Comment Of The Day: Not With A Bang, But With A Ker-ching!

Today’s is on the online Guardian’s hideous, dumbed down redesign; it comes from one of the paper’s own commenters and gives an idea of the depth of feeling people have towards the paper:

I implore the powers that be, the Editor … whoever is really in charge of this website, the Board of trustees and governors and cabinet consider the following:

1 – Your previous website had an utterly distinctive original identity. Whose idea was it to change it? What was their thinking? Please write a piece about this, if only to prove the likes of me wrong – I am fascinated why on earth you needed to change the previous website. Did you do market research? Were you losing viewers? Let’s have a major feature in Media Guardian of what really went on behind the scenes. Emily Bell is such a good writer normally that I think she was forced to write the above piece l by some editorial jihad types. Was there some change of Head of Dept who needed to assert their identity…. an incredible power battle and the re-designers won at the expense of the old guard.

In the end really the change makes no sense at all.

2 – May I as an all license’d Fool give some advice from the pub here where I am sitting with my wireless iBook spluttering into my ale – your redesign is Nu Lab nonsense apparently giving people a greater “choice” about what to read near the top the page. You fill hallowed news hierarchy space with bright colour photographs like the advertising pages of a glossy fashion magazine. It so totally dumbs down the authority of the The Guardian it makes me nauseous to look at and dizzy.. I must break off here a moment .. [“what? yes I will drink up and leave soon”]

…. to finish my bleat about this mosaic nonsense of a new website: your real strength Guardian is the clarity of statement and news judgement made by those experienced editors, saying to each other … ” OK, these are in our judgements, the TOP stories, here is the hierarchy of news information” That is the creative soul and the BRAND soul of The Guardian, the gold dust of journalism. When these editors and senior journalists are given the right space It makes for fascinating dramatic reading – the eye hits the page, scrolls down undistracted by glossy tripe and gets to the guts of what is going on in the town, the country and the world.

Your new website no longer does these great editors and journalists justice, it waters down their precious news judgement and clear story telling, it favours superficial colour photo self indulgence at the expense of the cold beautiful truth of print…

* * *

Please consider bringing back the essential features of the previous site

Whoever ordered that redesign wants shooting. The placement of items in the old design mirrored that of the actual newspaper, so it was very easy to see which items were thought to have more news value or editorial priority – and it’s the editorial voice that differentiates one newspaper from another.

Now it just looks and reads like a mashup of google news and handbag.com. The editorial voice now appears to be that of a daytime tv producer.

Still, I bet all the resulting confusion will push up the page views mightily, and whichever marketing droid who’s idea this was can point to advertising sales and go “see, I was right”. Tossers.

The Guardian, despite it’s Blairite slavishness still had enough of the old left about it, and a reputation for good reporting to ensure that it was the first paper many leftists and progressives around the world turned to every day. When all the US’ newspapers were drooling over Bush’s virility, cheering the war and ignoring the war crimes, you could still get the real news from the Guardian.

That they’ve taken this massive step in redesign, reducing the news and the moral heart of the paper, it’s comment and leader section, to just another tab to be clicked on an all-singing, all-dancing multimedia extravaganza, is an editorial decision in itself. It’s an editorial decision that says fluff is most important. It says that we are no longer a purveyor of serious news, with progressive views, but just another corporation in it for the money.

That the the new, shiny improved Guardian Unlimited is launched on the day that Blair finally,absolutely, says he’s going makes me also think there’s a bit of bending with the political wind going on here too: the redesign is not only convenient in terms of clickthrough and ad sales, it also disassociates the Guardian from its Blairite past. Bye bye Mr.Tony Blair, good fucking riddance, see you at Den Haag. Onwards and upwards with multimedia Gordon, or something like that.

The future’s grim, the future’s Brown, and I’m switching to the Independent.

UPDATE:

That new edirorial voice in action: odd, how the headline ‘German police claim G8 terror attack foiled’ morphed into ‘German police foil G8 terror attack’ on the Guardian Unlimited’s new front page.

Oh Yeah?

Jonathan Freedland was being ridiculously optimistic in the Guardian this morning:

A new book, Second Chance by Zbigniew Brzezinski, the cold war hawk who served as national security adviser to Jimmy Carter, includes a startling phrase. No leftist, Brzezinski detects what he calls a “global political awakening”, a stirring across much of the developing world, among those who are “conscious of social injustice to an unprecedented degree and resentful of its deprivations and lack of personal dignity”. Thanks to television and the internet, the global have-nots can now see all that the haves are enjoying at their expense. The hard-headed Brzezinski sniffs revolution in the air.

[…]

Is it possible that the Blair era of neoliberal certainty is coming to a close, that there are stirrings abroad that call for something else? Might there not be a demand for action, as there was when the last intolerable gap in wealth opened up nearly a century ago – a demand, in short, for a battle against inequality?

Dream on, Freedland. This is what happens when you plan to challenge the neoliberal status quo:

Hamburg – Hundreds of German police searched Wednesday the homes and offices of militants planning to protest against globalization at next month’s G8 summit on the Baltic coast. Federal prosecutors in Karlsruhe said they suspected 18 persons of terrorism. The inquiry is focussed on a series of petrol-bomb attacks over the past year on the offices, homes and cars of German officials in Berlin and Hamburg.

The raids, on 40 premises in northern Germany, were conducted by nearly 900 police.

The 18 had claimed responsibility under a variety of names for their bombings, prosecutors said.

Also under investigation were three persons identified as members of the separate Militant Groups (MG), a terrorist organization which had mounted two anti-G8 attacks, and 25 attacks on property in all since 2001.

Leftists accuse the Group of Eight (G8) nations of oppressing poor countries. They plan to disrupt the G8 summit to be hosted by German Chancellor Angela Merkel in the beach resort of Heiligendamm.

Police arrived at dawn at the Rote Flora, a building which functions as a headquarters for the German anarchist movement in the northern German city of Hamburg.

Prosecutors said the raids on the 18-person organization and MG were aimed at collecting documents and other evidence.

Among the targets of nine bomb attacks during 2006 was Thomas Mirow, state secretary of the finance ministry who lives in Hamburg, and there have been more attacks this year. Police have made no arrests so far.

The Rote Flora is the crumbling remnant of a 19th century theatre and was taken over by squatters in 1989.

The leftists now have a lease on the building, which has been at the focus of repeated clashes between rioters and the city-state’s riot police down the years.

Merkel has invited the leaders of the G7 nations and Russia to Heiligendamm, a high-class resort in sparsely populated countryside, to discuss world economic issues next month.

‘Leftist’ by whose definition? I note also that the arrested’ve been accused of terrorism – maybe I’m just dim, but I can’t find any reports on Google of a terrorist petrol bombing campaign carried out recently by leftists in Germany. Maybe someone can enlighten me?

I wonder how long it will take for all these people to be released with no charges against them. Not until conveniently after the G8, I expect.

Running Away From Reality

It boggles the mind that a large section of a nation of educated people, whose parents and grandparents had the gumption to run away from being ignorant peasants kept that way by a system of economic exploitation and religious separation, should willingly choose, in the space of a couple of generations, to go right back to being ignorant peasants again. Especially so when you consider what the young of other countries have to do to get an education and escape the kind of institutionalised ignorance and religious authoritarianism many Americans seem to yearn for.

It’s one thing to find a safe place to practice to worship your imgauinary gods but it’s another entirely to attempt and create a separatist state within a state in which your imginary god, (as interpreted by self-interested humans, as always) reigns supreme and to then use that as a base from which to convert the nation to an imposed belief in your fantasy world.

Here’sScholars and Rogues on the religious right’s retreat from reality:

So apparently some conservatives, unsatisfied with the “well-known liberal bias” of YouTube, have created their own conservative alternative (”conservalternative”?) called QubeTV.

[…]

But this is silly in the same way that Conservapedia is silly. Rather than actually engage their opponents in actual cultural discussion and putting their ideas in the stream of debate, these ostrich-heads are sticking their heads in the sand and creating closed social systems where they never have to face anyone who disagrees with them. To use a simpler and funnier metaphor, they’re taking their balls and going home.

It’s this kind of sheltering from reality that is endemic to so much of the modern conservative movement, particularly the evangelicals. They create their own home-schooled networks, their own shopping centers, their own cultural events–a sort of “parallel reality” that exists completely alongside ours, but is not engaged with ours in any relevant or real way. And when you never have to face or understand things that don’t conflict with your worldview, you never feel any need to question or criticize the world you live in.

In the intellectual arrogance of girlhood I used to openly wish that I were stupid – because then, although the world would still be shit, I wouldn’t care.

I can still see the attraction of just giving up questioning and going with the flow. In times of existential dread, when we live in fear of our fellow humans and what they might do, with the looming threat of a dying planet and an unforgiving, random universe, there’s an overwhelming yearning in all of us for some other reality than this. It’s a harsh epiphany when it hits you that this really is it, this is all there is and therefore it’s up to us to improve it and ourselves. No wonder people recoil into self-manufactured reality.

Most of us in the developed economies have our temporary virtual worlds, our escapes from the grimness of the news. For some it’s music, for some drugs, for some the digital world – but most of us know that this is only an escape, a temporary cop-out at best. Only Republicans and fundies have the money, the freedom and the scope to have made their preferred alternate world into a reality. The result is closed communities of the mind, and often of the body as well, where the pastors have always been in power and there’s no need to think and everything is allowed, even kinky sex, just as long you’re male and you slap a ‘Christian’ or ‘Biblical’ label on it.

The phrase ‘cognitive dissonance’ was all the rage on the blogs a couple of years ago, with many wondering how Bush supporters could maintain this ongoing denial of reality without their heads exploding. Well, making their own reality via the likes of Qtube and Conservapedia and the rubbish pumped into the media by the intricate nesting Chinese puzzle of wingnut thinktanks and advocacy organisations is how. They’ve simply ignored what they don’t want to hear; for them it just does not exist. What they do want to hear they make up out of whole cloth. A lie is not a lie if it suits God’s purpose, as interpreted by the one doing the lying.

Recently I quoted a contented Ukrainian goatherd, who’d spent most of his 116 years in a totalitarian society:

“People who know too much always come to a nasty end. Better to stay stupid and not wonder too much about anything.” He told local newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda he had only been to school twice when he had visited his local primary school for two days and learned to write his name. He added: “The less you know, the longer you live. Ignorance is long life and happiness.”

I know Christianity is also a philosophy of a an ancient goatherd, but who ever thought ‘Ignorance is long life and happiness’ would become the mantra of choice of such a substantial minority of educated Americans?

The fundies’ve taken escapism to its extreme, so much so that they’ve retreated into the blessed stupidity and blind faith of medieval feudalism. While that may be fine for a bunch of overprivileged westerners who can live out their fundy dreams in isolation out on the prairie somewhere, to the detriment of no-one but themselves – and who also of course mostly have the option to snap out of it at any time – the problem is that they want the rest of the world to dress up and revert to ignorant peasantry too. This fundy philosophy of willed ignorance and submission to authority in exchange for a spurious feeling of safety and community is a model that’sbeing exported around the world, to much ill-effect.

While I’ve no doubt that fath can be a comfort and escape to many this retrogressive movement is not faith – it’s an illusion and a snare, a political, uber-capitalist, exploitative, proselytising, patriarchal totalitarianism, dressed up as a blessed spiritual escape from the physical grimness of life. Just go with the flow, all is forgiven, Jesus will save us all. Just sign here…

.

Exactly.

HTML Mencken has words for the mushy middle of the US progressive blogosphere and the allegedly liberal media:

[…]

Some people would rather be nice than be right, than right a wrong, than prevent the next fucking catastrophe even as the current one engulfs everything in flames: better, it seems, to be civil to the idiots than embrace a principle of decency. Because, after all, the idiots are on the side of angels now!

Well, whoopdie fucking doo. Look at what it took for these people to finally get a clue.

Even now they don’t have a clue: they don’t have a clue about their own culpability for Iraq and the sheer amount of rhetorical blood on their hands. Fuck ’em, they don’t deserve civility or a pulpit in the media.

They Don’t Like It Up ’em

Censorship, it’s what the Patriot Act was made for – from Slashdot:

Cryptome, a website concerned with encryption, privacy, and government secrecy, has received two weeks’ notice from Verio that its service will be terminated for unspecified “violation of [its] Acceptable Use Policy.” Cryptome has a history of making publicly available documents and information that governments would rather keep secret. For the notice, and a public response by Cryptome webmaster John Young, see Cryptome Shutdown by Verio/NTT.”

That terse report hides a fascinating series of emails between Cryptome’s owners and their ISP, in which the ISP stonewalls in a very peculiar way and Cryptome tries to work out the subtext of what’s happening. Eventually they get this curt termination of service letter:

This letter is to notify you that we are terminating your service for violation of our Acceptable Use Policy, effective Friday May 4, 2007. We are providing you with two week notice to locate another service provider.

Cryptome had had no previous problems with the ISP despite it’s having had alleged copyright infringement complaints made against it by disgruntled exposees. So why the shutdown now?

Might it be that they’re currently exposing a massive hole in the US military’s electronic and data security?

Not to worry for the moment though, Cryptome will survive:

This never-to-be-explained self-gagging by ISPs has become characteristic around the net due to covert and open governmental, commercial and personal aggressions to suppress information. Librarians and lawyers, among others, battling to overturn clamps on information, have learned to exhibit coded signals to the public to indicate undisclosable measures to suppress. Could be that is what Danna and Verio are signaling. We’ve received over 30 offers to host Cryptome in several countries and will accept most to disperse the collection as protection against future shutdowns.

Although Cryptome’s safe for now, what happened to them emphasises that the need for data havens is becoming ever more pressing to preserve free political speech.