Not Open, and Not Left Either

Chris Bowers, at the kool kidz new blog, Open Left:

New Establishment Rising? The End Of the Flat Blogosphere

(Actually bumped at 2:31 p.m. – promoted by Chris Bowers)

SummaryOver the past five years, as the audience and political effectiveness of the progressive, political blogosphere has exploded, the “short head” of the progressive, political blogosphere has undergone a transformation from a loose collection of small, independent, solo projects into a sophisticated media and activist structure driving the national political scene. This transformation has the side-effect of significantly increasing the entry costs into the “short head” of the progressive, political, blogosphere for new, independent actors. As a result, what was once a fluid, “outsider” and “open” form of new media is now, quite possibly, crystallizing into a new “establishment” all its own.

No shit, Sherlock!

Bloody hell, how long have we saying that on this blog? We’ve certainly not been alone in saying that ad revenues and reformist sucking up to power has been creating a new blogospheric Democratic party nomenklatura.

So what’s Bowers’ and Stoller’s answer to this exclusionary trend in online politics? Why to make themselves a new establishment of course. The tussle now is over control of that new establishment and access to its ranks:

Introduction

This article was originally scheduled to appear in the first issue of JONI, The Journal of Netroots Ideas, to be published by the organization responsible for the YearklyKos Convention. Instead, it will serve as the first installment in a collaborative project between Open Left and JONI. Articles scheduled for print publication in the journal will first go through a series of directed discussions online, and those discussions will eventually be incorporated into the final JONI project.

[…]

Good grief, these US ‘progressives’ do love their acronynms and job titles, don’t they? (see also Feministe and their ‘thinking bloggers’ award.)

What is it, do American political bloggers feel their ideas have no legitimacy unless uttered by someone with a string of self-awarded titles, prizes and qualifications, or alternatively, someone who’s down with the Kos crew?

How is that ‘left’? How is that ‘open’? All posts are to be vetted by Kos loyalists – while I’m all for new political space being opened up, where’s the democratic accountability when what’s written must be pre-approved by a political cabal?

I don’t disagree entirely with Bowers’ and Stoller’s analysis of the development of the US progressive blogosphere but it is just that: the US political blogosphere, and the US political blogosphere is not the be-all and end-all of politics.

The left is much, much bigger, less insular and more international than a few Kossacks and their friends in the media. Note to Chris and Matt and their US progressive blogmates: it’s not all about you.

It’s the sheer bloody self-importance and arrogance of it all that gets to me. This about sums it up:

“…. has become a near impossibility for a new independent, individual actor to join the elite ranks of the national, progressive political blogosphere.”

That it is an impossibility may be true – but that Bowers sees it as essential that an elite exists to be promoted to says that this effort isn’t about opening up poilitical space for the masses, this is about making the elite even more elite. What’s ironic is that Bowers and Stoller seem to think that this is a good thing, a groundbreaking thing that they’re doing. But then they are are sensible liberals, more noted for reformist policy wonkery and process politics than anti-imperialism.

But no, sorry. It’s meet the new establishment, same as the old.

Rather than acknowledge their own roles – and that of other self-styled public intellectuals up the arse of the Democratic party- in creating the crystallisation of privilege and the exclusion of ‘lesser’ voices from the public discourse which they describe (years after everyone else noticed), they’re seeking to appear populist, whilst in reality being nothing of the sort.

Oh and btw, they’re using Sitemeter, so it means anyone visiting the blog gets infected with the Specificclick dataminer.

How leftist or open is that?

FBI Recruiting Stasi Students, Attempts To Ban Academic Freedom. Sorta.

It sounds like a joke – the FBI wants to stop US students going abroad, ’cause those evil, wily foreigners’ll steal their brains while they’re asleep:

FBI wants students to stop travelling

Fears technology loss

By Nick Farrell: Monday 25 June 2007, 07:50

THE FBI IS visiting the nation’s top technical universities in a bid to stop students taking their holidays outside the country.

MIT, Boston College, and the University of Massachusetts, have all had a visit from the spooks to warn them about the dangers of foreign spies and terrorists stealing sensitive academic research. The FBI wants the universities to impose rules that will stop US university students from working late at the campus, travelling abroad, showing an interest in their colleagues’ work, or have friends outside the United States, engaging in independent research, or making extra money without the prior consent of the authorities.

No friends from abroad? Naah, this has to be a windup.

But no, no joke. You can download the guidelines here and they are as draconian as you could imagine. It really is like East Germany all over again:

Faculty, staff and students are encouraged to monitor their colleagues for signs of suspicious behaviour and report any concerns to the FBI or the military.

Read more…

UPDATE: I’m editing this toi give the other side of the coin from a commenter at the link above:

A bit overblown
Submitted by JohnB (not verified) on Sun, 2007-06-24 23:52.

I’m a huge civil libertarian and in fact will be engaging in some ACLU protest activities this week in DC. But this article on Press ESC is really almost to the point of being misleading. Read the original article and guidance document and you’ll see that:

1) The guidance doc specifically says it is applicable to people with access to classified info. Not just students (unless they’re working on classified info).

2) The guidance doc also goes to some length to say that these signs don’t mean someone is a spy, that people should respect each other’s privacy and that good judgment needs to exercised when considering whether to report something.

3) These are not being foisted on universities and there is no apparent attempt to try to get universities to enforce these guidelines. This is essentially a “heads up” list of things that often are associated with people who spy.

And remember: these are guidelines for people working on CLASSIFIED info. I HOPE people who work on (legal) classified projects keep an eye out for these kinds of things.

Now if we could only keep the USDOJ from spying on us without any court oversight, I’d feel MUCH better

Even if that is so, it seems that the FBI is trying to push these guidelines to apply not merely to those working directly on government funded classified projects but also to those attending institutions whose research is largely funded by DOD money. Again with the chipping away at the resistance to spying on each other like good little automatons.

Centre For American What?

Via Max Sawicky. I see that the Center for American Progress hosted a conference last week to examine

” how the United States can re-assert its leadership for a more peaceful, prosperous, and secure world. “.

Are you kidding me? Re-assert it’s leadership? Not “work with others on a multilateral approach to international peace and justice and clean up the godawful fucking mess we made”? That’s what I’d call progressive,

But no, as it always is, it’s all about asserting US dominance some more, which in case no-one noticed, is what got us into this mess to begin with.

Guess which ‘progressives’ CAP chose to lead the discussion?

Speakers included former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, former CIA Director John Deutch, former U.S. Ambassador to Israel and Egypt Daniel Kurtzer, former Secretary of Treasury Bob Rubin, Senator Gordon Smith, and former Deputy Commander, Headquarters U.S. European Command Charles Wald

Yeah, because they did such a brilliant job last time. Former director of the Trilateral Commission Brzezinski and Bush wiretap program supporter Tom Daschle are bad enough: but Madeline bloody Albright?

The woman who said this?

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.

–60 Minutes (5/12/96)

[My emphasis]

Wow, I bet that little gang have some new and inniovative political ideas like… er….er… I’m going to go and bang my head on the table for a while.

“Centre for American Progress” my ass; how about “Centre for American Exceptionalism and Hubris”? There you go, do-nothing centrist liberals, I fixed your elitist dem thinktank title for you.

21st Century America, or 1970’s Argentina?

Which fascist Banana Republic will torture and disappear anyone, even children as young as 7?

Is it Honduras? is it East Timor? Is it Cambodia, maybe? Or Nicaragua? What about Colombia then, ’cause that’s a bit nasty? Is it El bloody Salvador and the death squads again?

Answer; none of the above – for once – though that’s where the current practitioners got their very thorough training. Can you spell Negroponte?

But no, as you well knew, it’s the good old US of A, aided by it’s good buddies in the British government and the new EU accession countries.

Los Desaparecidos De Septiembre 11….

Rights Groups List 39 Disappeared In War On Terror

Six human rights groups urged the U.S. government on Thursday to name and explain the whereabouts of 39 people.

[…]

The United States has acknowledged detaining three of the 39. The groups said, however, that there was strong evidence, including witness testimony, of secret detention in 18 more cases and some evidence of secret detention in the remaining 18 cases.

Joanne Mariner of Human Rights Watch said it was unknown if the suspects were now in U.S. or foreign custody, or even alive or dead.

“We have families who have not seen their loved ones for years. They’ve literally disappeared,” Mariner told Reuters.

Among the cases detailed in the report is the detention in September 2002 of two children, then aged seven and nine, of confessed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was later detained and is now held at Guantanamo.

Read more

Like a puddle in the sun my residual sympathy for the mass of Americans who just sit by while their government is imprisoning, disappearing and torturing childreni, yet who gorge on paedophile-exposing reality tv shows like candy, is drying up.

The liberals are just as bad, thinking that a democratic candidate’s winning of the next election will solve everything, the white knight is on his way, the cavalry is coming, hurrah!, so they can sit back and wait for the Democratic groundswell to clear away all the murderous trash in DC.

What a copout.

I suspect their are millions worldwide, formerly well-disposed, who feel just like me. Not terrorists, not reflexively anti-american, just seriously pissed off and out of patience with the US government’s brutality and arrogance and it’s citizens’ apathy.

There’s another 2 years of this adminstration to come yet. If they’ll disappear and torture children, like the 60 in Guantanamo and the children abusd in Abu Ghraib that we do lnow about and then there’s the unknown and unnumbered ones that we don’t know about.

The Republicans will do anything, anything at all to grab and maintain power. If they’d imprison, torture and/or rape a child, what would they not do?

To stand idly by while they do this is to be complicit. All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing, and so it’s proved.

I’d like to say you deserve what you get, but as it’s necessary to say again and again and again to Americans – it’s not all about you.

Unlike you the rest of us don’t even get the figleaf of a nominally democratic vote in the presidential election. We just have to deal with the fallout of your stupidity.

But hey, there’s plenty more diposable brown children. The stars and stripes forever, eh?

It’s The Secret Annexes, Dummies

TPM Muckraker has garnered opinions from various lawyers and civil liberties types (and a fat lot of good they’ve done us so far) who say that the Presidential directive I blogged about. the one that givies supreme power to Bush follwing any catastrophic incident at home or abroad (as defined by guess who, Bush.) is nothing to worry about. Nothing to see here, move along, you’re all a bunch of paranoids, calm down.

And I’m Marie of Rumania.

What’s important are the secret annexes to the order, the ones that are classified, the ones no-one’s allowed to see. These secret annexes:

23) Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes, attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this directive.

But of course they’re not hereto attached.

Who knows what they actually say, but in the light of Bushco’s ongoing power grab I have a pretty good guess. Halliburton didn’t get that open-ended domestic detention centre contract for nuthin’.

Typical bloody soft centrists though, to assign benign motives to a president whose every action in office has been the very opposite of benign.

Did it not even occur to these experts to ask themselves, if they are still of the opinion that the order changes nothing: why now? Why issue it at all?

It’s all in the secret annexes, dummies. And we won’t see those until the Deciderer decides to decide he’s the Dictator (cue the manufactured attack by Iran) or Cheney executes his domestic coup, whichever comes soonest.

[Added to later because I thought it was skimpy]