Comment of the Day

Aaronovitch Watch had another post on a typically dreadful Nick Cohen column, which inspired commenter Phil to the following comment, the “decent left” as the Self-Righteous Brothers:

I’ve got nothing against middle-class leftists. I admire their grasp of world affairs, to say nothing of their many stands on issues of principle. But if I thought that those middle-class leftists were cruelly exploiting some poor little refugee girl – if I thought they were refusing her a decent wage and confining her to her room and beating her – then I would have no hesitation in saying, OI! MIDDLE-CLASS LEFTISTS! NO!

Comment of The Day

Hello again. Did I miss anything?

Anyway first day back online after a leisurely summer being poked prodded, dialysed and made hideously and explosively sick with antibiotics and weird blood chemistry and already I have my CoTD, on the death of Ted Kennedy. Exactamundo, WILFSSON:

WILFSSON

27 Aug 09, 2:12am (about 6 hours ago)

‘He became one of the great senators of our time’ says Obama and the Washington claque echoes him.

But, great as in comparison to who – or rather what?

Joe Biden? John Kerry? Jesse Helms? Hilary Clinton? John Edwards?

Considering a forty-year Senate career in which virtually every member has been a bought and paid for corporate hack, the question of greatness is surely rather moot.

He may have endorsed Obama, he may have helped the NI peace process but for all his eloquence on democracy and justice he would never have been in office had Kennedy senior not been a fascist, a bootlegger and an arms dealer Ambassador to Britain and Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission who essentially bought his sons into office with both money and influence. “We’re going to sell Jack like soap flakes” he said. Ted Kennedy was a rich man from a rich family who expected to have political power.

So he lost two brothers to political assassination – “Hello. I’m Edwardus Kennedius Maximus, brother of a murdered politician, brother of another murdered politician” – but just because you’ve been bereaved it doesn’t make you any more moral. If that were the case humanity would’ve reached a much greater state of moral perfection by now.

He was untrustworthy in marital life and drove his first wife to drink with his many blatant affairs. He drank massively, which was a running joke in the media. Under the influence of drink and at a surprisingly late stage in his ‘distinguished’ life and career he played a very shady role in the commission and cover-up of a drunken rape by his nephew.

This is greatness?

There are those who will argue that tangled private life and personal peccadilloes like a few affairs and a constant smell of whisky have no bearing on the political greatness or otherwise of any given powerful man (because a woman would never recieve such generosity from the media, but that’s a whole other subject). It’s what He Does, not what he does that’s important – political achievements are somehow supposed to outweight complete arsery.

And he was an arse. What it always, always came back to for me with Kennedy is that the distinguished senator and sprig of American nobility left a girl to drown in a car wreck. He ran to save his own skin, and then he lied about it. He simply did not care whether she was alive or dead, provided he and his family not have any trouble. To me it said all that needed be said about his basic humanity, irrelevant of his politics.

Mind you I can’t let Kennedy politics go completely unremarked. They were of the white-bread, business as usual, carry on guys, let’s do a deal here school of politics, leavened with a hefty dose of guilt-fuelled ‘Hey, let’s be a little nicer to the servants, then we won’t have to deal with too much unpleasantness’ and a soupcon of “Oh yeah, lets give a concessions to the chicks, too while we’re at it. That’ll get me laid at least once.”.

Don’t get me started on the Kennedys and the Catholic church. I’ll be here all bloody day.

CotD: The War of Terror as outdoor relief for the dodgy

Jamie says:

One thing that strikes me from time to time is how amazingly hollow the whole WoT was and is: hollow in that it seems to attract an incredible number of chancers, scam artists, blaggers, fantasts and plain, vanilla opportunists. America lost its senses on that fateful day and everybody piled in for fun and profit, from Bout to Chalabi, from Hirsat Ali to Galloway. The whole thing is an enormous system of outdoor relief for the dodgy.

Comment of the Day: Obama letchery edition

Obama supposedly oggling a Brazilian woman - or is he?

Over at Edge of the West, SEK has done an excellent debunk of the above picture, which seems to show Obama checking out that woman’s ass, but which video evidence puts the lie to. Not that this has stopped wingnuts like Ann Althouse from obsessing over Obama’s crudeness and infidelity and all that good wingnutty stuff. You could argue that this doesn’t matter and let the wingnuts have their fantasies, but Scott was alive during the nineties and knows what similar moronic memes did to Clinton, so:

I’ve taken to pre-emptive meme stamping. I figure if I can marginalize these idiocies before they have the chance to “blossom” into the mainstream a la Lewinsky and the Foster murder, we might could avoid a repeat of the ’90s.

The comment thread on this post shows exactly why this meme stamping is needed, as comment after comment shows that people, rightwing or not, have been taking in by these false accusations of letching. It’s also worth reading for one of the best putdowns of a troll I’ve ever seen– “If you have anything substantive to add to this conversation, by all means, add it; but if you’re here to remind the rest us that people like you someone survived long enough to learn how to type, I’d rather you took your sad act somewhere else“.

But the most insightful comment comes from Thers, a reminder of why this incident is important even if seemingly trivial, as it’s not a trivial incident to the young women int he centre of it:

The thing about this nonsense is that the young woman in question, and her family, are being put through the wringer, and what should have been a wonderful moment in what sounds like a pretty hard life has now been trashed. For, as you show, nothing but an obvious cheap shot. NY Post article is even more despicable than most NY Post articles, and intensely depressing.

If you don’t buy the abstract idea that dishonesty like Althouse’s should be given a response because it just should be, well, consider that stuff like that almost always features a human being getting hurt by it.

Comment(s) of the Day: synchronity

Justin:

New Labour MPs, with their home improvements and their little property empires, use the expenses system to get away from the working classes as fast as they possibly can. Tory MPs with their moats and country homes and porticoes (whatever the hell they are) have already got away from the working classes as fast as they possibly could and now use their expenses to shore up the defences.

Jamie:

So what do the Tory expenses revelations tell us in terms of comparative party sociology? Arriviste versus arrived, so far as I can see. The Labour people seem to be scurrying up the ladder like prehensile little monkeys, frantically flipping properties, charging the taxpayers for stuff they’ve seen in the Sunday Times style section, claiming for everything on a throw shit at the wall basis. Labour are the garagistes now. The Tories? Clean my moat, taxpayer. And my swimming pool. Dig my garden. And build my portico while you’re at it. This is cruise control.

I now expect the same observation to be made on Friday’s Newsquiz as well, never mind Have I Got News for You. Not that the writers of these shows take their leads from blogs, oh no…