Would It Be Better For The World If The Republicans Won?

As the US Congressional elections loom, the pessimism I’ve been feeling about a Democratic win finds an echo in this comment at Gary Younge’s US election piece in the Guardian today:

I personally hope the republicans win. None of the us political parties are interested in doing what is right, just what is most profitable for themselves and their rich sponsers. The only real difference is in levels of arrogance, the republicans don’t care what the rest of the world thinks of their rapacious, world destroying greed and the democrats have enough intelligence to realise that playing their game a little more tactically makes it easier to do what ever they please. I think that for the good of this planet and its human population (of which the usa population makes up a measly 5%)we all see the usa for what it really is and the best people to demonstrate this is the immoral scum called the republican party. Let them take full responsbility for their global misadventures and selfish greedy policies.

You have to admit (s)he has a point – when you take a closer look at the people a Democratic vote will put in Congress, and consider where that party’s major funding stream comes from, it slowly starts to sink in that even if they win by a landslide, a Dem victory will mean very little to us in the rest of the world.

Take Nancy Pelosi for instance, the self-described ‘ultimate security mom’, who’ll likely be Speaker of the House, Diebold willing. Already she’s said she won’t push for impeachment for Bush.

And can anyone tell me where, if anywhere, she’s committed herself to repealing any of draconian wingnut legislation like the Patriot Act? What about the Military Commissions Act, that overturned habeas corpus and which overides the US constitution, allowing a President to torture or disappear any individual, anywhere in the world, in flagrant defiance of every known international law?

Her words on this issue are as mealy-mouthed as it gets:

?Democrats voted overwhelmingly to go to war in Afghanistan so that those responsible for the 9/11 attacks would be brought to justice. More than five years later, because of the failure of the Bush Administration to devise a legal process that could withstand the scrutiny of the Supreme Court, not a single person who planned the attacks has been tried and convicted.

?That record of failure is unlikely to be improved by the military commissions bill President Bush signed today. Legal challenges to the bill may result in convictions being overturned, punishments being set aside, and justice being further delayed. In addition, because the bill allows the President to interpret the Geneva Conventions through executive order, it invites other countries to do the same, thereby weakening the international legal standards that have protected our troops for decades.

?Democrats want terrorists who kill Americans tried, convicted, and punished through a constitutionally sound process that will be upheld on appeal. That goal will not be achieved by the bill President Bush signed into law today.?

Do you see the word torture anywhere there? Where in that blob of pablum did she actually say anything about torture, or illegality, or unconstitutional power grabs? She may have implied it, but only very slightly and obliquely. That press release was the PR equivalent of spitting into a hurricane.

And speaking of which, what about global warming? Has she promised to even push the US’ signing up to Kyoto ? Hell, no.

No, Pelosi supports the Safe Climate Act , a pathetic bandaid of a bill which relies on the free market to police itself and if passed would merely freeze US emissions at their current level. Well, woop-de-bloody-doo. Way to save the planet Democrats.

Those emissions levels got us to this point in the first place so keeping them the same is hardly progress. The Democrats and Pelosi act as though global warming is something way, way off in the future and that they can somehow preserve the current American way of life frozen in time, so all those industries whose PACs help fund their campaigns can blithely carry on polluting as before and no-one has to actually, you know, do anything or suffer at all.

And then there’s the issue of Israel and and its lobbyists within the Democratic party. On that topic for Democrats the position is eyes closed, mouths shut, hands out. Ms Pelosi herself pledged the party’s unwavering support and commitment to Israel even as they were bombing Lebanese civilians with white phosphorous, cluster bombs and worse.

I sure as hell don’t want the Republicans to win but the Democrats are not exactly the cavalry coming to the rescue, as some American liberal bloggers seem to fervently believe. Even those aware of the paucity of Democratic positions are taking the Polly Toynbee voting stance – hold your nose and vote Dem anyway. Anything for a change.

As much as I’d like to see a woman in such a high political office as Speaker (and she seems perfectly competent to do the job) and glad as I am that at least the Democrats are mostly honest, I still can’t forget that they’re just as in hock to the corporations and the lobbyists as the Republicans are. Even the netroots types will become so, after a short spell inside the beltway. It’s the whole system that’s fucked.

Looked at from a non-USAnian perspective this election’s really just a cosmetic exercise. Nothing will really change. The architects of the war, the PNAC types, the crooks, the war-profiteers, the torturers and all Bushco’s other minions will walk away unscathed – because we can’t have America’s self-image besmirched publicly now, can we? The tortured themselves will likely be discreetly paid off, or dumped and ignored. and people will still be dying by their hundreds in Iraq every day. There is no automagically happy ending the day after the election.

One hopeful thought (though it’s a bit of a faint hope, that I’m basing on the principle that it’s always darkest before the dawn) is that if the Republicans win this time, according to the poll-numbers it’ll likely have been by using nefarious means. There is so much pentup anxiety and anger about the government that has had no real outlet so far- and if the election is stolen again it may just be the spark that fires real reform in the US.

Emphasis on the may.

Digg this

Read more: US Politics, Congressional Election, Nancy Pelosi

Bokbier, Breakfasts and Bullying Bastards

Sorry, haven’t blogged since Friday, the result of having gone with Martin to the Bokbier Festival at the beautiful Beurs Van Berlage on the Dam to meet some very nice SFnal friends of his over from Scotland. I wasn’t able to drink, which rather negated the whole point of going to a beer festival; and as an unwilling teetotaller’s not good company and because I didn’t want to cramp anyone’s drinking style I skipped out early, just as things were getting convivial. But not soon enough, it appears, because the next day I was as sick as a dog.

The smell as I walked into the main hall where the pumps were should have given me a clue – concentrated yeast, fermented hops, collected man-farts, stale cigarette and dope-smoke plus a general pervading miasma of pent-up testosterone. Given that many Dutchmen are about 6 foot 5 or even taller and I’m only 5 foot, I was just at the right height to get it right in the nose. Blegh.

Since people come from all over to the Bokbier festival there must’ve been some nasty well-travelled bacteria from several continents mixed up in that lot. As at the moment I’m still horribly underweight and my immune system is still shot to shit from surgery, blam, I caught something vile. Spent last night throwing up and feeling like a wet rag. I hope it’s not the first flu of the season.

Anyhow as a result of that this morning I needed s some serious sustenance and Martin had the remains of a hangover to cure. A proper breakfast seemed in order. When I say proper breakfast, I mean a full on English breakfast – bacon, eggs, mushrooms, fried bread and beans – which is exactly what we had. Now I feel much restored.

I personally consider what we ate this morning to be the absolute bare-bones English breakfast, though your mileage may vary. There are loads of variations; optional are black pudding, white pudding, sausages, tomatoes (tinned or grilled fresh ones, both things I can’t abide), kidneys (lamb usually) and kippers or other some other smoked fish. All this to be accompanied with toast, butter and jam, marmalade ( there are various competing schools of thought on which kind) or honey (though I like Marmite, all that yummy zinc, mmm) and to be followed by proper porridge (not instant oatmeal) with proper golden syrup and cream. None of your namby-pamby dry cereals or poncy muesli. Then there are regional variations like haslet instead of black pudding and the legendary Ulster fry with soda bread and then there’s various types of Scots pancakes and griddle scones too…

Hard to believe so many people once started the day with even a small selection of that lot – and it used to be fried in lard. We only ever have a fried breakfast at home now and then these days and even so it’s all grilled but the eggs. Those are fried in only a tiny amount of extra virgin olive oil and I can’t eat those anyway so my breakfast’s virtually fat free. Away is different though- hotel breakfasts don’t count. There’s nothing like coming down to a big B&B breakfast that you haven’t had to cook yourself and everyone knows food you didn’t cook yourself has no calories ( just like holiday food, or at Christmas or birthday chocolates).

Anyway, why all this preamble about breakfast, you wonder? Because it’s Sunday and because for once you may have time to read something a bit longer than the avaerage blogpost I heartily recommend Matt Taibbi’s Rolling Stone 8-page piece on the criminal Congress, published last week but ideal for a relaxed Sunday, though you may not be so relaxed when you’ve read it.

My banging on about breakfast is by way of encouraging people to put a good lining in their stomach to protect against the inevitable explosion of bile that will follow on reading this article, which lays out in very plain terms the sheer dumbassed ineptitude, small-minded viciousness and greed of Congressional Republicans, Taibbi shows exactly how, in simple steps, process of government has been perverted and twisted by the Republican Party to make the US an effective one-party soft dictatorship, and by whom. An excellent bit of reporting. Taibbi’s not scared to use invective where necessary, though he’s never over-the-top; if anything his muted use of insult gives his words that much more power, considering how much vituperation he could have heaped on these host-killing lampreys.

Hah. You thought you’d escaped the politics with all the talk of bacon and eggs. No such luck.

Read more: Food blogging, English breakfast , Amsterdam, Bokbier, US Politics, Congress

Bwahahaha! Hoist. By. Own. Petard

.

Hilzoy at Obsidian Wings:

John Hinderaker: Placing Children At Risk?

by hilzoy

John Hinderaker suggests that Democrats covered up Congressman Mark Foley’s boy problem, a charge for which there is no evidence. One wonders, though, whether that is exactly what John Hinderaker did.

How did the email and instant messages that triggered the scandal come to light? It has been reported that at least one set of emails became public after they were sent to “a registered Republican” — a phrase that surely describes John Hinderaker. But when did that happen? The messages themselves are three years old. When did John Hinderaker find out about them? Did he sit on them for a while, in order to prevent them from coming out in time to influence the Presidential election, or to preserve a Republican Congressional majority?

I don’t know the answers to these questions, but they are important and need to be answered. If John Hinderaker has known for some time about Foley’s transgressions but failed to act until now, he endangered more boys–and why? Solely to advance his partisan political interests.

One would hope that the Ethics Committee will subpoena the reporters who broke the Foley story to find out where they got their information, and when. The question to be answered is, What did John Hinderaker know, and when did he know it?

Is it possible that John Hinderaker deliberately delayed disclosure of Foley’s transgressions, thereby endangering the security of current Congressional pages and other teenage boys, solely to advance the political interests of his allies? One would certainly hope not. But it is obviously a question that needs to be investigated and answered.

I also wonder: could John Hinderaker be the anthrax killer? Has he ever denied it, or agreed to take a polygraph? I don’t know the answers to these questions, but they are important. Inquiring minds would like to know the answers.

Some might also say that John Hinderaker is a torture-loving disgrace to our common humanity and flays kittens for sport. I couldn’t possibly comment.

Read more: Wingnuttia, Foleygate, Blogs, Snark

Even More Foley Jokes

Just when you thought it was safe…. more of the gift that keeps on giving, this time from Bartcop:

“I have the latest in the big Washington sex scandal. … CNN is reporting that former Congressman Mark Foley’s instant messages were not only sexually inappropriate, but were also full of typos. In his own defense, Foley said, ‘It’s hard to type with one hand.'” –Conan O’Brien

“The good news? Florida Congressman Mark Foley has entered rehab. The bad news? Rehab is a 14-year-old boy from Pakistan.” –Jay Leno

“The big question now is what should be done with Mark Foley’s seat in Congress. I say, spray it with Lysol, boil it, coat it with Bactine, and then maybe you can sit on it.” –Jay Leno

“On Rush Limbaugh yesterday, Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert said, ‘We took care of Mr. Foley. We found out about it and asked him to resign.’ Yeah, a year later. That’s not just slow, that’s FEMA slow.” –Jay Leno

“After being caught sending explicit emails to underage boys, Florida congressman Mark Foley has resigned. So his seat is up for grabs, which is what got him in trouble in the first place.” –Jay Leno

“This is like the worst thing to happen to congressional Republicans since last Thursday. … Most people think GOP stands for Gay Old Pedophile.” –Jay Leno

[…]

“Apparently, new evidence that just came out shows that former Congressman Mark Foley once engaged in Internet sex with a former page while a vote was being taken in the House. … Apparently, instead of voting ‘Aye,’ Foley voted ‘Oh God yes!'” –Conan O’Brien

“Mark Foley has now checked into rehab for alcoholism. Oh, shut up. Like that’s the big problem. Who cares if he’s addicted to Jack Daniels? He’s addicted to little Jack and little Daniel. That’s the problem.” –Jay Leno

“Actually, this scandal with Foley has finally led to some bipartisan cooperation in Congress. For example, Republican leaders had to meet with Ted Kennedy to find out what’s the best rehab center.” –Jay Leno

“Have you all been following this scandal in Washington with ex-Congressman Mark Foley? Well, a couple of days ago, he checked himself into rehab. … It had gotten so bad he had to go out and develop a drinking problem.” –David Letterman

“The ex-congressman, if nothing else, is contrite. He says when he gets out of rehab, he wants a fresh start and to turn over a new page.” –David Letterman

“He spent most of his career protecting children from Internet stalkers. Turns out he was doing it so he could have them all to himself.” –Jon Stewart

“The big question, of course, for this congressman, who was an online sex predator to a 16-year-old, is — what drove him to it? . The sauce. Sad juice. Satan’s breast milk. Uncle Scotchy’s anger wrangler. The active ingredient in Nyquil. That’s why he did this thing. For if not for alcohol, it would have never crossed his mind. Mark Foley’s problem wasn’t that he drank, it was what he drank . Young Boyschlager. It’s got real bits of young boy in it. You don’t stand a chance.” –Jon Stewart

“It’s unbelievable the way the mainstream media is reporting this thing. Listening to them, you’d think it’s all Foley’s fault. Don’t you think the kids bare some of the blame here? Hear me out. Let’s be fair. How can a 53-year-old, six-term congressman hold out against the snares and seductive trickery of a high student from the rural South?” –Stephen Colbert

“He’s in rehab, which means it only happened because he was drinking. We’ve all done it folks — drunk dialing. It’s just that in Foley’s case, it was drunk texting erotic messages to underage pages about masturbation. … It’s simple. You drink, you forget things — especially things that could endanger minors.” –Stephen Colbert

“Apparently he had text message phone sex with a boy during a vote on funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. No one can say he’s soft on terror.” –Jimmy Kimmel

“Former Florida Congressman Mark Foley has resigned over allegations he sent explicit emails to underage boys. What is it with Congress? If they?re not grabbing your wallet, they?re grabbing your ass.” ?Jay Leno

“How about that Florida congressman Mark Foley? Whoa. At least the Democrats wait until the interns are 18.” ?David Letterman

“The Republicans reacted quickly. They transferred Foley to a different parish.” ?David Letterman

“The Foley saga quickly sent leaders of the North American Man-Boy Love Association, or Congress, into action.” –Jon Stewart

[…]

More, much more, here. This one will outrun Les Mis.

Read more: Mark Foley Jokes