Hell no this was no accident!



Some thoughts: does anybody really believe this was an accident rather than premeditated? Even on just the evidence in the video the helicopter crew was mighty casual about killing the first group of people, while the attack on civilians attempting to carry off the wounded and dead is a straight warcrime. But put this atrocity in context: two of the people killed were journalists, in a war in which non-embedded journalists often seemed acceptable targets to the US military — the attack on the Al Jazeera office in Kabul, the shooting of that Baghdad hotel many journalists stayed at, various other careless or targeted killings. Each time the military had an excuse, some explenation for their mistakes, but put them all together and it’s clear that if the army doesn’t deliberately sets out to kill uncontrolled journalists, it at the very least doesn’t care if it does so.

Also, also: remember that story back in 2005 about the Al-Jazeera bombing memo? That showed that Bush was talking about bombing the Al-Jazeera offices in Qatar during the attack on Fallujah in 2004. If the US considered that kind of action outside of Iraq, it’s no surprise unfriendly journalists inside Iraq tended to die or disappear… Most of the cases that get attention in the American and European media concern western journalists; but many more Iraqi journalists have been killed as well, either by the Americans or Iraqi internal security.

And of course excuses can and were made in each case: that’s not the point. When there’s a pattern of such killings, during an already illegal and immoral wars, such mistakes are murders. These accidents fit a long standing US army policy of “controlling the information battlefield” by embedding journalists and denying independent reporters access — if a few of the latter are killed on the battlefield, no great loss…

Water, water everywhere, so why buy bottled?



Bottled water is one of the worst (legal!) scams business has foisted on us: selling the exact same product as we can get nearly for free out of our taps and marketed as if we’re better, more caring and slightly hip people for buying it. If you buy it, you’re an idiot and killin g the planet.

Met thugs forced to pay damages for wrongful arrests



The wheels of justice grind slowly, redux. Metropolitian Police have to pay 6,000 pounds in damage for wrongful arrests during the G20 protests:

At the time, protesters complained they were treated harshly because it had been a peaceful meeting. Some of the activists chanted “shame on you” at the officers during the raid which was subsequently posted on YouTube.

Ms McClure, of Leeds, and Mr Rubens, a Glasgow student, complained that they had been unlawfully arrested and held without reasonable suspicion.

They said they were made to stand in the street as officers compared the group with images of protesters that been gathered by intelligence teams.

Mr Rubens said in a witness statement to the court that he had been “very shaken up”.

In a statement, the force said: “The Metropolitan Police Service can confirm that it has settled a claim made by two people present at an address in Earl Street on 2nd April.

“We have accepted that they should not have been arrested and have agreed to pay them compensation. Any further claims will be looked at on a case-by-case basis.”

Galloway sues David Toube?



David Toube, for those of you with the luck not to know or care, is one of the guiding lights behind the “Harry’s Place” blog, best described as the clubhouse for what calls itself the “decent left”, mostly numpties and wingnuts who still have some sentimental attachment to being seen as leftwing, even if their opinions would put them comfortably on the rightwing of the Republican Party. Toube then is a bit of an ass, as also seen in the video above. An inflated ego and an desire to be a latter day Orwell, to take part in a fight againmst modern day fascism has led him to troll other leftie blogs, which has now gotten him into trouble. In particular, he has gotten into trouble for this comment on a Socialist Unity post.

Aaronovitch Watch has more details, with the discussion there focusing on how bizarre it is to sue Toube for a comment he left at the Socialist Unity website, but not Socialist Unity itself. To be fair, even if this is 2010 and everybody should be used to blogs and the internet already, it wouldn’t be the first time a lawyer got confused about these matters, if it actually was a mistake and not deliberate. You could argue that since Toube is the source of this comment, it is no more than right that he gets sued for it…

There’s also some soulsearching about it all, as people balance their loathing of Toube with the reflex antipathy any blogger feels against law suits threatening free speech as well as the loathing many have for Galloway himself. I can understand the dilemma, though do not share the mistrust of Galloway. However, as Aaronovitch Watch itself has shown over and over again, there are quite a few decent leftists who feel free to be bullies, not too careful with the truth and who think calling people nazis or Hamas supporters or whatever is consequence free. Perhaps this might persuade them to be a bit more careful with their accusations…