Love Thy Neighbour? Not In Hartlepool.

I hope this picture goes around the world and I hope people remember this face and act accordingly: I’m not a fan of summary or vigilante justice but this may be one of the most sickening things I’ve ever read.

What kind of disgusting people have we become?

Man admits sick attack on dying woman

September 19, 2007

By EMMA GREENHALGH

A MAN today pleaded guilty to urinating on a dying woman, covering her in shaving foam and throwing water over her as she lay helpless in the street.
Anthony Anderson admitted an offence of outraging public decency when he appeared before Hartlepool magistrates this morning.

The court heard how he threw a basin of water over Christine Lakinski, 50, covered her body in shaving foam and urinated on her while she lay collapsed in a doorway.

Lynne Dalton, prosecuting, said the incident was “videoed” by a friend.

The sick act happened in Jobson Street on July 26 when Christine was walking home from a friend’s house.

Both the victim, who later died, and Anderson lived in Raby Road.

More….

So what happened to the friend who stood by with the camera?

Shooting Yourself In The Foot

Interesting events in Phoenix as a litigious sheriff unhappy with the way Phoenix New Times journalists covered him allegedly takes his revenge:

Michael Lacey, the executive editor, and Jim Larkin, chief executive, were arrested at their homes after they wrote a story that revealed that the Village Voice Media company, its executives, its reporters and even the names of the readers of its website had been subpoenaed by a special prosecutor. The special prosecutor had been appointed to look into allegations that the newspaper had violated the law in publishing the home address of Maricopa Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s home address on its website more than three years ago.

The weekly and its leadership has been in a long running battle with Mr. Arpaio, after the weekly published a series of stories about his real estate dealings.

“They did not have a warrant, but they told me that I was being arrested for unlawful disclosure of grand jury information,” Mr. Larkin said by phone from his home early this morning, after he was released from jail. Mr. Lacey remained in jail early this morning. Captain Paul Chagolla, a spokesman for the sheriff did not return a call for comment.

Steve Suskin, legal counsel for Village Voice Media, said that the arrests on misdemeanor charges of the newspaper executives represent an escalation in the conflict between The Phoenix New Times and Sheriff Arpaio, who has received national attention for his reputation for running tough jails.

“It is an extraordinary sequence of events,” Mr. Suskin said. “The arrests were not totally unexpected, but they represent an act of revenge and a vindictive response on the part of an out of control sheriff.”

Here’s one of the articles Sheriff Joe Arpaio is so unhappy about:

You get elected to public office, say, sheriff.

You start scowling like John Wayne and jam the jails full. You put the cons in stripes and house them in surplus Army tents, where four guards oversee 1,800 inmates.

Your detention officers beat up prisoners, while feeding them food unfit for a dog. A paranoid public afraid of crime is grateful because it naively believes your abusive policies will scare people from committing that next robbery and shooting.

Who cares if this is all baloney?

You drum up a few death threats along the way, because that generates free publicity chronicling what a bad-ass you are.

Who cares if innocent people go to jail?

The voters love it. Even as your office is besieged by tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits stemming from beatings and deaths in your Mother of All Dungeons.

The dead guys were druggies anyway, your public relations machine claims. And, hey, that’s what the county’s insurance policy is for — settling claims of distraught survivors.

What matters most is that your image as “toughest sheriff in America” has made you into a valuable commodity.

And that image is worth a lot.

More…

If Arpaiao hadn’t had those media executives arrested and the NY Times hadn’t picked it up, I and many thousands of others nation and worldwide never would have read that and known of the terrible allegations against him.

Hubris begets nemesis. You’d think an officer of the law would know that. Silly sheriff.

Hey! Trutex! Leave Them Kids Alone

Via Archrights: first it was the co-option of teachers into fingerprinting every British child, whether they or their parents agreed or not.

Now even the school uniform suppliers are to be drafted into the suburban stasi:.

The chip connects with teachers’ computers to show a photograph of the pupil, data about academic performance and whether he or she is in the correct classroom. It can also restrict access to areas of the school. The radio frequency identification system is being tested at Hungerhill School in Doncaster, South Yorkshire. Ten pupils began wearing a chip sewn into their uniforms eight months ago.

The scheme has drawn criticism from human rights campaigners. “Tagging is what we do to criminals we let out of prison early,” said David Cleater, from Leave Them Kids Alone, which campaigns against the finger-printing of pupils. “It is appalling.”

It is, but that’s just a science experiment, Chipped uniforms are on the horizon though and a line of chipped uniform items is apparently going into production, made by Trutex. (Anyone British who has children or who has been a child knows Trutex. They’re one of the biggest suppliers of school uniforms and clothing in the country.)

A school uniform maker said yesterday it was “seriously considering” adding tracking devices to its clothes after a survey found many parents would be interested in knowing where their offspring were.
Trutex would not say whether it was studying a spy in the waistband or a bug in the blazer but admitted teenagers were less keen than younger children on the “big brother” idea.

What, you mean they get a choice?

Nope, didn’t think so.

Even leaving aside privacy concerns this will no doubt add to the cost. It cost over 600 pounds to kit my younger son out when he went to senior school, (and that as ten years ago) because you have to buy specific items in specific colours and patterns by specific manufacturers in specific shops: but if he’d turned up at school in the wrong thing, he’d’ve been a laughing stock, as my sister and I were when we had the wrong brand and colour of games skirts. Thirty years and it still rankles.

That kind of snobbery and financial bullying can drive some children, and some parents, to despair and self-harm. That’s bad enough. How much more is obliging parents and children to pay to be spied on going to cost?

Inside Blackwater’s Mercenary Training Centre

From Liveleak:

This video was recorded with the co-operation of Blackwater so don’t expect revelations; nevertheless it’s fascinating to see just how close the supposedly publically accountable armed forces, federal officers, sheriffs’ departnments and state and local police are to this private army and its commanders – and how beholden the country is to an unaccountable, well-armed private corporation as a consequence . There are very few areas of the military or law enforcement in which Erik Prince and his paramilitary company do not have an interest. [UPDATE: In addition to Prince’s own political ties, Joseph Schmitz COO and general counsel of Blackwater’s parent company the Prince Group is Jeb Bush’s brother-in-law.}

Part of the purpose of this training is to build loyalty. Who exactly is it that these troops, federal officers, sherriffs and local police are training to be loyal to?

Remember The Bastille

I wonder if any of these torturing US prison guards have ever considered the eventuality that one day all the prisoners they have abused will be free. What do they think will happen then? Do they think their victim’lll shake hands, laugh ruefully and agree it was all in good sport?

From Jill at Feministe:

The prison guards stand over their captives with electric cattle prods, stun guns, and dogs. Many of the prisoners have been ordered to strip naked. The guards are yelling abuse at them, ordering them to lie on the ground and crawl. ‘Crawl, motherf*****s, crawl.’

If a prisoner doesn’t drop to the ground fast enough, a guard kicks him or stamps on his back. There’s a high-pitched scream from one man as a dog clamps its teeth onto his lower leg.

Another prisoner has a broken ankle. He can’t crawl fast enough so a guard jabs a stun gun onto his buttocks. The jolt of electricity zaps through his naked flesh and genitals. For hours afterwards his whole body shakes.

Lines of men are now slithering across the floor of the cellblock while the guards stand over them shouting, prodding and kicking.

Second by second, their humiliation is captured on a video camera by one of the guards.

The images of abuse and brutality he records are horrifyingly familiar. These were exactly the kind of pictures from inside Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad that shocked the world this time last year.

And they are similar, too, to the images of brutality against Iraqi prisoners that this week led to the conviction of three British soldiers.

But there is a difference. These prisoners are not caught up in a war zone. They are Americans, and the video comes from inside a prison in Texas.

Jill’s post brings together many disparate aspects of the prison/industrial complex to give a chilling picture of what awaits those criminal, stupid or unfortunate enough to fall into the hands of the justice system under Bush.

Something about which I’ve blogged a lot is the tendency for pyschopaths to drift towards the military, mercenary, police and correctional industries and especially the privatised prisons, both in the UK and US, as a venue in which they can indulge their most shameful dreams of power and abuse upon a literally captive population.

Punishment is not only a crucial and ever-larger state function, it is also big business. Private ownership and/or operation of prisons, while an increasingly significant part of the corrections system, represents only a fraction of the “prison-industrial complex.” The cost of corrections-in cluding state, local, and federal corrections budgets-ran to more than $20 billion a year in the early 1990s. The cost of constructing enough cells just to keep up with the constant increase in prisoners is estimated at $6 billion a year. This figure does not address existing overcrowding, which is pandemic from city jails to federal prisons. The public sector imprisonment industry employs more than 50,000 guards, as well as additional tens of thousands of administrators, and health, education, and food service providers. Especially in rural communities where other employment is scarce, corrections assumes huge economic im portance as a growth industry which provides stable jobs.

The punishment juggernaut of the Reagan-Bush years also spawned an array of private enterprises locked in a parasitic embrace with the state. From architectural firms and construction companies, to drug treatment and food service contractors, to prison industries, to the whole gamut of equipment and hardware suppliers-steel doors, razor wire, communications systems, uniforms, etc.-the business of imprisonment boasts a powerful assortment of well-or ganized and well-represented vested interests. Privatized prisons, then, are not a quantum leap toward dismantling the state but simply an extension of the already significant private sector involvement in corrections. The public-private symbiotic relationship was well-established long before 1984, when CCA first contracted with the INS to operate detention centers for illegal aliens. With private firms already providing everything from health care to drug treatment, the private management of entire prisons was a natural progression, especially given the tenor of the times.

If the profit to be made by controlling and incarcerating fellow citizens were to disappear, the US economy would be in even bigger trouble than it is now.

There’s a lot of nastiness that can be turned a blind eye to when livelihoods’re on the line: prison officers in privatised prisons get between $7 and $10 an hour, or around $31 per diem and their positions are shaky. The boat cannot be rocked or poverty (and worse) can result. In state and federal prisons there are pensions and benefits to be protected: whistleblowing is not what they do. A steady job with benefits is preciousin uncertain times.

After all they’re just criminals anyway, and overwhelmingly dark-skinned criminals at at that. Who gives a shit? Out of sight, out of mind, invisible people with no rights.

Those paid by government to run prisons, who then torture their fellow citizens simply for the pleasure of it, are indeed psychopaths and should be treated as such. But what about the complicity of industry bosses and the state and federal government? If the guards are psychopaths, what does that make their superiors? They hire these people, knowing and not caring (or choosing not to know) that they have a proclivity for sadism. Why?

Pour encourager les autres. That means you and me. This is not an aberration, this is the way it’s meant to be.

But if one day the torture they’ve committed or condoned returns to bite them or their loved ones on the ass well, karma’s a bitch and what goes around comes around. You won’t catch me shedding many tears.