Untitled

Ahh, the weekend. Even though I’m mostly at home all the time as I am in want of at least one kidney and preferably two (the live donor for which I must find myself) I still like weekends.

This weekend the weather’s good and I can sit in the garden and read. Lovely. It’ll be a quiet one too, as it’s a week before most people’s payday and no-one’s going anywhere or doing anything; the stores have yet to ramp up for Hallowe’en, Thanksgiving, Ede/Suikerfeest or Christmas depending on cultural affiliation and the end-of-month bills have yet to hit the doormat. For the moment all is quiet and gezellig – a Dutch concept that’s very hard to describe in English.

It’s an amalgam of style, cosiness, warmth, comfort and ease, a pleasure in small things and the domestic; you know how sometimes as the evenings draw in you’ll see a lighted living room window and all is warm and safe within, everyone occupied, everyone content? That’s gezellig, though my description really can’t do it justice.

A weekend like this is the perfect time to sit down, survey, take stock of life and plan next year’s spring bulbs. Well, I say spring and I say plan but who knows what the weather’ll be? It could be very, very bad indeed, if Cheney has his way and America nukes Iran. To many it’s a done deal and we’re merely marking time.

Rupert Cornwell , describing in the Independent the odd, pregnant hush that’s fallen over political America:

These are strange times here, our equivalent of when the dogs and birds supposedly fall silent in the moments before an earthquake. Not that America’s political animals have fallen silent. The candidates to succeed Bush criss-cross Iowa and New Hampshire where the first primaries are less than four months off, holding forth on every imaginable subject. But somehow what they say matters little. Whoever wins, his or her presidency has already largely been shaped by the desperately unpopular lame duck who perforce will remain in charge of US foreign policy until January 20 2009 – and worse may well be to come.

Having entrusted the verdict on his presidency to historians generations in the future, Bush now sounds almost contemptuous of the opinions of his contemporaries. Confident that, like his role model Harry Truman, he will be vindicated 50 years hence, he openly admits that his successor (or should it be successors?) will have to find a way out of the mess left by his disastrous adventure in Iraq.

Iraq, however, may only be the start of it. The real question, the one that, spoken or unspoken, dominates every foreign policy discussion here, is another. Will Bush, now that the Iraq folly has handed Iran a massive strategic victory without lifting a finger, go double or quits by launching a military attack against Tehran?

As if we didn’t have enough looming threats, like the economy and the environment – “..and the Red Death held sway over all…” – we could all be plunged into a third world war at any moment on the whim of a stupid, vicious iblowhard who’s descending into psychosis, aided and abetted by his VP.

That pregnant hush Cornwell describes is real, although, as he says, there’s plenty of chatter. But we surely all know that however important the latest governmental or constitutional outrage we’re avidly discussing is now, it could become an utter irrelevance overnight should Bush order a nuclear first strike on Iran. Will he? Won’t he? Your guess is as good as mine.

There may be a small industry in predictinion but in the end Bush alone has the decision. That he’s demonstrably mentally unbalanced and deteriorating fast is obvious, even to the layperson.

Because should this madman push the button it wouldn’t just be one strike. It would escalate. The very expression ‘first strike’ implies there will be a second, and a third… when you start to think about a nuclear attack on Iran as a real possibility (and in the hands of a megalomanical madman it’s as real a possibibility as any other) a kind of stunned panic sets in.

But this weekend I’m going to take pleasure in small things and try not to think about it. Bloody hell, we got through the seventies and eighties’ threat of mutually assured destruction all right, didn’t we? We’ll get through this too.( How we do it is another matter entirely.)

But like I said, I’m not thinking about it any more this weekend. A mixture of flame orange Darwin tulips and violet hyacinths sounds good for the windowboxes…

In uncertain times gezelligheid is a very precious thing. So let’s all slow down a bit, step back and enjoy this autumnal peace and quiet while we can. It may not last.

Who’s To Blame For George Bush?

George Bush, that’s who.

Sidney Blumenthal in Salon, although he’s actually discussing General Petraeus’ performance before Congress in the light of Richard Draper’s aurhorised Bush biography, incidentally puts the blame where it really lies – on George Bush Sr.’and his pretensions to aristocracy..

[…]

The elder Bush assumed that the Bush family trust and its trustees — James Baker, Brent Scowcroft and Prince Bandar — would take the erstwhile wastrel and guide him on the path of wisdom. In this conception, the country was not entrusted to the younger Bush’s care so much as Bush was entrusted to the care of the trustees. He was the beneficiary of the trust. But to the surprise of those trustees, he slipped the bonds of the trust and cut off the family trustees. They knew he was ill-prepared and ignorant, but they never expected him to be assertive. They wrongly assumed that Cheney would act for them as a trustee.

Cheney had worked with and for them for decades and seemed to agree with them, if not on every detail then on the more important matter of attitude, particularly the question of who should govern. The elder Bush had helped arrange for Cheney to become the CEO of Halliburton, making him a very rich man at last. But Bush, Baker, Scowcroft et al. didn’t realize that Cheney’s apparent concurrence was to advance himself and his views, which were not theirs. When absolute power was conferred on him, the habits of deference lapsed, no longer necessary. (“Thank you for the privilege of serving today.”) Cheney was always more Rumsfeld oriented than Bush oriented. The elder Bush knew that Rumsfeld despised him and that Cheney was close to Rumsfeld, just as he knew his son’s grievous limitations. But the obvious didn’t occur to him — that Cheney would seize control of the lax son for his own purposes. The elder Bush committed a monumental error, empowering a regent to the prince who would betray the father. The myopia of the old WASP aristocracy allowed him to see Cheney as a member of his club. Cheney, for his part, was extremely convincing in playing possum. The elder Bush has many reasons for self-reproach, but perhaps none greater than being outsmarted by a courtier he thought was his trustee.

[…]

Read the whole thing

Yes, George Bush Sr, former president, was tossing around the future of not just millions of US citizens but the whole bloody world as though it were a family bauble to be disposed of on a whim. That’s just how entitled George Bush Sr. feels to power. Morals mean nothing, law means nothing, treason means nothing.

That’s because to the super-rich, the rest of us barely exist. What exists to them is money and power, not people and their annoying laws and rights. We’re just another annoying thing, we have no rights, unless they grant them to us from their beneficence. We are, at best, a necessary inconvenience. When we’re an unnecessary inconvenience… well, we’re screwed.

George Sr. and wife Barbara, their egos inflated to superimportance by years of Republican sycophancy to money, planned on Bushco being in power forever. They thought their patented child-rearing techiques had produced the ideal useful tool they could use.

But instead they’ve made a psychopathic monster that neither they nor anyone else can control. Now millions are dead, maimed or homeless and they are to blame.

I hope Bush Sr., who professes to Christianity, can’t sleep nights for guilt at what he’s done and I hope it’s sharper than a serpent’s tooth; I hope it’s a slow insinuating poison in his soul (should such a thing exist and should he have one).

It continues to amaze me that so very little public anger is turned his way: even notorious narcotic-loving nymphet Lindsey Lohan’s weirdo Dad probably gets more critical column inches than does the former president.

No doubt there are those who’d say, “They’re old now, what does it matter? They’ll be dead soon enough”, but just because Bush Sr. and his loathsome wife are old and infirm shouldn’t mean they’re absolved of any crimes against humanity.

Take Romania’s Ceaucescus and Chile’s Augusto Pinochet, for example; age didn’t spare them. Nor should it have, and neither should it spare George or Barbara Bush.

Ooops! Apocalypse.

AP, via Raw Story:

B-52 carried nuclear armed cruise missiles by mistake : US
Published: Wednesday September 5, 2007

A B-52 bomber flew the length of the United States last week mistakenly loaded with as many as six nuclear armed cruise missiles last week, a US military official confirmed Wednesday.

The mix-up was reported to President George W. Bush after the nuclear warheads were discovered when the aircraft landed at Barksdale Air Force Base Louisiana, the official said.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said as many as six cruise missiles loaded on to the plane were found to have nuclear warheads on them by mistake.

The B-52 was flying from Minot Air Base in North Dakota.

The incident was first reported by Military Times newspapers, which said the air launched cruise missiles can carry nuclear warheads of five to 150 kilotons.

The official said the discovery was reported to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Peter Pace, “and higher.” The official said the notification goes as high as the president.

“There are procedures in place and they kicked in and worked,” the official said.

I’m sure the Us public is mightily reassured. But ‘By mistake’? My ass – practicing for Iran, more like.