“The attack on the convoy amounted to an assault. It was unlawful because there was no lawful reason for it and in that respect it was criminal.”

So said the coroner today at the inquest into Cpl Matty Hull’s death in the Iraqi desert at the hands of negligent US pilots.

Isn’t it handy for those pilots that this verdict can have absolutely no practical effect whatsoever?

The terms of the Blair government-negotiated US/UK extradition treaty allow the US government to extradite any UK citizen from Britain into to American custody without their having to show any probable cause whatosever that an offence has even been committed, let alone that the intended extraditee is a bona fide suspect.

No, the US government’s say-so (and we know what that’s worth)
is enough for Blair and his minions to give up their own citizens to who knows what fate at whose hands.

The reverse does not hold true for US citizens, who may not be extradited to the UK or Europe, or anywhere else for that matter, without a hearing in a US court showing a] that a crime has been committed and b] that there is probable cause to believe that the accused may have had something to do with that crime.

The practical upshot of this is that the pilots whose gung-ho, shoot first, ask-questons-later attitude led to this killing and its cover-up will, like their their torturing colleagues in the CIA who’ve recently been indicted in Germany, Switzerland and Italy, be sitting pretty on their government pensions, sucking up the approbation of the wingnuts, thumbing their noses at justice, all courtesy of that obscene sense of American exceptionalism.

US To Europeans: “We can Torture and Kidnap You and There’s Not A Damned Thing You Can Do About It.”

Not only won’t holding an EC passport save you from being kidnapped and tortured by out of control CIA goons who won’t be disciplined for it, let alone charged, but if you then attempt to sue the criminals responsible for civil damages the American courts will just cover up for them by citing ‘national security’ –

The court said that to make his case, el-Masri “would be obliged to produce admissible evidence not only that he was detained and interrogated, but that the defendants were involved in his detention and interrogation in a manner that renders them personally liable to him.

“Such a showing could be made only with evidence that exposes how the CIA organizes, staffs and supervises its most sensitive intelligence operations.

“The defendants could not properly defend themselves without using privileged evidence,” the decision said.

American Civil Liberties Union director Anthony Romero said the court was wrong.

“Regrettably, today’s decision allows CIA officials to disregard the law with impunity by making it virtually impossible to challenge their actions in court,” he said in a statement.

“The state secrets doctrine has become a shield that covers even the most blatant abuses of power,” he said.

With all due respect to those US expatriates who’re iving on the continent perhaps it’s time EU governments just started snatching random American students, or tourists for instance, from the crowds that throng here – to then ship them off blindfiolded, beaten and drugged, to be tortured in some hidden former Cold War hellhole. See how how you US citizens take it. Why not, this kind of behaviour is openly sanctioned by your government and courts and a large swathe of your population, what possible objection could there be?

Nothing personal, but what else is it going to take to make your country respect the law?

Untitled

So Americans wonder why the US’ NATO partners won’t step up in Afghanistan? Well, here’s a clue.

Thanks to Avedon for pointing out this excellent post at NewsHog about the insulting and arrogant threats made by US ambassador John Bellinger to the European Parliament:

US To EU – Shut Up, Or Else
If you haven’t yet seen what John Bellinger, legal adviser to Condi Rice, is telling European nations about their probe into illegal rendition flights, read it and weep for the demise of American diplomacy and the simultaneous demise of any threadbare pretense that the Bush administration give a fig for anything or anyone but itself.

The European Parliament accused Britain, Poland, Italy and other nations in mid-February of colluding with the CIA to transport terror suspects to clandestine prisons in third countries.

In a report that concluded a yearlong investigation, the parliament identified 1,254 secret CIA flights that entered the European airspace since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States.

It said that these flights were against international air traffic rules and suggested some of them may have carried terror suspects on board in violation of human rights principles.

John Bellinger, legal adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, called the European Parliament report “unbalanced, inaccurate and unfair” and called on the EU governments to challenge the suggestion that Europeans need to be concerned about secret CIA flights.

“I can understand concerns about specific incidents but we should not somehow suggest that all intelligence activity is something illegal or suspicious,” he said.

Germany, Italy and several other EU countries have been carrying out their own inquiries into secret CIA activities in Europe, probes Bellinger said “have not been helpful with respect to necessary cooperation between the United States and Europe.”

“I do think these continuing investigations can harm intelligence cooperation, that’s simply a fact of life,” Bellinger told reporters after meeting legal advisers to EU governments in Brussels.

EU parliamentarians have rejected Bellinger’s criticism and called on the United States to address concerns that some flights have carried kidnapped terror suspects.

“People are imprisoned without being tried first. That is unacceptable. (The U.S.) should open up to us and tell us where they’re flying and who they’re carrying,” said Kathalijne Buitenweg, a Dutch member of the European Parliament.

[…]Bellinger also said the United States would refuse any Italian extradition request for CIA agents indicted in the alleged abduction of an Egyptian cleric in Milan, one of the cases the European Parliament focused on in its inquiry.

“We’ve not got an extradition request from Italy. If we got an extradition request from Italy, we would not extradite U.S. officials to Italy,” he said.

If you read that as a blatant threat – stop these probes into our illegal actions or we will halt all our sharing of intelligence on international terrorism – then I think you’d be right there with how EU national governments will read it. If you read it as an assertion of the Bush administration’s right, by virtue of sheer might, to break international law and the laws of other nations then you’d agree with how Europeans will read it. If you read it as a blatant, American-exceptionalist, denial of international human rights and the right of other nations to apply their laws to American government personnel living and working in those very countries, with or without diplomatic immunity, then you’d be correct on that too.

Then, Bellinger utters a blatant lie:…
Read whole post

I’d read about it earlier in the week but didn’t post, (and now Cernig has done a way better job of it than I would have anyway) as I was much too angry at the shameless and malevolent disdain for even the minimum international standards of behaviour that Bellinger displayed to put my anger into any coherent form. I just had to let it go.

But of course you can’t let these things go: all these small angers, postponed, eventually coalesce into one big ugly anger. The US can’t keep showing such naked contempt like this for it’s supposed allies for very much longer – and it’s hardly the first time – and if USanians think Europeans are America-haters now, just keep on with this kind of thug diplomacy and see what happens. Soon the US won’t have a friend left in the bloody world.

Image from Bartcop.

Urgent: four women to be executed by Iraqi puppet regime

From Amnesty International via Ilya:

IRAQ Samar Sa’ad ‘Abdullah (f), aged about 25
Wassan Talib (f), aged 31
Zeynab Fadhil (f), aged 25
Liqa’ Qamar (f), aged 25

The four women named above have been sentenced to death, and at least one of them is in imminent danger of execution. The president has the power to pardon them, or commute their sentences.

Samar Sa’ad ‘Abdullah was sentenced to death by the Central Criminal Court of Iraq (CCCI) on 15 August 2005 for the murder of her uncle, his wife and three of their children in the al-Khudra’ district of Baghdad. She reportedly blamed the killings on her fiancé, who, she said, had carried them out in order to rob her uncle. Her fiancé was said to have been arrested, but Amnesty International does not know what charges, if any, have been brought against him. Samar Sa’ad ‘Abdullah’s death sentence was upheld on appeal, and she is facing imminent execution.

In a separate case, Wassan Talib and Zeynab Fadhil were sentenced to death by the CCCI on 31 August 2006 for the 2005 murder of several members of Iraqi security forces in the Baghdad district of Hay al-Furat. Both women denied they had been involved, and Zeynab Fadhil reportedly claimed that she was abroad at the time of the killings.

Liqa’ Qamar was sentenced to death on 6 February 2006 by the CCCI, for a kidnapping which reportedly took place in 2005. Her husband is said to have been detained and accused of the same crime. No further details are available.

All four women are held at Baghdad’s al-Kadhimiya Prison. Two have young children with them: Zeynab Fadhil her three-year-old daughter, Liqa’ Qamar her one-year-old daughter, who was born in prison.

Send your protest to Iraq’s Justice minister: Hashim al Shilbi:
head-minister@iraqi-justice.org
.

An Inconvenient Academic

Man In The Iron Mask

Meanwhile, in another part of the gulag forest….

The Florida-based Palestinian academic who was tried and found not guilty of any offence, but who was forced make a risible plea deal with federal prosecutors just to get out of near-Gitmo remand conditions is now indefintely locked up in maximum security for contempt, at the whim of a pet judge, mostly because he could cause some embarasssment to the Chimperor and First Brother Jeb.

Do read this interview: the story’s worthy of Kafka at his most convoluted, but unfortunately it’s not fiction. Remember that this is an innocent man and he’s just one person that this has happened to. His story is only being told because he is a well-known academic, has contacts in the persistent left-wing media, a good lawyer and is able to be eloquent in his own cause.

How many more, less prominent people have been similarly locked up and abused for being politically inconvenient don’t we know about?

(Via Left I on The News)