Teeny Little Super Guys

Avedon Carol’s post yesterday about the general falloff in blog hits was yet another indicator of the latest periodic shakeout of Left blogdom, what with people filleting their blogrolls, burning out, dropping out, or just generally getting anxious about their hitcount or existential about the whole blogging ‘thing’. Nezua The Unapologetic Mexican has some soothing words for those afflicted by by blog angst:

A Bloggle of Wogglers

IT IS A STRANGE PHENOMENON that happens when people think of bloggers. I usually type ‘BLOGGERZ’ because that’s how “we” are so often thought of. As if one can tie a “group” or “type” of people together by the behavior that they TYPE WORDS that others can read and otherwise, do not necessarily have anything in common regarding their methodology but that they figured out some software and regularly fire it up.

Yet, it always reappears, this urge to define what function a BLOGGER has. Across the board. And I’m sure the tendency is a human one, somehow related to our need to understand environmental factors, assess behaviors and entities, group them, take inventory. As bloggers are so often human, this tendency presenteth on the Regular.

The truth is that these people need a copy of Nezua’s 2007 Blogger Stylebook, which would have cleared it up for them. As defined on page 882( Glossary), a “Blogger” is simply:

[A] person* who advertises their opinion or images on the Internet using some type of (preferably free) software while they are paid for (ostensibly) performing other activities.

*An animal may blog if they reside with a human liaison.

We all have our parts to play. Some inform, some influence, some critique, some cozy up the Establishment for A B or C, some deconstruct, some entertain, some seek to make change, or to challenge, some seek to affect the dialogue, some serve to translate the dialogue or spark new ones, some just like to talk about how drunk they got the night before (among my favorite types). And there is, of course, overlap of a varying and indeterminate amount.

Might I add take issue with and refine that definition slightly:

A] person* who advertises their opinion or images on the Internet using some type of (preferably free) software while they are paid for (ostensibly) performing other activities. skiving off from doing something productive.

Not everyone is on a salary. Other than that, exactly.

When it all starts feeling a bit pointless I try to remember the strength of the left blogosphere is collectivity and that by focusing on hierarchy and readership I miss the bigger picture. Yes, it’s annoying that the soft liberal big US blogs (who’d actually be characterised as fairly right wing in most of the rest of the world) have done exactly what one would’ve expected and promulgated a model of blogging that’s advertising revenue-driven and conforms to a stereotype of big ‘brands’ emerging as market leaders, but – never before in political history have ordinary voters been able to speak out and communicate so openly and so widely, transcending all sorts of social and national boundaries. That’s a fucking amazing thing, if you’ll excuse a gleam of optimism breaking through my usually dour demeanour.

Should I, heaven forbid, descend to the purely personal gripe, though, I’d have lots of issues with the big US bloggers. Fot a start there’s the way that political truths that the worldwide left have campaigned on for decades are now being ‘discovered’ by certain progressive blogs. They adorn the regurgitations of their very recent reading with a tag from an 18th century philosopher and post it as original thinking to be hailed as amazing new intellectual insight by the soi-disant Great Minds of the progressive intellectual blogosphere.

But if you were to politely point out that those are socialist ideas it’d be all denial and attacks of the vapours. Oooh, no, socialism? That would be dirty.My first reaction is bollocks to that, give the socialists the bloody credit. There’s also part of me wants to scream Oh for fucks sake, you took your bloody time!

Then there’s the exremely irritating way that the big Democrat bloggers contunue to enjoy the material fruits of neoliberalism even as the political system they support is biting them on the ass: they still can’t see that they are part of the system and therefore part of the problem. And then there’s the blogging kool kidz who got big and influential and then conveniently forgot who made them big in the first place.

Come the revolution….

But no, no, I couldn’t say that – that would be petty and not very in tune with my espoused collectivist ideals, wouldn’t it? Aren’t we all in it together?

So I shall take Nezua’s advice: best to take the long view and keep pegging away like all of us unnamed and uncelebrated millions do – slow and steady wins the race and so on. And when pissed off with blogs and blogging there’s always kittens or the wonder that is cephalopodia, or whatever else floats your boat. Like the man says :

So relax! And do ya thang. Others will do theirs. It will all shake out. Even on the days you don’t blog at all.

How very true.

Diversionary Tactics

Oooh, ooh, go get the lawn chairs and the chips and dip! There’s one of those old queen/new queen fights to the death going on over in the hateosphere.

Those were the days, my friend...

Sskeletal former neofascist pinup Ann Coulter and her up and coming anchor-baby rival Michelle Malkin are conducting the fight by proxy,the proxy being the once-powerful Matt Drudge.

As both women are unpricipled and hateful it’s all very catty and entertaining and is no doubt pushing up their hits. But, as is usual with wingnuts, at bottom it’s all about the money.

After Coulter’s ‘faggot’ comment at CPAC Malkin saw her rival wounded and attacked her without delay; not just because Republicans eat their own but because,as Malkin’s popularity with the provisional psychopathic wing of the Republican party is rising in contrast to Coulter’s, she’s also taking over Coulter’s syndicated column slots. That of course means more moolah for Michelle and husband/amanuensis Jesse and to fund Michelle’s vanity projects like the lame Hot Air vlog.

There’s more at stake here for both than just high-school bitchery:

Two More Papers Drop Ann Coulter Today: They Explain Why

By Dave Astor

Published: March 09, 2007 12:10 PM ET updated 1:30 PM ET

NEW YORK The Sanford (N.C.) Herald has become at least the sixth newspaper this week to drop Ann Coulter’s syndicated column following her March 2 remark concerning Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards that included the term “faggot.”

The DeKalb Daily Chronicle in Illinois, a Lee Enterprises paper, then became #7. That paper explained on its Web site today that it took issue with her syndicate, Universal, saying it had no intention of dropping Coulter because her offensive remark did not appear in a column. “That’s a lot like the Chronicle saying, ‘She didn’t say it in one of the columns we ran, so it isn’t our problem.’ Wrong. It is our problem, and not dealing with it is a cop-out,” the newspaper declared.

“So yesterday we called Universal Press Syndicate and ‘fired’ Coulter. What she said was wrong and hurtful and stepped way beyond the line of human decency, much less political commentary.”

[…]

Other papers dropping the conservative Coulter this week were the Lancaster (Pa.) New Era; The Oakland Press of Pontiac, Mich.; The Mountain Press of Sevierville, Tenn.; The Times of Shreveport, La.; and The American Press in Lake Charles, La.

Read whole story

A trumped-up public spat with Coulter is just what Malkin needs to finally step up to the throne of Bitch Queen of All Wingnuttia while there’s still a bit of money in it. Malkiin’s real advantage in this fight is her horde of smitten inadequates who’ll pile on the email pressure with their local papers.

The problem for Coulter is that that she’s playing by rightwing rules, and rigjhtwing rules say that once you get old and ugly then it’s curtains for you, sweetie. Nobody loves a harpy when she’s forty. The still youngish and attractive (if she keeps very still and doesn’t say anything) Malkin knows this; indeed her whole career is built on it. So Coulter’s bound to lose this one, and then there’s her prosecution for voter fraud…. With her star so precipitously on the wane’ she could almost be the Gloria Swanson of wingnuttery. You could almost feel sorry for Coulter.

Not.

To don my tinfoil hat fr a moment, I wonder if this isn’t about the hidden hand of the market as much as the hidden hand of Republican online psyops. What’s really interesting is how all this blew up just about the time Attorneygate was getting hot, nicely diverting away any wingnuts who might’ve been tempted to actually focus on what’s happening in Washington.

They know damned well that their supporters, given the choice between egging on a bit of brunette-on-blonde bitchslappery or facing their own accountability for having elected a bunch of crooks, would choose the former, no contest.

This leads me also to wonder about this big White House email dump that so many bloggers are poring over. Might this not also be a diversion? While the left is handily bogged down documenting the atrocities at the White House and Justice department and the right enthralled by fighting totty, what’s quietly being planned for Iran?

Apology

Since we moved to WordPress we’ve been suffering a perfect storm of comment spam, which means we’ve had to moderate comments. When I went to bed last night I’d just cleared 145 spam comments out of the queue and lo and behold this morning there’s another 200-odd.

So if it takes a little while for your comment to appear that’s why – I’m wading through spam. There’s no conspiracy involved.

By the way, anyone got any tips on a good spamkiller plugin for WordPress?

Vomit Comment of the Day

Though it’s actually quite a few days old I only just came across it. Cheers to Tom Hilton, who left this link in the comment thread to a post about odd lists at Lawyers, Guns and Money.

Click the link to find out what it is that John Bonham,Tommy Dorsey, Tammy Homolka, Jimi Hendrix and Anna Nicole Smith have in common.

Hint: it’s not dyslexia.

If April Is The Cruellest Month, March Surely Is The Arseholiest.

I’n not feeling very well and I’m fed up to the back teeth of the sight of my immediate environs and companions, having been greeted this morning after a very rough night by yet another pool of cat sick on the rug.

Enough already.

Also for once in this benighted bloody swamp of a country it’s a nice day, so I’m buggering off. Feel free to avail yourself of our fine blogroll or take a leisurely stroll through the archives ( both at right). I find 2005 to be a piquant litle year myself.

Don’t know where I’m going or what I’m doing, except Out.

Later.

UPDATE

I never did get out: someone let the tire down on my bike. Fuckwits.