Comment of The Day II

Is from Mnemosyne at Pandagon, on the religiously and misogynistically motivated US Supreme Court decision to outlaw a method of late-term abortion used to save women’s lives when babies are irretrievably malformed or dead in the womb :

Mnemosyne
Apr 19th, 2007 at 2:04 am

Not to mention … not a single “baby’s” life will be saved by this bill.

Not one.

The only reason women have this procedure done is because there is no way for the fetus to survive outside of the womb, assuming it’s not already dead, as Martha Mendoza’s son was.

The right-wing can scream and cry about saving “babies” all they want, but this decision did nothing but harm women whose planned and wanted pregnancies went horribly, horribly wrong and left those women’s doctors with fewer options to save their patients’ fertility if they want to try again.

So, trolls, go ahead and pat yourselves on the back: you just made life harder for thousands of women who’ve already gotten the worst news a pregnant woman can get — “Your baby will not survive to be born.” Yay, you! Time to par-TAY!

Exactly.

Do read that Martha Mendoza link and you’ll get some idea of the enormity of this attack by fundies on women’s right to decide about their own health and future.

It’s always been my view as a socialist that the reason why elites, ie white western men in this instance, want to deny women’s rights is to keep control over the means of production of new workers.

Heaven forbid that the silly fertile incubators should be in charge of their own bodies: the rich might run out of servants and cheap labour and that would never do. This decision, reached by religious absolutists appointed by Bush, reduces a woman’s status to that of a passive incubator with no say over whatsoever her own body. Which, the fundies consider, is as it should be – because God owns her body and God speaks to them so they get to say, not her.

And who will pay for the ageing white males’ pensions and make up for their declining fertility by providing them photogenic adoptive babies, if those uppity women get to decide not to have children?

Unthinkable. Better a few women should die from unsafe procedures. They’re not worth that much anyway, the dirty sluts, or they wouldn’t’ve had sex in the first place.

UPDATE: On rereading that I don’t feel I made my point sufficiently clear. This decision is about bodily autonomy: who owns women? The state or themselves?

The supreme court has decided that the state owns and controls women. Men, however, being superior, own themselves.

The US consitution, “Life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness” applies to you only if you’ve been born xy rather than xx.

Who In The World Is Kay Coles James?

And why should we care?

From the evidence being presented to the congressional enquiry it’s becoming clear that Bushco’s plan from the outset has been to politicise the US civil service, paying particular attention to the Justice department and the Civil Rights division, which is, or rather was,the section which oversees and prosecutes irregularities in voting and enforces minority voting rights.

How very handy to have one of those stacked in your favour, given the Republicans’ history of doubtful election results and voter fraud- and handier still that many of the partisan lawyers appointed after the purge of Democrats and insufficiently loyal Bushies are mostly al members of the Republican Lawyers association who’d been actively involved in engineering those very same doubtful election results.

The Justice department has been turned into a White House political hit squad of underqualified, undereducated, callow, anti-democratic zealots appointed from an barely-known fundie law school, Regent University. Regent University is ranked a “tier four” school by US News & World Report, the lowest score and essentially a tie for 136th place. It was started to make creationist, dominionist lawyers out of fundy homeschoolers by fundamentalist Christian pundit Pat Robertson:

One of those graduates is Monica Goodling , the former top aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who is at the center of the storm over the firing of US attorneys. Goodling, who resigned on Friday, has become the face of Regent overnight — and drawn a harsh spotlight to the administration’s hiring of officials educated at smaller, conservative schools with sometimes marginal academic reputations.

Documents show that Goodling, who has asserted her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying before Congress, was one of a handful of officials overseeing the firings. She helped install Timothy Griffin , the Karl Rove aide and her former boss at the Republican National Committee, as a replacement US attorney in Arkansas.

Because Goodling graduated from Regent in 1999 and has scant prosecutorial experience, her qualifications to evaluate the performance of US attorneys have come under fire. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, asked at a hearing: “Should we be concerned with the experience level of the people who are making these highly significant decisions?”

And across the political blogosphere, critics have held up Goodling, who declined to be interviewed, as a prime example of the Bush administration subordinating ability to politics in hiring decisions.

“It used to be that high-level DOJ jobs were generally reserved for the best of the legal profession,” wrote a contributor to The New Republic website . “. . . That a recent graduate of one of the very worst (and sketchiest) law schools with virtually no relevant experience could ascend to this position is a sure sign that there is something seriously wrong at the DOJ.”

The Regent law school was founded in 1986, when Oral Roberts University shut down its ailing law school and sent its library to Robertson’s Bible-based college in Virginia. It was initially called “CBN University School of Law” after the televangelist’s Christian Broadcasting Network, whose studios share the campus and which provided much of the funding for the law school. (The Coors Foundation is also a donor to the university.)

Pat Robertson is very clear about why he wants to train fundy lawyers:

We at the Christian Coalition are raising an army who cares. We are training people to be effective — to be elected to school boards, to city councils, to state legislatures, and to key positions in political parties…. By the end of this decade, if we work and give and organize and train, THE CHRISTIAN COALITION WILL BE THE MOST POWERFUL POLITICAL ORGANIZATION IN AMERICA
— Pat Robertson, in a fundraising letter, July 4, 1991

There is no such thing as separation of church and state in the Constitution. It is a lie of the Left and we are not going to take it anymore.

Pat Robertson, address to his American Center for Law and Justice, November, 1993.

This in preference to top graduates from A-rated nationwide law schools like Harvard or Yale (though having been to Yale is hardly a reccommendation, given as it’s Bush Sr and Jr’s alma mater). Appointments to the most important job in US government, the impartial administration of justice, are being made purely on the basis of religion, piety and loyalty to party.

It’s noit just Justice either, it’s all the federal government, including Homeland Security. Playing a pivotal role, though receiving scant attention, has been the Bush-appointed former Director of the Office of Personnel Management, Kay Coles James, winner of the Ditsinguished Christian Statesman Award 2003 and a woman with a long rightwing and Christian pedigree:

[…]

“I believe as Christians we are called to be salt and light,” said James. “We’re also told to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s. What belongs to Caesar? If you live in a participatory democracy, that’s your vote, your intellect, your time, your initiative, and your resources.” Mrs. James sets this example by combining her public service with a clear commitment to Christ.

[…]

That commitment has served her career well.

Prior to coming to OPM James served as a leader and manager in Government on the Federal, state, and local levels and in private, non-profit, and academic settings. She most recently served as a Senior Fellow and Director of The Citizenship Project at the Heritage Foundation. Prior to joining Heritage, James served as Dean of the School of Government at Regent University and as Chair of the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. James served as Secretary of Health and Human Resources for former Virginia Governor George Allen where she designed and implemented Virginia’s landmark welfare reform initiative. As Secretary, James was responsible for fourteen state agencies and over 19,000 employees.

Hang on, what was that? She worked for George ‘Macaca’ Allen? And wait a minute…

…..he most recently served as a Senior Fellow and Director of The Citizenship Project at the Heritage Foundation. Prior to joining Heritage, James served as Dean of the School of Government at Regent University

Now I don’t know about you but doesn’t that seem rather co-incidental? As does this:

Before serving in the Allen Administration, James was Senior Vice President of the Family Research Council.

So basically, if we cut in her in half she’s have Bushite Fundie written through her like a stick of rock. She’s a political commissar – and she’s had massive scope and the power to mould government personnel policy and appointments into the ideological shape her superiors in the White House require. And she’s used it, oh how she’s used it:

James is chair of the Chief Human Capital Officers Council (CHCO), a group comprised of the selected officers from cabinet departments and other agencies. Each CHCO is accountable for the strategic alignment of the agency’s work force to its mission, and will be given the responsibility of maintaining and effectively directing its human resources management policies and programs. James is also a member of the President’s Management Council and Chair of the Council’s Subcommittee for Human Capital / Workforce Management. The Council has been charged by the President to ensure the implementation of his bold agenda of reform. James has also been appointed by the President to serve on the White House Fellows Commission.

James has had a major say in every single policy-level staffing decision throughout the federal government. For “strategic alignment’ and ‘bold agenda for reform’, read ‘political purge’ and ‘installation of loyal party apparatchiks’. The policy may have come from Bushco and the GOP but the implementation has come from their loyal coreligionist James.

Pious proud grandma Kay Coles James is up to her neck in Republican partisan malfeasance and the subversion of the constitution , and no amount of Christian posturing can make that OK.

But hey, she’s done quite nicely out of it all, thank you. Wikipedia:

[…]

Subsequent to her OPM position, James took a job with Mitchell Wade, the disgraced defense contractor who bribed Representative Randy “Duke” Cunningham in the MZM scandal. Wade hired James with a compensation package that included a $150,000 signing bonus and a $350,000 base salary.

She quit within two months, right after the controversy became public.

[…].

Can’t let that halo slip can we?

Oh, and guess who’s also appointed to the Federal Commission for Electoral Reform? Yup, you guessed it… you’d have to have put your eyes with a sharp stick not to be seeing a pattern here.

If anyone could lift the lid on Bushco’s devious and cynical politicisation of the US civil service , it’s Kay Coles James. She’s definitely one church lady who should be isubpoena’d by Congress.

Asked And Answered

More about supermanlover Wolfie: one of the things I’ve been wondering is, if this situation’s been known about for so long, why the fuss now? Avedon has a clue, in reference to other scandals taking up airtime:

But Karl Rove must be loving it, because it’s taking people’s attention off of the things that are making him squirm.

Yup. That about sums it up.

Mr. Smith’s Not Going To Washington.

“>

In comments to the Bush/Cheney shrubbery video, commenter Swan brought to my attention this article from Carpetbagger about media disinterest in the US Attorney scandal:

[…]

One should be cautious about throwing around phrases like “journalistic malpractice” casually, but for the nation’s leading news-weekly to entirely ignore the nation’s biggest political controversy, just as it’s reaching crisis mode for the White House and the Justice Department, at a minimum raises questions about the magazine’s editorial judgment.

To be fair, Time altered its publishing schedule recently, and the new issue was released today, making it practically impossible to offer any kind of meaningful coverage of yesterday’s Sampson hearings. Also, Time did report on a new poll, which at least mentions the story in passing.

But given the circumstances, it’s hard to fathom why the controversy has been given short shrift.

Indeed, there were plenty of key developments in this story earlier in the week, any and all of which would have made good copy. A senior Justice Department official has taken the 5th, Gonzales gave an unpersuasive interview on national television, Republican lawmakers are increasingly unwilling to defend the DoJ’s decision making, the White House is getting antsy, new questions have arisen every day this week about exactly what happened and why.

But Time magazine, to borrow its editor’s word, finds all of this so “uninteresting” that there’s no need to even mention it to readers.

[…]

Swan asked whether I thought it possible that there could be coercion involved.

Oh dear, you had to ask… and by the time I’d finished blathering at length about my views on US domestic spying and its purpose I realised I’d written a whole post, not a comment. So here it is, tidied up and with links added.

It’s been conclusively proven that the Bush administration has been spying internally within the US since well before 9/11. The fact that Bushco hired the former heads of the Stasi and the KGB to advise Homeland Security is also well known, and they didn’t do that out of the goodness of their hearts.

The politicisation of the organs of state control, the NSA, CIA, FBI and the Justice Department, has been going on since the beginning, as has the development of TIA, the total informational awareness programme, which was officially quashed but continues under other names and other budgets. This is no scatttergun approach, it’s being done for a purpose; it looks in certain lights like a deliberate, targeted programme of corruption and blackmail. It’s all about the practical application of power to individuals to to coerce them to circumvent pesky, inconvenient rules.

Do I think key figures in politics, the media and the civil service are being blackmailed? Duh.

Corruption and blackmail are the classic tools of non-violent repression. It’s simple – the one blackmailed is powerless and cannot report the crime for the fear of their own crime or or that of someone close to them being revealed (the latter technique, as in torture, is often the most effective) and is thus ripe for manipulation. The secret doesn’t have to be much: you just have to know which levers to pull and that’s where the spying comes in. One iill-advised phone call from a monitored phone and bingo… it doesn’t need to be blackmail either. Solve a little problem for someone and they’re beholden to you, too.

There’s also a whole swamp of corruption and favour-peddling, of which the high-profile corruption trials we’ve seen so far are just the stinking methane bubbles on top. There’s a whole lot more of the likes of Dusty Foggo’s ‘booze, broads and cigars’ parties (a classic spook honeytrap) to come out yet, for example. Such is the venality and of Republicans that most involved walked right into what was a was a classic cold war blackmail ploy – get a bunch of notables in compromising positions and record it for later use. FFS sake, they all knew Foggo was CIA… but they did it anyway. Have willy, will follow.

That happened in Washington and caught some big fish but think of all the minnows at all the other private wingnut ‘fundraising’ dinners in state capitals around the country… I expect thee’s a fair few county commissioners, state senators and school board presidents with some dirty little secrets they don’t want to come out.

Tax cheating, affairs, drug use, porn, sexual pecadillos, abortions, incest, domestic violence – just think what some of these allegedly Christian people have to hide and what they’d do to avoid being publicly denounced by their co-religionists. Cut off from wingnut welfare and the largesse of the religious right, a lot of these people would struggle to survive and they know it. That’s a massive incentive to keep in line and that’s one of the reasons why the government has been stacked with fundies, because there’s so many guilt levers you can pull and sexual buttons to press.

This sounds like a description of the US or UK media to me:

The press in **** is heavily biased in favor of the ruling party, *****. Most private newspapers also are biased in favor of the ruling party, since they in fact are not entirely “private.” Government supporters very often provide some of the financing for the “private” press, making news tipped in favor of the president and the key government positions and views. The opposition press is likewise political, in that the newspapers associated with opposition party candidates present their party perspectives and criticize the president and his party.

But no, it’s from a critical US-authored report on… Kazakhstan.

Since the days of Reagan networks and major publishers owned by right wing money have steadily promoted young conservatives through their ranks, and this cadre of journalists has always had an incestuous relationship with their counterparts in the GOP lobby firms and thinktanks, and latterly in the government itself – so much so that at times they’re hard to tell apart. They went to school together, they party and socialise together, their children go to the same schools and they belong to the same same churches. There’s a lot of leverage there.

The questions that the media, and that includes blogs, are failing to ask about US domestic spying are the simple ones – who, what, where, when and why. Yes, we know they spy, but we don’t know the specifics, other than when it’s liberals who’ve been spied on and they’ve sued.

A major figure in the mainstream media would have to be very brave to speak out and say they’ve been coerced into taking a certain line on something. To be honest don’t think there’d be any media figure who has the guts.

Oh, wouldn’t it be fantastic if it was like, all Hollywood and someone big spoke out against injustice and Bush was defeated, yay, and it all came right in the end with liberty and justice and popcorn for all?

Not gonna happen. This is a mess that can’t be tidied away, not with peak oil and a foreclosure crisis and an ecologically-driven depression looming. Even if a Democrat wins the presidency they’re going to want all the tools for repressing a rebellious populace that they can get, when faced with the aftermath of yet more Hurricane Katrinas, for example, or when the ‘lone wolves’ nurtured by the far-Right Turner Diaries and Left-Behind readers go on the rampage when they realise they have a black or a female president ..

If the Democrats win the election then a new Administration, faced with the rabid winger IEDs that the Right has placed all over local, state and national government, will want a political purge – and when they realise just what a powerful tool they’ve got on their hands in a politicised domestic spying programme they’ll be just as bad, if somewhat less incompetent, as Bushco.

This is the way it is now.

The Importance of ‘Attorneygate’

I’m planning on spending this morning catching up on Attorneygate, particularly on the Senate hearing testimony of Gonzales’ sidekick and Rove mini-me Kyle Sampson, the baby-faced boy wonder who at first glance seems to be trying to take the fall for his boss for the politically motivated firings of US attorneys, if what he’s admitted so far is any guide.

But is that true? Is Kyle Sampson substantially to blame? Is he taking the fall, and why?

I love this stuff.

But that’s the point at which many eyes are beginning to glaze over. Not all of us are totally obsessed with the minutiae and the internecine rivalries of the administration of US justice.

However, most of us do give a damn when the government of a country that thinks of itself as the world’s policeman, and which has such a disproportionate effect on world culture, economy and politics, is being deliberately corrupted from within. It affects us all one way or another.

That is the big picture here, and why Attorneygate’s so important. But where can we go to find out more in language the casual yet interested observer rather than the political obsessive can understand?

For a list of the dramatis personae and a timeline of events you could do no better than than Talking Points Memo or TPM Muckraker, whose valiant efforts have pushed this story to the prominence it has now and whose readers have uncovered the story by sifting the reams of email evidence released by the White House in an attempt to bury the inquiry in paper.

For those who want the backstory the links are fascinating – it’s like lifting up a log and seeing crawly things scurrying panicky away from the light.

The story, grossly simplified and in short, as I understand it, is this:

Bushco got scared when California politician Randall ‘Duke Cunningham” was convicted of corruption over defence contracts, because a co-conspirator of his, one Dusty Foggo of the CIA, was also on the verge of being indicted for his involvement in the same shady doings.

Dusty Fuggo’s a friend, intimate and business associate of many, many senior Republican figures up to and including in the White House and is privy to all sorts of CIA shenanigans like, oh say, rendition, and torture, and misuse of funds, and bribery and prostitution – take your pick. he also knows where the bodies were buried, figuratively (though possibly actually) speaking, in Honduras during Reagan and Bush Sr.’s Central American adventures.. So the notion of his testifying anywhere, any time, simply would not do.

Foggo could’ve exposed everybody.

Not only was that little storm brewing for the White House, meanwhile there was that darned Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago, worrying away at Cheny aide Scotter Libby and about to expose the White House’s complicity in the media outing of yet another CIA agent, which would then expose their out and out lies over Iraq’s alleged attempted importation of yellowcake uranium from Niger and reveal their whole pretext for the war as a lie and a sham. (Not that we don’t know that already from other extrinsic evidence but it would’ve been nice to’ve seen it proved in court.)

Oh no, exposure! Whatever to do? It all got a bit panicky.

It got worse: previously loyal prosecutors started chafing when pressured politically by Bushco to push unfounded voter fraud cases against Democrats. They might have drunk some koolaid, but even they had limits. There was no evidence, they said.

Karl Rove, the wily old snake, had a brainwave. They could stop the Foggo prosecution and fix the next election too, plus the added extra of bringing the whole national prosecutorial wing of the Justice department entirely under their political control. All their problems solved at a stroke – all they had to do was fire all the lawyers and put unqualified partisans in their place. Of course! Easypeasy, lemon squeezy.

Th idea of being able to prosecute their political opponents on a whim was too tempting to resist. Why, Rove himself had a young padawan, a zealous devotee of the dark Rovian art of candidate smearing, who’d fit perfectly – and in Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s home state of Arkansas too. How very handy for the next presidential election.

The plan was all going well for the little group of alleged conspirators, Rove, Gonzales, Harriet Miers, (potentially Cheney and Bush too but that remains to be seen) – great theory, great plan. It all got discussed by email within and outside the White House (by whom is exactly what the hearings are about) then it was up to Gonzales to put it into action, which he did in the same half-assed way Bushco do everything.

He palmed it off to his deputy Kyle Sampson, the man who’s now sitting in the chair sweating before the committee. Because the US attorneys, quite understandably, didn’t take to being fired on flimsy pretexts like incompetence very well and started to talk to the media, and it all began to unravel. The Democrats took Congresss, the story came out, and here we are, Bushco and its evil lawyer minions on the stand, looking for all the world like the low-rent theives they are.

The big question is: how high up can this be proved to have gone? While it may be obvious to most of us that Bushco’re as rotten as a log full of woodlice, because of the virulence of the Right’s revisionist attack trops in the media it has to be shown in the clear light of judicial sunshine that the Democrats are not, in their turn, using the administration of justice for partisan purposes.

The proof of Bushco wrongdoing needs to be revealed in public.

Yes, there’re a lot of grounds for impeaching Bush and Cheney and Gonzales too for that matter, but without the actual, physical proof of a crime it’s all just conjecture and accusation. The evidence that’s coming to light as a result of the Attorneygate hearings may be that actual, physical proof – or at the very least, we may hear the testimony that will finally put the criminals in the White House in the dock, not for grand historical war crimes but for squalid hole-in-the-corner corruption and conspiracy.

How worried are Bushco about this? Worried enough to have made a futile attempt to stop the hearings yesterday on procedural grounds.. I shall continue to watch this one with interest, it has great potential to be the blow that finally brings the rotten edifice of modern-day Republicanism tumbling down.