Sorry for the lack of posts these past couple of days: Palau had to take a leave of absence to take care of some personal shit, which left me to feed and entertain three and a half cats all by myself. the half cat is the one which supposedly belongs to our next door neigbour but one, but who spents a lot of time being fed and watered by us. And one of those cats, pictured above is very demanding and very clever, gets bored easily and would’ve attempted to conquer the world already if it were not for the lack of opposable thumbs. she recently discovered the little people who live in the telly so now we can’t watch anything anymore without her trying to kill them.
What I would like to try today, and which may end in total embarassement, is to ask all you fine people who read this blog what they think happened back in 2003 that made the war on Iraq happen despite a majority of people worldwide being opposed to it. What should we have done differently, or was there nothing we could’ve done to stop it. If the latter, would it at least have been possible to stop the UK from participating, or was that never possible with Blair as prime minister?
Andy Newham of the Socialist Unity blog believes the war could’ve been stopped if the anti-war movement had concentrated on the day of the parliamentary vote as the trigger for direct action and on pressuring the MPs. He has a point, but what do you think?