116100940380857557

A Surfeit of Slimeballs

Even though I do have a little first-hand experience of US political campaigning, I still get shocked at just how vicious and negative US political tv ads can be.

The NYT has a very illuminating set of campaign videos up – well worth a look to get a flavour of how campaigning is going. The videos come from both sides of the fence, but the one that made the most impression on me is that of Tom Reynolds, who makes a straight-to-the-camera apology for fucking up on Foley. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone look quite so embarassingly insincere since Ricky Gervais. And George Allen? What a nasty piece of work. Every inch the oily, bigoted ‘southern’ pol.

The most effective I felt was the simplest and probably the least expensive and I hate to say that it was from a Republican, Joe O’Donnell. He said little substantive on politics but let his youthful and engaging personality speak very effectively and was upbeat about cleaning up Washington (yes, I realise that’s hilarious from a wingnut). I think he’ll appeal to a lot of core Republican voters who want change but just can’t bring themselves to vote Dem.

It must be horribly difficult for US voters whose lives don’t allow for time to be particularly well-informed – ie most people with jobs and kids and a life – who must necessarily get their political news and views from the mass media, to get any real idea of where the parties stand on any concrete issues at all, if this is a representative sample of how campaigns are being run.

Unfortunately, when one side (and it has generally been the Republicans) ratchets up the viciousness the other is almost bound to respond if only to counter the lies. Political campaigning has because of this become a mass-media arms race with no end in sight, whatever happens in the actual elections. It’s an industry now and just like other industries that rely on politics for their wherewithal (like its close siblings the arms industry and lobbying) it’s a colosssal sinkhole for more and more public cash.

Read more: US Politics, Video, Congressional elections, Campaign ads

116083338613193521

We Defeated Germany Only To Become Nazis Ourselves

Universities urged to spy on Muslims

Vikram Dodd
Monday October 16, 2006
The Guardian

Lecturers and university staff across Britain are to be asked to spy on “Asian-looking” and Muslim students they suspect of involvement in Islamic extremism and supporting terrorist violence, the Guardian has learned.
They will be told to inform on students to special branch because the government believes campuses have become “fertile recruiting grounds” for extremists.

The Department for Education has drawn up a series of proposals which are to be sent to universities and other centres of higher education before the end of the year. The 18-page document acknowledges that universities will be anxious about passing information to special branch, for fear it amounts to “collaborating with the ‘secret police'”. It says there will be “concerns about police targeting certain sections of the student population (eg Muslims)”.

Teaching unions and NUS – where the fuck are you? get off your asses and to the barricades: this is not bloody right. I’m too angry to post on the reasons why this is just so bloody wrong and besides, others have done so much more eloquently. I’m too angry to speak just now, let alone type legibly.

The Labour party is showing exactly what it is: a religious extremist, authoritarian party whose leadership has been infiltrated by Catholic zealots. There is no way these people can be impartial on anything regarding Islam while wearing their own religious bigotry on their sleeve so openly.

Parliament is not secular. There are at least 40 members of the Christian Socialist Movement in the House of Lords and the House of Commons, including current and former Cabinet members and the Prime Minister, Tony Blair. Not all are Catholic but there are a preponderance of them in the cabinet. Blair goes to mass, genuflects and is to all intents and purposes a Catholic like his wife. John Reid, Home Secretary, the man in charge of security, policing, anti-terrorism and the prisons, was in the front row at the Pope’s requiem mass at Westminster Cathedral.

The minister in charge of the quaintly named Department of Social Cohesion, the person who’s in charge of policy on religious matters, race relations and gay and women’s rights, is Ruth Kelly, a fanatical Catholic and Opus Dei member.

Imagine she was, rather than a member of Opus Dei , a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, and it was Catholics in universities she wanted Moslem teachers and students to spy on.

Would we be put up with religious discrimination by the government then? I doubt that sincerely. So why are we putting up with it now? IThat fact that New Labour have the gall to suggest that academics spy on pupils of a particular religion, that they betray them to what are effectively the seret police – that shows how far we’ve come down the road to a religious police state.

The producers of V for Vendetta are starting to look quite prescient.

Read more: British fascism, New Labour, Religion, Islam, Catholicism

116081044333597200

Progressive Entertainment News

Journalist Robert Fisk will be guest on Radio 4’s Desert Island Duscs tomorrow morning; for those not aware of the programme, it’s been going for 60-odd years and guests have included No?l Coward, the last 5 prime ministers, Dame Judi Dench, John Malkovich, Princess Margaret, George Clooney, Stephen Hawking, and Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.

Guests pick the eight records they’d like to have with them on a desert island ( they also get the Bible or religious book of their choice and the complete works of Shakespeare, plus one luxury item that can’t be useful for escaping) and say why they made those choices, sort of a Friday Random 10 but not on Friday and not random and not 10.

Lots of Brits carry their own desert island list in their head, just in case some day, no matter how unlikely it seems, a guest drops out, the magic call comes from the BBC and they find themselves broadcasting their life to the nation on Sunday norning.

DID can be much more illuminating than a straightforward interview – even, or maybe especially when, as many political figures have, guests’ve chosen their list with an eye to PR. It’s so easy to tell they’ve done that and it really says all you need to know about them. There’s also that horrible feet-of-clay moment when someone you quite liked turns out to have execrable musical tastes. Conversely, sometimes you find yourself liking a figure you’d previously despised purely because of a mutual love of Wreckless Eric – and of course there are some lists that just confirm your original impression of the person, ie that they’re a tasteless, boring shit.

Until very recently it was presented by my homegirl Sue Lawley, who has a voice like a cut-glass chandelier and an attitude to match Lawley’s also famous for asking Chancellor Gordon Brown outright if he was gay on his edition of the programme – ” “People want to know whether you’re gay or whether there is some flaw in your personality”. But this series Scots former news journalist and presenter Kirsty Young is taking over. Too early to tell how she’ll be ( the Fisk programme is only her second), but she’s shown herself on Have I Got News For You to have a wicked wit and a very attractive voice.

British BBC radio obsessives like me obsess about changes like this. A change of presenter can be a disaster to listeners because Radio 4 to us is much more than a radio station. We’ve been listening to it literally all our lives. We’ve imbibed it like mother’s milk. We own it. The BBC have learnt that to their cost several times when making changes; for example when removing the UK theme ( a musical medley) at the endstart (Tsk. Call yourself a Radio 4 listener? –ed.) of the broadcasting day. Questions were even asked in Parliament:

The announcement led to mass coverage in the British media and even to comments in its support by Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown. On the 24th of January, several British MPs submitted Early Day Motions about the theme which led to a question being asked at Prime Minister’s Questions, with Prime Minister Tony Blair referring to the “strong feeling” around the country. Also, BBC Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman played the UK Theme to end the programme on a number of occasions and several British orchestras and institutions have also pledged to play the theme. These include British supermarket chain ASDA, and London speech radio station, LBC.

If the BBC try and cut Sailing By I predict a riot – the nation can’t go to sleep without it. But I digress, as Radio 4 obsessives are wont to do.

############

In other entertainment news, the Secret Policeman’s Ball is back. tonight at the Royal Albert Hall. I remember those fundraisers for Amnesty International the first several times around, when money was being raised to fight government torture in Chile, Argentina, Russia and many other places.

Back then it was hip to be fair. But the liberal arts and media culture that the Right now vociferously condemns was actually twenty or more years ago, in the seventies and early eighties, not now. Times have changed; now the fundraiser’s to fight torture in and by the USA. Maybe because of that this time around the whole event seems somewhat lacklustre and lacking in something. (Or maybe it’s just benefit concert fatigue.)

I do think though that it’s very telling that the biggest US ‘star’ they could get to appear is… Chevy Chase. Has no other US comic the courage to speak out against torture on the international stage, really? Has it got that bad?

Did the organisers even ask Jon Stewart or Chris Rock or any other US comic? Or did they ask and they chickened out? It would be interesting to find out.

Read more: Progressive politics, Media, BBC, Radio 4, Desert Island Discs, Human Rights, Fundraising, Amnesty International , Secret Policemans Ball

116080508747387041

Comment of The Day

This one could’ve come from anywhere in the leftish blogosphere this past week, considering the nature of recent US news, but which actuially came from the News Blog‘s report on yet another Republican show-marriage collapse:

I just feel bad for the mules.

Oh, I’m sorry. Wrong Fundamentalist Christian pervert thread.

jimmiraybob 10.13.06 – 5:53 pm #

Read more: Internet, Blogs, Blogging, Comments, Comment of the day

116075757850235158

Such Devoted Sisters

All I?m going to say about this bit of ridiculousness at Pandagon and similar discussions at various other feminist blogs is – as much as I admire many of your ideas and much of your writing, who died and made you Boss of Us?

Amanda:

All I?m going to say about this bit of ridiculousness is that if you?ve actually gotten married, you?re in no place to be the self-appointed police of demanding women live as you think we would if there was no patriarchy. I don?t care what you wore to your wedding; marriage is a patriarchal structure and if you think that remaking traditionally male dominated institutions into egalitarian institutions is impossible, you sure as hell have no business being a wife.

So you tell someone off for being prescriptive while…. being prescriptive.

God, I’m so sick of youngish, American, self-described feminists re-inventing the wheel, fighting the same old battles all over again, self-centeredly and sanctimoniously deciding who’s in and who’s out in terms of their own understanding of what feminism is; an understanding that’s necessarily filtered through their own, generally white, US-centred world of relative economic and political privilege. I don’t care how nice they are individually, or how well-meaning they are, that’s a hump they can’t seem to get over.

It’s as though no other social system or way of living exists but that of the white-ish, thirty-ish, middle-class American female liberal. It’s as much a state of purdah as any outside the US – a metaphorical burqa if you will.

Witness the fuss when Amanda was called on for using the aforesaid burqa in a graphic, thereby inadvertently implying that to be a veiled Islamic woman is to be some kind of subhuman pity-object.

Despite plenty of evidence being put forward to the contrary (the fact that the pictured burqa was empty is neither here nor there) – when challenged, both she and her commenters wilfully misunderstood the discourse around colonialism, Islam and gender that was put to them, even when it was spelled out politely; because it challenged their smug preconceptions of themselves and their society such an analysis was not to be borne, and what’s more, it was those uppity women of colour who put the argument. How dare they.

I don’t wish to pick on one particular blogger; Amanda’s posts are just an example. There’s a clique of self-described feminist bloggers and commenters who continually visit each others blogs, comment there, link to each other and reinforce each others views. They act as an echo chamber and if your face or opinions don’t fit you’re ripe for attack. That’s who piled on those who made the colonialist argument. That’s hardly egalitarian, let alone feminist and worst of all it’s all so bloody parochial.

Take L’affaire De Les Grand Tetons for instance. When those bloggers who had been invited to meet Clinton were challenged about the lack of racial diversity at the event they became very defensive, and they fell on Ann Althouse’s snipe about Jessica’s breasts like it was manna from heaven. Far easier to to attack Althouse than to be forced to examine one’s own assumptions. Tits or racism? It was no contest.

Perhaps US feminist bloggers could turn away from their big feminist circle-jerk for a moment and see just how bogged down in trivialities they are. They’re bickering about makeup and a photo pose and shaved legs (didn’t we sort that one out in the seventies?) while women in the rest of the world are worrying about actual survival.

JOHANNESBURG (WOMENSENEWS)–For Betty Sgawuka, water is life, but it’s also backbreaking work. As a young child, she rambled after her mother with a small bucket; half a century later, now a grandmother several times over, she still makes multiple trips a day to a nearby stream.

Much has come to Sgawuka’s village during her 54 years: apartheid, freedom, AIDS. But eight years after South Africa’s first free, multi-racial elections, the only water that flows through Luphisi is the stream that nature put there.

[…]

But for millions of women like Sgawuka, clean water and access to sanitation also mean increased freedom and dignity.

“It’s women and girls who bear the brunt of the lack of clean water; it’s women and girls who are intimidated and humiliated by the lack of sanitation,” said Sir Richard Jolly, head of a new United Nations campaign called WASH–Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for All, speaking in Johannesburg. “Remember, the amount of water the African or Asian carries on her head is roughly equivalent to the amount of luggage most of us will bring home from Johannesburg, roughly 20 kg.”

In most of the world, it is a woman’s job to collect water for cooking, cleaning, drinking and sanitation. Girls often begin collecting water from a very young age and because the burden of collecting water is often so onerous, many are forced to drop out of school.

“The provision of clean water is particularly important because it has a liberating effect on women and young girls,” said Kul Gautam, deputy executive director of UNICEF. “In many rural areas, the average woman spends one-quarter to one-third of her time fetching water.”

Gautam also said UNICEF studies have shown that lack of water and sanitation are major factors leading to the high dropout rates of girls. In addition to the girls who drop out because their labor is needed at home, many girls also leave school because of inadequate sanitation at schools themselves.

Feminism is what you do, not what you say and what many of these bloggers’re saying is typically self-obsessed and narrow. A blog post, like any talk, is cheap; actually doing something to change the status quo is a bit more inconvenient than the transient thrilll of sniping at other women online.

Some allegedly feminist bloggers out there could perhaps stop obsessing over their own self-image and their status within the narrow confines of the blogosphere and pay a little attention to the real issues facing women worldwide. Because those women are the ones propping up that freedom to self-obsess they’re enjoying so much.

Read more: Internet, Blogs, Blogging, Feminism, Women