Interesting If True

Which of course it may not be, they’ve been wrong before. But then again it might.

Daily Kos: Breaking:Alleged Palin Affair w/ Husband’s Bus. Partner

Update & ObDisclaimer: as one of the commenters to this post points out this may be false flag strategy by the McCain campaign:

Promote the most outlandish stories.
Debunk them.
Obtain symparthy [sic] for Palin.
No one believes the true stuff.

He or she has a very good point: however I’m not sure that McCain’s people are that disciplined at this point. If true, that might really put the wind up the fundies; on the other hand they’ve shown their IOKIYAR reserves are just about inexhaustible. Whatever the outcome, you can tell I’m getting more than a little obsessed.

Update II

Curiouser and curiouser – one of the Right’s own organs, the NRO has taken up the story – is there an organised attempt to sink her from within the party?

So I Lied, So Sue Me

I know I said I’d do nothing else on Palin but I just came across this post at Cornell Professor Michael Dorf’s personal blog.

While decrying the GOP’s vetting procedure Dorf makes a point I’ve not seen anywhere else – the massive disconnect between evangelist Palin’s professed anti-abortionism and her having amniocentesis while pregnant herself:

….one acquires the information available through an amniocentesis only at the small but real risk of terminating the pregnancy. This is why younger women are generally not offered an amniocentesis at all — the risk of miscarriage is too great to justify the procedure. For a person in a higher-risk category (an older woman, for example) who either will or might terminate a pregnancy on the basis of a positive result, this risk might be worth taking. But for a person who will not abort no matter what the result is, it would not appear to be. This makes me think that, at least for the moment that she decided to have an amniocentesis, Sarah Palin considered having an abortion.

Read More

Veepy Dearest

One more thing, and then I’m done with Palin, or at least until the next revelation (which’ll could be anything; her husband runs guns for Alaskan secessionists or was Jimmy Jeff’s date at Bohemian Grove – anything). Whatever it is it’s bound to be grubby.

Although Trooper/Sprog/TreasonGate has been great entertainment given the candidate’s expressed religious and political views, the family situation is hardly uncommon. 17 year old daughters do get pregnant (usually by complete dorks and ne’er-do-wells), and especially so when they’ve been kept ignorant of how not to because of a misguided attempt to keep them ‘pure’. It happens. My own sister was a grandmother in her early forties too, a situation which gave me many enjoyable hours of sisterly schadenfreude. Hi Granny!

This time it happened to someone running for veep. Other than the momentary amusement and the justified outrage at continuing Republican hypocrisy, after the first flush of pleasurable derision it’s really no-one’s business, though it does make McCain’s advance vetting look worse than useless.

McCain insists that his VP pick was throroughly investigated and that he knew of Palin minor’s pregnancy before he announced the nomination. He appears to think that makes it all OK.

To me if McCain knew of Palin minor’s pregnancy beforehand, but nominated anyway, that actually makes it much, much worse.

It means Sarah Palin, the woman being projected as future MILF to the nation, simultaneously portrayed as a babe-librarian or a gun-toting survival chick, but primarily marketed by her party as a glossy conglomerate of Ma Walton and Raphael’s Madonna, is a terrible mother. One of the worst.

I know from terrible mothers; I am one. Without going into private family history I can assure readers there’s little you can tell me about awful parenting decisions. That said, I’m apalled.

All of this means that Palin knew very well her daughter was pregnant when she accepted the nomination – and unless she’s been hiding under a rock for the past century she’d have certainly also known that the media, ever hungry for prurient detail, would dive on the story like they would a line of free coke. Even Alaska gets the internet.

She must have known that they’d pry into her child’s private life and even into her pants – how could she not? – yet she accepted the nomination with alacrity. Knowing it would be bound to hurt one of her children, she did it anyway. That’s cold.

Worse still, she and her husband also went on to publicly take any and all decision-making capability regarding herself and her child entirely out of their daughter’s hands.

Not only is Palin making her daughter’s decisions re the pregnancy for her (ie that she will get married and be happy happy happy and photogenic ever after, seemingly regardless of her feelings or that of the putative father) her one criterion for making those decisions appears to be what would advance her political career.

I don’t know about any other parents following this story, but I don’t know one no matter how self-interested, who would so deliberately ruin their child’s future for their own personal advancement.

Parents make some tremendously ill-judged decisions and yes, children suffer because some parents are overly ambitious. But it’s usually a passive kind of harm, not delberate; being elsewhere at important moments, not paying enough attention, fobbing them off with money instead of time, letting them do something dodgy because it was easier than arguing and you’re just so damned tired… but it takes some hardnosed ruthlessness to sacrifice your child’s future to your own interests, publicly, and be so proud of it too.

I certainly don’t condemn Palin because she has five children and I don’t see why someone who does should not be vice-president – neither do I question someone’s ability to do the job because one of those children is disabled and needs extra care. Leaving aside Cheney’s activist vice-presidency it’s not that much of a job and besides, that’s what nannies, schools and nurses are for.

But I absolutely and unequivocally condemn someone who would drag her child through the tabloid mire, deliberately and with malice aforethought. She’s building her own glittering political future on her own child’s ruined hopes.

Nevertheless the right seem in thrall – but then they are well practiced at cognitive dissonance The GOP faithful at the Convention certainly have no problem with it whatsoever. Hypocrisy barely registers. But if McCain and his party think to have secured the undecided, independent woman voter with this transparent ploy then they are very much deluded.

I can’t be the only mother who’s looked at this situation and thought “Jeez, what a complete bitch.”

Family values…

Going to your seventeen year old daughter’s shotgun wedding after she became pregnant because you taught her abstinence was a contraceptive and all real contraceptives were sinful.

Palau adds – I need to de-earworm myself as I’ve had this school disco favourite running through my head interminably ever since I read the above news. It seems somehow appropriate, as I wouldn’t be at all surprised if that was where the Palin grandfoetus was conceived. (Or perhaps in the back seat of the family seaplane after the prom).

I don’t see why you shouldn’t suffer as well. A trouble shared is a trouble halved, and all that.

Roy C, with Shotgun Wedding:

Comment of the Day: Heinlein was more realistic edition

From Shadow of the Hegemon:

Palin is nobody. She’s a small-town mayor who managed to get into the Alaskan Governor’s Mansion in 2006 for being less somewhat less corrupt than Alaskan Republicans. That’s it. People were ticked off at Republican corruption, she positioned herself as a non-corrupt Republican, and got voted in in a traditionally Republican state. I could see her becoming a good Governor in time, better than most Republicans at any rate, but this is not that time.

And she could have her finger on the button if anything happens to McCain. It would be like that one Heinlein story in Expanded Universe, except somehow LESS plausible.

In the story refered to, it was a Black woman who got to be the token vice-president and then the real president got assasinated and the real powers in the party expect her to give up her job because she obviously wasn’t expected to actually govern (which some commentators also expect of Palin if McCain kicks the bucket). In true Heinlein fashion she of course refuses, kicks out the corrupt elements and starts putting the country back on the right track, which IIRC meant getting back on the gold standard, putting the navy in charge of nuclear power because they had such a good track record with it and finally getting the colonalisation of space going properly. Somehow I doubt Palin would do as well.