Comment of The Day: Fun With Wiki & Wingnuts

No-one could possibly condone such a frivolous exercise as the use of Wikipedia edits to puncture the pomposity of a wingnut windbag.

But – mwahahahaha.

It seems rightwing blogger and noted heterosexual Ace of Spades (“Who?” Exactly.), Sadly No‘s very own office pinata, is having a meetup with his fans in Boston.

That such a manly man turned out to be from the effete East Coast rather than somewhere macho and potent like Little Buttfuck, Idaho, naturally caused a great deal of comment, in the course of which came this:

Charles Giacometti said,

September 8, 2007 at 23:34

By the way, I discovered that Wikipedia has a bizarre, fawning entry about Ace see here,. Apparently it was nominated for deletion before, and was deleted, but then someone posted it again, under a new name. I just nominated it for deletion again. Join in the fun.

This one will run and run.

Comment of The Day

Today’s comes from an understandably anomymous correspondent via the Independent’s letters section and is aimed at all those who’d punish today’s parents for the actions of their children:

The plight of parents when teenagers get out of control

Sir: Much has been made of poor parenting (letters, 18 August). No doubt there are parents who do not care, but it is a complicated situation. You can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink. My daughters were brought up to respect us and the law, work hard and invest in their own futures.

At the age of 12, both became foul-mouthed, aggressive strangers, who swore at us, refused to divulge their whereabouts or come home to agreed deadlines. Our 13-year-old often stayed out all night. We had no idea where she was or who she was with, and she refused to tell us anything. There is no lawful tool for parents to deal with this; good behaviour depends on mutual trust and respect. When this disappears, parents are backed into a corner where they have used all sanctions as punishment, and the teenager has no incentive to behave well.

The suggestion that such children be taken into care is not the answer. Our younger daughter has been in care for most of the past 12 months, but far from helping her, she lost the security of a loving home, gained a criminal record, was seriously sexually assaulted and, despite much work from the staff in her present children’s home, has absconded 22 times in three months. So parental influence, or lack of it, cannot be the whole story.

I was forced to attend patenting classes (because of a crime my daughter committed in care). These were an abusive, humiliating experience which did nothing to help our situation and much to exacerbate it. Any remaining tatters of confidence I had as a parent were destroyed.

Our older daughter is now 17, stable, personable, working hard towards a university place, taking part-time jobs and living happily with us. She cringes at her earlier behaviour (and is highly critical of her sister). In fact, her past mistakes spur her on to make a success of her life and make us proud of her.

The past couple of years have put an intolerable strain on our health, our marriage, our careers and our lives. If we could have avoided or shortened our nightmare we would obviously have done so.

Name and address supplied

I know that’s a true story because I’ve been there – as have thousands of other parents whom the Daily Mail would make homeless, bang up or fine, whether they’re lone or partnered, rich, poor or middling, black or white; though it’s undeniable that to be poor and/or a visible monrity is to have more chance of it happening to your family.

We appear to have come to a point in our developed and developing cultures where the governments that we’ve elected are entirely focused on compelling every single member of society to be a financially productive unit, regardless of all else. This means that a generation is bringing itself up alone and indeed a generation that has already brought itself up alone is now producing another to do the same.

Consistent parenting and boundary setting for adolescents has become a luxury: when one parent is trying to do two jobs, or two parents are working back-to-back shifts for minimum wage, who has time to do much else than a pile of laundry, a quick vacuum and a scan of homework schedules? Short of electronic tagging (and even that’s evadable) what’s a parent to do whan a child is determined to go entirely off the rails?

Unfortunately ‘going off the rails’ nowadays doesn’t just mean making a couple of stupid mistakes: when even the smallest of infractions leads to criminal sanctions, a criminal record and your DNA added to the database. If you’re already an outlaw why not be hung for a sheep as well as a lamb?

All that our offspring see and hear teaches that they are living on a dying planet anyway, so what the fuck. It teaches that greed is good, that everyone’s a hypocrite and no-one, least of all politicians, can be trusted, especially not about drugs, money or sex, since so many are using themselves or creaming off a few quid or getting some on the side, whilst condemning those very activities in the young.

If our children learn nothing else from globalisation and 24 hr media access it’s that they are tiny and a it’s a big cruel world that they’re powerless to do anything about. They also learn that their parents, instead of being the rocks of authority and strength they should be, are shown every day to be as utterly powerless as anyone else. Imagine what that does to fragile adolescent confidence and a fatalistic nihilism seems a totally understandable response.

When our children can see with their own eyes that even supposedly fair and democratic governments can kill, torture, steal and lie with impunity and nothing will happen, or that the police can shoot a man in the head seven times for no good reason then walk away and nothing will happen, it tells them that these days you can just about do anything and nothing will happen. But since to be young is to be prejudged criminal anyay, like the ad says, why not just do it?

What can your Mum and Dad do, lock you up?

The magnet for rebelling adolescents is of course their peer group and as in the wider world local hierarchies are built on money and force. It’s just ‘doing business’, other children have little choice but to go along and the police are largely an irrelevance. No-one grasses, not if they want to have a life. Pull your hood up, keep your head down, safe.

How has this come about? After Thatcher’s welfare reforms of the mid-eighties to mid-nineties, state support for unemployed parents and lone parents was sharply reduced. In a time of rising unemployment, benefit cuts and high taxes the underground economy boomed – with no jobs to be had the only way of making a little school uniform or Christmas money was and still is selling goods cheap, no questions asked, or looking after or selling a bit of dope – just ‘doing a bit of business’. But of course like any developing economy ‘a bit of business’ has grown and diversified and become a criminal way of life that has turned some areas of our towns and cities into virtual tribal fiefdoms.

The thug life is now a generational klifestyle and is pimped as the cool lifestyle of choice to the young by boomer ad execs and trendmakers who should know better.

The surroundings may be suburban and prosaic or urban and hellish but in their head everybody’s a Soprano or 50cent, even if only pimp-rolling their merry way along the street in say, Budleigh Salterton. To them even a boardedup post offifce is turf to be defended and marked: stomping on the head of a complaining neighbour – perfect! Instant, underground fame. A drive-by? Even better.

Disaffected adolescents used to dream of when they were King of Acacia Avenue – now, with the culture of impunity and the easy availability of guns. they actually can be. This makes us scared of them and they know that. That gives them power over us that adolescents should not have. But then again, with 2, even 3 greedy generations ahead of them determined to keep a tight grip on power and the world’s wealth while it still lasts, how else are they ever to get any power except by force?

It seems as though our children are taken from us by the world at earlier and earlier ages, to be returned to us refashioned, in an image we dont recognise. This I suppose has been the refrain of every parent ever and it may be it’s something that has to happen in order for our children to lean the skills to cope in the future world.

What’s different now is that it’s uncertain whether there will be a world to have a future in and thus iit may well be that callousness, greed and brutality are the skills they’lll need to learn to survive.

What to do? I don’t know what the answer is, I wish to God I did; I’m still working on it myself.

Comment of The Day

Bruce Baugh on the psychology behind the Rove/Bush folie a deux – it’s a sublimated crush:

A while back, some blogger I read – Digby, I think – speculated that Rove is gay and has a lasting crush on Bush Jr. That made sense to me, and still does. I have an elderly gay friend who talks with a sigh about stupid things he did for the sake of a decades-long unrequited crush on a classmate and co-worker he knew was straight and he knew he wasn’t the type to go poaching, but where he just couldn’t give it up until unrelated griefs forced him into a general reexamination. Now he feels that he wasted far too much of those decades trying to help out the object of desire, not nearly enough of them helping himself, either professionally or personally, say, by seeking out a relationship with reciprocity in it. Unlike Rove, my friend is a decent, honorable guy who’s an asset to his family, friends, neighborhood, and nation. But anyone is capable of mind-boggling stupidity and a lot of it under the right circumstances.

A lot of movement conservative leaders really seem to like their sex squalid and dirty, or at least to need it that way. They have sordid affairs, they engage in sleazy behavior in public parks, they dump their wives in painful and needlessly abusive ways…in such an environment, there wouldn’t be much incentive for a gay man with an unfulfillable crush to seek out a healthy alternative, and all the incentive in the world to seek solace or distraction by (for instance) carrying on with a prostitute passing himself off as a reporter, much to the grins and giggles of everyone on the inside.

This could all be dead wrong, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

Digby was hardly the first to notice.

Even I can remember, back around 2001/2002 or so saying on usenet (and I’ve blogged about it numerous times since) that what the Republicans are about is denial – there’s a hardcore in the party and its fundy base of closeted gays with mil-fetishes, all longing for a good hard seeing-to by a hot, buff stud in full combat gear. American posters were deeply offended and spoke of homophobia, and knee-jerk anti-Americanism. But it’s only homophobia if you think being gay is bad, which I don’t. And I’m anti-imperialist, not anti-American, though admittedly these days it is hard to tell the difference.

As I tend to repeat over and over, it’s the hypocrisy, stupids.

A majority of Republicans and their base on the other hand do truly believe or profess to believe that homosexuality (or pretty much anything but dry painful missionary in the dark copulation) is sinful, wicked and dirty – which of course is why they get so much guilty pleasure from it. It’s forbidden, oooh…. and religion is a spice that that hots up sex wonderfully, as profitable writers of convent porn know. All that guilt… Speaking of which, I’d love to see what sort of lurid Bush/Cheney/Gannon fanfic Rove might’ve written had he been a fanfic sort of guy… he’s certainly not backwards in coming forward with the homoerotic language – remember the apocryphal

“We will f**k him. Do you hear me? We will f**k him. We will ruin him. Like no one has ever f**ked him.” ?

Bush himself isn’t averse to a touch of of the ol’ brokeback rhetoric himself: here he is on bin Laden:

‘I will screw him in the a**!’

I suppose it is theoretically possible that Rove has finally accepted that his longtime private pash object has feet of clay and that’s why he’s going, but somehow I doubt it. I also doubt that their poisonously co-dependent relationship has actually ended or will ever end with Rove’s official exit. All these oily, nasty little spoutings-off on tv (Fox is an agent of Congress? WTF?) – no way these aren’t approved by the WH hierarchy, such as it is these days (I’m seeing Cheney-> Bush->Gonzales-> Miers-> Barney the dog. Correct me if I’m wrong).

I do wonder if Turdblossom’s actually resigned at all. Or has he just been let off the leash? Is this the last line of defence in the media, part of the slash and burn defence Bush & Cheney promised?

If so, it’s not very effective, because one result of all this unaccustomed Rovian media visibility is that the public are finally seeing Rove in all his oleaginous, porcine pomp

and really, really don’t like him.

There’s also potential legal proceedings pending against Rove and it could be that his early ‘departure’ is their pathetic way of distancing the White House from it. Fat chance – Rove is forever tied to Bush, whether he wants to be or not. His ability to make his own reality was fleeting and in actual reality is he’s become one of the most hated people in the country.

It iis gratifying to see some Americans finally coming round to the same way of thinking as many of us abroad who saw the politically and emotionally perverse nature of the Rove/Bush relationship and of the obscenity of the corrupt political movement calling itself Republicanism, right from the days of Reagan and the so-called moral majority.

But it’s a shame, to put it mildly, that they’ve pushed the US off a poltical cliff and the rest of the world has had to go through all this crap – I think war, corruption torture or mass murder count as crap – for the American public to finally wake up to Bush, Rove and Cheney’s sick little Oval Office psychodrama. Their unrequited longings for one another (unrequited as far as I know; if they are requited, bang so to speak goes a major plank of my argument) and the whole dark dominance and daddy thing they have going is the very quintessence of modern Republicanism.

Comment Of The Day: BOHICA!

Just before the train crash...

Hurrah, I’m back, bearing mysterious growing theings from the Eden Project and a winter’s worth of clothes from Primark and M&S, gallons of shampoo from Boots and a lot of teabags.

Richard Branson did his best to fuck it up – quiet carriage my arse – but rather than bore you with the minutiae of the journey, here’s GarfieldSnixon in the Grauniad to do it for me.

August 18, 2007 10:18 AM

How much VAT or duty on a train ticket? How much on vehicle fuel? No government will invest properly in rail travel as there is no incentive; oh well, ‘climate change’, but then that’s just a convenient fly-swat term to use when it suits government purpose. I travel on Virgin Rail pretty well weekly and it is surprisingly reliable.

The travel conditions suck though: it’s not just that the toilets don’t work, they often back up so you have the malodorous accompaniment of a couple of journey’s worth of shit to enjoy; you have “Keith’ or whoever telling you at least twice at a time that the buffet is now open or will shut in ten minutes (somewhere north of Milton Keynes if you are travelling south) and as the PA system was probably fitted by a bloke from Yellow Pages, it feeds back with a deafening squeal. The ‘train manager’ will spend what seems like a lifetime reciting the bleedin’ obvious about terms and conditions which may be OK on your first journey but is boring after the second (buy a ticket to use the train – durgh) and then there’s the two-tone descending signal that repeats three times and no-one knows what it is or what it means but is it ever loud. The seating is unadjustable and leg room is pitiful; the windows are not always aligned with the seating although the luggage squeezed into the minute luggage bay enjoys an excellent view of the countryside.

The ticketing system is arcane and frankly borders on the fraudulent; despite the high profile adverts there are seldom ‘cheap’ tickets available for any journey and the Virgin website has been put together by the Yellow Pages guy who also does the train’s PA. And don’t get me going on weekend travel; if you cannot run a proper service, don’t charge for it – drop the rate at wekends. Oh yeah, 1st class is rubbish as well: crap food, unadjustable seating – the last time I was offered the sandwiches they couldn’t sell from the buffet even though the tables were set for silver service (pretentious w***ers).

Yet none of this is functionally addressable until it cuts into the bonuses of the managers (train staff are generally OK, particularly as you just know the kind of BOHICA* they would have to deal with); I would propose that no bonus ever be paid in a year when a toilet malfunctions for a start, then that any major fines imposed by OffRail or whatever it’s called (which are going to be passed on to us mugs anyway) be translated into obligatory fare reductions; for example, for one month all fares to be reduced by 50%. There are other sanctions I’d love to suggest; some involving Branson but none in keeping with the current human rights’ conventions.

* management speak: Bend Over Here It Comes Again

Our train manager tried to enliven the proceedings with arch little witticisms as we approached every station – “Taunton! A titillating treat! Taunton, your next station stop!” – like a low-rent Graham Norton, but without the brogue and the rakish charm or let’s face it, the comic talent. Poor guy. I got the impression he’d’ve welcomed a bit of BOHICA on those long, lonely nights criss-crossing the wilds of the West Country.

Re the blog, I still need to recover from the unaccustomed exertion : but tomorrow, as the railways so laughably put it, normal service will be resumed. This blog has been remarkably cat-free in my absence, but that will be rectified in short order and that’s a promise.