Condi, Congress, Contempt and Resignation

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testifies before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Middle East policy on Capitol Hill in Washington DC USA on 24 October 2007. Rice said on Wednesday the United States would cut off Iran's 'malignant' activities in Iraq and stop its destabilizing behavior across the region. EPA/MATTHEW CAVANAUGH

Could it possibly be that even Condi Rice is shocked at the depth of the incompetence and greed that are being publicly revealed by the Iraq corruption hearings?

Head of State Dep’t Anti-Corruption Office in Baghdad Is A Paralegal
By Spencer Ackerman – October 25, 2007, 11:35AM

How well are the State Department’s anti-corruption efforts in Iraq managed? Don’t ask Condoleezza Rice.

Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) laid it all out. Not only are there duplicative U.S. offices in Baghdad to oversee anti-corruption efforts — the Anti-corruption Working Group and the Office of Accountability and Transparency, to name two — but coordination is so bad that the OAT for months boycotted the meetings of the AWG. Rice said she was “not aware” of that.

What, officially ‘not aware’ or actually not aware? Or could it be both? Could it really be that she did not know and the depths of her ignorance are only now becoming clear to her? She’s certainly looking as though something’s knocked what little stuffing she had out of her recently. It could be from that… or maybe they didn’t have the patent Ferragamo boots in her size. Who knows.

Another point she wasn’t aware of: OAT has had, according to Rep. Tierney, four acting or permanent directors in the past ten months alone. The most recent one isn’t a diplomat or a trained anti-corruption official at all, but rather a “paralegal” who works at the U.S. embassy. “I should get back to you with a sense of how we manage these programs,” she replied.

Perhaps Rice actually didn’t know; not that that gives me have any sympathy towards her. Why didn’t she know? It’s her frickin’ job.

It could be she’s just been brought down to earth with a great big thud on learning that she isn’t the noble liberator of the barbarians and the heroine of her loyal underlings, but rather the aider and abettor of a gang of common thieves and murderers, but even so her ignorance was deliberate policy not inadvertence.

Plausible deniability they call it – with former attorney general Samuel “I don’t recall” Alito, it’s foremost proponent. It got so ridiculous that he had to resign, but he never actually admitted anything much.

Alito made sure he didn’t know anything that could condemn him – even if he actually did know, he made sure he officially ‘didn’t know’.

It’s a useful and convenent bit of sophistry, that – it covers up much administration wrongdoing and plasters over all sorts of festering sores. When you don’t know something you can’t be blamed and if everybody stonewalls, no-one gets caught. But the one thing you can’t escape from is the fact that an officer of state should know what’s going on their department.

That’s why Alito had to go, that and the ridiculousness of the country’s senior law officer being seen to deliberately obstruct a judicially-powered committee.

Whether Rice knew details about the fuckups and corruption in her department officially or otherwise is kind of irrelevant anyway, complicit as she is in the larger crime of the illegal invasion of Iraq, the unlawful killing of much of its population and the wanton destruction of its infrastructure. Everything else flows from that original offence and to even begin to list Rice’s resulting crimes is to pile Pelion upon Ossa.

But it’s looking increasingly less likely that she’s got the stamina for the long- planned attack on Iran, even though she is currently managing to hold the line in public:

During a hearing bristling with partisan snipes between Democrats and Republicans, the overall state of affairs in Iraq was never far from the surface. Pressed by committee members to acknowledge any regrets, Rice said that the war in Iraq had been difficult and expensive.

“Yes, frankly, it has been harder than I thought it would be,” she said.

But she defended administration policy and praised patriotic Iraqis who had risked their lives.

“I cannot by any means make up for the terrible sacrifice,” she said. “But I can say that I think nothing of value is ever won without sacrifice. And yes, I do believe that it’s been worth it.”

I expect it’ll be the same with Rice as it was with Alito: she’ll continue to deny she knew anything, say “I don’t recall” a lot and eventually resign, leaving Bush to make another dreadful recess appointment, perhaps the odious John Bolton (or someone equally rabid) who will push for nuclear strikes on Iran.

Rice has to be got rid of now , even if she is George’s best friend. She may be talking up Iraq success but anyone watching the hearings can see she’s at the end of her tether. If is the case that even she has been shocked at the depth and breadth of the corruption revealed in Iraq it could be that there may be some dark moral places that even Condi won’t go, unlikely as that might seem.

But that would mean she disagreed with Bush: that means disloyalty and if you ain’t for the Chimperor, you’re against him. You have to go, office wife or not.

Shooting Yourself In The Foot

Interesting events in Phoenix as a litigious sheriff unhappy with the way Phoenix New Times journalists covered him allegedly takes his revenge:

Michael Lacey, the executive editor, and Jim Larkin, chief executive, were arrested at their homes after they wrote a story that revealed that the Village Voice Media company, its executives, its reporters and even the names of the readers of its website had been subpoenaed by a special prosecutor. The special prosecutor had been appointed to look into allegations that the newspaper had violated the law in publishing the home address of Maricopa Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s home address on its website more than three years ago.

The weekly and its leadership has been in a long running battle with Mr. Arpaio, after the weekly published a series of stories about his real estate dealings.

“They did not have a warrant, but they told me that I was being arrested for unlawful disclosure of grand jury information,” Mr. Larkin said by phone from his home early this morning, after he was released from jail. Mr. Lacey remained in jail early this morning. Captain Paul Chagolla, a spokesman for the sheriff did not return a call for comment.

Steve Suskin, legal counsel for Village Voice Media, said that the arrests on misdemeanor charges of the newspaper executives represent an escalation in the conflict between The Phoenix New Times and Sheriff Arpaio, who has received national attention for his reputation for running tough jails.

“It is an extraordinary sequence of events,” Mr. Suskin said. “The arrests were not totally unexpected, but they represent an act of revenge and a vindictive response on the part of an out of control sheriff.”

Here’s one of the articles Sheriff Joe Arpaio is so unhappy about:

You get elected to public office, say, sheriff.

You start scowling like John Wayne and jam the jails full. You put the cons in stripes and house them in surplus Army tents, where four guards oversee 1,800 inmates.

Your detention officers beat up prisoners, while feeding them food unfit for a dog. A paranoid public afraid of crime is grateful because it naively believes your abusive policies will scare people from committing that next robbery and shooting.

Who cares if this is all baloney?

You drum up a few death threats along the way, because that generates free publicity chronicling what a bad-ass you are.

Who cares if innocent people go to jail?

The voters love it. Even as your office is besieged by tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits stemming from beatings and deaths in your Mother of All Dungeons.

The dead guys were druggies anyway, your public relations machine claims. And, hey, that’s what the county’s insurance policy is for — settling claims of distraught survivors.

What matters most is that your image as “toughest sheriff in America” has made you into a valuable commodity.

And that image is worth a lot.

More…

If Arpaiao hadn’t had those media executives arrested and the NY Times hadn’t picked it up, I and many thousands of others nation and worldwide never would have read that and known of the terrible allegations against him.

Hubris begets nemesis. You’d think an officer of the law would know that. Silly sheriff.

To By Those Who Have, Much Shall be Given.Taken

The sick furore created by the self-crowned Bitch-Queen Of All Wingnuttia Michelle Malkin and her legion of flying buttmonkeys over the Frost family’s appearance in a Democrat healthcare policy ad, as ordered by the Republican party, has already coming back to bite her – in the form of her own words. Seems her views were quite different until very recently. Sweet.

Not that this will at all impede her metamorphosis from sloppy dishonest journalist to the La Pasionara of the Fox Brownshirts.

Malkin’s been a good little GOP shocktrooper lately, but in the process of debunking her all sorts of people have been shown to be sucking off the public teat, and guess what, it’s not the poor so much as the comfortably off and those who don’t have to worry about affording things like healthcare because theirs is covered, thanks, and usually by your tax dollars. And that’s without even mentioning corporate welfare. The wingnuts may have opened a can of worms they’d rather have kept closed.

Here’s a couple of cases in point, though there’s no shortage of more. First, via Cliff Schecter’s blog there’s the NY millionaire who has persuaded the courts that the taxpayers should pay for his son’s private school:

Supreme Court: NYC schools must pay private special education for multimillionaire’s son

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Wednesday affirmed a ruling that requires New York City schools to reimburse a wealthy businessman for private special education for his son.

The justices split 4-4 on the case, which means a lower court ruling siding with former Viacom executive Tom Freston remains in place.

Lower courts had sided with Freston against New York City’s board of education, saying the city must pay for educating the learning-disabled student, even though he had been enrolled in private school.

The student’s parents had insisted that public schools were unable to meet the child’s needs. His learning disabilities were diagnosed after he was enrolled in private school.

In case you don’t know what I’m talking about, here is the link to where this twaddle actually ended up, at the NYT.

I’m not going to link to Malkin, you can find her easily. But here are her words about a family of 6 living on approx 45-55k per year.

The bottom line here is that this family has considerable assets. Maryland’ s S-CHIP program does not means-test (correction: I meant to say assets-test>. The refusal to do assets tests on federal health insurance programs is why federal entitlements are exploding and government keeps expanding. If Republicans don’t have the guts to hold the line, they deserve to lose their seats.

I expect the vilification, stalking and slandering of Viacom Exec Tom Freston to begin immediately.

Don’t hold your breath.

On a less blatant but no less hypocritical note it seems it’s not enough that police on the job have all of their medical expenses covered and workmens’ comp and paid recuperation leave, though no-one begrudges them that becauise many put their lives on the line every day.

But it’s not enough for this greedy Orkando police officer:

Cop who fell on the job sues family of baby who almost drowned
An officer who went to help when a baby fell in a pool says she slipped in a puddle.

CASSELBERRY – In January, 1-year-old Joey Cosmillo wandered into the backyard and fell into the family pool. When his mother hauled him out, he wasn’t breathing. Rescuers were able to bring him back to life, but he suffered severe brain damage and cannot walk, talk or even swallow.

Now, his family faces another burden: One of the rescuers, Casselberry police Sgt. Andrea Eichhorn, is suing, alleging the family left a puddle of water on the floor that afternoon, causing her to slip and fall.

The boy’s grandparents, named in the suit, are mystified and angry.

A family friend today set up an account, hoping to raise funds for the boy’s long-term care. It’s the Joseph “Joey” Cosmillo Assistance Fund. Donors can make contributions at any Wachovia bank branch.

Without the insurance programme that Malkin and her ilk are so vehemently opposing, children like this would have no care at all. This family would have had to sell everything to provide medicine and round-the-clock nursing – and when that money that ran out, what then?

The flying buttmonkeys don’t care. Like the Spartans that they so homoerotically venerate, they think sick children should be considered a societal encumbrance who deserve to be left to die as the obvious defectives they are.

“Eichhorn last week sued Richard Cosmillo; his wife, Maggie Cosmillo; and the boy’s mother, Angela Cosmillo, accusing them of negligence. They were careless, according to the suit, and allowed the home they shared to become unsafe.

As a consequence, Eichhorn broke her knee, something that kept her off the job for two months, according to police Chief John Pavlis.

Joey now lives in a nursing home five miles away, where he gets 24-hour care. He breathes through one tube. He’s fed through another.

“He doesn’t have any abilities — any,” his grandmother said. “He can’t sit. He can’t swallow. He can’t eat. We’re not even sure he can see.”

She and Richard Cosmillo are the boy’s legal guardians. For the first two months after the accident, she remained at his bedside, never once going home.

She has now gone back to work at a furniture store, and her husband keeps watch on the boy. He visits every day.

“This thing,” Maggie Cosmillo said, “has destroyed our lives forever.”

The baby’s mother was the only one home Jan. 9, when the boy slipped out of the house and wound up in the pool, according to a police report.

She plunged in and dragged him out, carrying him inside, down a hallway and into a bedroom. She also called 911.

Eichhorn arrived a few minutes later. As she stepped into the room where rescuers were working on the boy, she slipped and went down on one knee, then stood back up, according to Richard Cosmillo.

Later that day, she went to an emergency care center and eventually to an orthopedist, according to her attorney, David Heil.

While she was on medical leave, Pavlis said, the city’s insurer paid her medical bills and provided disability checks.

Eichhorn, a 12-year department veteran, would not discuss the suit. Her attorney said those benefits, paid by the city’s workers’ compensation carrier, were not enough. The suit seeks an unspecified amount of money.

Eichhorn, he said, is a victim. Her knee aches, and she will likely develop arthritis.

If the Cosmillos had made their pool baby-proof, police would not have been called to the scene, there would have been no water on the floor, and Eichhorn would not have hurt herself, he said.

“It’s a situation where the Cosmillos have caused these problems, brought them on themselves, then tried to play the victim,” he said.

More…

Doesn’t that just about sum up the wingnut attitude?

Anything bad that happens to you must must be your fault, because otherwise that would mean that bad things happen to good people and life is just random – that would never do. After all, weren’t they gifted their own comfortable lifestyles as a reward for being good people? Of course they’re good, mothing bad’s happened to them, QED.

The alternative, that really it’s all just blind chance, not a matter of just deserts and that they’re no better or worse than the rest of us and not exceptional at all is unthinkable.

To admit otherwise is to accept that their God, be it supernatural or the invisble hand of the free market, doesn’t exist. There they stand, they can do no other: the thought that they are not special and beloved, but just ordinary schmucks who got lucky, is just too much for their little heads to cope with.

Not The Justice League of America

The sooner Democratic supporters get that through their heads the better.

Democrats ?Justice League of America

You’d think, wouldn’t you, that after the warcrimes of Iraq and Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, after the warrantless wiretapping of its own citizens, and the theft of an election, that the congressional Democrats would be taking a long, hard look at any candidate for Attorney General that Bush might’ve nominated. A reasonable person might consider that the very fact that Bush, a known criminal and liar, nominated him or her should be sufficient to put a confirmation on indefinite hold.

You’d be wrong.

This is the man, Michael Mukasey, that the Democrats have agreed is a fit person to be potentially in charge of of the impartial administration of federal justice and to be the arbiter of the legality of all executive actions:the judge who took away habeas corpus.

Dealing with terrorists

“Michael Mukasey was the chief judge of U.S. District Court in Manhattan from 1987 thru 2006. President Reagan appointed him to the bench. He was the judge of the 1995 trial of 10 militant Muslims who were convicted of a plot to blow up the United Nations and other landmarks around the city. He should be better known however as the first judge to rule on Jose Padilla after his arrest. He ruled that President Bush did have the authority to hold Mr. Padilla as an enemy combatant without charging him for a crime.[4] But he also ruled that the government must allow Mr. Padilla to see his attorneys.

Supports torture

In October 2001, Judge Mukasey “dismissed concerns by a 21-year old Jordanian immigrant that he had been beaten while in U.S. custody, leaving bruises that were hidden beneath his orange prison jumpsuit.”[8] “‘As far as the claim that he was beaten, I will tell you that he looks fine to me,’ said Judge Mukasey.”[9]

Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff reported in the October 1, 2007, issue[10] “that in recent private meetings with ‘hard-liners,’ Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey reassured conservatives that he was committed to the Bush administration’s right-wing ideology:

“According to three sources, who asked not to be named discussing the private meetings, Mukasey said that he saw ‘significant problems’ with shutting down Guantánamo Bay and that he understood the need for the CIA to use some ‘enhanced’ interrogation techniques against Qaeda suspects. Mukasey also signaled reluctance with naming a special prosecutor to investigate Bush-administration misconduct, according to one participant.”[11]
[edit]

“Terror trials hurt the nation even when they lead to convictions.”

In an August 22, 2007, Wall Street Journal op-ed, Mukasey[12] “argues that ‘Terror trials hurt the nation even when they lead to convictions’,” ArgusRun wrote in The Daily Kos.[13] “Not because they involve detainees who have been tortured or mistreated, or secret information not available to the defense. No, this respected jurist does not care about the damage done to the rule of law or our constitutional protections. Rather, he is terrified that the trials give valuable information to the terrorists.”

“Mukasey is obviously just what the Justice Department needs to restore Americans’ confidence in their legal system: A judge who does not have confidence in our legal system,” Argus Run commented.[13]
[edit]

Defended Patriot Act

“In a 2004 speech accepting the Learned Hand Medal for Excellence in Federal Jurisprudence, Judge Mukasey delivered a defense of the controversial counter-terrorism law.[14]

“I think one would have to concede that the USA Patriot Act has an awkward, even Orwellian, name, which is one of those Washington acronyms derived by calling the law ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Interrupt and Obstruct Terrorism.’ You get the impression they started with the acronym first, and then offered a $50 savings bond to whoever could come up with a name to fit. Without offering my view on any case or controversy, current or future, I think that that awkward name may very well be the worst thing about the statute.”

[edit]

Joined at the hip with Giuliani
[edit]
Battling crime in New York

Michael Mukasey was “an assistant U.S. attorney and head of the official corruption unit” when Rudolph W. Giuliani was U.S. Attorney in New York. “To prepare for trials, Giuliani practiced his cross-examinations on Mukasey, who would portray the witness.”[15]

In 1985, when Mukasey was U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Giuliani “was coming under intense criticism for his aggressive tactics in prosecuting organized crime, including his use of mass trials, his habit of holding defendants without bail and his practice of subpoenaing defense lawyers to testify at their clients’ grand jury hearings, which lawyers argued was a violation of client confidentiality.

“Springing to Giuliani’s defense was a former colleague, Michael B. Mukasey, who argued in a strongly worded opinion piece that Giuliani’s tough tactics were justified to defeat an enemy that, he said, was far more dangerous and powerful than Giuliani’s critics were willing to acknowledge,” Alec MacGillis reported September 18, 2007, in the Washington Post.[16]

[edit]

Swore Giuliani in as NYC Mayor

On January 2, 1994, Judge Michael Mukasy swore in now Republican 2008 presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani as Mayor of New York City.[17]

“When Giuliani was elected mayor of New York in 1993 and 1997, Judge Mukasey presided at his friend’s swearing-in. In fact, one of the ceremonies was held at Mukasey’s own Manhattan apartment.”[15]

[edit]

Justice Advisory Committee

Michael Mukasey and his son, Marc L. Mukasey (see below),[18] both partners (Michael prior, Mark current) in Giuliani’s law firm, are both members of Giuliani’s Justice Advisory Committee.[19][20]

There’s more, much more…

Those who want actual change in America aren’t going to find it via any Democrat.

Either Dems’ve been pressured (it’s not just hippies get wiretapped) or they really do not give a shit anymore for anything except short-term political self-interest or they’ve just gone “Oh, it’s only another 15 months, what the hell, saves hassle”. Any one of those reasons is enough to prove they’ve totally abdicated their responsibility to their country.

An electorate that allows their Democratic representatives to continue to cave in to Bush and the far-right, over and over again, and who then continue to donate to and vote for them, deserves everything it gets as a consequence. America was a great political experiment, once. It’s very sad to anyone who believes in liberty and equality to see it fall apart like this.