Remember The Bastille

I wonder if any of these torturing US prison guards have ever considered the eventuality that one day all the prisoners they have abused will be free. What do they think will happen then? Do they think their victim’lll shake hands, laugh ruefully and agree it was all in good sport?

From Jill at Feministe:

The prison guards stand over their captives with electric cattle prods, stun guns, and dogs. Many of the prisoners have been ordered to strip naked. The guards are yelling abuse at them, ordering them to lie on the ground and crawl. ‘Crawl, motherf*****s, crawl.’

If a prisoner doesn’t drop to the ground fast enough, a guard kicks him or stamps on his back. There’s a high-pitched scream from one man as a dog clamps its teeth onto his lower leg.

Another prisoner has a broken ankle. He can’t crawl fast enough so a guard jabs a stun gun onto his buttocks. The jolt of electricity zaps through his naked flesh and genitals. For hours afterwards his whole body shakes.

Lines of men are now slithering across the floor of the cellblock while the guards stand over them shouting, prodding and kicking.

Second by second, their humiliation is captured on a video camera by one of the guards.

The images of abuse and brutality he records are horrifyingly familiar. These were exactly the kind of pictures from inside Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad that shocked the world this time last year.

And they are similar, too, to the images of brutality against Iraqi prisoners that this week led to the conviction of three British soldiers.

But there is a difference. These prisoners are not caught up in a war zone. They are Americans, and the video comes from inside a prison in Texas.

Jill’s post brings together many disparate aspects of the prison/industrial complex to give a chilling picture of what awaits those criminal, stupid or unfortunate enough to fall into the hands of the justice system under Bush.

Something about which I’ve blogged a lot is the tendency for pyschopaths to drift towards the military, mercenary, police and correctional industries and especially the privatised prisons, both in the UK and US, as a venue in which they can indulge their most shameful dreams of power and abuse upon a literally captive population.

Punishment is not only a crucial and ever-larger state function, it is also big business. Private ownership and/or operation of prisons, while an increasingly significant part of the corrections system, represents only a fraction of the “prison-industrial complex.” The cost of corrections-in cluding state, local, and federal corrections budgets-ran to more than $20 billion a year in the early 1990s. The cost of constructing enough cells just to keep up with the constant increase in prisoners is estimated at $6 billion a year. This figure does not address existing overcrowding, which is pandemic from city jails to federal prisons. The public sector imprisonment industry employs more than 50,000 guards, as well as additional tens of thousands of administrators, and health, education, and food service providers. Especially in rural communities where other employment is scarce, corrections assumes huge economic im portance as a growth industry which provides stable jobs.

The punishment juggernaut of the Reagan-Bush years also spawned an array of private enterprises locked in a parasitic embrace with the state. From architectural firms and construction companies, to drug treatment and food service contractors, to prison industries, to the whole gamut of equipment and hardware suppliers-steel doors, razor wire, communications systems, uniforms, etc.-the business of imprisonment boasts a powerful assortment of well-or ganized and well-represented vested interests. Privatized prisons, then, are not a quantum leap toward dismantling the state but simply an extension of the already significant private sector involvement in corrections. The public-private symbiotic relationship was well-established long before 1984, when CCA first contracted with the INS to operate detention centers for illegal aliens. With private firms already providing everything from health care to drug treatment, the private management of entire prisons was a natural progression, especially given the tenor of the times.

If the profit to be made by controlling and incarcerating fellow citizens were to disappear, the US economy would be in even bigger trouble than it is now.

There’s a lot of nastiness that can be turned a blind eye to when livelihoods’re on the line: prison officers in privatised prisons get between $7 and $10 an hour, or around $31 per diem and their positions are shaky. The boat cannot be rocked or poverty (and worse) can result. In state and federal prisons there are pensions and benefits to be protected: whistleblowing is not what they do. A steady job with benefits is preciousin uncertain times.

After all they’re just criminals anyway, and overwhelmingly dark-skinned criminals at at that. Who gives a shit? Out of sight, out of mind, invisible people with no rights.

Those paid by government to run prisons, who then torture their fellow citizens simply for the pleasure of it, are indeed psychopaths and should be treated as such. But what about the complicity of industry bosses and the state and federal government? If the guards are psychopaths, what does that make their superiors? They hire these people, knowing and not caring (or choosing not to know) that they have a proclivity for sadism. Why?

Pour encourager les autres. That means you and me. This is not an aberration, this is the way it’s meant to be.

But if one day the torture they’ve committed or condoned returns to bite them or their loved ones on the ass well, karma’s a bitch and what goes around comes around. You won’t catch me shedding many tears.

A Marked Man?

What’s the betting that WaPo associate editor Eugene Robinson just made the No Fly List?

Saying his proposal is a “serious” alternative to Jonathan Swift’s “modest proposal,” the Post’s Eugene Robinson says Bush should endure the same detainee treatment he authorized, which “international conventions deem torture.”

“My proposal on torture is serious,” Robinson wrote on a washingtonpost.com discussion board Sunday. “Let me know if you agree: Bush administration officials who claim the “harsh” interrogation techniques being used on terrorism suspects are not torture should have to undergo those same techniques. Personally. Repeatedly.”

Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow Triangulation

Clinton triangulation in action

Cartoon courtesy of Zot Media

Here’s more evidence, if much more were needed, that the Democrats, and most specifically the Clintons, are not the good guys. The cavalry is not coming – or at least not in the shape of Hillary and Bill.

Torture like Jack Bauer’s would be OK, Bill Clinton says
BY MICHAEL McAULIFF
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Monday, October 1st 2007, 4:00 AM
WASHINGTON – What the nation needs is some good Jack Bauer agents, says Bill Clinton.

Bill and Hillary Clinton apparently no longer think torture has a place in U.S. policy, but Bubba sure hopes a “24”-style cowboy steps up if someone ever nabs a terrorist who knows a bomb is about to blow.

Triangulating, much?

Should Hillary Clinton win the Democratic nomination and the next presidential election (if it’s not suspended due to a ‘national emergency’ in the meantime and if it’s not fixed if it does happen) her Presidency’ll just be more of the same: like Gordon Brown has post-Tony Blair (who?), Clinton’ll quite happily accept the unitary executive theory and to assume the powers of the previous autocrat in office once elected.

Just as SuperGordo has she’ll dress those autocratic powers in touchyfeely, management inspirospeak: but underneath the shiny smile and friendly suits will be the same old corporate tool, willing to shade any moral issue to advance their career and their sponsors’ interests.

“If you’re the Jack Bauer person, you’ll do whatever you do and you should be prepared to take the consequences,” Bill Clinton said yesterday.

In Fox’s hit show “24,” actor Kiefer Sutherland’s character Jack Bauer is regularly confronted with the ticking-time bomb scenario – and makes his own rules about how to save the country.

Pointing to the show, Clinton argued on NBC’s “Meet the Press” it was better that way because any law that approved torture could be abused.

“If you have any kind of a formal exception, people just drive a truck through it, and they’ll say, ‘Well, I thought it was covered by the exception,'” Clinton said.

“When Bauer goes out there on his own and is prepared to live with the consequences, it always seems to work better,” he said.

Torture is a substantive issue and the US news media doesn’t do subtantive, it does Jack Bauer. And hey, what does torture matter when Bill had his lollipop licked in the sacred Oval Office and Hillary cackles?

But even allowing for rightwing media spin, this isn’t the kind of moral sophistry the world needs in its leaders just now. Torture is brutal, inhuman and illegal; it’s not a finessable issue.

To see the frontrunning Democratic candidate’s partner, a former lawyer and president himself who’s well aware of torture’s illegality (which makes his words all the more reprehensible) using torture as a triangulation point and vote-grabber, is the clearest illustration there is that the leadership of the Democratic party, as it stands, is as morally corrupt – if not ethically worse because of their mealy-mouthed hypocrisy – as the Republican government they seek to replace.

Mr. Clinton was anonymously quoted earlier this week by Tim Russert during the Democratic debate on MSNBC. In that instance, Mr. Russert read a quote that suggested it was appropriate to use torture on a captured terrorist if it was known he or she had knowledge of an impending terrorist attack. Mrs. Clinton ended up opposing that view, before Mr. Russert told her it was her husband who had said it.

Mr. Obama’s campaign was clearly pleased at having unearthed this example of Mr. Clinton in 1992 arguing against Mr. Clinton in 2007. Within moments of him delivering the remark here, the Obama campaign sent out a press release, complete with a link to the video of Mr. Clinton speaking on, you guessed it, You Tube.

Leaving morals aside (something Democrats seem to be able to do with ease), in purely campaigning terms it is very clever indeed of Barack Obama to use torture as a wedge against Clinton media double-teaming. That’s the downside of the Clintons ‘twofer’ strategy: they’re saying “Look at us, we have history, we have experience, you’ll get 2 for 1” – but it’s also their weakest point: their history is their political underbelly. Norman Hsu could yet be Hillary’s undoing – Clinton/Hsu corruption is an issue being loaded into the Republican projection cannon as I type.

If the Clintons are subjected to barrage of rightwing corruption allegations they have only themselves to blame: again and again the Clintons have shown that they are willing to do anything, say anything, just as long as it picks up a few more votes. Granted they are not quite as corrupt as most Republicans but that will hardly matter – the Republican-embedded media knows damned well the best defence is a good offence. For once the target deserves it.

Future Shock

That dystopian, authoritarian future we’re so fond of reading about in science fiction? It’s here already.

From Mother Jones comes this sickening expose of the use of electroshock equipment to torture disturbed American teens into compliance:

Rob Santana awoke terrified. He’d had that dream again, the one where silver wires ran under his shirt and into his pants, connecting to electrodes attached to his limbs and torso. Adults armed with surveillance cameras and remote-control activators watched his every move. One press of a button, and there was no telling where the shock would hit—his arm or leg or, worse, his stomach. All Rob knew was that the pain would be intense.

Every time he woke from this dream, it took him a few moments to remember that he was in his own bed, that there weren’t electrodes locked to his skin, that he wasn’t about to be shocked. It was no mystery where this recurring nightmare came from—not A Clockwork Orange or 1984, but the years he spent confined in America’s most controversial “behavior modification” facility.

[…]

The Rotenberg Center is the only facility in the country that disciplines students by shocking them, a form of punishment not inflicted on serial killers or child molesters or any of the 2.2 million inmates now incarcerated in U.S. jails and prisons. Over its 36-year history, six children have died in its care, prompting numerous lawsuits and government investigations. Last year, New York state investigators filed a blistering report that made the place sound like a high school version of Abu Ghraib. Yet the program continues to thrive—in large part because no one except desperate parents, and a few state legislators, seems to care about what happens to the hundreds of kids who pass through its gates.

[…]

Despite spending more than three years at this behavior-modification facility, Rob still has problems controlling his behavior. In 2005, he was arrested for attempted assault and sent to jail. (This year he was arrested again, for drugs and assault.) Being locked up has given him plenty of time to reflect on his childhood, and he has gained a new perspective on the Rotenberg Center. “It’s worse than jail,” he told me. “That place is the worst place on earth.”

More…

Tasers As A Litmus Test

The reaction of some allegedly liberal bloggers to the tasering of a student at a Kerry event speaks volumes to me about the normalisation of torture. For the writers it’s not an issue of whether tasers should be used on citizens in a free state at all and whether police should be allowed to render what is, in effect, a punishment without a trial. For them it’s merely an issue of who deserves it and who doesn’t.

Torture is becoming normalised – here, as if we needed much more proof is a demonstration of that normalisation:

Awww, how cute. This cute pink seal taser’s perfect for any budding little hitlerjiugend on your Christmas list. Imagine the joy on Christmas morning! No more childish bickering over the Wii…

Tasers even come in cool designer colours, like electric blue, black pearl and baby pink. Match your taser to your cellphone and go jackbooting in style! Not just handy for shutting up kids or getting rid of annoyingly on-point loudmouth sophomore journalists, tasers are a must-have for shutting up annoying relatives, cripples and the mentally ill:

Permanently.

Wheelchair-Bound Woman Dies After Being Shocked With Taser 10 Times

Wed Sep 19, 9:38 AM ET

A Clay County woman’s family said it’s seeking justice after their loved one died shortly after being shocked 10 times with Taser guns during a confrontation with police.

The family of 56-year-old Emily Delafield said it would take the Green Cove Springs Police Department to court, according to a WJXT-TV report.

In April 2006, officers with the police department said they were called to a disturbance at a home in the 400 block of Harrison Street just before 5 p.m.

In a 911 call made to the Green Cove Springs, Delafield can be heard telling a dispatcher that she believed she was in danger:

Dispatcher: And what’s the problem?

Delafield: My sister is waiting on my property.

Dispatcher: Your what?

Delafield: My sister (inaudible) is on my property trying to harm me.

Officers said they arrived to find Delafield in a wheelchair, armed with two knives and a hammer. Police said the woman was swinging the weapons at family members and police.

Within an hour of her call to 911, Delafield, a wheelchair-bound woman documented to have mental illness, was dead.

Family attorney Rick Alexander said Delafield’s death could have been prevented and that there are four things that jump out at him about the case.

“One, she’s in a wheelchair. Two, she’s schizophrenic. Three, they’re using a Taser on a person that’s in a wheelchair, and then four is that they tasered her 10 times for a period of like two minutes,” Alexander said.

According to a police report, one of the officers used her Taser gun nine times for a total of 160 seconds and the other officer discharged his Taser gun once for a total of no more than five seconds.

A medical examiner found Delafield died from hypertensive heart disease and cited the Taser gun shock as a contributing factor, the report said. On her death certificate, the medical examiner ruled Delafield’s death a homicide.

More….

Did Emily Delafield deserve it, too? If not,why not?

“But she was in a wheelchair!” So what? She was armed. The Kerry protestor wasn’t armed – but if he deserved it, why didn’t she? Who decides who deserves it and who doesn’t anyway, the cops?

You see where we go when accept the premise that tasers can be used by a supposedly civilised society against it’s citizens? Right down the rabbithole.

Now if only they’d used the pretty pink seal taser on her, at least she’d’ve died smiling at teh cute and they might’ve avoided a lawsuit…

I don’t suppose this report will raise any more outrage with some liberal bloggers than did the Kerry tasering, though. One of the things that’s so shocking about the Kerry video is the way Kerry just let it happen and how the audience, inured to Jerry Springer-hype shenanigans, just sat there and watched avidly and worst of all was the approving applause from the audience – and some bloggers

If it were up to those bloggers being a pretentious writer and careerist publicity hound iwould be a crime deserving of summary judgement and umpty-thousand volts. Christ, if if that were the case then many of those same bloggers wouldd’ve been regularly writhing in agony on their own floors these past years. I suggest they go read their own archives, it can be a sobering experience.

There is at least one useful result though from the controversy; it’s causing a real sorting of sheep from goats as ‘sensible’ liberals come out as objectively pro violent repression, or at least pro when it suits them.

If now isn’t a time to choose which side you’re on – for or against creeping corporate neofascism – when is?

As Martiin points out, anyone who is in favour of taser use in any way, shape or form has taken a political position that’s entirely incompatible with any known definition of ‘left’ or ‘liberal’.These are the same bloggers who’ve appointed themselves the vanguard of the revolution and who’ve proclaimied themselves ‘the left’ – when what they actually are is anti-Bush and anti-Republican, which is not at all the same thing.

This is highlighted most clearly when it comes to authoritananism and policing: many self-described US liberals, when it comes to repressive policing, seem to consider it to be ‘for thee but not for me’. However much they might try to convince themselves otherwise to try and retain their alt credibility, they are conservatives, not liberals, because they don’t want to question the political system we live under, they want to conserve what they have, and if that takes harsh and repressive policing, so be it.

Crack a few jokes about prison rape and Scooter Libby, really stick it to the man, man, it’s all good snark – but ignore the fact of insitutionalised torture, sexuali abuse and modern slavery in US jails because that’s what’s propping up your own comfy lifestyle.

The Kerry incident brought out something very ugly in US liberal blogging – but it’s also served the useful function of reminding us just how skewed notions of left and right in US politics are and how useless it is to try and compartmentalise left and right when the entire public discourse, is slanted so far right to begin with that the Democrats, far from being the flaming communist atheists the rightwing media paints them as, are pro-free-market, pro-military imperialism and pro the status quo, and would be out on the right iwng of any given .eu conservative party.

Democrats are not the left or the good guys. You won’t see Democrats rolling back the police state when in power: just so long as it happens to people they don’t know or who they can easily despise and dismiss, and they don’t have to question capitalism and they get to keep their stuff, repressive paramilitary policing is no problem.

What I hope is that the furore of comments that’s resulted from their flip and callous reactions to the Kerry tasering has also caused some ‘liberals’ to examine their consciences and ask themselves what it is they really stand for when they accept taser use as a given.

If nothing else, the Kerry incident’s pushed taser misuse into the public spotlight, so I suppose you could at least count that as a plus.