Dulce Et Decorum Ain’t

Seems to me a certain senior RAF officer is a lot more than half in love with easeful death… provided it’s someone else’s.

Meet General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett VC KCB DSO, Air Vice-Marshal David Allan Walker OBE MVO FRAeS:

RAF pilots asked to consider suicide flight
Lee Glendinning
Tuesday April 3, 2007
The Guardian

A senior RAF officer asked fighter pilots whether they would consider suicide missions as a last resort to stop terrorists if their weapons had failed or they had run out of ammunition.

During a training exercise, Air Vice-Marshal David Walker put it to newly qualified pilots that they should think of flying suicide missions in a “worst case scenario” when a terrorist attack was imminent.

The head of the RAF’s elite One Group who is in operational control of Typhoon, Tornado, Jaguar and Harrier fighters and bombers, is reported to have asked the pilots: “Would you think it unreasonable if I ordered you to fly your aircraft into the ground in order to destroy a vehicle carrying a Taliban or al-Qaida commander?”

According to reports in today’s Sun, he told them they knew when they signed up that they would have to risk their lives.

The Ministry of Defence last night confirmed that the training exercise had taken place but stressed it was a hypothetical question to provoke thoughts as to what pilots would do if they were confronted with a situation in which they might die.

[…]

“The idea of officers ordering personnel to commit suicide is disgusting,” an unnamed officer told the Sun.

Another said: “His idea of leadership is to suggest that it is within his power to authorise the first example of an ordered kamikaze attack in the RAF’s 89-year history. He is subtly suggesting that if he wished he could order anyone in his command to die.”

It’s one thing to put your life at risk but it’s quite another to have a senior officer say he’d kill you on a whim. It’s a situation Walker’ll never face though: he’s too busy yukking it up at guest nights with royalty, celebrity and the Red Arrows. All that ceremonial Master of the Royal Household stuff to see to, doncherknow.

It’s hard work, just like the field of military expertise that led Air Vice Marshal Walker to reach the eminent heights from which he now pontificates to fighting women and men – administration:

Air Vice-Marshal David Allan Walker OBE MVO FRAeS has been Master of the Household of the Royal Household of the Sovereign of the United Kingdom since 2005.

He was born 14 July 1956, and educated at the City of London School, and the University of Birmingham (BSc, 1977). He joined the Royal Air Force in 1974, and served in the Administration Branch. He is a MIPD and staff qualified (qs).

[…]

Walker became an Air Commodore in 1998 and was appointed Director Corporate Communications (RAF), 1998–2001, and later was Director Personnel Policy (RAF) then Personnel Training Policy 2001–2003..

So. He’s a professional suckup to royalty, policy wonk and spin merchant. The most serious danger he’s been in in his life was probably at a No 10 dinner party. If this is the calibre of officer in charge the UK forces truly are fucked.

“What Did You Do In The Information War, Daddy?”

The notion of free speech may not last very much longer if the US Department of Homeland Security succeeds in its ongoing attempt to steal the whole bloody internet:

DHS Wants Master Key for DNS
Posted by Zonk on Saturday March 31, @01:33PM
from the they-own-all-the-locks-and-doors dept.

An anonymous reader writes

“At an ICANN meeting in Lisbon, the US Department of Homeland Security made it clear that it has requested the master key for the DNS root zone. The key will play an important role in the new DNSSec security extension, because it will make spoofing IP-addresses impossible. By forcing the IANA to hand out a copy of the master key, the US government will be the only institution that is able to spoof IP addresses and be able to break into computers connected to the Internet without much effort. There’s a further complication, of course, because even ‘if the IANA retains the key … the US government still reserves the right to oversee ICANN/IANA. If the keys are then handed over to ICANN/IANA, there would be even less of an incentive [for the U.S.] to give up this role as a monitor. As a result, the DHS’s demands will probably only heat up the debate about US dominance of the control of Internet resources.'”

This is not just about paranoid American security bods trying to control their own national corner of the internet: this is about the blatant theft by Bushco, dressed up in its spiffy Homeland Security costume, of the DNS root servers, the basic infrastructure of the whole world-wide web.

The root DNS servers are essential to the function of the Internet, as so many protocols use DNS, either directly or indirectly. They are potential points of failure for the entire Internet. For this reason, there are 13 named root servers worldwide. There are no more root servers because a single DNS reply can only be 512 bytes long; while it is possible to fit 15 root servers in a datagram of this size, the variable size of DNS packets makes it prudent to only have 13 root servers.

They are housed in multiple sites with high bandwidth access, to try to prevent attacks such as distributed denial-of-service attacks. Most of these single-site installations are still in the United States. Usually each DNS server in a given site is actually a cluster of servers behind a load-balancing set of routers.

However, a number of root servers lie outside the United States:

i.root-servers.net is in Stockholm and many other locations using anycast

k.root-servers.net has globally visible nodes in Amsterdam, London, Miami, Delhi and Tokyo

m.root-servers.net is in Tokyo, Paris and Seoul using anycast

The modern trend is to use anycast to give resilience and to balance load across a wide geographic area. For example, j.root-servers.net, f.root-servers.net and k.root-servers.net are served using anycast from a number of sites worldwide. The use of anycast
has allowed the growth of non-U.S. root DNS servers until most DNS root instances are outside the U.S.

Details of all the root servers can be seen at the root-servers.org website.

[My emphasis]

This isn’t just about market dominance. This is about invasion, colonialism and the pursuit of imperialist aims by other means. The theatre of war just happens to be virtual. The US government, or any other individual governmment for that matter, has no right to claim control over resources it does not own and which are not located on its territory. But it’s doing it anyway… eminent domain apparently works online too.

But where is the chorus of protest from the geeks?

From what I can see the majority of American IT professionals, with notable exceptions, have been remarkably quiet so far on political matters except for their ad infinitum online arguments about some spurious utopian future with libertarian transhumanisam, polyamory and rocky road ice-cream for all. The doors of their comfy padded cages are slamming shut and they don’t hear a thing. Their freedom (and ours) is being stolen from under their noses.

But hey, look, shiny new gadgets! Oooh, iPhone!

Geeky types like to think of themselves as rebels, outside the mainstream and cleverer than the rest of us lesser mortals. So why are they being so bloody supine while Bushco steals the web?

I have a question for any IT professionals reading this: dammit, people, you are the ones that control and support the IT infrastructure, you could stop this if you wanted to. You could put the skids under the entire Bushco venture if you had a mind.

But do you actually want to ? Homeland Security pays well…

So this is my question – do you really give a damn about freedom or are you just happy to be the future well-paid technocrats of the New Fascism? C’mon geeks, get up off your asses and fight for once, us non-geeks are relying on you.

The Importance of ‘Attorneygate’

I’m planning on spending this morning catching up on Attorneygate, particularly on the Senate hearing testimony of Gonzales’ sidekick and Rove mini-me Kyle Sampson, the baby-faced boy wonder who at first glance seems to be trying to take the fall for his boss for the politically motivated firings of US attorneys, if what he’s admitted so far is any guide.

But is that true? Is Kyle Sampson substantially to blame? Is he taking the fall, and why?

I love this stuff.

But that’s the point at which many eyes are beginning to glaze over. Not all of us are totally obsessed with the minutiae and the internecine rivalries of the administration of US justice.

However, most of us do give a damn when the government of a country that thinks of itself as the world’s policeman, and which has such a disproportionate effect on world culture, economy and politics, is being deliberately corrupted from within. It affects us all one way or another.

That is the big picture here, and why Attorneygate’s so important. But where can we go to find out more in language the casual yet interested observer rather than the political obsessive can understand?

For a list of the dramatis personae and a timeline of events you could do no better than than Talking Points Memo or TPM Muckraker, whose valiant efforts have pushed this story to the prominence it has now and whose readers have uncovered the story by sifting the reams of email evidence released by the White House in an attempt to bury the inquiry in paper.

For those who want the backstory the links are fascinating – it’s like lifting up a log and seeing crawly things scurrying panicky away from the light.

The story, grossly simplified and in short, as I understand it, is this:

Bushco got scared when California politician Randall ‘Duke Cunningham” was convicted of corruption over defence contracts, because a co-conspirator of his, one Dusty Foggo of the CIA, was also on the verge of being indicted for his involvement in the same shady doings.

Dusty Fuggo’s a friend, intimate and business associate of many, many senior Republican figures up to and including in the White House and is privy to all sorts of CIA shenanigans like, oh say, rendition, and torture, and misuse of funds, and bribery and prostitution – take your pick. he also knows where the bodies were buried, figuratively (though possibly actually) speaking, in Honduras during Reagan and Bush Sr.’s Central American adventures.. So the notion of his testifying anywhere, any time, simply would not do.

Foggo could’ve exposed everybody.

Not only was that little storm brewing for the White House, meanwhile there was that darned Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago, worrying away at Cheny aide Scotter Libby and about to expose the White House’s complicity in the media outing of yet another CIA agent, which would then expose their out and out lies over Iraq’s alleged attempted importation of yellowcake uranium from Niger and reveal their whole pretext for the war as a lie and a sham. (Not that we don’t know that already from other extrinsic evidence but it would’ve been nice to’ve seen it proved in court.)

Oh no, exposure! Whatever to do? It all got a bit panicky.

It got worse: previously loyal prosecutors started chafing when pressured politically by Bushco to push unfounded voter fraud cases against Democrats. They might have drunk some koolaid, but even they had limits. There was no evidence, they said.

Karl Rove, the wily old snake, had a brainwave. They could stop the Foggo prosecution and fix the next election too, plus the added extra of bringing the whole national prosecutorial wing of the Justice department entirely under their political control. All their problems solved at a stroke – all they had to do was fire all the lawyers and put unqualified partisans in their place. Of course! Easypeasy, lemon squeezy.

Th idea of being able to prosecute their political opponents on a whim was too tempting to resist. Why, Rove himself had a young padawan, a zealous devotee of the dark Rovian art of candidate smearing, who’d fit perfectly – and in Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s home state of Arkansas too. How very handy for the next presidential election.

The plan was all going well for the little group of alleged conspirators, Rove, Gonzales, Harriet Miers, (potentially Cheney and Bush too but that remains to be seen) – great theory, great plan. It all got discussed by email within and outside the White House (by whom is exactly what the hearings are about) then it was up to Gonzales to put it into action, which he did in the same half-assed way Bushco do everything.

He palmed it off to his deputy Kyle Sampson, the man who’s now sitting in the chair sweating before the committee. Because the US attorneys, quite understandably, didn’t take to being fired on flimsy pretexts like incompetence very well and started to talk to the media, and it all began to unravel. The Democrats took Congresss, the story came out, and here we are, Bushco and its evil lawyer minions on the stand, looking for all the world like the low-rent theives they are.

The big question is: how high up can this be proved to have gone? While it may be obvious to most of us that Bushco’re as rotten as a log full of woodlice, because of the virulence of the Right’s revisionist attack trops in the media it has to be shown in the clear light of judicial sunshine that the Democrats are not, in their turn, using the administration of justice for partisan purposes.

The proof of Bushco wrongdoing needs to be revealed in public.

Yes, there’re a lot of grounds for impeaching Bush and Cheney and Gonzales too for that matter, but without the actual, physical proof of a crime it’s all just conjecture and accusation. The evidence that’s coming to light as a result of the Attorneygate hearings may be that actual, physical proof – or at the very least, we may hear the testimony that will finally put the criminals in the White House in the dock, not for grand historical war crimes but for squalid hole-in-the-corner corruption and conspiracy.

How worried are Bushco about this? Worried enough to have made a futile attempt to stop the hearings yesterday on procedural grounds.. I shall continue to watch this one with interest, it has great potential to be the blow that finally brings the rotten edifice of modern-day Republicanism tumbling down.

Always Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom

Last night it was Bush, accusing congressional Democrats of staging political theatre over the Attorneygate hearings whilst himself flanked by theatrical props, ie military families:

Bush appeared at the White House alongside veterans and family members of troops to accuse Democrats of staging nothing more than “political theater” that delays the delivery of resources to soldiers fighting in Iraq.

This morning it’s this headline re corrupt US attorney general Alberto Gonzales:

Gonzales Launches PR Campaign
Will Tour And Letters Of Support From Latino And Law Enforcement Groups Burnish Embattled AG’s Image?

A PR campaign? It’s a little bit late for that, surely?

I’ll give Bushco one thing, they are at least consistent: anything and everything they do gets spun. Sometimes they spin so hard and so fast they disappear up their own arsesholes in a puff of ridiculousness.

But what do they care as long as the actual truth is muddied by falsehood? The mainstream media will report this, as they do all other Bushco spin, as though it were gospel. I predict that by next week the conservative media narrative will be ’embattled yet brave president and his unfairly picked-upon Hispanic hero sidekick’. Job done.

Diversionary Tactics

Oooh, ooh, go get the lawn chairs and the chips and dip! There’s one of those old queen/new queen fights to the death going on over in the hateosphere.

Those were the days, my friend...

Sskeletal former neofascist pinup Ann Coulter and her up and coming anchor-baby rival Michelle Malkin are conducting the fight by proxy,the proxy being the once-powerful Matt Drudge.

As both women are unpricipled and hateful it’s all very catty and entertaining and is no doubt pushing up their hits. But, as is usual with wingnuts, at bottom it’s all about the money.

After Coulter’s ‘faggot’ comment at CPAC Malkin saw her rival wounded and attacked her without delay; not just because Republicans eat their own but because,as Malkin’s popularity with the provisional psychopathic wing of the Republican party is rising in contrast to Coulter’s, she’s also taking over Coulter’s syndicated column slots. That of course means more moolah for Michelle and husband/amanuensis Jesse and to fund Michelle’s vanity projects like the lame Hot Air vlog.

There’s more at stake here for both than just high-school bitchery:

Two More Papers Drop Ann Coulter Today: They Explain Why

By Dave Astor

Published: March 09, 2007 12:10 PM ET updated 1:30 PM ET

NEW YORK The Sanford (N.C.) Herald has become at least the sixth newspaper this week to drop Ann Coulter’s syndicated column following her March 2 remark concerning Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards that included the term “faggot.”

The DeKalb Daily Chronicle in Illinois, a Lee Enterprises paper, then became #7. That paper explained on its Web site today that it took issue with her syndicate, Universal, saying it had no intention of dropping Coulter because her offensive remark did not appear in a column. “That’s a lot like the Chronicle saying, ‘She didn’t say it in one of the columns we ran, so it isn’t our problem.’ Wrong. It is our problem, and not dealing with it is a cop-out,” the newspaper declared.

“So yesterday we called Universal Press Syndicate and ‘fired’ Coulter. What she said was wrong and hurtful and stepped way beyond the line of human decency, much less political commentary.”

[…]

Other papers dropping the conservative Coulter this week were the Lancaster (Pa.) New Era; The Oakland Press of Pontiac, Mich.; The Mountain Press of Sevierville, Tenn.; The Times of Shreveport, La.; and The American Press in Lake Charles, La.

Read whole story

A trumped-up public spat with Coulter is just what Malkin needs to finally step up to the throne of Bitch Queen of All Wingnuttia while there’s still a bit of money in it. Malkiin’s real advantage in this fight is her horde of smitten inadequates who’ll pile on the email pressure with their local papers.

The problem for Coulter is that that she’s playing by rightwing rules, and rigjhtwing rules say that once you get old and ugly then it’s curtains for you, sweetie. Nobody loves a harpy when she’s forty. The still youngish and attractive (if she keeps very still and doesn’t say anything) Malkin knows this; indeed her whole career is built on it. So Coulter’s bound to lose this one, and then there’s her prosecution for voter fraud…. With her star so precipitously on the wane’ she could almost be the Gloria Swanson of wingnuttery. You could almost feel sorry for Coulter.

Not.

To don my tinfoil hat fr a moment, I wonder if this isn’t about the hidden hand of the market as much as the hidden hand of Republican online psyops. What’s really interesting is how all this blew up just about the time Attorneygate was getting hot, nicely diverting away any wingnuts who might’ve been tempted to actually focus on what’s happening in Washington.

They know damned well that their supporters, given the choice between egging on a bit of brunette-on-blonde bitchslappery or facing their own accountability for having elected a bunch of crooks, would choose the former, no contest.

This leads me also to wonder about this big White House email dump that so many bloggers are poring over. Might this not also be a diversion? While the left is handily bogged down documenting the atrocities at the White House and Justice department and the right enthralled by fighting totty, what’s quietly being planned for Iran?