QotD: the uselessness of Nick Robinson

D-Squared on the uselessness of Robinson and other supposed insiders in covering the coalition negotiations:

The fact that Labour and the LibDems were involved in negotiations all weekend seems to have come as a total surprise to political journalists. Shouldn’t this be the occasion for some serious carpetings by their editors? People like Nick Robinson, Adam Boulton and Andrew Rawnsley don’t cover stories and they don’t have specialist analytical skills. Their entire value-add is meant to be that they are “in the loop” and connected to all the big important players. If something as important as this can be happening without them knowing about it, that’s actually very embarrassing.

It should come as no great surprise that Robinson et all, for all their supposed connections, missed this story. The point about their connections is that they only ever are used to leak approved stories, usually semi-anonymously, with Robinson as conduit rather than active investigator, to influence whatever debate is taking place at a given moment. The value of a Robinson for politicians lies in the way in which they can make their positions clear without making them official, while to the news media the value lies in getting easily digestable news chunks with little risk of offending their news sources.

But if Robinson only reports what he gets given and is too polite to dig around on his own, the fact that he and others like him didn’t hear anything about these negotiations until they were made official is significant. It makes it likely that there were no rebels on either the Labour or the Lib-Dem side willing to leak this story in order to sabotage proceedings…

As an aside, the naivity with which the whole post-election negotiations are reported is charming if infuriating. There are plenty of European countries with experience of this sort of thing, why oh why can’t BBC or Sky News learn from their experiences what roughly to expect? Why pretend that the Liberal Democrats negotiating with both Labour and the Tories at the same time is shocking or wrong, when it’s perfectly normal to do so?

First let them do no harm

More evidence for the fact that getting a hung parliament is the best that could happen in the UK elections. Niall Fergueson is urging the Tories on to crash the economy:

‘There is a very real danger that [things] could now spiral, Greek style, out of all control if foreign confidence in sterling slumps and long-term interest rates rise. Mr Cameron needs to do two things right away. He must instruct George Osborne to wield the axe ruthlessly with the aim of returning to a balanced budget over a credible eight- to ten-year timeframe.

That means not only reversing Labour’s disastrous expansion of public sector spending, but also encouraging business growth with incentives to innovate, invest and work. At the same time, he needs to initiate talks with the IMF in case external support proves to be necessary. In both cases, it is much better to act sooner than later. The mess we are in is the result of 13 squandered years in which an unprincipled government frittered away the achievements of the Thatcher era. We are back not just in 1979, but in 1976, the last time the IMF had to bail Britain out as a consequence of Labour’s economic mismanagement.’

Drastically cutting government spending at a time of economic crisis worked so well in getting the world out of the Depression in the 1930ties, but then this isn’t about economics, but ideology, as Jamie notes. Talking about “the achievements of the Thatcher era”, in which much of the industrial strength of Britain was destroyed so that yuppies could roam free, is a dead giveaway. Hence the need to not let the Tories win this elections is just as great as to let Labour lose: vote tactically, vote hung parliament. First, let them do no harm.

Philippa Stroud: Fag Hag

how to be a fabolous fag hag by Margaret Cho

David Cameron has got some explaining to do about Philippa Stroud, who’s both bigoted enough and stupid enough to believe gay people should be excorised of their gayness:

A high-flying prospective Conservative MP, credited with shaping many of the party’s social policies, founded a church that tried to “cure” homosexuals by driving out their “demons” through prayer.

Philippa Stroud, who is likely to win the Sutton and Cheam seat on Thursday and is head of the Centre for Social Justice, the thinktank set up by the former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, has heavily influenced David Cameron’s beliefs on subjects such as the family. A popular and energetic Tory, she is seen as one of the party’s rising stars.

[…]

Abi, a teenage girl with transsexual issues, was sent to the church by her parents, who were evangelical Christians. “Convinced I was demonically possessed, my parents made the decision to move to Bedford, because of this woman [Stroud] who had come back from Hong Kong and had the power to set me free,” Abi told the Observer.

“She wanted me to know all my thinking was wrong, I was wrong and the so-called demons inside me were wrong. The session ended with her and others praying over me, calling out the demons. She really believed things like homosexuality, transsexualism and addiction could be fixed just by prayer, all in the name of Jesus.”

It’s not every day you meet somebody insulting both gay people and Christians, as surely any Christian taking their religion serious will be offended by the idea that homosexuality is akin to demonic possession. It makes Philippa Stroud quite literally a fag hag, who thinks she can witch out the gayness. If you’re in the Sutton and Cheam constituency today, remember that…

The coming Tory coup

Liberal Conspiracy has the lowdown on how the Tories plan to sieze power in a hung parliament:

Here is what has now emerged as the Tory plan:

• Declare victory anyway.
• Have the party’s media allies strain every sinew to make that a self-fulfilling prophecy.
• Insist on being given the keys to number 10 without having to talk substantively to any other party first – to avoid a coalition or any substantive policy concessions.
• Make a partisan challenge to the civil service in seeking to overturn any existing constitutional convention or practice that might conceivably get in the way, or even slow this down a little.
• Threaten to drag the Monarchy into political controversy for partisan advantage, by challenging the conventions designed precisely to avoid this.
• Hold out against electoral reform, whatever the election result.
• Threaten apocalyptic political and financial meltdown if anybody disagrees.

The key objective of this strategy is to use the vociferous campaigning of the press – no doubt amplifying interventions from friends in the City – to argue that any negotiations between parties would be democratically illegitimate, without first putting the Conservatives into power, even (or especially) if Labour and the Liberal Democrats could between them muster a majority of both votes and Commons seats.

What does that remind you of? Me, it does the Republican coup of 2000, when the Supreme Court declared Bush the winner of the presidential election, even though Al Gore had actually won Florida by all counts. There you had the situation that the Republican administration in the state before the election did its best to purge the voters rolls of likely Democratic voters, then when the election became too close to call did its utmost best to stop recounts, going so far as to fly in a rentamob of Republican staffers to stop the count in Miami Dade county. This was paired to a media campaign in which Bush was presented as the obvious winner and the need to get a decision fast rather than making the right decision.

The more it’s become obvious some form of a hung parliament is going to be the outcome of Thursday’s elections, the more we’ve heard about both the mistrust of business in it as well as the need for a speedy resolution because “Britain needs firm, clear leadership”. These are of course obvious propaganda ploys to prepare the ground for a Tory coup. Obvious, since the experience in other European countries with coalition governments clearly says otherwise. Our own dear Holland after all is not some third world hellhole and is in fact weathering the crisis better than the UK so far, despite having had a long drawn out coalition process during it, followed by a fallen government not too long after it had finally been formed.

Meanwhile, as Palau posted last week, Labour is fond of a little election fiddling as well

A quick political quiz

Six political slogans, used during this election. Can you match them up with the right six parties?

1. GET BRITAIN WORKING

2. BYE BYE, BUREAUCRACY

3. WE’RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

4. PEOPLE POWER

5. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NOT STATE CONTROL

6. BIG GOVERNMENT = BIG PROBLEMS

Answers here: no peeking!

Read More