Tony Blair Is A Wanker

But then we knew that already. The uncropped photo‘s just pictorial proof.

Published by Palau

Been there, done that, bought the t-shirt, washed the t-shirt 23 times, threw the t-shirt in the ragbag, now I'm polishing furniture with it.

1 Comment

  • Zbiginew Brzezinski

    March 10, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    (THIS VERSION HAS BEEN THROUGH THE SPELLING/GRAMMER CHECK, SORRY ABOUT POSTING TWICE)

    He is the biggest wanker out there, unfortunately I like many others voted for this wanker. I will never vote Labour again, and if people like me, my family and neighbours don’t vote Labour, Labour is finished. The thing is I don’t think wanker Blair gives a damn about the Labour party anyway.

    He is basically following the rules and policies of this ‘Great Geo-Political Strategist’ called Zbiginew Brzezinski a Polish émigré to the United States.
    This guy is an A1 nut job, EVERYTHING he writes in his books (which have grand audacious titles like) ‘The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives’, is worth reading and quotes from his books are widely available on the internet. They are worth reading to understand how these deluded Machiavellian morons actually think.
    Blair is a moron who likes to wank; Brzezinski is a wanker who likes to think he’s clever.

    Brzezinski came from Poland, where he was more than likely living in a shack with a pig, donkey and horse. He got to America and as a ‘white European’ suddenly became superior to everyone else (especially the blacks there). He also discovered hot and cold running water; these kinds of experiences are dangerous for a man who used to be a bit-part player in a stable. This guy got delusions of grandeur, got through the American education system and started telling the yanks that they were the unmatched superpower in the world, and could kick anyone’s arse. The yanks love being sucked off like that, especially by wankers.

    Here’s a couple quotes from deluded pole Brzezinski, from his book ‘The Grand Chessboard’; and after reading it, ask yourself the question why are we in Iraq.

    “In that context, how America ‘manages’ Eurasia is critical. Eurasia is the globe’s largest continent and is geopolitically axial. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world’s three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa’s subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world’s central continent. About 75 per cent of the world’s people live in Eurasia, and most of the world’s physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of the world’s GNP and about three-fourths of the world’s known energy resources.” (p.31)

    “It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.” (p.35)

    Conclusion Blair is a WANKER, Brzezinski is a C*#T