With Friends Like These…

Friendly fire

It’s come to something when a Murdoch paper does a public service , but for once The Sun’s has, by publiishing the sickening cockpit video of US forces casually opening fire on UK ground troops in Iraq resulting in the unnecessary death of 25-year-old Lance-Corporal Matty Hull. The US Defence department is refusing to disclose the recordings to the British coroner overseeing the enquiry into Hull’s death.

See the video for yourself:

Video
Transcript

Rumours abound that the US forces who did this were high on drugs, or over-fatigued and overstretched, or all three together. You can make ytour own mind up – US pilots certainly admitted they were off their heads on amphetamines when they killed Canadian troops in Afghanistan:

The pills, which are illegal in the US, are given to combat pilots who are involved in long eight or nine-hour sorties in small controlled doses, say the military.

The Air Force stopped prescribing the ‘Go’ pills, as they are known by the pilots, in 1993 after reports that crews using them during the Gulf War became addicted.

But the drug has been quietly reintroduced in recent years.

But no one knows for sure, because the evidence has been withheld by the Pentagon. For an inquest to get the full picture and reach a true verdict requires all the evidence and the inquest has heard all but the crucial recordings of the pilots responsible.

The US Defence department has dissembled, obfuscated and outright lied about the recordings: first there was no tape, then there was, then they couldn’t find it, then it suddenly it existed but had been classified… and Blair’s government, being the spineless poodles that they are, have done nothing to bring pressure on the Bush administration to disclose the evidence that’s so crucial to the determination of how this soldier died. The coroner is, understandably, outraged that the government refuses to uphold British law.

So well done the Sun for once. Normally I consider it a rag I wouldn’t wipe catsick up with, but today? A bang-up job. Nevertheless, this video is of absolutely no evidentiary use except in the court of public opinion. We can see it, but the inquest can’t: despite the video now being in the public domain, it’s provenance can’t be verified because the US refuses to release an official copy. That means that although it’s plain as day to the world that the American pilots were acting like cowboys, the Coroner and the inquest jury are forced to be absurdly, officially blind.

This whole shabby episode is emblematic of the hollowness of the ‘special relationship’. Our troops must blindly follow orders to impose US foreign policy abroad and die needlessly at their supposed allies’ hands for the privilege, but no reciprocal sacrifice is required, not even the common courtesy of disclosing to this soldier’s devastated parents just how their son died.

We’ve come to expect the US government to cover up, sweep under the rug and lie, it’s the modus operandi of most government departments under Bush. The Pentagon just takes it to extremes.

But you’d think a British government would protest, however weakly, when it’s partner-in-crime kills British soldiers and covers it up.

Too many of our soldiers die in Iraq and Afghanistan not by the hand of the amorphous ‘enemy’ but by the ineptitude and bull-headed aggression of the US military, and this government is too supine and too obsessed with its own internal political troubles to protest, even in the weakest, most milquetoast terms.

I’ve never thought British troops should be in Iraq to begin with: this is and always has been an illegal war. But conversely I don’t think that that circumstance merits their casual annihilation by a bunch of gung-ho pilots, off their heads on jingoism and who knows what else.

Downing St and the Pentagon’s casual treatment of friendly fire incidents shows their contempt for servicemembers and their families and demonstrates that just as the average worker is to the multinational corporation, to the warmongers servicemen and women aren’t real people but just so much fodder for the free-market meat-grinder.

UPDATE:

Just to clarify: the MOD has had possession of the recordings for 3 years. What they didn’t have was Pentagon permission to release it. But now the government and MOD have said that as it’s now in the public domain, it can be admitted.

Good.

Wesley Clark Wants YOU!

Wesley Clark Wants You!

Is Wesley Clark really a good primary votiing option for liberals who loathe Hillary, Obama and Edwards ?

Digby has been on a tear recently, pointing out just how useless those particular Democrats are and how tied to big money and special interests, particularly the increasingly bellicose Israel lobby. The Democratic presidential frontrunners are all on the same page as Bush and AIPAC as regards attacking Iran: “No options are off the table”.

A number of commenters have responded by saying “Ah, yes, but there’s always Wesley Clark”.

Wesley Clark? Wesley Clark? You mean the Wesley Clark that wants to draft civilians in wartime? From Clark’s campaign website:

Read More

Compare and Contrast

Remember the ruckus Labourites made about Ruth Turner being arrested in a “dawn raid”:

High-level Labour figures have characterised Mr Yates’s techniques as intimidatory, claiming that Ms Turner,Mr Blair’s head of government relations, was forced to dress in front of the police when they knocked at her door at 6.30am.

One Labour official angrily said: “We do not live in a banana public, whatever Assistant Commissioner Yates believes.”

The police insist they are using normal police techniques and are simply not giving anyone any preferential treatment.

From the screams of outrage you’d think this sort of thing wasn’t standard police practice, but in fact it’s used regularly on people whose only crime was applying for asylum in Britain and not getting it, as Labour MP Austin Mitchell explains:

A second dawn raid took place on 9 January at 6am. Used on Ruth Turner this appalling practice produces howls of protest. With asylum families it’s an everyday part of the game. Vicious and cruel but a good way of catching kids before they go to school. Public protests had forced an end to dawn raids in New Zealand when Labour came in in 1984. Here New Labour sees them as the norm.

Mrs Bokhari rang a friend but was cut off. The friend went round but wasn’t allowed to speak to the family who were dragged off, Mr Bokhari kicking and screaming to the horror of the neighbours who liked the family and disliked the din.

Bokhari is a diabetic but no health check had been made beforehand so the raiders didn’t believe him and his insulin was left in the fridge. They were taken to Yarl’s Wood, arriving unfed and uninjected at 6pm. Next day Bokhari was taken off, I hoped, for treatment, though the family weren’t told where, and it was three days before he was brought back with bad bruising.

Mitchell goes on:

It leaves a nasty taste. An out-of-control Immigration and Nationality Directorate is doing what it wants to get deportations up. The minister goes along, ratifies its decisions (he hardly ever rejects them), observes its deadlines and strings MPs along, pretending to listen while doing nothing. Perhaps scarring young souls will teach them not to come here when they grow up.

Perhaps it will win votes to Labour from the lumpen lunatics who’ve deluged the Grimsby Telegraph’s website with abuse of their soft, immigrant-loving, geriatric, fool of an MP. Perhaps we’ll win enough National Fronters to compensate for the loss of the many liberals this has alienated. I don’t know. But I do know how I feel. Ashamed.

I can sympathise with Mitchell. If only there was a political party
which was serious about defending the right of asylum seekers mr. Mitchell could join.

Is He A Midnight Toker, Too?

Dutch Joker’s ID card prank

A Dutchman has been issued with an ID card featuring a picture of himself dressed as Batman’s enemy The Joker.

The man, from Hellevoetsluis, persuaded officials that he had to wear the costume because of his religious beliefs.

He wanted to challenge new rules introduced last year in Holland, restricting the way people are allowed to pose for passport and ID card photos.

The Dutch Ministery of Interior Affairs insists people must keep their mouths closed and must look serious when posing for photos.

A head dress, for religious reasons is permitted, but the whole face must be shown clearly.

There’s a lot to be learnt from the Dutch.

Too Posh to Protest? Then Pay A Servant To Do It For You.

Why didn’t I think of this?

Damn, I could’ve made a bundle from full-diaried woolly liberals ( “Sorry, darling, my facial’s been booked for simply weeks“) during the antiwar protests:

German website offers rent-a-protester service
Can’t be arsed waving a banner? Click here
By Lester Haines
Published Wednesday 24th January 2007 11:46 GMT

You know how it is: you feel very strongly that the government really ought to address the issue of rampant unemployment among immigrant Romanian single mothers in the Frankfurt sausage-making industry, but can’t actually be bothered to get up off the sofa and hit the streets in protest. Fear not, for help is at hand in the shape of Erento.com, where agitators are renting out their services to worthy causes.

For example, as the BBC explains, “next to a black and white posed picture, Melanie lists her details from her jeans size to her shoe size and tells potential protest organisers that she is willing to be deployed up to 100km around Berlin”. Six hours of Melanie giving forth will set you back €145.

An Erento.com spokesman was “unable to say how many demonstrators had been booked since the service was launched earlier this month, but that there had certainly been demand”.

Indeed, German media has reported that a Munich march “hired protesters because its own adherents were too old to stand for hours waving banners”.

More….

Presumably that 145 euro includes a portion for the legal and medical costs incurred when the protester gets their head kicked in by baton-wielding riot police?