Comment of The Day

Driftglass at the News Blog on learning a former house page, now a soldier in Iraq, is to give evidence against Foley :

Stplossed: unit in firefite. WTF do u wnt?

Maf54: Bet that?s a heckuva wrk out. What R U wearing?

Stplossed: desert cmo. Again, WTF d/u wnt?

Maf54: Sounds hot. C U send me a pix of your ?unit??

Stplossed: C U send us some F?KING BODY ARMOR!

driftglass

Read more: Internet, Blogs, Blogging, Comments, Comment of The Day, Snark

More Foley Jokes

The Republicans can alternately squirm and insinuate, bluster and intimidate all they want to: this comedy’s going to run and run and run.

Why did Mark Foley resign? To get over his 16 year old crack habit.

What does Foley want to do when gets out of rehab? Start fresh and
turn over a new page.

And there’s these from TV:

“Former Florida Congressman Mark Foley has resigned over allegations
he sent explicit emails to underage boys. What is it with Congress? If
they’re not grabbing your wallet, they’re grabbing your ass.” Jay
Leno

“How about that Florida congressman Mark Foley? Whoa. At least the
Democrats wait until the interns are 18.” David Letterman

“The Republicans reacted quickly. They transferred Foley to a
different parish.” David Letterman

“The Foley saga quickly sent leaders of the North American Man-Boy
Love Association, or Congress, into action.” —Jon Stewart

“This is like the worst thing to happen to congressional Republicans
since last Thursday. … Most people think GOP stands for Gay Old
Pedophile.” —Jay Leno

“ABC is reporting that Mark Foley interrupted a vote on the House
floor, stopped the House floor vote, so he could have online phone sex
with a 16-year-old. Say what you want about Bill Clinton — he could
sit at his desk and have sex and work at the same time.” —Jay Leno

If public derision were any guide, the Republican congress would be dead in the water come November – Leno and Letterman are no flaming liberals. I even heard Richard Viguerie, Arch-conservative and money man, say on the BBC this morning using the ‘they’re not real conservatives’ argument that conservative voters should not vote for incumbent Republicans because of the Foley cover-up. I’m sure there’s more, much more to come out.

At the moment the media is concentrating on male pages and Republicans, but soon they’ll get jaded, remember who their paymasters are, and start looking for Democrats and female pages. The Democrats’d better be confident they have a clean house before they do.

Meanwhile we’ll feel free to yuk it up at the Right’s expense. British comedian John Oliver, on the Daily Show:

‘Everyone knows that Congress people are assigned to committees based on their great weakness. Why would Senator Ted Stevens, a man more comfortable in the horse and buggy era, be in charge of regulating the Internet? Which he believes is a series of tubes – ” a series of tubes though which other congressmen can reach through and fondle 16-year-olds.” ‘

Read more: US Politics, Foleygate, Jokes, Congressional elections, Congresional sex scandals

Olbermann’d, or The Sound of Worms Turning

I remember way back when, before the Iraq war was a twinkle in Rummy’s sclerotic eye, being flamed horribly on usenet for suggesting that Americans were being bamboozled by their news and media outlets. They were most insulted: you’d’ve thought I’d suggested that all Americans committed incest as a matter of course considering the hysterical reaction.

So I never thought to see this tirade from Keith Olbermann, condemning Bush & Rummy and all their works, on US mainstream media – and on MSNBC no less.

He’s a bit tendentious (not to mention pompous) in parts, but you’ve got to applaud the sentiment. You can tell he’s been saving this up for a looong time.

Thanks to TRex at FDL for the link.

Read more: War on terror, Islamofascism, Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, YouTube, Video, Bush, Rumsfeld

Crap Abounds

Poor old Chimperor, he’s not doing well lately.

One my one his suckup cronies are deserting him and now even his most passionate political friend has dropped him overboard by proxy from the comfort of his luxury holiday yacht. The proxy is of course – nice cuddly Tone would never get his hands dirty – John Prescott, who’s desperate to get some popularity back from the party after his recent perks and pervs problems .

This arms-length denial of Bush is Blairs’ own hail-mary pass, a last desperate scramble to hold on to his job by denying the relationship that has been the bedrock of his prime-ministerial career. But is Blair really, finally finished?

An emergency resolution to oust Blair from the party leadership is already being circulated to MPs, constituency parties and conference delegates (who are much more important in this context than the parliamentary party) by the internal Campaign for Labour Party Democracy, prior to the Labour party conference next month. Support for the resolution amongst back-benchers and conference delegates looks to be snowballing .

But Blair has survived before and he has a strategy….

It’s my theory that he put Scots hardman John Reid, with his over-the-top pronouncements on terrorism – “We’re all dooomed, doomed I tell you”– and his dour hatchet-faced demeanour, in de facto charge of the country during his luxury yacht holiday as a compare and contrast exercise. Blair was implicitly asking the country “Resolute thrusting young executive or Mussolini-lite? Your choice.”

It was also a tacit warning to English voters against having a Scot in charge – a reference to the West Lothian question and thus yet another sideswipe at Gordon Brown.

And where has Gordon Brown been during all this? Yes, he’s been on holiday, yes he has a new child, but has he not got a mobile phone? Foreign affairs and government don’t just stop when someone’s on leave, paternity or otherwise. A Chancellor and pretender to the prime ministership who’s incommunicado is not quite like a middle manager buggering off on a week-long bender in Aya Napa and turning off the phone.

Brown’s been very quiet indeed on the issue of Lebanon, Israel, Bush and US Middle East policy – remarkably so for the supposed anointed successor to the leadership. Bush has another 2 years to go so the generous view would be that its a necessary political expedience on Brown’s part (whereas he no doubt considers it a statesmanlike position), but it still leaves an unpleasant taste in the mouth.

What it says to the electorate is that Brown’s a man too scared to take a stand on a moral principle for fear of jeopardising his own career. He likes to portray himself as the morally upright son of the manse but to the majority of the population his continued failure to condemn US foreign policy shows exactly the opposite, that he’s a man prepared to compromise his principles for advancement, and not only that, that he hasn’t got the gumption to be purposeful and ruthless enough to make himself the hero of the hour in the party and the nation and get rid of the rightly detested Blair.

With his proxy condemnation of Bush (proxies are the new political black) Blair has stolen a march on Gordon Brown yet again, which leaves Brown looking very stupid. Whatever the outcome of the emergency resolution for Blair, it’s looking increasingly unlikely that Gordon will ever succeed to the leadership. Reid has been neatly eliminated from competition merely by the exposure of his true megalomaniac nature to the nation over the past couple of weeks. Other than ousted Foreign Secretary and Condi intimate Jack Straw, who seems to be biding his time, who else is is in the running?

Some commentators have been pushing oleaginous schools ministerDavid Milliband as the next Great White Hope for New Labour. Not having been a party member since the Clause 4 debacle I have no say in the matter (not that members have much more now) but if I did, I couldn’t imagine a worse choice.

Milliband is yet another member of yet another of those middle-class legacy Labour families like the Hobsbawms, Toynbees, Benns and so many others, local and national, who think that because their forebears were socialist pioneers it confers upon them the right to rule in perpetuity. Miliband’s never had a real job:

Former Head of the No 10 Policy Unit. He is a former Labour Party policy director (before 1997 election), Secretary of the Social Justice Commission and member of the IPPR. Brother of Ed Milliband, Special Adviser to Gordon Brown at the Treasury. He was paid ?70,000 in 2000. He went to Oxford University and MIT. While he was at No.10, no Government Green or White Paper was published until he cleared it.

Miliband and his peers in New Labour are not averse to using their own old-boys’ and girls’ networks to get ahead and they exude the same sense of personal and political entitlement ( though cloaked in a more touchy-feely disguise) as many of those inside-the-beltway, think-tank-employed, wingnut welfare recipents, who know no life outside that of party hacks, lobbyists and the continued jockeying for power and privilege.

We know them well, the political parasites in Westminster and Washington, the pampered ones who like to tell themselves they’re in their comfortable postions on merit and who’ve abrogated to themselves the absolute right to tell the rest of us what to do. Miliband is the most currently prominent of these and is rumoured to be Blairs own personal choice to succeed him as party leader and prsumably PM. He’s certainly been throwing his weight around like someone whose political future is assured.

Hmm. Hereditary privilege, nepotism, authoritarianism, hubris, no real world experience…

Miliband and Chimpy should get along like a house on fire.

Read More: UK Politics, US Politics, Blair. Brown, Bush Prescott, Crap, Miliband, Labour Party leadership, Middle East, Lebanon

Blast From The Past

Vice President Wallace in The New York Times on April 9,1944 ( via Common Dreams):

“The really dangerous American fascist, is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.”

Sound familiar?

“They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.”

Oh, you mean like this?

” If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States. There are probably several hundred thousand if we narrow the definition to include only those who in their search for money and power are ruthless and deceitful. … They are patriotic in time of war because it is to their interest to be so, but in time of peace they follow power and the dollar wherever they may lead.”

Orthis?

Plus ca change….