Not A Coronary

BBC Radio 5 live is reporting that the second postmortem on Ian Tomlinson has found that he died of a internal bleeding in the abdomen and not a heart attack, as police claimed.

The pathologist at the first postmortem has form for jumping the gun with the press and getting things wrong:

Dr Patel is on a Home Office register of accredited forensic pathologists, which is managed on behalf of all police forces by the National Policing Improvement Agency. Questions have twice been asked about his handling of suspicious death cases. In 1999 Dr Patel was disciplined by the GMC after he discussed the medical history of Roger Sylvester, a 30-year-old black man who died in police custody, outside an inquest hearing.

He told reporters: “I am aware from the medical records held at Whittington hospital that Mr Sylvester was a user of crack cocaine.” Sylvester’s family were devastated by the suggestion and contested that he been a user.

More here.

[edited for links as more reports become available]

Darth Plod

copfacebook

So that’s why the police love their helmets and lightsabres batons so much – they think they’re bloody Jedi. Jerome Taylor in The Independent:

The force is with the police force

[…]

Haha! You’ve gotta love silly freedom of information requests. Cop shop magazine Police Review put in a load of FOI’s to see whether any forces have Jedi knights in their ranks.

Lo and behold, Strathclyde Police have 10 members of staff who claim to be from the Jedi faith. They were the only force to admit it.

Well, it’s one explanation, I suppose.

Whummm, whummmm!

Hindsight Is Overrated

pixies

Belatedly, a former UK Director of Public Prosecutions asks the essential questions about the police’s behaviour at the G20 protests:

…here are some questions for the IPCC to consider as it investigates the events leading to Ian Tomlinson’s death: why were British police officers attending a demonstration in the heart of London with their identifying numbers hidden? In the absence of a fire risk, who authorised them to pull balaclavas up over their heads? And why didn’t they want anyone to see their faces?

Yes why? Were they “Only following orders….”? Presumably the police at Mark Saunders shooting were following orders to cover their faces; otherwise that’s a lot of bad apples in the police.

The DPP is responsible for determining any charges and prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales; he or she makes decisions about the most complex and sensitive cases and advises the police on criminal matters. He reports to the Attorney General, the Government minister who answers for the Crown Prosecution Service in Parliament.

How come it was that the politically-appointed former DPP from 2003 to 2008, MCDonald, a QC and former (and again post-retirement) member of human rights chambers Matrix (colleague Cherie Blair), couldn’t bring himself to ask those questions when he could have had some effect?

It’s much easier to write a condemnatory Guardian editorial after the fact – and presumably pocket a fee – than to act against the police when you have the power to.

Just Keep Spinning

CPS declares there’s no evidence to sufficient to prosecute Damien Green or his source and the opposition MP’s arrest by the antiterrorism police aka the Keystone Kops is shown to have been politically motivated.

Meanwhile as far away as possible from Westminster in Scotland, Gordon Brown finally says sorry for Smeargate.

The media’s consequently in a bit of a quandary as which story to give top billing.

What a coincidence that the two events should happen on the same day and at the same time, just in time for the 1 o’clock news.

Could they by any chance be related?

Update

I think he may feeling the pressure. Quote:

Gordon Brown: “I take full responsibility for what happens and that’s why the person who was responsible went immediately.”

WTF? Gordon’s resigned now?

Terrorism, smerrorism

Fancy that. On Tuesday it’s revealed Ian Tomlinson was attacked without provocation minutes before his death, on camera. Wednesday Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick makes a schoolboy error by walking around with documents labelled secret in large friendly letters about a supposed anti-terror operation. Within hours the raid these documents supposedly refered to was put forward and carried out with a great display of force on the part of the police, arresting suspects at gunpoint in front of a library and all that. According to the police, Bob Quick’s blunder meant the police had to bring those raids forward or run the risk of the terrorists getting away or attacking early.

All I know is that the Ian Tomlinson story seems to have disappeared from the frontpages, replaced by yet another terror scare…

It will be interesting to see where Bobby Quick ends up in a few months time when the current excitement has died down.