Don’t Let’s Be Beastly To The Germans

But why shouldn’t I be beastly? You killed my grandma, you teutonic bastards!

Ah, but when I say ‘you’ who do I actually mean? The generation that blitzed Britain, invaded most of Europe and exterminated nearly all of European Jewry is almost gone bar a few aged relicts gumming their Iron Crosses in very clean senior facilities, and the Germans of today bear no responsibility for past horrors.

Rational people realise this. Nevertheless, negative feelings towards Germany and stereotypes about Germans persist, both in the US and in Britain:

Not that there isn’t a kernel of truth in some of the stereotyping; this video is one of a series from German broadcaster Deutsche Welle‘s YouTube channel called The Truth About Germany and explains the concept of speißigheit:

spießig
smug {adj}
suburban {adj}
bourgeois {adj}
philistine {adj}
narrow-minded {adj}
petty bourgeois {adj}
white-bread {adj} [coll.]
square {adj} [coll.: boringly traditional]

The whole series is well worth watching.

As if being labelled petty bourgeois, obsessive and dull weren’t enough, one of the most persistent stereotypes of Germans is that they have no sense of humour.

Oh ja? Is dat zo? German comedian Henning Vehn has made it his mission to turn that particular stereotype inside out and give it a good shake:

Here he is trying to entice visitors with his guide to (West) Germany;

…and boggling at the British tabloids’ obsession with the Nazis and WWII:

Yes, our papers are a bit obsessed, aren’t they ? You’d think the German armed forces were some kind of mechanical death whirlwind rather than fallible human beings:

Less mechanical death whirlwind, more Windy Miller.

So what have we learned from this brief foray into German culture and humour? Bugger-all really, other than the Germans are just like us really, and stereotypes (whilst sometimes having at their core a teensy-weensy little seed of truth) are just mental constructs that serve to distance us from our common humanity. It’s much easier to kill a humourless kraut than it is to kill a fellow human being who’s quite nice really. Let’s not be beastly to the Germans – we’re going to need them soon anyway, when the economy goes to shit.

Libertarianism in action

An oldie but goodie, found thanks to a commenter at Roy’s place. Here’s the example of what libertarianism leads to, a sad and yet also funny tale of Derek Kieper, a young man enraged by seat belt laws:

No law, or set of laws, has made the government more intrusive and ridiculous than seat belt legislation. Nothing is a bigger affront to the ideas of freedom, liberty, yada, yada, yada. Whether you are a pinko liberal or a right-wing whack job, there are plenty of reasons for just saying to hell with seat belt laws.

Leading to the inevitable:

Kieper, a 21-year-old senior at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, died early Tuesday morning when the Ford Explorer he was a passenger in travelled off an icy section of Interstate 80 and rolled several times in a ditch. Kieper, who was riding in the back seat of the Explorer, was ejected from the vehicle.

[…]

Derek, who was thrown from the vehicle, was not wearing a seat belt,…

You can say he died from, though not for his beliefs. Sad to see somebody so young die for soemthing as stupid as not wearing a seat belt because it intrudes on his liberty, which is about as logical as rejecting potty training because it intrudes on your liberty to shit anywhere you want.

Chick, Chick, Chick, Chicken, Lay A Laparoscopy For Me

Just when you think the US right wing could not possibly get more insane, not to mention openly fascist, someone or something comes along that makes your jaw drop so far you’re eating lunch off the doormat.

Sue Lowden is a former local tv news bimbo and Nevada GOP chair who’s running against current Senate Leader Harry Reid. Her big idea for those millions of US citizens without health insurance is that they barter with their doctors for care -with chickens, or hay or alfalfa or bathtubs, even.

From the Huffington Post:

Republican Senate candidate Sue Lowden on Tuesday defended her claim that a “chickens for checkups” barter system would be an effective alternative to the recently-passed health care reform bill.

She also said her original comments on the proposal were taken “way out of context.”

Lowden, who is seeking to unseat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada, explained her previous statement in an interview with a local news outlet in Nevada:

“The truth of the matter is there is bartering going on in this state and in the country. It has been going on for years and it was a casual statement talking about the reality of what’s going on, and not in a negative way by the way. This is something — you know when I talk about bartering like you said it’s also bargaining for the price, asking doctors if there’s a different price if you’re paying cash or paying by check. We know this is going on.”

She’s tried to back off her statements more than once since, but the more she wriggles, the worse it gets. Someone’s even been helpful enough to design a handy chicken/care calculator. What I want to know is what about the more expensive procedures, like transplants? That’s an awful lot of chickens to cart around, and let’s not even mention the guano. It’s no good switching to bigger currency either – for example, can anyone tell me where I can get change for a herd of Friesians?

Must we imitate everything in US politics?

You thought the McCain girls were bad enough, but the Cameron girls beat everything… Not quite meant to be taken serious though.



Horrible thought. Everything that happens in the US, politics wise shows up in the UK about two-five years later and in the Netherlands two to five years after that. Does this mean that in the next election after this one we might just see the Balkenende girls?