Climbing The Crest Of A Wave

A slow tsunami of debt misery and homelessness is about to roll over the United States, and consequently the rest of us, if the financial markets do not stabilise soon. It’s already on it’s way and picking up speed.

The Sacramento Bee has an excellent report up that puts a human face on the building subprime lending disaster:

Frustrated borrowers who lenders to try to work things out say it’s a fruitless ordeal

By Jim Wasserman – Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:00 am PDT Sunday, September 2, 2007
Story appeared in BUSINESS section, Page D1

Tracy Trammell sold the boat, the extra vehicles and tried everything to “find a way to refinance, or do what I could not to lose the house for my children.”

She is in a bind all too common in Sacramento: a home losing value and an adjustable-rate mortgage with payments that jumped $1,000 a month in June.

Thirty days ago, Trammell, a widow and working mother with two daughters, skipped her first payment to Countrywide Financial Corp., a company deep in its own crisis amid a pileup of hardship cases. This month, Trammell will miss a second payment on a refinance loan her late husband handled at the peak of the housing boom in 2005.

After this article was written Countrywide announced the layoff of up to 12,000 employees – most of whom are about to have trouble paying their own home loans too. So it goes, the big wave’s picking up speed.

Bottom line: Neither Trammel nor Calabasas-based Countrywide has yet been able to work out a deal to spare her small house in Citrus Heights from foreclosure. There are no loan modifications. No refinance options. No waiving of a pre-payment penalty that stings a borrower for thousands of dollars to get out of trouble.

“I asked, ‘What’s your solution? Give me some ways I can keep this from happening,’ ” says Trammell of her dealings with the nation’s leading lender. “They said, ‘Get a roommate.’ That’s what she told me. I said, ‘OK. Well, I guess we’re done talking.’ ”

The ceaseless multiplication of this joint impasse helps explain the 617,000 foreclosures during the first seven months of this year in the United States, according to Fair Oaks-based Foreclosures.com, a Web site for real estate investors. Behind those numbers — including 3,756 foreclosures in the Sacramento region during the first six months of 2007, according to DataQuick Informations System — is the often- unbridgeable divide between mortgage lenders and their growing ranks of distressed borrowers.

Read more…

For those distressed borrowers there will be no end to the distress, even if their home is reposessed – because of course it is no longer possible to declare bankruptcy, lose everything and start again . The Bush administration, aided and abetted by both Democrats and Republicans in thrall to finance companies’ campaign donations, pushed through a bankruptcy bill that means that even if the ownership of your house reverts to the finance company or bank you’ll still be paying for it for ever, even if you’re jobless and living on the street.

They don’t just own what you owe them: they own you. There is to be no escape from debt peonage.

One might almost think that the market saw the debt crunch coming and their bubble about to burst and decided to take steps to protect their investments….

The war economy that Bush has built is constructed on the flimsiest of foundations, worthless paper. America’s past and current good times and overconsumption are financed on tick by other nations’ money, particularly Chinese money – now all that paper’s coming due, and they want all of it back.

There’s a lot to be repaid. US business and consumer debt is a tradeable commodity like any other and there’s a full suite of clever sounding derivative debt ‘products’ on the market to be sold to gullible investors, all of which boil down to gambling.on a grand scale: its a punt on whether the money will be paid back and if so, when and how much. The rewards can be huge and so can the losses.

This trade in debt, this new South Sea Bubble, has been rated by companies like Standard & Poor, but some of these companies have, proven to be corrupt and to have been gaming the ratings to their own advantage.

International investment funds and overseas banks have bought huge amounts of US debt and derivatives because there has been huge money to be made in high risk loans: but now, because ratings can no longer be trusted, banks and investment funds don’t know what their paper assets are worth. Because of this there is no confidence in the financial markets; because of this lack of confidence no one will lend anyone any money; and because of that, the market and the whole economy is in danger of collapsing, sending a wave of debt bondage through the US middle classes and threatening another Great Depression.

Phillip R. Robinson, executive director of Civil Justice Inc., a public interest law group in Maryland that helps victims of predatory real estate practices, said much of the data on foreclosure and delinquency rates appears to be conflicting.

But he said it is clear from the deluge of borrowers turning to his group for help that the number of homeowners in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure is increasing steadily.

“There’s a dramatic increase and shift in the kind of homeowner calling us,” Robinson said. Previously, his group saw mostly “a homeowner who’s had a devastating life event and is not able to make payments.”

But now, he continued, “We’re seeing a huge increase of very-good-credit borrowers who got mortgage loans that were unsuitable for them in the first place. The professional they relied on steered them to the highest-cost loan in which the professional could make a profit. They’ve gotten themselves in over their head. These are prime borrowers in subprime loans.”

After the last depression state banks and treasuries became the lenders of last resort – no more would the banks run out of money as people hurried to realise their few remaining assets and drained the banks of cash. Now the Federal Reserve are frantically triying to keep the money supply flowing and lubricating the opposing sprockets of credit and debt that make the whole rickety contraption go round, but the whole thing is grinding to halt faster they they can throw money at it.

Unsurprisingly for organisations whose very existence is predicated on the maximisalisation of profit and the minimisation of loss, with no regard to any potential human consequences, many investment companies and banks are deciding to take the money and run cut their losses by liquidating their assets now.

What that means in practical terms is a lot of people being thrown in the street when their homeloan is called in, or when they can no longer afford accelerating payments and default on the loan. Surprise, surprise, surprise, it’s women, and particularly black women, who are suffering most.

But the wave of foreclosures is spreading fast amd picking up speed: the great American middle class can dismiss the issue when it’s only lone parents, minorities and the poor hurting –them – but when it hits NASCAR Dad and Security Mom – us – will we finally see the rump of what used to be middle America wake up to the fact that they’ve been royally screwed too?

In Citrus Heights, Tracy Trammell said she knew she might have trouble with refinancing the loan her husband took out in 2005. But a Countrywide representative told her early this year not to worry — her loan would only go up a little.

As June approached, she called again. This time a different representative said she faced a major reset on her two-year adjustable loan — the payment would rise $1,000 a month.

“I called the original girl and said, ‘I need to know what’s going on,’ ” Trammell said. “She said, ‘Fax me the stuff, and I’ll get back to you.’ Then her first words were, ‘Oops, I missed that part.’ I said, ‘What do you mean, oops? This is my home.’ ”

Trammel made her new $3,000 payment in June. She made another in July. Then she considered reality. She is bound to lose the house with this loan, a loan with one more year before its pre-payment penalty expires.

When Countrywide suggested a roommate, Trammell felt insulted. She skipped a payment. It is one more foreclosure now in motion.

Regulate The Smartshops By All Means, But Parents, Educate Your Bloody Young.

The media, in the US especially, is making much of the Dutch government’s moves to further regulate Smartshops and the sale of magic mushrooms, which are legal in NL if sold fresh but illegal if sold dried.

It doesn’t look good for the Smartshops:

AMSTERDAM – A 19-year-old tourist from Iceland jumped from a hotel window in Amsterdam last weekend after ingesting fresh hallucinogenic mushrooms. The boy suffered broken bones in both his legs and feet.

The Volkskrant reports this on Friday. This is the third serious incident involving hallucinogenic mushrooms in Amsterdam in a few months’ time.

In March a 17-year-old French girl jumped to her death from a bridge near the IJ tunnel after taking hallucinogenic mushrooms.

In June a 22-year-old British tourist lost control after taking the substance. He trashed his hotel room on the Martelaarsgracht in Amsterdam and threw items onto the street, injuring one passer by.

More…

Worse still, two smartshops in Amsterdam, Innerspace and Magic Mushroom Gallery, were found recently to have also been selling banned drugs like GHB and were shut down.

The Smartshops themselves, fearing a total ban on mushroom sales, propose strict regulation along the lines of that applied to coffeeshops:

VLOS, the National Association of Smartshops, now calls for regulation so that mushrooms will remain legally and safely available. The forthcoming points are proposed to the parliament.

1) No sale to minors.
2) Further professionalisation of the smartshops by means of a course for smartshop owners and staffs.
3) A general mushroom information flyer, in as many languages as possible.
4) Concentration of the sale of mushrooms in specialized professional shops that handle according to the rules, recognizable by a trademark.

All of which would be fine, if it weren’t for the bloody stupid tourists, none of whom seem to have the sense they were born with. They come to Amsterdam for a lost weekend of drink, drugs, dancing and hedonism and don’t seem to give a stuff about what they take with what and what the physical and mental consequences might be.

It’s as though they think because they’re somewhere foreign the normal rules about safety don’t apply. They’re on holiday! Nothing bad can happen! They are either totally irresponsible or woefully uninformed and ignorant. Who in their right mind takes hallucinogenics in the street anyway?

I don’t think mushrooms should be banned, although personally I don’t and wouldn’t take them. I’ve eaten them twice (long ago, I hasten to add), once inadvertently and once deliberately and I wouldn’t want to repeat the experience or the later flashbacks either.

Mushrooms strike me as something that should be taken only in very safe space in very specific circumstances, ie not at a Halloween costume party or busy streets full of bridges, cyclists and canals. Pirates+cutlasses+hallucinogenics=BAD, let me tell you.

Take it on holiday in the street? Next to an unfenced canal? On top of who knows what other intoxicants? That’s asking for trouble and trouble is what irresponsible 17 year olds do on the loose in a foreign city. Where were their parents anyway, and what did they teach her about drugs, if anything at all?

Personally I see it as Darwinism in action. Wise up about drugs and alcohol or die.

My condolences to the family, and 17 or 19 is no bloody age to die, but the teenagers in question could have just as easily fallen in a canal drunk as high. These are the sorts of things that happen when you let your irresponsible young travel unaccompanied: they do stupid things, some of them fatal. It could have happened to a hooray on a campsite in Cornwall, or a chav at a rave in Ibiza; youthful recklessness and stupidity knows no class or national boundaries.

But neither does the wilful blindness of doting parents when it comes to their children’s use of mind-altering substances. “No, not my little precious!”

What, they’d rather have them ignorant? And dead?

Athough there’s a chorus from the war on drugs folks for a prohibition, a complete ban on mushrooms is unfeasible: the genie is out of the bottle now and smartshops, drug tourism and the associated hotel and catering profits are big business. To ban the open sale of mushrooms will only push the trade underground and increase criminality The demand will still be there, someone will supply it, ban or no ban.

Strict regulation, licensing of sales and strong enforcement and public education will have to be the way forward, though any regulation will have to be a damned sight stricter than what the smartshops themselves propose if it’s to protect tourists agaisnt their own natural inclination towards being stupid bloody idiots.

Arms and The Man

When it comes to the arms trade the British government are the deranged offspring of a Ferengi and Franz Kafka, insatiable greed and bureacratic ineptitude combined in one nightmare package.

Here’s a nice encapsulation of the sick situation by activist/comedian Mark Thomas at the 2007 Birmingham Police and Security Fair :

[…]

In the middle of the hall was Mr Xia, a Chinese man with three electro-shock weapons on display for all to see. He demonstrated them for me while I filmed him. A bargain at £3.25 each. At least, I thought, it shouldn’t be hard to find a cop at the police and security fair. How foolishly naive. The Association of Chief of Police Officers had a stall around the corner from Mr Xia, but with no one there. The nearest Customs officer, I was told, was at the airport. The closest thing I found to an on-duty officer were two life-size cardboard cutout cops, on sale as a deterrent to thieves. Eventually, I found the fair organiser’s office.

Mr Xia was arrested, and two weeks later I got a phone call from Solihull CID. “Mr Xia has pleaded guilty to the possession of prohibited firearms,” said the voice, “but I think it is illegal to try and sell these weapons.”

“You would be right.”

“And I think Mr Xia was trying to sell them.”

“He was at a trade fair.”

“Would you give us a statement and let us see the film you shot at the fair?”

“Yes, I would be happy to.”

“And one more thing – if you wouldn’t mind, could you bring up copies of the relevant legislation?”

More…

While it’s long been an open secret in Britain that our national earnings are underpinned by international arms sales – we make 46 billion a year out of it – what’s not often mentioned is that we’re also one of the biggest enablers of the worldwide and domestic trade in illegal small arms and torture equipment.

The British government’s attitude to arms sales is hypocritical to the nth degree. On one hand it subscribes to the “Guns bad, mmmkay?” school of thought for domestic consumption; on the other it allows illegal arms and torture weapons to be sold under its nose to pretty much anyone from at home and abroad, so long as they have the money.

You’d be surprised at who has a financial interest in the arms and repression industry:

45 UK UNIVERSITIES own over £15m worth of shares in the arms trade. Three institutions – University College London (UCL), Trinity Hall Cambridge and the University of Liverpool – each own shares worth over £1million.

British academics, MPs, police and media alike bemoan the growing gun culture that leads to the murders of so many young men and shed crocodile tears even as they condemn: “Tsk tsk”, they say. “Oh dear, black drugs and gun culture, tragic isn’t it? Oh well, at least it’s not our children.”

Yet while all that international money is sloshing around London they’ll happily turn a blind eye either by passivity or ineptitude,to the international gun culture that is the Daddy of the gun culture in our cities.

As a spokesperson for the University of Liverpool explains; “The university has a legal obligation to maximise returns on its investments as it is accountable to its beneficiaries. We would not choose to invest in arms if other opportunities to fulfil our financial obligations were equally available.”

Oh well, then, that’s fine. Profit trumps morals, my duh.

It’s a sad fact that in our post-imperial and industrial days of decline we are a fading, insignificant offshore island in a big scary world. Our only remaining diplomatic bargaining chips are a] guns and b] money. These days we can only wield power in the world by

a] enabling, supporting and protecting the international trade in arms and weapons of repression, come what may and

b] by having a whole city full of handy banks for managing the subsequent profits and lots of accountants and lawyers to evade any inconvenient legislation (that’s when they’re not actually orchestrating it on a massive scale).

and

c] By knowing where the bodies are buried. *Cough* Banco Ambrosiano.*Cough*

that last’s influence probably outweights the first two.

Mind you, the relevant laws are such an absolute dogs breakfast as to be almost totally ineffectual anyway and of course lets not forget that we in our turn are mere passive instruments of US foreign policy, just another tool to be used by Washington to do politics by the back door.

The voters have expressed their justified disgust with this hypocrisy by demonstrating peacefully yet forcefully, only to find themselves subjected to the most draconian of the post-911 terror laws. A state of terrorist emergency was first declared in metropolitan London in Feb 2001, but no-one knew until the law was used not against terrorists but against legitimate arms trade prorestors.

The Metropolitan Police are using anti-terrorist legislation against protesters demonstrating at Europe’s biggest annual arms fair which was opened today by Geoff Hoon, UK defence minister, in London’s Docklands. The police have invoked Section 44 of Terrorism Act 2000 which allows assistant chief constables (or the commander in the case of the Metropolitan police) to authorise extended stop and search where they

“consider it expedient for the prevention of acts of terrorism”

Section 44 was also used extensively during the protests and peace camp at Fairford RAF airbase in the build-up to the Iraq War (1). This is contrary to clear undertakings from the Home Secretary to the House of Commons that Section 44 notices would only be used where there is good reason to suspect terrorist activity. Protestors have already won a judicial review of police mass detention tactics during the Fairford protests (2), while Liberty has said it will seek a judicial review of the Met Police’s use of Section 44 in the Docklands.

There has been much made in the press of how the police have “braced themselves for violent protests” (e.g. The Guardian, 6 September 2003) and the £1 million pound cost of the policing operation. Sixteen arrests were reported on the evening news, while inside, cluster bombs, which the exhibition organisers had last week said should not be included, were among the exhibits.

They lost their case.

That that state of emergency hasn’t been lifted since and it was what eventually resulted in the effective ‘shoot to kill’ policy that then allowed the extra-judicial murder of Jean-Charles Menezes by trigger happy police.

Which makes the persistence of anti arms-trade protestors all the more admirable.

A nondescript large industrial unit in Lenton, Nottingham had its anonymity taken away by local Disarm DSEI / anti-arms trade protesters on Tuesday when they descended on Heckler and Koch’s UK headquarters.

H&K are the world’s second largest maker of pistols and machine-guns for soldiers and death squads across the world, including Turkey, Iran, Mexico, Thailand, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Burma/Myanmar. Their weapons are in use in over 90 countries, including by British police, and the company has evaded EU arms controls to sell weapons to war-zones in Sudan, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Sierra Leone. Over half a million people are killed worldwide by small-arms annually.

A productive bit of research led a couple of intrepid investigators to buzz the company and ask “Excuse me, is this the Nottingham Small Arms Factory?” Although they didn’t get a response as such, their suspicions were confirmed when armed police turned up minutes later and detained them for 45 minutes under the Terrorism Act.

The subsequent demo made it clear that gun merchants are not welcome in the city (which, by the way, has the highest gun crime rate in the UK). The peaceful protest obviously hit a raw nerve as the forty or so people in attendance attracted an almost equal number of cops, including members of the (London-based political squad) Forward Intelligence Team.

Local rag, the Nottingham Evening Post, showed just how weak its commitment to reporting is when they pulled the story from page 2 after being told by a police press officer that it would be ‘irresponsible’ for the media to publish the arms company’s address (…yes, so obviously it’s: NSAF Ltd, Unit 3, Easter Park, Lenton Lane, Nottingham NG7 2PX). See http://disarmdsei.evey.org

It’s easy to see a grand establishment conspiracy in all this but I’m inclined to think it’s more a typical mixture of jaw-dropping venality, sheer ineptitude and passive complicity.

Or am I?

When you think of a world in the grip of accelerating climate change, potential social disorder and subject to an increasing scramble, even to the death, for temperate land and resources and you consider how few natural resources we actually have, then controlling the weapons of repression and the gold begins to look less like conspiracy and more like an actual strategy.

Looked at in that light the arms traders’re doing our young a favour by training them in weapons skills for the the apocalyptic future. You could even say it’s a public service.

See what I mean about Kafka and the Ferengi…..

Such Sweet Irony.

The News International Wapping Strike

They say a liberal is a conservative who’s just been arrested, but let me modernise that aphorism slightly: a liberal is a conservative journalist who’s about to be downsized or outsourced.

The Wall St Journal, currently threatened by a fiscally inexplicable yet politically perfectly explicable bid for the paper by Rupert Murdoch, has been responsible for some of the most egregious untruths about the effects of unfettered tree trade, globalisation and Republican economic ‘policy’, not to mention its lies and exaggerations about the case for and conduct of the Iraq war and it’s self-interested spiel (USA No 1; all are equal butl some are more equal than others; God loves the almighty dollar) has caused untold worldwide misery.

So I must say I’m rather enjoying watching them get all militant about the Murdoch/WSJ merger.

Wall Street Journal Reporters Are Takin’ it to the Streets!

Wow. Yesterday, when we got word that the Murdoch-Bancrofts courtship was going to go on for an additional three weeks, we thought to ourselves, “Sweet fancy Moses! Could the media story of 2007 get any duller?” Props to the reporters of the Wall Street Journal, then, who today injected a dose of much needed excitement back into the proceedings by staging a nationwide no-show this morning.
A key excerpt from the “statement from Wall Street Journal reporters”:

“Dow Jones currently is in contract negotiations with its primary union, seeking severe cutbacks in our health benefits and limits on our pay. It is beyond debate that the professionals who create The Wall Street Journal and other Dow Jones publications every day deserve a fair contract that rewards their achievements. At a time when Dow Jones is finding the resources to award golden parachutes to 135 top executives, it should not be seeking to eviscerate employees’ health benefits and impose salary adjustments that amount to a pay cut.”

Says a WSJ employee:

“…what is Murdoch going to do if the entire staff revolts? He can’t simply fire them all and easily replace them with people just out of journalism school.””

Oh no, you think not? Let me remihd you….

Wapping was the most vicious dispute ever perpetrated. After 15 months of so-called negotiations on the move out of Fleet Street, Rupert Murdoch provoked the strike that he had cynically wanted in a plot cooked up with his lawyers. Overnight, 5,000 people were sacked, and Murdoch’s plan was put into action. His secret workforce, men and women lured from unemployment blackspots with a promise of a prosperous future, arrived by the coachload.

Week in, week out, I attended the demonstrations and as the weeks turned to months, I watched the lives of people I’d known and worked with for years unravel. There were suicides, marriage break-ups; people lost their homes. Twenty years may have passed but those sacked overnight – secretaries, researchers and cashiers as well as printers – still bear the scars of Wapping today.

Events on the picket line are seared into my memory. The police would wait until the early hours of the morning, when most people had gone, then clear the remaining pickets. With no regard to safety, officers on horseback would charge people, driving them out of Wapping Highway. As the policemen finished their shifts for the night and headed off in their coaches, they would jubilantly wave their overtime pay packets at us, along with their copies of the Sun

The strike ended after a long bloody year, but the consequences of Murdoch’s victory are still felt by the industry today. Other employers rushed to exploit the opportunities he’d opened up. When it comes to cutting costs and creaming off bigger profits, newspaper bosses have slavishly followed Murdoch’s example.

His promises of a bright new future for journalism never materialised, just like the swimming pool he promised for the new plant. Wages for journalists have slumped in real terms. Far too many are desk-bound, and staffing levels are inadequate in many national titles as well as in the regional press. Instead of investing in quality journalism, companies are spending millions on promotional gimmicks, and as a result we’re awash with CDs that nobody wants to listen to.

Murdoch has used the profits from his newspaper titles to extend his grip on other industries, such as sport, through BSkyB. One way or another, most people in this country line his pockets. Yet he pays next to no tax in the UK; he changed his nationality to further his business interests, and considers he’s got the right to choose our next prime minister.

Murdoch is squeezing his other publications hard to pay for this WSJ takeover, with 100 jobs gone at Wapping already this year.

News Corp’s print titles have been punching above their weight for years. Unfortunately, this trend came to a halt during 2006, when papers contributed 16 per cent of revenues, but only 13 per cent of operating profits. Murdoch blames the business cycle for his newspapers’ recent poor performance. Here and in the US, interest rates are riding high and consumer spending remains sluggish. Since late-2005, advertisers have been tightening the purse strings with gusto.

On the horizon, however, a game-changing prospect looms – the possibility that News Corp investors might be asked to stump up a steep $5bn to acquire Dow Jones. Murdoch has plenty of ideas for expanding the Wall Street Journal’s revenue base. But in the short term, these plans will suck even more cash out of News Corp.

At the back of Hinton’s mind must be a concern that News Corp is planning to squeeze its British titles further – this time, to pay for Rupert’s proposed adventures in Manhattan.

The WSJ journos jobs are no safer, though they can protest as much as they like. Rupert doesn’t like unions, and he needs the cash. Look to see an influx of ex-WSJ types looking to make a bit of money into the blogosphere sometime soon. They can always join that bastion of journalistic integrity, Pyjamas Media..

I hear they’re looking for a replacement for Pam Atlas.

“There Is No Escape, Resistance Is Useless”

From Duncan Riley at Techcrunch, Via Pharyngula:

Texas based ISP Redmoon has implemented software that hijacks pages being visited by their customers by placing Redmoon’s own ads on these pages.

The technology is provided by NebuAD, which boasts that ISP delivered advertisements are an untapped source of revenue.

Every single web site owner is affected by NebuAD’s technology: whether a site is running ads or not makes no difference, Customers of any ISP evil enough to run NebuAD’s platform are going to see ads on every page on every site; ads that don’t benefit the content creator. It is important to note that these ads are NOT pop-ups, and this is not a free internet service; the ads are served as if they were part of the page, to paying internet customers who are NOT made aware that these ads have been inserted by their ISP.

[My emphasis]

As a content creator I’m horrified that any page I create could be plastered with advertisements I don’t approve of as I’m sure many others will be as well. There are probably copyright issues as well in terms of hijacking original works for profit. We can only hope that this evil form of advertising does not spread beyond Texas.

I think that hope is a very faint one indeed – where there’s money to be made, money will be made.

Coming soon, to an ISP near you.