More Cash For Honours: Yes, It Was The Emails

The Independent reports:

Email led to BBC legal gag in cash for honours probe
Document at centre of injunction led to change of police tactics, as detectives prepare to send their final files to the CPS By Francis Elliott, Whitehall Editor
Published: 04 March 2007

Detectives in charge of the cash-for-honours investigation gagged the BBC because it was about to reveal details of a significant email, The Independent on Sunday has learnt.

The existence of the email is thought to explain why police switched their attention from the alleged sale of honours to claims that there had been a subsequent cover-up.

Senior BBC sources last night indicated that it would not be seeking to overturn an injunction imposed on Friday night after an application by the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, who said releasing details of the communication, believed to be known by the BBC political editor Nick Robinson, would harm the inquiry.

The injunction suggests the police are about to send their final files – together with a recommendation about whether to prosecute – to the Crown Prosecution Service.

This newspaper has been told that Tony Blair expects the year-long investigation to come to an end this week. A long-awaited independent report on party funding, delayed until the conclusion of the police probe, is pencilled in for next week.

Detectives are thought to have uncovered the email last year. It was one of the “major developments” alluded to by John Yates, the police chief in charge of the investigation, in a letter to MPs on 16 November.

Since that letter, the Prime Minister’s chief fundraiser, Lord Levy, has been arrested and questioned on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Ruth Turner, No 10’s director of government relations, has also been arrested. Ms Turner has been questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice, not, as in Lord Levy’s case, of conspiracy to do so.

Whole story

[My emphasis]

Meanwhile, In Other News: UK Quietly Reauthorises Slavery

For all the pious hooha that’s been spouted this past few weeks by the likes of that permatanned fraud Peter Hain and the risible John Prescott about the sanctity of William Wilberforce and the Abolition Movement they somehow failed to mention, as lenin points out, that quietly, New Labour has been repealing employment legislation thus allowing the effective reinstitution of slavery – not in some far-off, easily hidden colony this time, but on its own soil.

Slavery in the UK. posted by lenin

It seems Tom DeLay was not the only one to learn from the perfect petri dish of pure capitalism. New Labour is to abolish laws that provide the most basic protection for migrant workers. Workers who receive visas to enter domestic service are “legally entitled to leave their employer if they are abused or exploited and to receive basic protection – including the minimum wage – under UK employment law.” Now, if they are abused or mistreated by an employer, either they must suck it up or flee back to their country of origin. Even Barbara Roche, the former Home Office minister who used to put on a hideous freak show by appearing at the docks and interrogating lorry-drivers about any human cargo they might inadvertently be carrying, is alarmed: “These new proposals are a very retrograde step. Workers who suffer abuse from employers will feel absolutely alone. I can’t believe a Labour government which has taken such a firm stance against trafficking will want this to happen.” Oh, you’d be surprised, Barbara.

This comes as a recent report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found an enormous amount of slavery operating in the UK. There are said to be 10,000 gangmasters operating in the UK, who supply labour that operates under the threat of extreme physical violence to various sectors of British capital. These include everything from domestic service, where the new laws will apply, to agriculture, manufacturing, restaurant workers, food processors, care work, hotels and so on. Among these are tens of thousands of sex slaves, who include thousands of children – and not all of those children come from overseas. If you try to protest about your treatment, you “may be beaten, abused, raped, deported or even killed.”

Read whole post.

Those of us on the anticapitalist left have long been derided as out-there hysterics when we’ve warned that the increased slavery and exploitation so apparent elsewhere is spreading to the developed world and that this is the natural outcome of the neoliberal economic polices that Blair and Brown have been pursuing.

Blindly tribal Labour supporters who still harbour the hope that Gordon Brown’s ascendance to the premiership would herald some sort of shift towards humanity and away from rapaciousness, when Brown himself willingly enables that rapaciousness is out of their tiny mind,

Just look at the money the party has just taken from private equity groups – largely unaccountable conglomerations of private money which buy take private and proceed to asset-strip other companies, They’re run by fund managers, unlike publicly regulated corporations they have no shareholders and they have little social accountability compared to public companies. Plus the Gordon Brown gives them a tax break!

Anyone who’s still with Labour despite everything, and that includes a number of people I was once was close to and thought highly of, deserves to go down with the rest of them.

Did you ever think, staunch union actvist and Labour loyalist, when you were sitting under that tree at Tolpuddle with the union banner at your feet and a cold drink in your hand, that your party would one day be the party of slavery?.

Well now it is and it’s all down to you and your blind loyalty to party over principle. Fuck you, you little Eichmanns.

Goldsmith Saves Blair’s Neck, Gags BBC

The BBC’s reporting that recently-admitted adulterer and Blair-appointed Attorney General Lord Goldsmith has slapped a hastily-appiled-for injunctionon the BBC that prohibits it from reporting a significant development in the Cash for Honours investigation. The BBC website is reported to have earlier illustrated its report with a photo of Ruth Turner, that’s since been taken down, and Guido and the other Tory blogs are all atwitter.

Aside from the sheer conflict of interest displayed by the government’s senior law officer intervening to directly protect his political patrons from exposure it’s just plain dumb – there’s no doubt that the story’ll be out all over the world by morning.

My money’s on Ruth Turner when Education Secretary having emailed something very indiscreet to Lord Levy and to Tony Blair. Either that or Blair himself has been arrested under caution; but at this point we don’t actually know.

C’mon Beeb, cry havoc and let slip the story to the foreign press or blogs! Has none of you any post-Hutton balls?

New Labour must be feeling it though: Ruth Turner Kelly was openly jeered on Radio 4 this evening when she suggested on Any Questions that everyone respects Tony Blair, while Ken Loach replied, to tumultuous applause, that Blair and all his government should be tried at Den Haag for war crimes.

Then there’s this ultimate humiliation:

Tony Blair’s Old Band Record Anti-War Song

Published Thursday, 1st March, 2007

Ugly Rumours – that’s the band Tony Blair once belonged to – have now reformed and have their sights on the charts with an anti-war song directed straight at the Prime Minister.

The original members have come together (complete with a Tony Blair lookalike it seems) to record a cover version of the Edwin Starr song, War (What Is It Good For?). The band have also started a new website which explains their decision to release the track.

Anyone wanting to show their support can buy the track for just £1.50 by texting the word PEACE1 to 78789 or by this online link. All profits raised are going to support the work the Stop The War Coalition do.

According to their site, Ugly Rumours only need 5000 sales to break into the charts.

I think the country is trying to tell them something.

This has got to be the end this time.

Hasn’t it?

UPDATE: Bleh, shouldn’t post on the fly late at night – have corrected the more sloppy errors.

Latest from early morning news is that Goldsmith has put out a statement saying that he sought the injunction in the public interest at the behest of the Metropolitan police.

Whatever.

The effect is the same, a closed circle deciding that we ordinary mugs are not fit to know what criminality is happening at the upper reaches of the gpvernment we pay for. “They’re all just covering up for each other” – that’s the message the electorate will take from this latest Goldsmith manoeuvre, not prosecutorial fairhandedness. At this point even otherwise perfectly legally valid considerations of whether news reports might wreck a pending prosecution or skew any subsequent hearing seem rather irrelevant to us voters as the tide rises around Blair and his sofa government’s necks. We know he and they’re corrupt, we want them gone and we just wish the media would just do their bloody job and defy the injunction.

DOUBLE UPDATE: The BBC have banned the Ugly Rumours single. Way to go, beeb.

It Could Happen To You

It could happen to any one of us who happens not to look exactly like every pig-ignorant, crayon sucker of a prison service meathead thinks they ought to, or who has the audacity to have a funny foreign name.

But hey, look on the bright side, at least he wasn’t banged up indefinitely on terror charges; he should be grateful, shouldn’t he?

British Asian faced deportation threat

· Officials believed jailed student was Pakistani
· Detention meant he could not produce documents

Jeevan Vasagar
Thursday March 1, 2007
The Guardian

A British Asian was held in a detention centre for nearly two months and threatened with deportation to Pakistan because Home Office officials believed he was a foreigner.

Immigration officials assumed that Sabbir Ahmed, who speaks with a Lancashire accent, was Pakistani despite the fact that he was born in Blackburn and has a British passport. His parents come from India but also have British citizenship.

Mr Ahmed, 34, an accountancy student at the University of Leicester, had finished serving a two-month prison sentence for driving while disqualified when he was identified as a foreign national and held for deportation. His case followed a furore over the failure to deport foreign prisoners which cost home secretary Charles Clarke his job last summer.

Mr Ahmed said: “It was so frustrating, it just felt like I was banging my head against a brick wall. I was screaming my innocence to anyone who would listen and they were trying to deport me to a country where I’ve got no ties.”

He was asked to provide documents proving his nationality but was unable to do so because his passport was at his flat in east London and he could not leave Haslar detention centre in Gosport, Hampshire. He was only freed after campaigners from Haslar visitors’ group got access to his flat to recover his documents, and photocopies were shown to a judge at an appeal hearing against the deportation.

“I’ve never been to Pakistan,” he said in an interview with the Portsmouth News. “But no matter how much I protested I was innocent, that didn’t matter.”

[…]

Mr Ahmed’s case is not an isolated one. A report last year on foreign prisoners by Anne Owers, chief inspector of prisons, found regular failings in establishing the nationality of prisoners. In one case an inspection team which interviewed 12 juvenile prisoners identified as foreign found that five of them were British. It quoted one prisoners’ representative as saying: “If you are black officers assume you are a foreign national.”

Whole story

Seriously, any Briton who feels this could happen to them or someone close to them (and after seeing more and more stories like this pop up, it seems less and less unlikely) would do well to download, read and keep handy the Immigration Law Practitioner’s Group Best Practice Guide To Challenging Immigration Detention, just in case.

The Sins Of The Father

I meant to mention this post of Martin’s from Wisse Words in the week but it slipped my mind, sorry.

But he points out one of the big unspokens about wingnuts, and wingnut pundits in particular, though it’s not a phenomenon that’s exclusive to the US right:that it’s all about Daddy.

Wed 21 Feb 2007
More Reynolds

Scruggs over at UFO Breakfast Recipients has read my post on Glenn Reynolds and points out something I missed: that Reynolds’ dad was a moderately famous antiwar protestor himself and much of his behaviour may just be because of unresolved daddy issues:

Now let’s be clear that many young, rebellious kids say awful things. I made my parents wince more times than I care to contemplate when I was in the throes of puberty. And some parents really are pretty dreadful. Growing up and individuating is not always easy, especially in an authoritarian state. So one can understand why some apsects of the angry, frustrated, spiteful child persist into physical adulthood.

They certainly do: witness the angry frustrated, spitefuilly childish rightwing bloggers and commenters in full flow this week post- Reynolds’ call for the assassination of nuclear scientists and clerics who have had the misfortune not to be born white and American. The uber-angry, frustrated, spitefuilly childish Instapundit is right in the vanguard of the Daddy-issues wingers.

There’s certainly past evidence for Scruggs’ thesis that Reynolds (and by extension, his fellow wingnut pundits) has unresolved paternal issues and it comes from a unexpected, hawkish source:

Listen to Yourself, Instaman
by Gene Healy | Jan 9, 2003 | 4 comments

So here’s Glenn Reynolds on the US (the Daddy Country) and its relationship with other countries (sniveling, spoiled teenage brats with no respect for authority):

LAST NIGHT there was a Cosby show rerun on Nickelodeon. Theo defies his parents, and they leave him with nowhere to live in order to teach him that actions have consequences, and forgiveness isn’t to be taken for granted.

This morning Howard Kurtz is writing about the surprising degree of support, even among conservatives, for the idea of hanging South Korea out to dry. I wonder if there’s a parallel to be drawn here?

… long-term, there’s a lot to be gained by reminding our triangulating allies that American love, and American forgiveness, are not to be taken for granted either. That’s a lesson we keep ramming home to the Germans. And the Koreans need to learn it too.

We live in a world where most of our allies are Theo Huxtables: self-centered, unrealistic, and overconfident in their assorted schemes because they know Heathcliff will always bail them out in the end. But this isn’t a situation comedy.

[…]

Reynolds is like one of those spoiled, crying, snot-nosed children you see shrieking and grabbing their parents’ sleeve in the supermarket. “Daddy! Daddy, Daddy, Daddy!, DADDY!! Notice meeeeee!”

Read More