Times, as well as political commentator for the Today programme at the BBC. In all a fairly typical representative of the political media elite, who describes himself as leftist and whose opinions, as showcased on his website, are firmly in the mainstream of British politics, even if not necessarily shared by the British voter.

This background is echoed in Blair’s Wars: this is a book about the politics behind the wars, not the wars themselves. So there’s plenty of material about how Blair tried to get UN approval for the War on Iraq, how he succeeded or failed to persuaded the Americans to do something or to not do something, all from an insider’s point of view, with various senior advisors describing their roles in these processes. Kampfner is very good at describing the mechanics of this, but it is all treated somewhat like a ballgame, in that who wins these behind the scenes political struggles and the struggle itself is given more attention than what the outcome of such a struggle means.

Read more

Looking for Jake and Other Stories — China Miéville

Cover of Looking for Jake and Other Stories


Looking for Jake and Other Stories
China Miéville
303 pages
published in 2005

Because of their birth in the pulp magazines of the mid-1920s, science fiction and fantasy used to be dominated by the short story and the novella, long after these story formats had become largely irrelevant in other genres. It was only in the early to mid seventies that the novel finally gained the upper hand on them, but even then there was a place for the short story and the sf magazines as a nursery for new talent. Not any longer, as this China Miéville collection shows. Looking for Jake is his first; it came out seven years after his first novel and five years after the book that made his name, Perdido Street Station. Even more telling, it seems to contain all the short fiction he has written in that time… Clearly, to Miéville at least, writing short stories is not a priority.

The stories seem to reinforce this feeling. Many of them feel slight, little amusements, enjoyed when read but easily forgotten by the next day, as if Miéville wrote them as exercises, scribbles inbetween more important work. Not that this makes them bad stories as such, but they mostly miss the power he packs in his novels. Most of the stories are either horror or “weird fiction”, in the tradition of M. R. James, E. F. Benson, Sheridan LeFanu and the like: not quite horror, not quite fantasy, but stories about strange happenings and all. Not quite my genre to be honest, as these stories always seem to run on rails towards set destinations in my experience.

Read more

A Game of Thrones — George R. R. Martin

Cover of A Game of Thrones


A Game of Thrones
George R. R. Martin
835 pages
published in 1996

I’ve always had a weakness for epic fantasy, not so much Tolkien as his imitators, happily reading my way through long, long series of books as thick as my fist: Donaldson, Feist, Eddings, Jordan, I’ve read and enjoyed them all. They may not have been very good, but as long as there was even a hint of a sufficiently epic story, I read them. As long as I could get my kick I was happy. Fortunately, not all epic fantasy is crap these days, as several excellent writers have turned their hand to it. George R. R. Martin is one of them. Until he started his A Song of Ice and Fire series, he was better known as somewhat of a cult science fiction writer, having written some excellent novels (Tuf Voyaging comes to mind) as well as short stories (Sandkings, The way of Cross and Dragon). With this series however Martin moved from being a well respected science fiction and fantasy writer to being a still respected but bestselling science fiction
and fantasy writer. He deserves it, as this is easily the best post-Tolkien epic fantasy series I’ve ever read.

There is a downside however. Writing good fantasy takes time, which means the wait inbetween novels has been long and getting longer. The first one, A Game of Throne came out in 1996, when the idea was that this would be a proper trilogy, three books, no more. Instead the series has become a proper fantasy trilogy: four books and counting. Currently it seems the whole series will eventually be seven books long, but who knows if that remains the case.

Read more

The World Hitler Never Made — Gavriel D. Rosenfeld

Cover of The World Hitler Never Made


The World Hitler Never Made
Gavriel D. Rosenfeld
462 pages, including index and notes
published in 1990

Alternate history is a subgenre of science fiction, which revolves around asking what if the great historical events of the past happened differently, what would the world look like then? It’s unique in that it was invented twice at roughly the same tinme: in the pulp science fiction of the 1930s, but also amongst serious historians at the same time, independently of each other. Murray Leinster introduced the idea to science fiction in 1934, in “Sideways in Time“, while three years earlier a collection of alt-historical essays had appeared under the title If it Had Happened Otherwise, which contained contributions by such people as Winston Churchill. Much of what appeared in the pulps on this subject was of course the usual science fiction nonsense, not at all related to true history; it was only after World War II that science fiction writers would get interested in proper alternate history stories, rather than stories about visiting alternate worlds, with no resemblance to our own.

The reason is obvious: the Second World War seemed so much the work of an evil genius, Adolf Hitler, that it was very tempting to ask what would’ve happened if he hadn’t existed. At the same time, the menace of the nazis was so clear and the consequences of their victory so horrible that again, it was tempting to ask what would’ve happened if… Finally, there’s also the fate of Hitler himself, who disappeared at the end of the war, allegedly having committed suicide. Because the Russians refused to
confirm his suicide until the end of the Cold War, the road was clear for speculation about what else might’ve happened…

Read more

In de Ban van Fortuyn — Jutta Chorus and Menno de Galan

Cover of In de Ban van Fortuyn


In de Ban van Fortuyn
Jutta Chorus and Menno de Galan
462 pages, including index and notes
published in 1990

The murder of Pim Fortuyn on May 6th, 2002 was the first political murder in the Netherlands to have happened since the seventeenth century. As such, it was the end of an era, a catalyst for change whose consequences are still being worked out today. Dutch politics lost its innocence that day. Fortuyn’s murdered thought he saved the Netherlands from a very dangerous man, but in reality he only succeeded into making Fortuyn into a martyr, a handy symbol for lesser people to sell their politics with. Though the movement he founded has now almost disappeared from politics, Fortuyn’s legacy lives on.

Fittingly, In de Ban van Fortuyn (which means something like “Captivated by Fortuyn”) opens with the day of his murder and the immediate aftermath of it, before it trackbacks to Fortuyn’s youth and early career, then to slowly move forward through his stormy career, his murder and what happened to his party afterward. The authors are two well respected Dutch journalists who were already following Fortuyn, almost from the start of his political career. The result is a well told history of Fortuyn, sympathetic to Fortuyn himself, if not necessarily his politics, but without losing their objectivity.

Read more