This Weekend We Shall be Mostly… Discussing Marxism

As regular readers may know I’m a SWPer and Martin’s a Dutch SP member so of course there’s no way we’d miss Marxisme 2007, the Netherlands’ biggest annual event for the discussion of socialist ideas, theory and practice, which is being held this weekend the 20, 21 and 22 April, at the University of Amsterdam.

Speakers include

• Lindsey German (UK Stop the War Coalition)
• David Hilliard (Black Panther Party)
• Miriyam Aouragh (Together Against Racism)
• Hajo Meyer (Another Jewish Voice)
• Peyman Jafari (Internationale Socialisten)
• Ronald van Raak (Socialistische Partij MP)
• Bart Griffioen (Dutch Stop the War Coalition)
• Khaled Hroub (Author of “Hamas: A Beginners Guide”)
• Tofik Dibi (GroenLinks MP)
• Martijn de Rooi (researcher, Openness About Iraq)
• Susan George (Author of “Another World is Possible”)
• Geert Reuten (Head of Economics department, Universiteit van Amsterdam)
• John Rose (Autthor, “The Myths of Zionism”)
• Tariq Shadid (Dutch Organisation Of Palestinians)
• Donald Pols (Environmentalist)
• Pepijn Brandon (Editor of “De Socialist”)
• Dick Pels (Sociologist & Stichting Waterland)
• Mohamed Rabbae (One Land, One Unity)
• Jonathan Neale (Campaign Against Climate Change)
• Mohamed Waked (socialist from Egypt)

A lot of discussion will be in Dutch – but because we are internationalist, much will also be in English. Here’s registration details and directions in English:

MARXISME FESTIVAL 2007 registration

Register for the Marxism festival and buy tickets:

Entry prices:

– Friday: € 5
– Saturday: € 12,50 / € 10 *
– Sunday: € 10 / € 7,50 *
– Whole Weekend: € 20 / € 15,- *

* Savings for schoolchildren, students and those in reciept of state benefits.

Accommodation and childcare:

Free overnight sleeping places and childcare (daytime only) is available. To arrange contact the organisers direct.

Directions via public transport:

From Centraal Station by tram 4, 9, 16, 24 of 25: get out at the second stop at Spui. Bear left through Langebrugsteeg. Follow the Marxism placards.

It’s going to be good. We hope to see you there.

Martin you can’t miss, I’ll be in a vintage UK Marxism t-shirt of some description. Socialism is a little like SF fandom that way, when it comes to t-shirts, you gotta establish your seniority right from the start or you’ll get some spotty adolescent trying to teach his grandma to suck eggs about Gramsci, and that would never do.

Just look for red hair at a level about a foot and a half below a crowd of dairy-fed Dutch giants’ heads and that’ll be me. Say hello.

UPDATE: Via Dave Osler comes new that Lindsey German is also running against Ken Livingstone as Respect candidate for Mayor of London. Goodie.

Shit, Hot Damn, Get Off Your Ass and Organise

As politics and antiwar sentiment heats up on both sides of the Atlantic an issue that comes up time and time again on blogs and blog comments is the difficulty of translating opinion into action.

I’m not talking the Kossackian, big politics, Crashing The Gates type of organising – I’m talking about thinking globally and acting locally, building low-level. mostly single-issue, community political organisations in which it’s possible to maintain the principles of equality and democracy whilst still projecting a coherent message. It’s myriad small local organisations like this, banding together in democratic solidarity, that form the bedrock of left activism.

Small organisations are more secure too, in a climate where any dissenting political activity can get you spied on or worse.

It’s so much easier to sit and pontificate from behind the PC at the huge injustices than to actually get out and challenge the little ones: don’t I know it. But we can at least try and make a difference: all the rest is just so much verbiage. It might only be a tiny difference you make, it might even fail, but at least you stood up for what you believed. Better a moment as a lion than a lifetime as a sheep.

So having made your mind up to action, where on earth do you start? Right at the bottom.

Educate yourself. Do you know how your local government works, or national government for that matter? How can you protest something or hope to inluence a decision when you don’t know who to protest to? How can you influence a decision if you don’t know who by, where or when the decision is made? Find out what the political structures are, who is in charge, and learn as much about them and their departments as possible.If you don’t make it your business to find out where the levers of power are, however can you expect to push them?

That done (she says, waving her magic wand) define your goals. it’s no good saying “I’m against Bush”, or cruelty to fluffy bunnies or world poverty. What is it exactly about those things that your’e against? What is it exactly you’re in favour of doing to remedy that? What can you realistically hope to achieve? More to the point, who else is already doing it? No point wasting effort and resources starting up something when it’s already there.

There are some excellent web resources on grassroots organising: they’re not bibles, and some may not suit your particular circumstances, but all contain useful tips. here’s a handful to start with:

One thing I noticed while looking for meatspace organising resources online is that there are many political organising handbooks out there of varying usefulness, but they’re mostly for sale, so right away you have to spend money you may not have. So if you’re not somewhere where the Patriot Act applies, use your library if you have one or your university library if its accessible.

The key is to start small, you and a few like-minded others, even if it’s only inviting a few mates over for coffee or a beer to put together a flyer against dog poop in the playground or a dangerous intersection. Trying to organise a big public meeting in an age of apathy is a futile effort, Informal messaging is where it’s at – viral messaging, word of mouth, water cooler gossip. Talk to your neighbours and workmates, you might be pleasantly surprised at the views they hold. You might not, but then you’ll at least know what you’re up against.

Define your message, your goals and your audience and remember that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar. Stridency and anger might get you a 5 second spot on the news as you get dragged away by police, and there is a place for that in politics, but you’ll then have to rely on escalating outrage to get any attention in the future and you’ll be forever labelled as crackpots. Be nice and forceful where you can and civil but forceful where you can’t. Start small and sedate – that’ll make any later noisy protests that much effective, coming as it does from a group of normally sober citizens.

Politics is alll about commucating effectively and persuading others to your point of view. Have a media and online strategy. Any idiot can spam any number of websites and activist orgnaisations with emails so know who it is you’re talking to. Make a personal approach where possible, especially with the press: have a prepared statement or talking points ready and put your most eloquent and persuasive person on press duty. Get to know your local reporters. If one calls you and you don’t know them, take a number and ring back to check their bona fides.

Speaking as a someone formerly involved in high profile anti-nuke, anti-Halliburton, antiwar and antifa protesting and organising I’m well aware of the prevalence of right infiltrators and police, so a big issue for me in organising is security, both of the organisation and the individuals involved. However open and innocent your cause you have a right to peacefully express your opinion free of government spies and surveillance or attack from counter-protestors or police.

First be mindful of online security. Use as much technology as you can, it is a cost efficient way of getting your message to a large audience after all, but put the most technically adept amongst you in charge of online communications and email. Encrypt your email and use specific email adresses for all political organising and between group members. Keep archived files and email records and lists offsite and regularly clean up your pc. Use a firewall, antivirus and anti-spyware software. Take sensible precautions.

Be mindful of personal security – don’t hand out contact lists of emails and phone numbers to just anyone. Don’t use a home phone as a contact point for the group: try and acquire a pay as you go SIM card or cheap mobile phone and use it for organising and only that.

What about group members themselves? How can you ensure they’re not ringers? The short answer is you can’t, not entirely. You have to take people and their stated motivations at face value, but what you shouldn’t do is be so desperate for volunteers that you fail to take some basic precautions. At the very least check that they are who they say they are and don’t give anyone that you feel at all doubtful about any key responsibilties.

That of course can be difficult at a puiblic demo, should you hold one. One way to deal with this is to beg, rent, borrow or liberate a video camera and record the whole event. Not only do you then have photographic, timed and dated evidence of all that occurs, including any police actions, you’ll also have film of any agents provocateurs. Simply look for the person that’s deliberately, repeatedly avoiding the camera. (You could attempt to winnow them out by asking them to commit an illegal act but that’s a very dangerous tactic that could net you a conspiracy charge. Not worth it. Just being alert will usually be enough.) If you see anyone videoing you, video them right back. They don’t like it up ’em.

Before holding any public demonstration (having obtianed any necessary permits, naturally) hold a briefing on safety and security. If you can get someone to outline basic techniques for non-violent resistance. Inform particpants of their legal rights and what they might expect if arrested and who to call. Assign participants to affinty groups with one person with a mobile phone in charge of each, all reporting to the demo organiser. Have recognised rendezvous times and points and make sure all involved have an emergency number to call in case of any unfortunate incidents.

Last but not least, find a friendly lawyer if you can. Law schools and universities, law societies and lawyers’ guilds are often willing to do some pro bono work for activists – at the very least they’re very good to have along with you on a demo. (Indeed that’s how I started protesting politically, as a final-year student legal observer on the Stephen Lawrence anti-BNP demo in 1993.)

These days given the minefield of restrictions placed around free speech and public assembly legal advice is essential so that you know exactly what you can and cannot do. It also helps that someone’s got your back should the police get heavy-handed.

Lest all my paranoia about the chilling effect of the WoT on political actvism put you off, I’d like to say that I’ve met some of the best people ever (plus some of the worst) in political organising and it has opened my mind to the sheer power that’s unleashed when ordinary people act in concert. Political activism can change your life and the world – it may be a truism but like whoever it was said, think globally, act locally. You’ll do OK and you may even win, and small victories accumulate.

“What Did You Do In The Information War, Daddy?”

The notion of free speech may not last very much longer if the US Department of Homeland Security succeeds in its ongoing attempt to steal the whole bloody internet:

DHS Wants Master Key for DNS
Posted by Zonk on Saturday March 31, @01:33PM
from the they-own-all-the-locks-and-doors dept.

An anonymous reader writes

“At an ICANN meeting in Lisbon, the US Department of Homeland Security made it clear that it has requested the master key for the DNS root zone. The key will play an important role in the new DNSSec security extension, because it will make spoofing IP-addresses impossible. By forcing the IANA to hand out a copy of the master key, the US government will be the only institution that is able to spoof IP addresses and be able to break into computers connected to the Internet without much effort. There’s a further complication, of course, because even ‘if the IANA retains the key … the US government still reserves the right to oversee ICANN/IANA. If the keys are then handed over to ICANN/IANA, there would be even less of an incentive [for the U.S.] to give up this role as a monitor. As a result, the DHS’s demands will probably only heat up the debate about US dominance of the control of Internet resources.'”

This is not just about paranoid American security bods trying to control their own national corner of the internet: this is about the blatant theft by Bushco, dressed up in its spiffy Homeland Security costume, of the DNS root servers, the basic infrastructure of the whole world-wide web.

The root DNS servers are essential to the function of the Internet, as so many protocols use DNS, either directly or indirectly. They are potential points of failure for the entire Internet. For this reason, there are 13 named root servers worldwide. There are no more root servers because a single DNS reply can only be 512 bytes long; while it is possible to fit 15 root servers in a datagram of this size, the variable size of DNS packets makes it prudent to only have 13 root servers.

They are housed in multiple sites with high bandwidth access, to try to prevent attacks such as distributed denial-of-service attacks. Most of these single-site installations are still in the United States. Usually each DNS server in a given site is actually a cluster of servers behind a load-balancing set of routers.

However, a number of root servers lie outside the United States:

i.root-servers.net is in Stockholm and many other locations using anycast

k.root-servers.net has globally visible nodes in Amsterdam, London, Miami, Delhi and Tokyo

m.root-servers.net is in Tokyo, Paris and Seoul using anycast

The modern trend is to use anycast to give resilience and to balance load across a wide geographic area. For example, j.root-servers.net, f.root-servers.net and k.root-servers.net are served using anycast from a number of sites worldwide. The use of anycast
has allowed the growth of non-U.S. root DNS servers until most DNS root instances are outside the U.S.

Details of all the root servers can be seen at the root-servers.org website.

[My emphasis]

This isn’t just about market dominance. This is about invasion, colonialism and the pursuit of imperialist aims by other means. The theatre of war just happens to be virtual. The US government, or any other individual governmment for that matter, has no right to claim control over resources it does not own and which are not located on its territory. But it’s doing it anyway… eminent domain apparently works online too.

But where is the chorus of protest from the geeks?

From what I can see the majority of American IT professionals, with notable exceptions, have been remarkably quiet so far on political matters except for their ad infinitum online arguments about some spurious utopian future with libertarian transhumanisam, polyamory and rocky road ice-cream for all. The doors of their comfy padded cages are slamming shut and they don’t hear a thing. Their freedom (and ours) is being stolen from under their noses.

But hey, look, shiny new gadgets! Oooh, iPhone!

Geeky types like to think of themselves as rebels, outside the mainstream and cleverer than the rest of us lesser mortals. So why are they being so bloody supine while Bushco steals the web?

I have a question for any IT professionals reading this: dammit, people, you are the ones that control and support the IT infrastructure, you could stop this if you wanted to. You could put the skids under the entire Bushco venture if you had a mind.

But do you actually want to ? Homeland Security pays well…

So this is my question – do you really give a damn about freedom or are you just happy to be the future well-paid technocrats of the New Fascism? C’mon geeks, get up off your asses and fight for once, us non-geeks are relying on you.

Sniffing Out Revisionism

We know from experience that the Bush and Blair administrations are revisionists par excellence: they’re so good at it they change history as they go along – and in some instances they’ve even written it beforehand.

We also know from experience that the corporate news media retrospectively edits its news stories. That’s fair enough when it involves a factuial error, but often it’s done to adjust the spin.

Newsniffer was created by Yorkshireman John Leach to detect revisions and bias in online journalism using a clever combination of backend database wizardry, RSS feeds, and WordPress. Now that’s what I call useful – given the caveat that it remains an accessible public tool, and doesn’t become a private political weapon to ensure doctrinaire conformity.

Newssniffer’s currently monitoring BBC Have Your Say and Guardian Comment Is Free threads for censored comments and any bias that that might represent, but it’s also has proving very effective in detecting revisions of BBC News reports.

Yes, it’s limited in scope at the moment, but it looks like something that could could be expanded given sufficient resources. The big issue, in my opinion, is ensuring that no bias creeps in as to which media outlets are targeted – if it’s not even-handed, it’s pointless.

That said, imagine how handy it would be to be able to track every revision of reports by, for example, the NYT, WaPo, CNN or Fox, or the press releases put out by the various government departments, lobbying firms and PR companies. There’s lots of things an activist could do with this info, all of which would tend to keep the fourth estate a little more honest, a quality which as a whole they seem to be sadly lacking at the moment.

UPDATE: In the interest of full disclosure: I do revise my posts after posting, because I usually spot at least 3, and usually more, glaring spelling or grammatical errors. Sometimes I edit because what I wrote comes across as clunky and lacks mellifluosity. What I don’t and won’t do, unlike some, is to change the story retrospectively.

She’s so Vain…. She Probably Thinks This Post Is About Her

Surprise, surprise. It is.

Tbogg, as have so many other bloggers who loathe the self-obsessed Wisconsin law lecturer, has the video up of the video head to head between Ann Althouse and progressive writer Garance Franke-Ruta, in which Ann Althouse comes over as the vindictive, vain and bullying Queen Bee type she is by going off on an ad-feminam rant halfway through, much to the consternation of Franke-Ruta.

See it for yourself:

I mean jeez, Franke-Ruta only mentioned Jessica Valenti’s breasts because pressed by Althouse for a reason why the progressive blogs loathed her so much. A full-on mauling seemed a little excessive. As Franke-Ruta comments on her own blog:

But I do want to provide some additional background to my use of the phrase “Jessica Valenti breast controversy,” which was neither intended to provoke nor chosen out of a a soup of total ignorance. In preparation for our BHTV encounter and to get a sense of Ann Althouse, since we’d never met and I mainly knew her through her New York Times columns, which I enjoyed, and the occasional persual of the cultural criticism on her blog, I watched her previous BHTV episdode with Glenn Reynolds and Helen Smith. It included a segment where Althouse and Smith went into some detail discussing various blogospheric breast controversies, including how one AutoAdmit commenter calling himself “Hitler Hitler Hitler” had said of Althouse that she had a “decent rack.” In that earlier episode, Althouse and Smith talked openly about blogospheric breast commentary, much of which I agree is incredibly juvenile and stupid, with amusement and good humor and suggestions that laughing off criticism is the best response. Althouse said (forward to 4:30): “They constantly talk about me and connect me to the subject of breasts. They constantly portray me as someone who, um, is opposed to the fact that women have breasts…Which is, I guess, sort of funny.” She didn’t seem particularly thin-skinned about the issue.

On looking at that bit of video again Althouse’s unjustified attack on seems just a little too fortuitous to me, a little too preplanned. Althouse didn’t come unprepared – you can see that, it looks as though she’d even done her hair and makeup for the occasion – and that was an ambush, in my opinion.

What’s sad is that athough she was in the right, nevertheless I don’t think Franke-Ruta came over particularly well at all, as talented or as capable as she may be off-screen. (Though I do find it hard to believe she’s over 30. Is it me or are police officers and polciy wonks getting younger these days?).

Head to head video debate is obviously not her metier, though I’m told she regularly appears on televiison as representing the progressive point of view. I don’t wish to be cruel, but is she really the best talking head we can put up against Althouse, who should be easily defeated in open debate given the paucity of her political positions and the mendacity of her arguments?

Franke-Ruta was easily perplexed and derailed by that fabricated and theatrical (but then real as she started to enjoy it) bit of business by Althouse; she immediately gave ground by apologising (what the hell for?), and then kept on doing it. She was totally nonplussed.

Even allowing for the element of surprise, if Franke-Ruta’d only had a little gumption Althouse would’ve been totally deflated, because right and logic were patently on her side, not Althouse’s. But as it was, even if Athouse did lose it for a while and come across as more than a little crazy, she still did what she meant to do and kept to her own agenda the whole time – ie the evil that is progressive bloggers.

Althouse and her mouthbreathing fans’re now chalking that one up as a win over the progressive blogosphere. Technically they’re right, Althouse’s temper tantrum notwithstanding. And that stinks.