Compare and Contrast

Remember the ruckus Labourites made about Ruth Turner being arrested in a “dawn raid”:

High-level Labour figures have characterised Mr Yates’s techniques as intimidatory, claiming that Ms Turner,Mr Blair’s head of government relations, was forced to dress in front of the police when they knocked at her door at 6.30am.

One Labour official angrily said: “We do not live in a banana public, whatever Assistant Commissioner Yates believes.”

The police insist they are using normal police techniques and are simply not giving anyone any preferential treatment.

From the screams of outrage you’d think this sort of thing wasn’t standard police practice, but in fact it’s used regularly on people whose only crime was applying for asylum in Britain and not getting it, as Labour MP Austin Mitchell explains:

A second dawn raid took place on 9 January at 6am. Used on Ruth Turner this appalling practice produces howls of protest. With asylum families it’s an everyday part of the game. Vicious and cruel but a good way of catching kids before they go to school. Public protests had forced an end to dawn raids in New Zealand when Labour came in in 1984. Here New Labour sees them as the norm.

Mrs Bokhari rang a friend but was cut off. The friend went round but wasn’t allowed to speak to the family who were dragged off, Mr Bokhari kicking and screaming to the horror of the neighbours who liked the family and disliked the din.

Bokhari is a diabetic but no health check had been made beforehand so the raiders didn’t believe him and his insulin was left in the fridge. They were taken to Yarl’s Wood, arriving unfed and uninjected at 6pm. Next day Bokhari was taken off, I hoped, for treatment, though the family weren’t told where, and it was three days before he was brought back with bad bruising.

Mitchell goes on:

It leaves a nasty taste. An out-of-control Immigration and Nationality Directorate is doing what it wants to get deportations up. The minister goes along, ratifies its decisions (he hardly ever rejects them), observes its deadlines and strings MPs along, pretending to listen while doing nothing. Perhaps scarring young souls will teach them not to come here when they grow up.

Perhaps it will win votes to Labour from the lumpen lunatics who’ve deluged the Grimsby Telegraph’s website with abuse of their soft, immigrant-loving, geriatric, fool of an MP. Perhaps we’ll win enough National Fronters to compensate for the loss of the many liberals this has alienated. I don’t know. But I do know how I feel. Ashamed.

I can sympathise with Mitchell. If only there was a political party
which was serious about defending the right of asylum seekers mr. Mitchell could join.

Oh, Just Piss Off, UK Tells Blair

Stop The War 2002

What’s it going to take for Blair to get the message? 2 million voters demonstrating on the streets of London? A million signatures on a petition that he resign? A poll telling him the whole country wants him gone? What?

Most Britons want Blair to resign now -poll
Sun Feb 4, 2007 8:10 AM GMT
Email This Article | Print This Article | RSS

LONDON (Reuters) – Most Britons think Prime Minister Tony Blair should step down now, according to an opinion poll published on Sunday after a week of damaging headlines for the premier over an investigation into political funding.

Blair, who plans to resign later this year after more than a decade in power, was questioned by police for a second time last month about the case which has also seen some of his closest aides arrested.

Blair said in a speech to activists from his Labour Party on Saturday that he did not underestimate the scale of the problems facing his government. But he has said the cash-for-peerages probe will not force him to bring forward his departure date.

The ICM poll published in the Sunday Express found 56 percent of those polled believed Blair should resign now. Even among those who termed themselves as Labour voters, 43 percent said Blair should leave his post immediately.

No, he’s going to hang on for grim death, fingernails gripping the doorjamb of No 10 all the way as he’s dragged out by a posse of stout police constables, accompanied by hordes of baying journos and Cherie scuttling furtively away behind the scrum with the silver in a recyclable Tesco carrier bag .

Meanwhile Blair’s arselicker-in-chief and very own Comical Ali, Philip Gould, will still be valiantly proclaiming to all and sundry how remarkable Blair is and what integrity he’s got and that we should look to history and think how very lucky we are to have such a man as our leader, no really, it’s true.

It’s Getting Hot In Here

Sweaty Blair

Closer and closer….

Police interviewed Blair for second time
By Andrew Woodcock, PA Chief Political Correspondent
Published: 01 February 2007

Tony Blair has been questioned for a second time by police investigating allegations of cash for honours, his official spokesman said today.

The Prime Minister was questioned as a witness for less than one hour at 10 Downing Street last Friday morning.

The police requested a news blackout on the interview, which was not lifted until this morning.

Downing Street refused to comment on the content of the interview, which came a few days after the 19 January arrest of Mr Blair’s close aide, Ruth Turner, on suspicion of perverting the course of justice, and shortly before this week’s arrest of his chief fundraiser, Lord Levy, on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Downing Street said it was not known whether Mr Blair would be questioned again, saying that was “a matter entirely for police”.

Put The Champagne On Ice

O frabjous day! Calloo, callay!

Lord Levy has been arrested, again, on suspicion of perverting the course of justice, the BBC reports.

Former pop impresario, Blair best friend, tennis partner, personal middle east envoy, Labour peer and Friend of Israel, party fundraiser and joint British/Israeli citizen Levy was arrested when he returned to answer police bail, which was granted after his first arrest and questioning about his role in the sale of peerages for cash.

Following his being given bail last time Levy hotfooted it to his house in Israel.

I wonder: as he’s a known flight risk, will the plod risk bailing him again, or will they remand him in custody? I bet the latter. It’ll take only one night in Britain’s totally buggered prison system to convince hsi poptastic lordship that he has a good memory after all. like he said, he’s not taking the rap.

Blair must be quaking in his boots. Not only will his best and most trusted friend sing like a canary if jailed, even for the briefest of periods, but it seems that the private Labour internal email system that Blair’s official spokesman denied exists does indeed, exist. and that No 10’s official spokesperson lied to the police about it, thus hiding evidence. That in itself is obstruction of justice, a charge I think quite a few Labour notables and party droids will soon be facing.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. The New Labour project is crumbling from corruption and internal rot, not long now before Blair has no choice but to go too.

UPDATE: He’s been bailed again. More fool the Met. I suspect Lord Levy’s housekeeper in Tel Aviv is stocking the fridge up and airing the sheets right now.

Britain’s Very Own Newt Gingrich

It’s true, being a Conservative makes you a prick, whatever your nationality:

Tories support MP who had affair

Arsehole

Mr Gray has been North Wilts MP since 1997

James Gray, a Conservative MP who cheated on his wife, was reselected as constituency candidate on Tuesday.

In a ballot of the North Wiltshire Conservative Association, the 52-year-old received the backing of the party members.

He had called for voters to judge him on his record of constituency work.

The father-of-three admitted having an affair while his wife, Sarah, 51, was being treated for breast cancer. They are now divorcing.

[…]

It gets even nastier when you look at at the background.

The cancer-stricken wife of a Tory MP who left her for another woman has launched a devastating attack on her husband for publicly belittling her fight against the disease.

Sarah Gray, the wife of Wiltshire North MP James Gray, has written to David Cameron saying she is ‘deeply hurt’ by her husband’s behaviour since he left her for married mother-of-three Philippa Mayo, a fellow foxhunting supporter.

Mrs Gray claims her husband ‘undermined’ her cancer ordeal by claiming she merely had treatment for ‘pre-cancerous cells’.

“I cannot ignore the slight he has dealt me,” she told the Conservative leader. “It only serves to show the lack of understanding he had of the physical and psychological effects of the cancer.”

The row erupted following a Mail on Sunday article two weeks ago that revealed that 51-year-old Mrs Gray was considering taking work as a cleaner to make ends meet after their acrimonious break-up.

The MP lodged a complaint about the report with the newspaper industry watchdog, denying his wife was ‘cancer-stricken’ when he left her -but it was his decision to post the letter of complaint on the Conservative Home website that caused further upset to his wife.

Mrs Gray has now also complained to the Press Complaints Commission, objecting to the way her husband made ‘personal statements about me without my permission, many of which I disagree with’. A copy of her letter was also sent to Mr Cameron, local Tory officials and friends

[…]

“He misunderstands what I went through,” she said. “He talks of “pre-cancerous cells”, but re-reading my surgeon’s letters, the words “pre-cancerous” do not appear. “Invasive ductal carcinoma”, “three breast cancers”, “bilateral mastectomy” do appear.

“I do not think that the NHS would have given me two operations, two MRI scans, six courses of chemotherapy and 30 sessions of radiotherapy and now treatment for lymphoedema for nothing.”

Far from playing down her cancer, Mrs Gray claims her husband did the precise opposite at the last Election when he was fighting to hold on to his marginal seat.

“James did ask an audience to pray for me during the Election campaign in 2005,” she says:

“This was the first time he used my illness without my permission. It generated a lot of Press interest. I also postponed my operation for a week as it clashed with Election Day. James must not make light of my illness.”

She describes the way she fought her cancer aided by the couple’s three children as well as the ‘amazing’ team at Bath’s Royal United Hospital and a Haven Trust support centre in Fulham, West London.

She added that she supported her husband’s political career as well as maintaining her family responsibilities despite her health problems.

“In all my varied roles, I kept the show on the road. I cooked for and hosted James’s political supper club for 35 people a week after my last chemotherapy for “pre-cancerous cells”,’ she says bitterly.

“It has been a difficult few months and now James has thrust the issue of my cancer into the spotlight again.”

[…]

But Mrs Gray is not alone in criticising her husband’s conduct. Mrs Mayo’s husband, a 43-year-old criminal barrister, was distraught when he found out his 41-year-old wife was cheating on him and told the MP he was ‘not fit for office’.

Mr Gray declined to comment.

Well he would, wouldn’t he?

It tells you all you need to know about the actual truth of David Cameron’s new ‘kinder gentler’ Tories when they reselect a man like this to represent them.