“This is the National Health Service — it’s free.”

An American blogger in London gets ill, is struck with amazement at how people in civilised countries deal with healthcare:

My name was called after just a couple of minutes in the waiting room. An Asian doctor with a gentle, inquisitive face and a soothing, avuncular manner took my medical history, asked me if I was allergic to any medication, and examined my eyes. The diagnosis was indeed conjunctivitis. The doctor wrote out a prescription for antibiotic eye drops with steroids that would take care of both the infection and the discomfort, and pointed to a pharmacy directly across the street where I could fill it. Did I have any further questions?

Only one: Where could I get the forms and receipts that I would need to file with my insurance company back home? ”The eyedrops will cost you about ten pounds,” the doctor replied, “but there’s no cost for this examination.” When I gazed at him with disbelief, he added, as if patiently explaining something elemental to a child, “This is the National Health Service — it’s free.”

Not pointed out in the article or noted by any of the commenters is that this poor guy first spent half the night getting permission from his own insurer to get medical help in London, having to call a dollar a minute helpline on his mobile from abroad (so ghu knows how much it all cost him), just because he’s so used to being fucked over by insurance, when all this time none of this was necessary…

Do read the comments, as though there is some pushback from people convinced socialist medicine can’t be any good, there’s also the explanation of an elected governor of an NHS hospital about how “free at the point of access” is worked out behind the scenes. One of the clearer, more concise explanations I’ve read about how the NHS assigns costs to its various components…

Getting a brain tumour is not a learning experience

Last year Sarah Pin had to deal with the little problem of a brain tumour which, quite obviously is scary and awful enough in the best of situations. But Sarah lives in the US and therefore had to deal with the third world medical system there. This did not make her happy:

If I have learned anything – and I have not – it is this: that people who talk about shitty things happening like they’re about gaining EXP or wisdom can go fuck themselves.

Unnecessary painful learning experiences suck. There is no fucking value to my having gotten a brain tumor, it is not something that god wanted to happen to me, I refuse to behave as if it has been some sort of goddamn privilege, and I decline ever do something like this again. I’m done with things sucking now. From now on I intend for everything that ever happens to awesome, and if it’s not I will bitch about it and, if someone else is at fault, I will make them feel it.

[…]

The doctor who finally sent me for the MRI wouldn’t have prescribed it to someone in my situation who didn’t have insurance. I know this because the first time I went in, I didn’t, and she didn’t. She told me to go home, get some rest and see if the dizziness got better. I did, it got better briefly and then came back, and I came back signed up for the Maryland pool two months later. She then suggested the MRI along with a battery of the other tests she thought more likely to turn something up. She was very restrainedly startled when it was the brain that turned out to be the problem.

It’s your right to decide that I should’ve had to either choose to pay full-price for the treatment or go without – I mean, I’m not you. But when people get angry with you for your politics, you need to understand that this is why. They’re not making something of nothing. My brain is not nothing to me. My stupid little pile of money is not nothing.

That kidney thing

If you’re a longtime reader of this blog and still bothering to keep up with us though it is more or less moribund, you may have wondered where Palau has been this past year. Perhaps you’ve also wandered over to Wis[s]e Words and read my posts there about what’s been going on, but I’ve never really explained here what’s been happening. To keep a long story short, Palau always had had problems with her kidneys, due to a bout with cancer years ago, but had managed to keep them functioning on a high enough level not to need dialysis. Last year this was no longer possible and she had to go to dialysis treatment three times a week. We had already decided that if necessary and possible I would donate a kidney to her (having two of them it is actually possible to do this as a live donor). At the time we thought we had to wait for a kidney swap, me donating it to somebody else and their donor giving their kidney to Palau, but luckily we turned out to be compatible and didn’t need to wait for anybody else. It took roughly a year of tests and exercise on my part to get my weight down to get ready, but in December last year, five days before Christmas, we had the operation. For my side of the process, I can’t do much better than the comic cartoonist Jana Christy did about her donation.

page from the Kidney Thing comic

Unfortunately in our case the aftermath didn’t go so well. Again, I won’t bore you with everything we went through but Palau has been in and out of hospital ever since, suffering from side effects of the anti-rejection drugs, various opportunistic infections and so on. The last time she was home was in June and she’s been in hospital again since early July (heck, we even got married in hospital). It’s getting her down, especially with her birthday coming up this Wednesday. If y’all would like to do something to cheer her up, why not send a card to:

Palau
Room 18 Ward 4B
VU Medisch Centrum
De Boelelaan 1117
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

The hospital has been great on the medical side of things, but Palau is missing some of the camaraderie of an English hospital and would be cheered up no end by a nice card from a blog reader. As for myself, I try and keep this blog more uptodate than I have been doing.

What drives me nuts about BBC science reporting

Dilbert.com

Is neatly captured in the above Dilbert strip. Any report about some new research finding out cheese causes cancer in middle aged women e.g. never quantifies the risk enough to know how serious you should take it, nor puts it into context. If there’s a “significant increase” in getting cancer from eating cheese, what does it? Does it mean of a 100 non-cheese eating women none get cancer and of 100 cheese eating women, all get cancer? Or does it mean two in the non-cheese group and 3 in the cheese group, or…

What I expect from these stories, but never get, is a) how reliable is the finding b) how does the bad/good thing used as story hook compares to not doing it and c) context with other risks and likelyhood of having to care about it because the risk/benefit is high enough to make it worthwhile. If eating grapes makes me better resistent to Alzheimers, it matters whether eating a bunch a week means I never get Alzheimers or whether I need to eat a ton a day to get a five percent less high risk of getting it…