115995516834602879

O, Blog All Ye Faithful

The invaluable Raw Story (some blogs, and they know who they are, wouldn’t look half so prescient without it, or have so much pre-digested copy to cut and paste from) links to a surprisingly even-handed, well-researched and interesting USA Today article about libel law and blogging. Defintely worth reading. One case of many that’re mentioned intrigued me:

Ligonier Ministries, a religious broadcaster and publisher in Lake Mary, Fla., has taken the unusual step of asking a judge to pre-emptively silence a blogger to try to prevent him from criticizing the ministries. Judges historically have refused to place such limits on traditional publishers.

So as you do, I had a little google. And lo, a whole can of worms came forth… and particularly slimy, wriggly ones at that, considering these are supposed to be the ‘moral’ people. The blogger, Vance Tribe, has issues with the financial management of Ligonier Ministries.

His criticisms are not only managerial, but spiritual and theological, and he’s been unafraid of saying so on his blog. Ligonier Ministries is a massive moneymaking publishing affair largely exempt from tax and public scrutiny and it appears that in this instance, as they always do, the leeches have battened onto the credulous faithful. There’s defrocked priests, nepotism, hypocrisy and greed, and bad behaviour by the bucketful if you don’t mind wading through the sanctimony. Juicy.

It’s a interesting story, and doubly so for bloggers, because this religious business is trying for prior restraint to stop blog criticism before it even happens. That has implications for many bloggers if it’s successful. If they can do it, so can other churches, and a lot of churches have a lot to hide.

What encourages me about the affair (one that’s familiar to any reader of Elmer Gantry or Trollope) is that by following some of the links at Vance’s blog, it becomes clear that his story’s merely the tip of a gigantic iceberg of criticism of the corporate churches and their trading arms by their own members and that there are many other disgruntled religious bloggers out there.

Now I consider myself an atheist (an agnostic when facing surgery) but I hope I can respect that other people have devout faith. Faith is not church. A church is a social and physical construct, a bureacracy for the collection of funds to maintain itself and its associated social activities and status- it has little to do with belief and is all about administration and self-survival.

It’s the social aspect, the community, that binds so many to their churches. In an uncertain world it’s a comforting structure to cling to, a ready-made way of life, a comfortable, safe nest. Certainty, niceness, security. All those nasty bad people are outside. But that isn’t faith. Faith you can practice anywhere, a megachurch is not required. I don’t recall the New Testament saying “Wherever two or three thousand are gathered together in my name…”

Maybe more religious people are beginning to realise that they are continually being preyed upon by crooks and sociopaths who have turned their spiritual lives into just another moneymaking opportunity, faith as toilet tissue or canned ravioli, with all the boardroom politics, backstabbing and corporate dirty dealings that that implies. They could think of it as a shareholders revolt.

I also hope that after they’ve sorted out their churches they’ll actually think about what it is they actually believe and what Jesus actually said – and see that there is no bearded sky-fairy, there’s just us.

I’d also like world peace, a new intestine, puppies and kittens, and a shiny new kitchen sometime before the next millennium, but I’m not going to get them.

Read more: Internet, Blogging, Bloggers, Law, Defamation, Libel, Megachurches, Religion, Money, US Christianity

115994856428029911

Running In The Family

It’s not just wealth that cascades down the Bush generations. Let’s go back, way back, back into time… to 1989:

The Washington Child Sex Ring Coverup

The Franklin Child Sex Ring Implicating the Bush Whitehouse

The following archive paints a chilling portrait of what is really going on in the upper echelons of the ruling elite here in America. The story involves children from orphanages in Nebraska being flown around the United States by top Republican officials in order to engage in child sex orgies with America’s ruling elite. It is a fact that during the 1980’s, child sexual services were provided by top Republican officials to key, bureaucrats and diplomats but most importantly, there is a chilling proximity of all of these events and personalities, to the President of the United States at the time, George H.W. Bush. And there have been victims who claim that the President himself engaged in the activities. It is a tale of child sex, murder, espionage, blackmail, and huge payoffs. And all the players are involved. From the White House to the CIA to the media barrons to the Republican elite – right down to the orphanages where they procured their victims.

This story was the second biggest scandal of the 1980’s which was completely obliterated by the Bush White House – A complete coordinated blackout by the ruling elite in cooperation with the American television networks. (The biggest scandal being the Bush involvement in the attempted assassination of President Reagan) Since the elite who own the television networks in America are the same elite who feast off the carcass of the American population – just like the Bushes do and who sit on the same boards of the same corporate cartels as the Bushes do – most Americans will never hear of this explosive story. But thanks to the Internet all these suppressed news facts are re-surfacing. Perhaps the most chilling aspect of this horrific tale is that such realities can be so completely obliterated by the powers that be so that, even though these are simply the very biggest most explosive stories of our time – you will never know that they happened. That is why http://www.voxfux.com exists. To bring you the hard cold truth about what is really happening to our world. To inform you about who these people really are who rule America.

Fortunately not all people are in on the crimes of the elite. Once and a while a person comes along who is human and who fights and resists this evil force which is destroying the human race. In this case, former republican Senator John Decamp was involved in the production a documentary called “Conspiracy of Silence” it was to air May 3, 1994 on the Discovery Channel. This documentary exposed a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington D.C. for sex orgies. As the story goes, at the last minute before airing, there was a massive effort from key Washington politicians who were implicated in the scandal to exert pressure on the channel to threatened the TV Cable industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired.

Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased by unknown persons who had ordered all copies destroyed. A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired F.B.I. chief, Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by the participants involved.

In 1989 it was an easy story to squash. Those were much more innocent times and the access of the ordinary person to information was still easily limited by sympathetic government and mass media gatekeepers in the press, radio and tv.

But now we have blogs and email and IRC, and we still have Usenet, and SMSes, and ironically enough in the circumstances, IM…. The Republican machine can’t quah current story without imposing a complete digital media blackout ( though I wouldn’t put it past them – funny how Haloscan went all kerflooey just at the opporrtune moment yesterday. Or maybe I should just take off my tinfoil hat. Oy, these are strange times.).

I’m sure I’m not the only one making the connections between the House page scandal and the 1989 Franklin coverup. Soon all the links between the past and today will be made. Maybe the truth about Jeff Gannon will come out: was he the military link?

Much more than you ever wanted to know about the sordid history of recent US politics, paedophilia, prostitution, the GOP and the Bush family is available here, here and here. As with any historical exercise, use your own judgement on sources etc – I’m merely pointing out the existence of the scandal and the cover-up, not the veracity of the reports.

Some might say the whole thing is a mere co-incidental resemblance. Mind you they’d be credulous fools and I have a bridge they might be interested in.

Read more: US politics, Congress, Predatorgate, Foley, Paedophilia, Republican sex scandals, Bush, Prostitution, Rent-boys.

115987404513103084

MySpace For Pets

I’m really in need of a little light relief and general fluffiness at the moment, so here’s my humble offering towards the better humouredness of humanity and the gaiety of nations, Catster.

(Just hope there’s no man-on-dog senators trawling for a little underage action…)

Awww. Cute kittens.

I have to wonder though, at what point does the adoption of the persona of your pet online shade into becoming a fully-fledged Furry?

Read more: Internet, Weblogs, Blogs, Cats, Kittens, Social networks, Social networking

115987263762366678

The Other Sexual Politics

Amanda has an excellent post up about how, when it comes down to it, abortion is not the real issue for the Right, it’s all about controlling women. (Obvious I know, and I’m probably preaching to the choir, but there are still those fixated on the icky side of the abortion debate who don’t get it.) The post also neatly illustrates the real mechanisms of practical politics -how to divide and conquer the political opposition by Doing Things With Rules.

Turns out they wanted to keep the abortion rate high after all

Published by Amanda Marcotte October 2nd, 2006 in Reproductive Rights.

There?s something almost kind of charming about William Saletan?s straining to believe that anti-choicers are actually interested in protecting ?life? more than limiting women?s choices. (Via.) However, he?s straining so hard on this latest column that I can?t help but think he?s going to break a blood vessel. The issue this time out is the 95-10 solution that?s being promoted as a ?compromise? between anti- and pro-choicers?the idea behind the bill is that by identifying the reasons women get abortions and working to take away those reasons, then the abortion rate should reduce. Pro-choicers get a slew of things they want, like financial help for single mothers and better contraceptive access and anti-choicers get to see fewer abortions.

Now this bill is the perfect wedge issue, of course, because it drives a wedge between the people who actually do want to see abortions reduced and the ?pro-lifers?, who are primarily about hating Teh Sex. It was predicted that the anti-choicers would balk at this bill because they are all about preventing people from having safe sex. It was patently obvious that anti-choicers would oppose effective measures to lower the abortion rate because those measures would have to deal maturely with the fact that people fuck, which makes it all the funnier that Saletan is acting surprised here.

Then Ryan looked at the data and realized that to get anywhere near their target, he and his pro-life colleagues would have to provide more birth control. That?s when the squirming began.

Some of Ryan?s allies worried that morning-after pills might prevent embryos from implanting, so he omitted such pills from his bill. They opposed requiring private insurers to offer contraceptive coverage, so he took that out, too. They complained that other pregnancy-prevention bills hadn?t emphasized abortion reduction, so he put abortion reduction in the title. They wanted sex education programs to emphasize abstinence; they got it. The only troublesome thing left in the bill was birth control.

In other words, Ryan?s ?allies?, when they realized that he was serious about a pragmatic program to reduce the abortion rate, flipped shit and started taking out the very things that will be effective, from sex education so that women know how not to get pregnant in the first place to actual female-controlled contraception.

Saletan casts around, seeking more and more strained arguments that he just knows will convince the anti-choicers to embrace empowering women to control our reproductive lives, but it?s just one of those differences of opinion you can?t really compromise on. Anti-choicers are adamantly opposed to women having power over their reproductive lives as a fundamental principle. You can?t keep saying, ?Well, how about letting them have this power? Or maybe this power?? because the answer will always be, ?Wait, no that?s still power. None of the above.?

But it does go to show why this bill is such a great wedge issue. The Democrats introduce a bill that will definitely lower the number of abortions each year by a significant amount and the people claiming to detest abortion kill the bill. Guess they actually like having a high abortion rate, right? Well, not exactly, of course. But when given a choice between lowering the abortion rate and disempowering women, they?re going to pick the latter ever single time, which demonstrates where their priorities lay.

Read whole thing.

For actvists, particularly new media activists, it’s tempting to join in the online foodfight of the latest cause celebre, but it’s the instances of practical politicking like the one Amanda highlights that make the difference in the long term.

It’s just a shame the Dems didn’t use the same tactic when Bush’s torture bill and suspension of habeas corpus was up for discussion and vote.

Read more: Abortion, Pro-Choice, Republican hypocrisy