Oh, Just Piss Off, UK Tells Blair

Stop The War 2002

What’s it going to take for Blair to get the message? 2 million voters demonstrating on the streets of London? A million signatures on a petition that he resign? A poll telling him the whole country wants him gone? What?

Most Britons want Blair to resign now -poll
Sun Feb 4, 2007 8:10 AM GMT
Email This Article | Print This Article | RSS

LONDON (Reuters) – Most Britons think Prime Minister Tony Blair should step down now, according to an opinion poll published on Sunday after a week of damaging headlines for the premier over an investigation into political funding.

Blair, who plans to resign later this year after more than a decade in power, was questioned by police for a second time last month about the case which has also seen some of his closest aides arrested.

Blair said in a speech to activists from his Labour Party on Saturday that he did not underestimate the scale of the problems facing his government. But he has said the cash-for-peerages probe will not force him to bring forward his departure date.

The ICM poll published in the Sunday Express found 56 percent of those polled believed Blair should resign now. Even among those who termed themselves as Labour voters, 43 percent said Blair should leave his post immediately.

No, he’s going to hang on for grim death, fingernails gripping the doorjamb of No 10 all the way as he’s dragged out by a posse of stout police constables, accompanied by hordes of baying journos and Cherie scuttling furtively away behind the scrum with the silver in a recyclable Tesco carrier bag .

Meanwhile Blair’s arselicker-in-chief and very own Comical Ali, Philip Gould, will still be valiantly proclaiming to all and sundry how remarkable Blair is and what integrity he’s got and that we should look to history and think how very lucky we are to have such a man as our leader, no really, it’s true.

Put The Champagne On Ice

O frabjous day! Calloo, callay!

Lord Levy has been arrested, again, on suspicion of perverting the course of justice, the BBC reports.

Former pop impresario, Blair best friend, tennis partner, personal middle east envoy, Labour peer and Friend of Israel, party fundraiser and joint British/Israeli citizen Levy was arrested when he returned to answer police bail, which was granted after his first arrest and questioning about his role in the sale of peerages for cash.

Following his being given bail last time Levy hotfooted it to his house in Israel.

I wonder: as he’s a known flight risk, will the plod risk bailing him again, or will they remand him in custody? I bet the latter. It’ll take only one night in Britain’s totally buggered prison system to convince hsi poptastic lordship that he has a good memory after all. like he said, he’s not taking the rap.

Blair must be quaking in his boots. Not only will his best and most trusted friend sing like a canary if jailed, even for the briefest of periods, but it seems that the private Labour internal email system that Blair’s official spokesman denied exists does indeed, exist. and that No 10’s official spokesperson lied to the police about it, thus hiding evidence. That in itself is obstruction of justice, a charge I think quite a few Labour notables and party droids will soon be facing.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. The New Labour project is crumbling from corruption and internal rot, not long now before Blair has no choice but to go too.

UPDATE: He’s been bailed again. More fool the Met. I suspect Lord Levy’s housekeeper in Tel Aviv is stocking the fridge up and airing the sheets right now.

Come In Mr Blair, Your Time Is Up

Mr. Plod.

Yesterday I posted that Rove’s having been called to the stand in the Scooter Libby trial could sink Bush. On this side of the pond a similar fate is approaching Tony Blair with accelerating speed.

Scotland Yard, using New Labour’s own, recently-passed, draconian investigative powers over email and computers, is getting ever closer to uncovering the proof of Blair’s alleged complicity in the political corruption of Cash for Honours affair.

The Independent on Sunday has a very good roundup of the situation so far:

[…]

Following the arrest of Ruth Turner, one of the Prime Minister’s closest aides, last week, it is perhaps not surprising that members of the Cabinet are now invoking God to come to their aid.

The police inquiry which they curtly dismissed as opportunism a few months ago is swiftly gaining ground. Files of evidence are now in the hands of Crown Prosecution Service with the prospect of charges growing every day.

Not only is the Scotland Yard investigation under the 1925 Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act gathering pace, but the police are also making solid progress in their investigations into breaches by Labour of electoral law.

The Electoral Commission, which has been advising the police on the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act, is expected to recommend that the Act is tested in court and that Labour be tried for breaching its terms on disclosure of commercial loans.

What is more, Labour’s attempts to keep secret millions of pounds in loans made by millionaire supporters before the last election are being seen as supporting evidence in the case on the abuse of the honours system.

There is fresh talk of another police interview for Mr Blair. Even if the Prime Minister is not charged, ministers fear that Labour may be brought to court and the PM cross-examined, if not as a defendant then as a witness, where he could be asked anything by lawyers.

“It could be extremely embarrassing, and Blair would not have the same kind of protection he would have as a defendant if he is called to give evidence as a witness,” said one QC. “In many ways it would be worse.”

During Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Mr Blair’s communications chief David Hill chewed his nails as his boss was asked by Tory MP Bill Wiggin: “Will he confirm that if a close aide is charged he will leave office?” Labour MPs sitting behind the Prime Minister stared nervously at their shoes as Mr Blair snapped back: “I have absolutely nothing to say about that inquiry at all.”

Mr Blair was possibly the only politician not talking about the latest revelations in the cash-for-honours inquiry. There was open talk in the tea rooms of forcing the Prime Minister to resign early as a damage-limitation exercise. “We are leaking support to the Conservatives,” said one former cabinet minister. “How can we fight the May elections with Blair in office and all these cash-for-honours headlines dogging us?”

One senior aide to the Prime Minister said that the hope now was that, if there are charges, Mr Blair would not be dragged to court as a serving Prime Minister. With the police inquiry expected to drag on until the end of February, a trial would not take place until after Mr Blair leaves office, which is expected in July.

John McTernan, director of political operations, who worked with Ms Turner in choosing names for peerages, has been interviewed again by the police. Jonathan Powell, Mr Blair’s chief of staff, has also been interviewed again. And unlike their first round of interviews these have not been cosy, informal chats, but, it is believed, grillings under caution.

The newly resolute mood in Scotland Yard is a sign of frustration that it has not been given the complete picture by the Labour Party. Senior figures in Government say that Downing Street, despite its protestations about aiding the police, has not been as helpful as it could have been.

One senior Whitehall figure said that although No 10 had not withheld information requested by Scotland Yard, it had done nothing to help them actively to find evidence. “They only give them what they ask for. They don’t say ‘you want to look here and you want to look there’,” he said.

But the police have proved persistent. They have followed an email trail which has shown inconsistencies and compared witness statements, which have not always added up. Emails deleted from aides’ personal queues have been discovered by police who have trawled through a secret back-up archive set up by Downing Street to store files that had been erased.

Government sources say that before Christmas six plainclothes police officers, trained in recovering missing computer files and emails, went into Downing Street and the Cabinet Office where they spent days downloading emails from computers belonging to staff who drew up Tony Blair’s honours list. The police looked through the secret internal Downing Street email system and other emails used for communications between journalists and outside organisations.

They even took away emails sent to Mr Blair himself. The emails referred to potential nominees for the honours list, including Labour donors. Others are believed to have discussed conversations between Jonathan Powell and Lord Levy, who preferred to communicate with Downing Street by phone.

The emails are understood to refer not only to those who were nominated for peerages but also to donors who did not make it to the final nomination stage. Sir Christopher Evans, whose loan of £1m is being repaid by Labour, is thought to have been among those names floated as a possible peer. Notes the biotechnology tycoon took of a conversation he had with Lord Levy give a rare insight into New Labour schmoozing. The note referred to talk of “a K [knighthood] or a big P [peerage]?”.

[…]

This is getting interesting on both sides of the Atlantic: like I keep saying, the wheels of justice grind exceeding slow but exceeding fine. Blair and Bush may have been able to escape justice so far with the use of nifty political footwork and outright lying, but it’s coming for them.

Downing St Corruption: It’s Not Just Blair, It’s Brown Too

Oooh. Looks like Inspector Knacker may bag more than one major Labour politician. A major corruption and patronage storm is brewing around Gordon Brown, who has been anointed by the faithful to take over as Prime Minister when Tony Blair finally goes or is arrested (whichever comes soonest).

The story in brief: Brown is accused of being complicit in what may be fraudulent activity concerning an allegedly non-political ‘educational’ charity, the Smith Institute.

The institute is fimanced and run by Brown supporters, staffed by his and his wife’s personal friends, and holds closed meetings at No.11 Downing St.. the Chancellor’s office, which the Chancellor himself attends. These meetings are where prominent buinesspeople are dictating government economic policy to Brown and channeling fcharitable funds to the Smith Institute, Brown’s private slush fund, for the privilege of doing so – all the while claiming charitable status and the tax perks that go with it.

As Guido Fawkes puts it, it smells. More than that, it reeks. he has put together a timeline of posts that give the whole backstory, and a stinking mess of secret dealings, jobs for the boys, general self-interestedness and cynicism it is.

Cash for Policy.

Sith attempt to cover-up use of No. 11.

Mrs Brown recruits Konrad as the Sith apprentice.

The back story to the Sith’s Konrad.

The public charity which refuses to talk to the public.

Cameron : Brown is the dark side. [Sith Death Star graphic]

more….

BBC2’s Newsnight also did a an expose last night which can be viewed here.

Just because the major media is keeping schtum on this one for the moment doesn’t mean it won’t develop into a yet another major New Labour corruption story. I can’t wait. Brown is the architect of New Labour’s disastrous neoliberal economic policies and he’s as big a warmonger and liar as Blair.

Perhaps we’ll be rid of them both in one godalmighty, gigantic scandal and dramafest. That would be sweet.

It’s not enough for me that they’re gone: I want to see them go with piles of burning coals heaped upon their heads, never to be able to show their faces in public again, preferably to end their days chronically ill, on means-tested benefits, gibbering madly in one of their own privatised hellholes of a homeless hostel.

Or do you think I’m being too soft?

It’s A Small World, After All

Now see, this is the reason I blog, so that someone else will take the ball and run with it.

Yesterday I posted a rather flip comparison using the latest global wealth inequality figures and a letter to the WSJ. but Belledame took those figures, broke them down, and extended her research to show how those global inequities are actually mirrored in the US and how, despite the continued mass delusion of belief in the Americam Dream, it’s no accident that the American rich keep getting richer and the poor, poorer.

And that ‘poor’ means you. What? You didn’t really think you were middle-class did you? Do you own your own means of production? No? Could you survive independently beyond maybe one or two last paychecks? No? That fat pension fund you’re were relying on, is it invested in the markets? Then it could disappear tomorrow: you’re working class just like the rest of us. Deal with it.

So many are in denial of this reality though. As Belledame says:

I’ll be honest. I had a bunch of reasons for not tackling this shit before; dunno if they’re the same as y’all’s or not. Well, one, I suppose relatively speaking I am comfortable enough to sort-of pretend this isn’t actually happening (although denial works in mysterious ways, doesn’t it); certainly more so if you factor in my family background, who by now i expect is in, oh, i don’t know what percentile, but i suspect it’s up there. Not in the supra-wealthy micro-fraction percentile, no, but…and especially globally…so.

And, gender stereotypes or not, I’ve always had issues with numbers, personally. I wasn’t kidding: math and anything related literally gives me nightmares. (I dread my upcoming statistics class).

And let’s face it: this shit’s boring compared to, oh I don’t know, blowjobs.

And yet.

Somehow, you know, call it a hunch; i have the feeling that even if I, we, most, all? of us? don’t start concerning ourselves with this shit pretty soon?

It’s gonna concern itself with us.

Well yes, it is going to. It’s inescapable. Create an unsustainable global economic system and everyone suffers whenit all goes pear-shaped.

As a long time Euroweenie socialist these sorts of glaring inequalities are not news: they are the reason for our huge protests at every G8 summit. So I posted the link rather glibly assuming it was recieved wisdom.

From a European perspective it does sometimes seem as though America is living in its own self-created bubble and doesn’t see or even want to see the self-created potential wave of global misery headed its way and which according to your figures, is already lapping at American feet.

Schadenfreude, though tempting, is pointless at this late stage because we’re all affected by this new reality of resource wars, declining quality of life and a fucked-up planet. On the streets of Amsterdam you can see people from all over the world who’ve had to flee to safety for whatever reason, economic, climatic or political, from their home countries, largely as a result of the rampages of international capitalism and the arms trade.

And every day drowned young Africans wash up on the shores of Italy and Spain, or Eastern Europeans and Asians asphyxiated in containers at Dover or Calais, desperate to get away from grinding poverty and warfare. So far the US has been insulated from many of the worst effects of global capitalism like these, but not for much longer.

If not for posts like Belledame’s about the way the current economic model affects Americans personally they’d never know it’s happening till it’s too late. Is there any reporting of this on US TV? I certainly haven’t seen it on Fox or CNN.

Americans’d be surprised at the goodwill that’s still out there though: we still don’t hate Americans per se, despite Iraq, despite everything – we know you’re just like us. Mostly. We just loathe what the guzzling juggernaut that your nation has become is doing and the way it’s driving the rest of the world into poverty to fuel its own temporary comfort and prosperity and its insane competition with China and India.

BTW, I’m British, and Britain is as prime an offender as the US. Our government talks about tackling global poverty, but Brown & Blair’s Britain’s right in there hoovering up capitalism’s crumbs, making money from moving all the money around, all the while applying free-market US business models to public services like the NHS and water supplies and being one of the biggest arms traders on the planet. Oh, and don’t get me started on the GATT agreements…

We’re also completely exasperated by US media and governments’ refusal to see the looming danger – even when the facts and figures are staring them in the face – because it doesn’t fit the mythical national narrative they’ve constructed, of ever expanding profits, military glory and boundless influence.

Unfortunately for that narrative and those who still beleive in it, so far history is heading exactly in the way Marx predicted.

How angry are the American people going to be when they realise this and that they’ve been had? Will they even realise it? And if they do how will that angry realisation manifest itself, if at all? I think all bets are off on what happens in US and consequently global, politics in the next 5 years. Events are moving so fast now any prediction is contingent and the rollercoaster is accelerating.

Is socialism the answer to such gross inequalities? Revolution? What? Is it too late already? I don’t bloody know, I’m just a blogger. At least some of us are attempting to create some equity even if it’s only by making the current obscene situation better known.

But whatever your politics, surely our common humanity says that such massive inequalities as these are totally unjust, unsustainable and something has to give globally, and soon.

Read more: Global inequality, Capitalism, Anticapitalism, Marxism, US