116168335884726364

Not So Quaint Now

Apparently a US soldier has been kidnapped in Iraq and all the stops are being pulled out for the search.

I truly hope that the soldier’s found unharmed – but what I actually expect is that it’s only a matter of time before a horribly tortured and mutilated, electric-drill-hole-riddled corpse is dumped on the Coalition’s doorstep.

No doubt there’ll be roaring outrage from the hateosphere if that happens, howls that those barbarous ragheads would kidnap, torture and murder American troops. “But..but… they’re American! They’re special! They’re protected! The bastards! How dare they! Nuke Iran!! It’s against the Geneva Convention!

Yes, it is.

Still think Abu Gonzales is a legal genius, wingnuts?

Read more: Iraq Civil War, US Troops, Kidnap, Torture, Geneva Convention, Alberto Gonzales.

116151586020383268

Sometimes It Just Has To Be Said

There’s an allegedly feminist US law professor – a demonstrably public figure, a scholar, an authority on privacy, consumer databases and the internet – who’s reportedly using her tenured position to harass another not quite so privileged pseudonymous feminist blogger from the public sphere by threatening her via a third party with a defamation lawsuit.

Because there’re are no costs orders for losers in the US courts system, the expense of defending such a suit, no matter how ill-founded the suit (and even if it’s sucessfully defended) could well be a financial death blow to the average blogger – a fact which you’d think a law professional would be well aware of and which makes said prof’s actions even more reprehensible.

This supposedly-respected and widely-published academic’s also apparently made veiled threats about publishing this and other pseudonymous feminist bloggers’ personal details online, as though she wasn’t aware, as an internet privacy expert, of the potential harassment and even violence this could trigger. There’s no way she could not know this and indeed it’s the implied threat underlying all her attacks; how very handy to be able to indulge in threatening physical violence by proxy whilst safe within the safe cocoon of your own insulated academic position.

The potential financial and work-related pressure of the impending lawsuit and the outing threat has now caused the pseudonymous feminist blogger to stop blogging.

It doesn’t really matter who the feminist blogger or the blog is in the great ongoing theme of internet discourse, though of course it’s vitally important to the person affected – what matters is that someone with a protected online voice, a voice that’s protected not just by free speech laws but by her employment contract, can use that position to silence the voice of those she doesn’t like or who have opinions she doesn’t agree with. She’s allegedly even gone so far as to have used her privileged position and access to databases such as Lexis/Nexis to stalk other bloggers.

That a tenured academic, a female academic at that, who even self-identifies as feminist would attack another woman in such a vicious, underhanded and yes, childish way boggles the mind.

There can be only one response; I give it in the full knowledge of all the baggage that comes with the word and I make no apology whatsoever. Sue me, I’d love it. Fuck, I’m just reclaiming our word from the patriarchy anyway.

Ann Barstow is a bitch, she’s a big fat bitch

She’s the biggest bitch in the whole wide world,

She’s a stupid bitch, if there ever was a bitch,

She’s a bitch to all the boys and girls.

On Monday she’s a bitch

On Tuesday she’s a bitch

On Wednesday through Saturday she’s a bitch

Then on Sunday just to be different,

Shes a super king kong mega mega biyatch!

Update: This appeared in the comments at Feministe:

Ann Bartow Says:

October 20th, 2006 at 7:54 pm

Hi, it?s me. Ann Bartow. I?m not going to sue anybody.
I?m not going to out anybody. I want Zuzu to come back to Feministe. I never intended to threaten Zuzu (or anyone else) with the prospect of my outing her, and I wasn?t trying to silence her. I?m sorry anything I said or did contributed to her thinking otherwise.

Here?s what happened: Yes, I happen to know who zuzu is. No, I didn?t use any special databases or inside knowledge to find out. No, I?m not going to tell you how I know, because that would be tantamount to outing her, and I?m not going to do that. I did want to convey to her the fact that her anonymity wasn?t as
secure as she thought it was, because I believe that people who legitimately want anonymity shouldn?t be outed. (I?ve made it clear that I think the discussion would benefit from people choosing not to be anonymous or pseudonymous, but that?s another story.)

I know that a lot of you have concluded that by conveying this to her via Jill last July that I must have been making some sort of hidden threat, and I gather that Zuzu concluded that, but I wasn?t. I?m sorry she thought so.

I was pretty upset when zuzu indicated on Feministe that
I was somehow using secret knowledge to ferret out her identity and terrorize her with the threat of revealing it. That was the opposite of anything I had intended or wanted, and I did think it was defamatory, and I figured that Zuzu was saying it as some sort of attack on me. It?s become clear to me since then that no, she was just freaked out, and I can understand that.

So anyway, I?m not a litigious person, and I?m not going to start now suing people now. I do think that discussion works better when people use real names, but I?m not going to out anybody. That?s not me. I?ve never intended to make Zuzu or anyone else feel that they were in danger of that from me. I?m sorry that an email to Jill from me last July, without my realizing it, caused her to think she was. (I do think that a lot of the rest of you folks jumped to some pretty nasty conclusions about me without any evidence to back them up). And Goddess knows I didn?t intend to cause Zuzu to take a break from blogging. There was no reaction after I sent the e-mail to Jill back on July 5th. I guess it has been bothering her for a while.

So nobody in this community has anything to fear from me ? we?re on the same side, even when we disagree ? and I hope Zuzu comes back soon.

If that was indeed by Ann Barstow then I’m glad to hear this apology, barbed as it is. So she’s not sueing, or threatening to sue, which has to a good thing.

But I sense she’s being disingenous with all this upfront niceness. However emollient it doesn’t disguise that what Barstow did was to use a fundamentally dishonest and nasty tactic in argument, one which ill behooves someone who argues professionally. It was the online equivalent of “I know where you live” delivered slwoly and with a meaning look.

Another commenter at Feministe said that just because you can figure out who someone is it doesn?t mean you should, to which I would add that just because you know who someone is doesn’t mean you should threaten, however obliquely, to use it against them, then turn around and act all innocent.

Read more: Internet, Blogs, Blogging Feminism, Feminist Blogs, Freedom of Speech, Defamation, Pseudonyms, When Law Professors Go Nuts.

116135077636885724

Comment of the day week month

I don’t think Althouse is sufficiently socialized to breach the surface of her own narcissism to actually share a political point of view with other people. IMO, she’s a kind of passive-aggressive existentialist, the supreme navel-gazing centrist of her own world, and if anything’s being normalized here it’s her own subjective values and choices. She has to shun the very idea that she is ever partisan?by definition a group thing?because denies the primacy of her own self. Which, in this case, is a wingnut.


R.Porrofatto over in comments at Alicublog.

116134493163851388

The Best Lack All Conviction

Amanda has a very thought-provoking post and a fascinating comment thread up on the topic of political hopelessness, following Riverbend’s reappearance in blogging and Billmon’s frank admittal that he considers he’s failed in not opposing Bushco strongly enough:

[…]

It?s easy to think up excuses now ? we were in the minority, the media was against us, the country was against us. We didn?t know how bad it would be.

But we knew, or should have known, that what Bush was planning was an illegal act of aggression, based on a warmongering campaign of deception and ginned-up hysteria. And we knew, or should have known, what our moral and legal obligations were:

Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.

We were all complicit. I was complicit. Because I was afraid ? afraid to sacrifice my comfortable middle class lifestyle, afraid to lose my job and my house, afraid of the IRS, afraid to go to jail.

But not nearly as afraid, of course, as the thousands of Iraqis who have been tortured or murdered, or who, like Riverbend, are forced to live in bloody chaos, day after day. Which is why, reading her post today, I couldn?t help but feel deeply, bitterly ashamed ? not just of my country, but of myself.

And he’s right to feel that. All Americans of conscience should. You didn’t do enough because you weren’t prepared to pay the potential price and it’s way past time to look yourself in the mirror and admit that. While you’re there you could maybe ask yourself another question – am I prepared to put myself on the line for what I believe?

The weight of history is behind principled dissent, but the history is of sacrifice for a greater good. Nothing ever changes without sacrifice, even if it’s only on the domestic scale. For example if you can’t stand up for your principles at home, where your moral character counts most, then where can you? Which of course is not to say I advocate browbeating your nearest and dearest, except maybe where they’re being particularly politically meatheaded, just suggesting that you can’t doff your principles at the door as you do your coat. But what about at work? Socialising? Just standing up and being counted? Did you have the guts to be against Bushco when it wasn’t so popular or was it easier to go along to get along – and are you still doing that?

Political convictions mean nothing if you don’t act on them. A little inspiration for fainthearts might be found in this man, who’s firmly in the tradition of working-class oppositional radicalism that the US is heir to and which seems sadly lacking these days. He continues to live his politics – but living your principles isn’t easy, as Amanda bravely acknowledges; it’s painful and difficult and it’s too often more expedient to opt for an easier life . And after all, isn’t life hard enough already?

Well, no, actually, it isn’t. It’s going to get worse. That’s a given regardless of party politics and elections. Global warming holds sway over all while a de facto neofascist coup has occurred in the world’s most influential country, the nation that could’ve had some influence to reverse the phenomenon had they so decided. That affects us all, as does the fact that your government believes its writ runs everywhere. They’re riding roughshod over international law in detaining other countries’ nationals in secret, indefinitely and without trial. And then there’s the torture.

None of us is safe now, not even those happy fundies in their gated communities with their cctv’s and panic rooms.

I hear people wondering what it’s going to take to rouse the public, forgetting that they themselves are the public. Will it be the arrest of prominent journalists or bloggers? Well, no – Greg Palast’s already been arrested and charged and that caused barely a ripple. What if, say, Olbermann were assassinated, what then? Or is it going to take something much bigger, like another Kent State – though it’d have to be on a pretty spectacular scale since the public is so jaded with massacres by now – to rouse the American people to start taking creative, non-violent direct action? Maybe the destruction of Miami by hurricane? Riots at the polling stations next month? The draft? What? How bad does it have to get?

This feels like a time of waiting. The progressive US left seems to be wondering when and if the first move against the political opposition is going to come.

It’s really important to us in the rest of the world that when and if that move is made and your principles as expressed in the Constitution come to the test you don’t chicken out. We’ve kept faith with Americans so far despite the horrible actions of your government, because of our sincere hope that what US progressives say is what they’ll do. Although your government’s policies put us in danger too we have no power over anything the US does and can only sympathise powerlessly and be scared shitless at a distance.

Faith and patience in America run quite thin though. when no-one in the progressive opposition seems prepared to go to the barricades for what they say they believe in. When your continued collective failure to act against such a dangerous regime can have such terrible implications for the survival of the rest of us worldwide you can’t blame us for saying ‘If not now, when?’.

We are on the verge of planet-wide historical and sociological shifts caused by climate change, much of which can be blamed on the continuing overconsumption of your country. (Sorry, nothing personal but that’s the way it is.) Your current regime continues to blithely encourage this despite the clear scienetific evidence of impending catastrophe. They just don’t care that there’ll be natural disasters, mass deaths, crop failures and economic collapse, energy wars and horrible conflicts over land and resources. They have the nukes.

The question of who”ll be in charge of the largest nuclear arsenal when the world is in climate chaos is a crucially important one. At the moment it’s in the hands of madmen, out and out scheming sociopaths who’ve shown no compunction whatever in attacking a sovereign nation without cause for no other credible reason than that they wanted to and who regularly threaten other nations with the same treatment. As the world’s political situation becomes ever more unbalanced, driven by climate change and our rulers’ sociopathy, so those sociopaths become ever more unstable. We could all be annihilated in an instant at the whim of a Bush or Cheney.

It’s not just your own personal future at stake here; its much bigger than that. If you do screw your courage to the sticking point and resist your own government’s tyranny be under no illusions: the state will oppose you with every means at their command – and they don’t play nice. You as individuals will have a lot to lose, but we all have even more to lose if we let the fuckers win. Sacrifices will have to made for the common good – but are you prepared to be that sacrifice?

Will you be a good German? Sheep or goat? The time is coming when you’ll have to decide.

Yet my mind was not at rest, because nothing was acted, and thoughts run in me that words and writings were all nothing, and must die, for action is the life of all, and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing.

Gerrard Winstanley

*For the avoidance of doubt the phrase ‘go to the barricades’ is a metaphor and not a call to armed insurrection. Got it, spybots and CentCom operatives?

Read more: US Politics, Progressive Blogosphere, Climate Change, Global Warming, War on Terror

116126236269456553

The Log Cabin Has Many Mansions

There’s been a lot of hoohah about a list of alleged closeted gay Republicans that’s been circulated. Well, here is the LIST , courtesy of Blogactive, “Operating since July of 2004, telling you the truth about hypocrisy in the gov’t.”. Make of it what you will.


US Representatives

    Rep. Ed Schrock (VA)

    Rep. David Drier (CA)

    Rep. James McCrery (LA)

    Rep. Mark Foley (FL)

US Senators

    Sen Barbara Mikulski (MD)

Senior GOP Staff

    Jay Timmons, NRSC

    Dan Gurley, RNC

    Jay Banning, RNC

Senior Senate Staffers

  • Robert Traynham, Santorum

    Jonathan Tolman, Inhofe

    Kirk Fordham, Martinez

    Dirk Smith, Lott

    John Reid, Allen

    Paul Unger, Allen

    Linus Catignani, Frist

Senior House Staffers

    Jim Conzelman, Oxley

    Lee Cohen, Hart

    Robert O’Conner, King

    Pete Meachum, Brown-Waite

Bush Staff

    Israel Hernandez

    Jeff Berkowitz

Local Officials

    Vincent Gentile, NYC

The rest…

    Ed Koch, NYC Mayor

    Jennifer Helms-Knox, Judge

    Armstrong Williams, Radio host

    Matt Drudge, Headline writer

    Steve Kreseski, MD Gov.

    Chip DiPaula, MD Gov.

    Lee LaHaye, CWA

    John Schlafley, Eagle Forum

Read more: US Politics, Republicans, Closeted Gays, Outing, Hypocrisy