Comment of The Day II

Is from Mnemosyne at Pandagon, on the religiously and misogynistically motivated US Supreme Court decision to outlaw a method of late-term abortion used to save women’s lives when babies are irretrievably malformed or dead in the womb :

Mnemosyne
Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:04 am

Not to mention … not a single “baby’s” life will be saved by this bill.

Not one.

The only reason women have this procedure done is because there is no way for the fetus to survive outside of the womb, assuming it’s not already dead, as Martha Mendoza’s son was.

The right-wing can scream and cry about saving “babies” all they want, but this decision did nothing but harm women whose planned and wanted pregnancies went horribly, horribly wrong and left those women’s doctors with fewer options to save their patients’ fertility if they want to try again.

So, trolls, go ahead and pat yourselves on the back: you just made life harder for thousands of women who’ve already gotten the worst news a pregnant woman can get — “Your baby will not survive to be born.” Yay, you! Time to par-TAY!

Exactly.

Do read that Martha Mendoza link and you’ll get some idea of the enormity of this attack by fundies on women’s right to decide about their own health and future.

It’s always been my view as a socialist that the reason why elites, ie white western men in this instance, want to deny women’s rights is to keep control over the means of production of new workers.

Heaven forbid that the silly fertile incubators should be in charge of their own bodies: the rich might run out of servants and cheap labour and that would never do. This decision, reached by religious absolutists appointed by Bush, reduces a woman’s status to that of a passive incubator with no say over whatsoever her own body. Which, the fundies consider, is as it should be – because God owns her body and God speaks to them so they get to say, not her.

And who will pay for the ageing white males’ pensions and make up for their declining fertility by providing them photogenic adoptive babies, if those uppity women get to decide not to have children?

Unthinkable. Better a few women should die from unsafe procedures. They’re not worth that much anyway, the dirty sluts, or they wouldn’t’ve had sex in the first place.

UPDATE: On rereading that I don’t feel I made my point sufficiently clear. This decision is about bodily autonomy: who owns women? The state or themselves?

The supreme court has decided that the state owns and controls women. Men, however, being superior, own themselves.

The US consitution, “Life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness” applies to you only if you’ve been born xy rather than xx.

The Cult Of Poisonality

Sadly, No has a post up re lawyer, blogger and online pundit Debbie Schlussel, and boy, I wish I’d never read it, or even seen or heard of her. Speaking as a former member of the legal profession (I was crap at it in practice, I freely admit) I’m under no illusions that lawyers are any more moral, clever or humane than other average mortals. Probably much less so if anything.

Nevertheless at times I’m just completely gobsmacked at the sheer ineptititude, spite and moral stupidity that comes out of US law schools. Ann Althouse, for example, and Ann Coulter and the Powerline trio – all those petty-minded little people with their petty little hatreds, who’ve been given a public bully pulpit to spout off from, just because they were able to pass a bunch of multiple choice exams and can spell ‘libertarianism’. (At least all my finals questions required actual essays, even if I did throw up in Trusts and Equity from sheer exam nerves, and had to resit it in the autumn.). Detroit lawyer Schlussel can spell libertarian too, but only in ALLCAPS.

The ability to memorise a pile of case cites and headnotes does not automatically confer the ability to reason – if only – and so it proves yet again. This US law school product turned, airbrushed-blonde-wingnut-pundit, seems to think an obsession with the race and/or immigration status of the mass-murderer of 33 people is somehow relevant to the crime, and also that the insult ‘Paki’ is a perfectly acceptable epithet for someone from Pakistan.

That’s bad enough, but Schlussel takes her lack of rational thought further into batshit insane wingnut territory as she reasons that because some students are Asians and some Asians are Pakistani and some Pakistanis are Moslem and some Moslems are terrorists – why, then it must’ve been a terrorist…

Who is the “Asian” Mass Murderer at Virginia Tech? UPDATE: Shooter is Chinese National w/Student Visa

[…]

Here’s what we know about the murderer of at least 32 students and maimer of at least 28 more at Virginia Tech, today:

* The murderer has been identified by law enforcement and media reports as “a young Asian male.”

* The Virginia Tech campus has a very large Muslim community, many of which are from Pakistan (per terrorism investigator Bill Warner).

* Pakis are considered “Asian.”

Now I’m no Majikthise, but that reasoning strikes me as just ever-so-slightly disingenuous. And “Pakis”? How very ignorant. Yet a simple google would have produced this as the top result:

Web definitions for Paki

AVOID. An offensive term referring to Pakistanis. Sometimes used in Britain as an epithet against all South Asians

If she didn’t find out whether it was insulting she’s ignorant and racist: and if she knew and just didn’t care she’s maliciously racist. Either way it’s racist. I somehow doubt Ms Schlussel will be guest of honour at the Bradford mela this year, though she might get a pash note from our very own fellow lawyer and racist Nick Griffin.

Seeing this a number of commenters kindly pointed out her error, to be met with this polite response:

MY NAME IS DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL, NOT DON IMUS. IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO FALL ALL OVER THEMSELVES IN SHAME AND GROVELLING FOR YOUR FORGIVENESS FOR SAYING SOMETHING YOU FIND OFFENSIVE, GO TO THE IMUS HOME. ALSO, THIS IS NOT MSNBC OR CBS RADIO. IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO CAVE INTO YOUR THOUGHT-POLICE ORTHODOXY LIKE A WET NOODLE, THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THIS SITE–ALSO ME–IS NOT WHAT YOU ARE SEEKING.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

Well, there’s a measured and well-thought-out reply. How does a noodle cave, exactly?

Counselor Schluessel has the online manners of a rampaging hippo on angel dust and the literary skills of our 3-legged cat Hector. No wonder she chose punditry over litigation if that’s her courtroom persona. Schlussel, from my admittedly brief perusal of her works, doesn’t strike me as the unambitious type; but if she really wants to reach the giddy heights of Instahackdom (and don’t they all?) it’d help if she had a handle on the correct euphemisms to use when making brioad, sweeping, racist generalisations.

So here, courtesy of Loren Javier is a handy aide-memoire for Schlussel when those racist ants in her undoubtedly pristine pants start to get a little itchy:

Asian
A term either describe somebody of Asian descent or something that comes from Asia. When speaking of Asians who are American citizens, however, use Asian American, Asian Pacific American (APA), Asian Pacific Islander (API) or Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI).

Asian AmericanThis phrase was first used in the 1980 Census to describe American citizens from all Asian ethnic backgrounds. It is a commonly used term and is preferred by those of Asian descent who were born and raised in the United States.

Asian Pacific American
This is a relatively new term that is inclusive of both Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. It is abbreviated as APA. Some other acceptable terms are Asian Pacific Islander (API) and Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI)

Cantonese
Chinese dialect spoken in the environs of Canton, now known as Guangzhou, near the South China Sea. The dialect of many of the early Chinese immigrants to the United States in the 1840s to 1870s. Also the principal dialect of Hong Kong. Still widely spoken in U.S. Chinatowns.

China Doll
AVOID. A figurine, usually porcelain, but when used metaphorically or as a comparison the implied image of female submission demeans women of Chinese heritage.

[…].

Desi This is a colloquial name for people of South Asian descent, particularly those of Indian and Pakistani descent, to self describe each other or their community. The term is derogatory outside of the South Asian community.

Dragon Lady
A cartoon character from the popular 1930s comic strip, “Terry and the Pirates.” Variations of the Dragon Lady were later popularized in many Hollywood adventure movies of the 1940s and later. She was portrayed as sexy and evil in Chinese silk gowns with long sleeves, cigarette holder between two fingers

Gook
AVOID. This is an offensive term that American soldiers coined to describe Koreans during the Korean War. “Gook” is actually Korean for “country.” “Han Gook” describes a person from the People’s Republic of Korea while “Mee Gook” describes a person from the United States. The irony is that American soldiers believed Koreans were describing themselves as gooks when, in reality, they were describing Americans. The term eventually was used during the Vietnam war and became widely used as a derogatory term for all Asian Americans.

Gosei (GO-say)
Fifth-generation Japanese Americans, generally born in the new millennium. Term is mainly of historical interest only.

[…]

Paki
AVOID. An offensive term referring to Pakistanis. Sometimes used in Britain as an epithet against all South Asians.

Pinoy/Pinay (pee-NOY/pee-NAHY)
This term describes a Filipino American man (Pinoy) or woman (Pinay). While it is widely used within Filipino American communities, some consider it derogatory. It is advised that media use “Filipino American” unless quoting someone who self-identifies that way.

Potato Queen
This is a slang term used to describe lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Asian Pacific Americans, particularly men, who only date Caucasian people. While it is used tongue-in-cheek, it is considered derogatory by some people and, therefore, advised that media avoid it, unless quoting someone who self-identifies that way or is used by an Asian Pacific American in a more opinion or editorial tone.

More…

You’d think a lawyer’d have the necessary research skills to have found that out herself, wouldn’t you? Unless of course that lawyer were determined to give full rein to her basest lizard-brain feelings in the hope of making herself an online career. Otherwise, she’d probably be sitting in some law mill with a thousand other associates churning out boilerplate real-estate contracts. If not for blogging and an unfortunate turn for hateful bile, most of these wingnut lawyer/blogger/pundits’d be doing the same. Aren’t the interwebs wonderful?

[*Note to male progressive bloggers, re Michelle Malkin and oingoing references to pingpong/patpong: much as we loathe her, this post applies to you too. But feel free to use ‘potato queen’ though. It seems rather apt in light of Jesse Malkin’s undoubted caucasianity.]

US To Give Telcos Retrospective Immunity From Spying Lawsuits, Expand Spying


(Cartoon from Bunnyherolabs)

From Wired (h/t Norwegianity)

Spy Chief Seeks to Expand Power

The new director of national intelligence is seeking to expand the government’s ability to conduct black bag searches, allow the National Security Agency to spy on foreigners inside the United States without a warrant, kill off lawsuits against telecoms for helping the government spy on American’s phone calls, and make it easier for the government to get phone and email records, even as the FBI remains mired in a scandal over its illegal and widespread use of a Patriot Act power, according to the Associated Press.

The draft bill being circulated by spy chief Mitch McConnell would, according to the AP:

  • Give the NSA the power to monitor foreigners without seeking FISA court approval, even if the surveillance is conducted by tapping phones and e-mail accounts in the United States.[…]
  • Clarify the standards the FBI and NSA must use to get court orders for basic information about calls and e-mails — such as the number dialed, e-mail address, or time and date of the communications. Civil liberties advocates contend the change will make it too easy for the government to access this information.
  • Triple the life span of a FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] warrant for a non-U.S. citizen from 120 days to one year, allowing the government to monitor much longer without checking back in with a judge.
  • Give telecommunications companies immunity from civil liability for their cooperation with Bush’s terrorist surveillance program. Pending lawsuits against companies including Verizon and AT&T allege they violated privacy laws by giving phone records to the NSA for the program.
  • Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.

The bill would be yet another attempt to update FISA, a bill that seems to always be not up to the task. It was last updated in 2005. Shortly thereafter, the government’s warrantless wiretapping program and a related program in which phone companies dumped their phone call databases to the NSA were revealed, giving lie to campaign assurances from President Bush that all wiretaps had court approval.

The provision to include what can only be retroactive immunity for telcos is very interesting in that this provision has been widely rumored in many bills floating around Congress, but has never been inserted in a publicly introduced bill. It’s evidence that the telcos remain afraid that they could be found liable for billions of dollars in fines if a court finds they indeed helped the government spy on Americans without requiring valid legal process.

McConnell is going to have a tough road ahead of him, given the bill needs the blessing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which these days is talking about rolling back Patriot Act powers, not increasing them.

The Importance of ‘Attorneygate’

I’m planning on spending this morning catching up on Attorneygate, particularly on the Senate hearing testimony of Gonzales’ sidekick and Rove mini-me Kyle Sampson, the baby-faced boy wonder who at first glance seems to be trying to take the fall for his boss for the politically motivated firings of US attorneys, if what he’s admitted so far is any guide.

But is that true? Is Kyle Sampson substantially to blame? Is he taking the fall, and why?

I love this stuff.

But that’s the point at which many eyes are beginning to glaze over. Not all of us are totally obsessed with the minutiae and the internecine rivalries of the administration of US justice.

However, most of us do give a damn when the government of a country that thinks of itself as the world’s policeman, and which has such a disproportionate effect on world culture, economy and politics, is being deliberately corrupted from within. It affects us all one way or another.

That is the big picture here, and why Attorneygate’s so important. But where can we go to find out more in language the casual yet interested observer rather than the political obsessive can understand?

For a list of the dramatis personae and a timeline of events you could do no better than than Talking Points Memo or TPM Muckraker, whose valiant efforts have pushed this story to the prominence it has now and whose readers have uncovered the story by sifting the reams of email evidence released by the White House in an attempt to bury the inquiry in paper.

For those who want the backstory the links are fascinating – it’s like lifting up a log and seeing crawly things scurrying panicky away from the light.

The story, grossly simplified and in short, as I understand it, is this:

Bushco got scared when California politician Randall ‘Duke Cunningham” was convicted of corruption over defence contracts, because a co-conspirator of his, one Dusty Foggo of the CIA, was also on the verge of being indicted for his involvement in the same shady doings.

Dusty Fuggo’s a friend, intimate and business associate of many, many senior Republican figures up to and including in the White House and is privy to all sorts of CIA shenanigans like, oh say, rendition, and torture, and misuse of funds, and bribery and prostitution – take your pick. he also knows where the bodies were buried, figuratively (though possibly actually) speaking, in Honduras during Reagan and Bush Sr.’s Central American adventures.. So the notion of his testifying anywhere, any time, simply would not do.

Foggo could’ve exposed everybody.

Not only was that little storm brewing for the White House, meanwhile there was that darned Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago, worrying away at Cheny aide Scotter Libby and about to expose the White House’s complicity in the media outing of yet another CIA agent, which would then expose their out and out lies over Iraq’s alleged attempted importation of yellowcake uranium from Niger and reveal their whole pretext for the war as a lie and a sham. (Not that we don’t know that already from other extrinsic evidence but it would’ve been nice to’ve seen it proved in court.)

Oh no, exposure! Whatever to do? It all got a bit panicky.

It got worse: previously loyal prosecutors started chafing when pressured politically by Bushco to push unfounded voter fraud cases against Democrats. They might have drunk some koolaid, but even they had limits. There was no evidence, they said.

Karl Rove, the wily old snake, had a brainwave. They could stop the Foggo prosecution and fix the next election too, plus the added extra of bringing the whole national prosecutorial wing of the Justice department entirely under their political control. All their problems solved at a stroke – all they had to do was fire all the lawyers and put unqualified partisans in their place. Of course! Easypeasy, lemon squeezy.

Th idea of being able to prosecute their political opponents on a whim was too tempting to resist. Why, Rove himself had a young padawan, a zealous devotee of the dark Rovian art of candidate smearing, who’d fit perfectly – and in Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s home state of Arkansas too. How very handy for the next presidential election.

The plan was all going well for the little group of alleged conspirators, Rove, Gonzales, Harriet Miers, (potentially Cheney and Bush too but that remains to be seen) – great theory, great plan. It all got discussed by email within and outside the White House (by whom is exactly what the hearings are about) then it was up to Gonzales to put it into action, which he did in the same half-assed way Bushco do everything.

He palmed it off to his deputy Kyle Sampson, the man who’s now sitting in the chair sweating before the committee. Because the US attorneys, quite understandably, didn’t take to being fired on flimsy pretexts like incompetence very well and started to talk to the media, and it all began to unravel. The Democrats took Congresss, the story came out, and here we are, Bushco and its evil lawyer minions on the stand, looking for all the world like the low-rent theives they are.

The big question is: how high up can this be proved to have gone? While it may be obvious to most of us that Bushco’re as rotten as a log full of woodlice, because of the virulence of the Right’s revisionist attack trops in the media it has to be shown in the clear light of judicial sunshine that the Democrats are not, in their turn, using the administration of justice for partisan purposes.

The proof of Bushco wrongdoing needs to be revealed in public.

Yes, there’re a lot of grounds for impeaching Bush and Cheney and Gonzales too for that matter, but without the actual, physical proof of a crime it’s all just conjecture and accusation. The evidence that’s coming to light as a result of the Attorneygate hearings may be that actual, physical proof – or at the very least, we may hear the testimony that will finally put the criminals in the White House in the dock, not for grand historical war crimes but for squalid hole-in-the-corner corruption and conspiracy.

How worried are Bushco about this? Worried enough to have made a futile attempt to stop the hearings yesterday on procedural grounds.. I shall continue to watch this one with interest, it has great potential to be the blow that finally brings the rotten edifice of modern-day Republicanism tumbling down.

It’s Quarter To Three, There’s No-One In The Place…

Oh dear, talk about tired and emotional…

This latest self-produced video of cultural criticism (“Pop Idol! Yay! Me! Yay! Wine! Yay!”) by Ann Althouse was again kindly brought to our attention by twinkly Uncle Tbogg and if we’re very lucky it may just have a chilling effect on Althouse’s long-dreamt-about career as a media pundit.

We can only hope.

It would be hilarious if it weren’t so very sad.