A License To Break The Law

If there is any one thing that lays bare the rottenness of the British political system for all to see it’s the news that following the court’s excorating decision on the Saudi Arms for Oil and bribery deal yesterday, the Tories are to support Labour in giving the Attorney General powers to shut down politically sensitive criminal investigations just by citing ‘national security’.

As with the attempt to censor coroners’ courts in the matter of soldiers’ deaths by inadequate equipment in Afghanistan, not only do they want to cover up their own past lawbreaking they want to print themselves a license to break the law in the future.

We cannot question or protest, it because it is secret. Why is it secret? Because it’s secret. Shut up, it’s national security.

But national security has little to do with this nor do the jobs of arms industry workers, though the profits of the arms companies is certainly a consideration. What’s really at stake is the personal security of the great and the good in parliament, the cabinet, the civil service, diplomacy and finance, who have committed crimes not just of political expediency but greed, trading others’ human rights for their own personal aggrandisement in order to mainstain the arms and oil industries and their longterm collusion with a vicious theocratic dynasty that tortures and beheads its own people (and sometimes ours, too)to maintain its power.

The Al-Yamamah deal and the corruption around it well precedes the current administration – Thatcher set it in motion – but New Labour joined in with enthusiasm once they had a taste of Saudi largesse themselves. New Labour’s starry eyed petty-bourgeois, tempted by riches and power, were easily persuaded that to reveal and prosecute in the Al-Yamamah deal could bring down the entire edifice of British government – and worse prominent politicians of both parties could go to jail. That there’s a revolving door between government and the the arms and oil industries has been a standing political joke for decades. .

Few hands are clean in any party and then of course, if the SFO pursues Al-Yamamah, then it must pursue Bush the CIA and the US government, since the deal was handled through Bush family vehicle Riggs Bank. the US justice department is considering a investigation, but if it’s shut down here, then what will there be to investigate?

For the sake of saving their own skins and Bush’s both parties are handing a future government and Prime Minister – and who knows what or who that’ll be in ten years, given the current fashion for repression – the power to commit whatever crimes they like under cover of protecting us. They mustn’t be allowed to get away with it.

Kangaroo Courts as Wingnut Welfare?

Bryan Finoki writes at BagNewsNotes and in more depth at his own blog, Subtopia, about the militarisation of public life and public space.

His latest post is about the US’ “Expeditionary Legal Complex”, aka ‘Camp Justice’.

Camp Justice

Camp Justice is a moveable, tent-city courtroom and jail complex that can be dopped down virtually anywhere to dispense American ‘justice’ on the spot, presumably at the barrel of a gun.

Judge Roy Bean would be proud.

It’s currently located at Gitmo and is primed and ready to convict innocent and guilty alike for offences they’ve never been properly charged with using coerced evidence in order to retrospectively justify their kidnapping and detention in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, a handy imperial posession now reinvented as a legal black hole for the purpose of hiding and torturing foreign citizens for political purposes. As Bryan puts it:

“In a frighteningly lucid and surgical essay The Vanishing Point geographer Derek Gregory describes the war on terror as a “war on law”, or a “war through law” – through the suspension of law. While emergency is the state’s tactic it is ultimately the law itself that is the most critical site of political struggle, he contends. If I recall correctly, Derek explains how Guantanamo Bay was established as a purposefully ambiguous political space camouflaged in the folds of legal uncertainty. In short, the U.S. left Cuba while still claiming jurisdiction over the base but not official territorial sovereignty, which allowed it to exist in between a place of law and lawlessness – essentially a place of “indeterminate time” and “indefinite detention.” He calls it a “site of non-place” created for a “site of non-people” located on the peripheral edge – or the “the vanishing point” – of the legal spectrum where international law is no longer enforceable (and therefore non-existent), and where American sovereignty has no application. It is the ultimate space of legal oblivion, you might say.

It is neither a legal nor an illegal space and in all juridical dimensions is neither existent nor non-existent: it is – as far as I can make of it – the production of a convenient and sub-legal nowhere.

If that isn’t Kafkaesque and terrifying enough (and we’re only talking about Gitmo here: we haven’t even touched secret prisons in Diego Garcia, Afganistan and elsewhere) now this criminal administration has created a convenient and sublegal nowhere that can go travelling.

This is not the first Camp Justice.Here’s the permanent one on Diego Garcia: there’s one in Baghdad and more are planned:

… let me remind you, according to an older Times story additional complexes have been planned for various regions in Iraq, and I’d be willing to bet that if we took a closer look we might even find similar justice-in-a-can deployments in Afghanistan, Libya, the West Bank, etc. I don’t think it would be difficult to predict the future geographies of portable justice, if you know what I’m sayin’.

I know what you’re sayin’, Bryan.

But what also interests me is who will be dispensing this ‘justice’. There is known to be dissent amongst top-ranking military lawyers about the administration’s continued illegal outrages and I also wonder, on a practical level, if JAG even has enough military legal staff to run these camps, even if military lawyers were prepared to co-operate.

If they’re not willing, then that means outsourcing.

Cue the traditional handing over of plum posts to right-thinking associates of the administration. I predict a rush of applications to be prosecutors, not only from the Bush government’s favourite fundy law school, Pat Robertson’s Regent law school, but also from those good germans fron the late Jerry Falwell’s Liberty law school – which is conveniently producing its first graduating classes just at the right time. Even the necessary ancillary staff are being trained as I type, at a Department of Homeland Security sponsored hugh school. The Camp Justice buildings may look temporary, but they’re thinking long-term and long-range here.

“Between the idea and the reality, between the motion and the act, lies the shadow.”

The shadow government shows forth and Cheney is summoned to council.

Whether this is a bad thing or a very very bad thing – well, that remains to be seen, doesn’t it?

An ultra-secret conservative group — so secret that members don’t even use the group’s name in communications — will feature Vice President Dick Cheney as a speaker at a meeting in Utah today.

“Cheney will address the fall meeting of the Council for National Policy, a group whose self-described mission is to promote ‘a free-enterprise system, a strong national defense and support for traditional Western values,” according to the Salt Lake City Tribune.

Founded in 1981 by Tim LaHaye, the co-author of the popular post-apocalyptic Christian-themed Left Behind books, the group holds confidential meetings three times a year attended by a small but powerful cadre of top conservatives.

[…]
We do not lobby Congress, support candidates, or issue public policy statements on controversial issues,” the group states on its website. Members “meet to share the best information available on national and world problems, know one another on a personal basis, and collaborate in achieving their shared goals.”

[…]

Cheney’s speech and other events of his trip, which coincides with a fundraising swing through West, is closed to the public and the press, according to the Tribune.

A secret speech to a secret society of far-right, religious nutjobs at public expense on public time. Why? He’s either going there to to rally support for his attack on Iran, get torn off a strip for not having yet triggered the apocalypse, or to plan the final coup.

Never has a heart attack been so overdue.

Why Tomatoes Are Better Than Politics

I had to walk away from the radio and tv altogether yesterday; Bush’s ideliberately inept stirring up of a hornet’s nest with Russia made me want to gio and put my fist through a window. I had to go and pot up some seedlings instead. There’s nothing gives you more perspective than potting up seedlings, unless it’s cats.

To see him tromping around in his monogrammed cowboy boots all over china-brittle alliances that are only barely glued together, it just…argh. the stupidity of it. But why? Why do something so apparently dumb?

Patrick Buchanan in The San Jose Mercury gets it:

When the Red Army went home from Eastern Europe, the United States, in violation of an understanding with Moscow, began to move NATO east. We have since brought into our military alliance six former members of the Warsaw Pact and three former provinces of the Soviet Union: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

Anti-Russia hawks are now pushing to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO. If they succeed, we could be dragged into future confrontations with a nuclear-armed Russia about who has sovereignty over the Crimea and whether South Ossetia should be part of Georgia.

Are these vital U.S. interests worth risking a war? Why are we moving a U.S.-led military alliance into the front yard and onto the side porch of a country with thousands of nuclear weapons? Would we accept any commensurate Chinese or Russian move in the Caribbean?

After Moscow gave us a green light to use the former Soviet republics of Central Asia to base U.S. forces for the Afghan war, the United States has sought permanent bases there. Russia and China have now united to throw us out of their back yard.

America colluded with Azerbaijan and Georgia to build a Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan pipeline to transmit Caspian Sea oil across the Caucasus to the Black Sea and Turkey, cutting Russia out of the action.

In 1999, the United States bombed Serbia 78 days to punish it for fighting to hold its cradle province of Kosovo, which Muslim Albanians were tearing away. Orthodox Russia had long seen itself as protectress of the Balkan Slavs. That Clinton ignored Russia in launching this unprovoked war on Serbia was seen in Moscow as proof that Russian concerns had become irrelevant in Washington.

After helping dump over the government in Belgrade, our Neocomintern – the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House and other fronts – interfered in Ukraine and Georgia, helping oust pro-Moscow regimes and install pro-American ones. Since then, NED has been run out of Belarus and its subsidiaries are about to get the boot from Moscow.

Can we blame the Russians for being angry? How would we react to left-wing NGOs in Washington, flush with Moscow oil money, aiding elements hostile to the Bush administration?

Oh yeah and fuck the EU too. Cheese-eating surrender monkeys. They deserve it.

Bush and the current generation of US politicians are very fond of using WWII and ‘the greatest generation’ to buttress their chickenhawkery and although they know in theory that a big war happened in Europe, because they”ve seen the movies and played the games, they don’t know that a war happened in Europe – and it wasn’t so long ago either, and it was as vicious at what’s happening in the Middle East if not more so. We can’t forget it, we’re still getting reminders every day.

A mass grave holding the remains of thousands of Jews executed by the Nazis during the second world war has been discovered in southern Ukraine by workers digging pipelines.

The workers stumbled upon the remains by chance last month in the village of Gvozdavka-1, near the Black Sea port of Odessa, Jewish leaders said yesterday.

[..]

According to Roman Shvartsman, spokesman for the regional Jewish community, the Nazis established a ghetto near the village. In November 1941 the ghetto was transformed into a concentration camp and at least 4,000 Jews were killed at or near the site between the end of 1941 and the beginning of 1942.

“The workmen were laying gas pipes near the centre of the village. They discovered hair, children’s toys, skulls and pieces of clothing,” Mr Shvartsman told the Guardian last night.

54 years later the voices of those destroyed by war come back to haunt us.

A teenage Jewish girl living under the Nazis in Poland during 1943 feared she was “turning into an animal waiting to die”, according to her diary, which documents the final months before her death in the Auschwitz concentration camp.

Rutka Laskier, 14, the same age as the Dutch girl Anne Frank, wrote the 60-page diary over a four-month period in Bedzin, Poland. The diary, published by Israel’s Holocaust museum, documents the steady collapse of the ghetto under the weight of the Nazi occupation and deportations, as well as the first loves, friendships and jealousies of an adolescent girl growing up during the war.

You can imagine the goodwill and sheer effort required to have reached a kind of modus vivendi after a history like that, Unsatisfactory as this arrangement is, it’s nevertheless relatively peaceful and prosperous on the whole, a few genocides and regional wars notwithstanding. Peace in Europe has been fragile but holding, even with Putin’s increasingly restrictive and totalitarian grip on power in Russia.

But Bush is flailing badly at home: there’s a power struggle with Cheney in the White House, he’s poison in the polls, his own party’s against him, Iraq’s a bloodbath and the US military’s at low ebb as a result, a whole swathe of experienced officers gone or planning to go, either retired or pushed out…. I could go on. suffice it to say he’s very, very weak.

But he’s also a sociopathic, bullying dry drunk – and when he feels weak he wants to hurt something or start a fight. He also desperately needs to divert attention from his continuing military failures and his illlegalities at home: what better way to thumb your nose at everybody, to start a fight for fun, to hurt people and to get attention, than to wind up Vladimir Putin?

I really want to put what he’s doing down to pure stupidity and psychopathy, but I’m also sure there’s a game plan here. Attempt to encircle and destabilise Russia, poke iit with a stick, go to the G8 spoling for a fight, win concessions. All about the oil, always and forever about the oil.

But Bush also wants a showdown with someone, anyone, to rescue his wounded pride; and he just doesn’t give a shit who gets hurt in the process. His advisers are just using his childish need to provoke to further their country’s economic interests.

Though the San Jose Mercury gets it, I wonder if Americans in general grasp the seriousness of the political situation their President is deliberately provoking. From a brief scan of news and the blogs, no, not really. To the mainstream US media it’s mostly harmless rhetoric, Bush being Bush for tv and a chance to roll out all the old Cold war cliches. Ooh, a new cold war, when the secret agents wore trenchcoats and made glamorous dashes across Checkpoint Charlie….

Shorter US mainstream media: “What, me worry?” Oh well, it’s not them the missiles are aiimed at, is it?

It’s not like there’s a surfeit of statesmen and women with the capability or stature to defuse the situation either. To the question “Can saner heads prevail? ” I can only answer “Who?” Really, who is there? Tony Blair perhaps?

He says he can, but then he would, wouldn’t he. He wants a Legacy. But Tony Blair is a completely busted flush, a nothing, yesterday’s man just waiting for the indictment to come – unless, miracles of miracles, he’s had a resignation conversion and for once tells it like it is. As if.

So it’s down to German Chancellor Angela Merkel to talk down these two roosters from their posturing. If anyone has the weight of history on her shoulders in matters of war and peace, it’s her. Is she up to it? Given her antidemocratic record, I’m not hopeful. Now, I have some clematis to tie in.

Interesting Times

This is getting scary now – Steve Clemons at the Washington Note says that Cheney is planning an ‘end run’ around Bush to bomb Iran, that he doesn’t trust Bush, and he thinks he should take over as the ‘presidents hands’, colluding with Israel to attack Iran. He’s sent his minions out to various lobby groups and thinktanks to effectively seek support ifor a palace coup.

Good grief, Dr. Strangelove is actually playing out in real time and all the media act as though nothing was happening.

How far is the rest of the sane world going to let this go?