First Junkie

Cindy McCain field recognition guide

“She was blonde and beautiful. A rich man’s daughter who became a politically powerful man’s wife. She had it all, including an insidious addiction to drugs that sapped the beauty from her life like a spider on a butterfly.”

You’d think the media would jump on a juicy story of drug addiction, dishonesty and outright theft by a potential first lady, wouldn’t you? Can you imagine the furore, the accusations of druggy baby-mamadom, if it were Michelle Obama? She’d be in jail by now and her kids in foster care. But it’s Cindy McCain and she’s blonde and rich – so she’s not and they’re not.

No, blonde rich junkies don’t get pokey, they get put in the White House.

Salon, October 1999:

GOP presidential candidate John McCain’s wife Cindy took to the airwaves last week, recounting for Jane Pauley (on “Dateline”) and Diane Sawyer (on “Good Morning America”) the tale of her onetime addiction to Percocet and Vicodin, and the fact that she stole the drugs from her own nonprofit medical relief organization.

It was a brave and obviously painful thing to do.

It was also vintage McCain media manipulation.

I had deja vu watching Cindy McCain on television, perky in a purple suit with tinted pearls to match. It was so reminiscent of the summer day in 1994 when suddenly, years after she’d claimed to have kicked her habit, McCain decided to come clean to the world about her addiction to prescription painkillers.

I believe she wore red that day. She granted semi-exclusive interviews to one TV station and three daily newspaper reporters in Arizona, tearfully recalling her addiction, which came about after painful back and knee problems and was exacerbated by the stress of the Keating Five banking scandal that had ensnared her husband. To make matters worse, McCain admitted, she had stolen the drugs from the American Voluntary Medical Team, her own charity, and had been investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The local press cooed over her hard-luck story. One of the four journalists spoon-fed the story — Doug McEachern, then a reporter for Tribune Newspapers, now a columnist with the Arizona Republic (and, it must be added, normally much more acerbic) — wrote this rather typical lead:

“She was blonde and beautiful. A rich man’s daughter who became a politically powerful man’s wife. She had it all, including an insidious addiction to drugs that sapped the beauty from her life like a spider on a butterfly.”

What McEachern and the others didn’t know was that, far from being a simple, honest admission designed to clear her conscience and help other addicts, Cindy McCain’s storytelling had been orchestrated by Jay Smith, then John McCain’s Washington campaign media advisor. And it was intended to divert attention from a different story, a story that was getting quite messy.Read the whole thing.

More from Majikthise here and Kos here.

The Incredible Shrinking Attribution Ray

As has become depressingly usual in UK media, here’s yet another lazy British media hack blatantly ripping off a US blog thinking no-one will notice. Do they not think we can use the internet?

From the Guardian’s Money Blog, 18 August:

The incredible grocery shrink ray – why what you buy is getting smaller

US blog The Consumerist has been covering this for weeks, a quick google for ‘grocery shrink ray‘ would have immediately revealed. The pages and pages of posts, all tagged ‘grocery shrink ray’ for the ease and convenience of researchers and readers.

Is it just too much effort for Guardian bloggers even to type a phrase or a word or two into a search engine and check it out before claiming it as their own?

I don’t know what it is; does being a proper paid writer – with qualifications and everything – on a proper newspaper (The Guardian! Woohoo!) magically elevate Sandra Haurant above such plebeian tools as Google?

Granted there is an acknowledgement of sorts but it’s to the wrong person.

Jeff Allder, policy expert at the National Consumer Council, says:

“In America it is known as the grocery shrink ray and this is one trend from the US that we definitely don’t want too much of over here.”

For someone with so much paid writing on consumer issues under her belt you’d think Haurant would know all about this trend in product sizing anyway, and know the blog too, with no need to google. After all The Consumerist is one of the big consumer issues blogs out there and any competent consumer journalist worth their salt would know that. To my mind this makes her lack of attribution or a link quite difficult to understand.

But then what do I know? I’m not a proper paid writer – editor even – on a proper newspaper and above such petty concerns as boring old plagiarism. I’m just another blogging oik, and things like that bother me.

Onwards And Upwards

What a wanker.

TV journalist Martin Bashir has apologised for making what he called a “tasteless” comment about Asian women.

Speaking at the Asian American Journalists Association annual banquet in Chicago, he said: “I’m happy to be in the midst of so many Asian babes.

“In fact, I’m happy that the podium covers me from the waist down.”

Call Him Mr. Pitiful

What have we got to look forward to should that nice young Mr Cameron get into No.10? More of the same old malfeasance, bad judgement and spin it seems.

Take journo Daniel Finkelstein, the Gold List Tory candidate, Comment Editor for Murdoch’s Times and regular guest on BBC2’s Newnight, who jumped at the invitation to join a panel vetting prospective Conservative parliamentary candidates in one of his local constituencies. Not often a mere pundit gets direct input into the process.

This is the man he chose:

A Tory parliamentary candidate who bombarded his Liberal Democrat rival with hate mail and vandalised the party’s Watford headquarters was facing jail today after admitting more than 70 offences of criminal damage and harassment.

Ian Oakley, 31, of Ryeland Close, West Drayton, north west London, admitted mounting a two year hate campaign against Sal Brinton, who he considered his main rival to defeat the sitting Labour MP.

The Times report of Oakley’s conviction yesterday was prepended with a link to Finkelstein’s blogpost “Ian Oakley, My Part In His Downfall”. Even before the court had found Oakley guilty Finkelstein had his apologia ready and a lame one it is too:

[…]

It is now the fashion to invite journalists to interview applicants in the final round of the seat selection. And I was asked to be the interviewer in Watford.

I asked Oakley and the other candidates questions, one applicant after the other, in front of a meeting of party members. Members were then asked to vote on the candidate they liked best.

Oakley wasn’t intellectually the strongest candidate but I understood why he was selected. He seemed the most experienced of the finalists and the one most obviously ready to be the PPC.

[My emphasis]

When I was asked by friends, I said I thought Watford hadn’t necessarily selected the best future MP but they had chosen the one who seemed most assured, self confident and politically mature. I thought him a very stable, solid choice even if he didn’t do all that much for me.

There wasn’t the smallest sign that he was, well, basically bonkers.

More…

This man is is in the running to be Cameron’s Alistair Campbell. Looks like he’s perfectly qualified.

What interests me about all this is not so much Finkelstein’s future career in wanksterdom as it is this: Oakley’s constituency party members surely must have known, or at least suspected that the man was mentally ill. I find it hard to believe such a vile and vicious misogynist could have hidden it so effectively in his council career even. Yet it appears no one who knew him thought fit to mention it until he was arrested and charged.

That says more to me about the Conservative party’s fitness to rule than any Tory hack’s lame public excuses for his own bad judgement.