The Looming Storm

It’s still dark at noon, there’s a massive, scary and possibly global-warming-driven gale blowing up outside and the BBC is reporting that US troops are already attacking euphemistically described ‘Iranian interests’ along the Iran/Iraq border.

American soldiers have already raided an Iranian diplomatic mission. It seems even the inviolability of embassies is fair game now. Le Loi? C’est Bush. Game on.

Massive troop surges, attacks on diplomatic missions, naval strike groups in the Gulf, a change of peskily obstructive generals – it’s clear that, as I’ve always said, megalomaniac midget George Bush is is planning to nuke Iran. The only question is when.

There’s depression and then there’s despair and this news, although expected, is tipping me towards the latter. It’s tempting to take a mental health day, to go back to bed and sleep it all away, but what good would that do? It’d still be there when I woke up.

No, Bush really is riding into his longed-for Armageddon with his eyes wide shut and nothing and no-one seems able to stop him, not even his own father – or maybe especially not his own father. Famously he’s said he’ll carry on to ‘victory’, whatever that is, even if only Laura and the dog support him – he’s even willing to fire his own officers, who, if they gainsay the boy emperor, are swiftly replaced with biddable fundy automatons.

He’s also promised a ‘cataclysmic fight to the death‘ should Congress attempt to oppose or depose him; indeed he’s already divorced one of his office wives in order to get lawyered up for the fray by hiring a veteran Watergate defence counsel.

Maybe I’m hoping for too much too soon, given the time differences, but there’s a very strange yet pregnant lull in the public conversation on the subject of Bush’s speech last night, as though people are hoping this is all not really happening. Some discuss Bush’s odd and apparently drug-fuelled affect and there is much weary outrage, but the overall tone, from the left blogs at least, seems to be despairing resignation .

Wingnut bloggers, as one would expect, are creaming their pants at the anticipation of an onscreen bloodbath.

The major US media outlets in general (though with a couple of honourable exceptions) appear to be supinely accepting this further invasion and the latest pre-emptive attack on a sovereign nation, as though sending more young people to die and destroying yet another country are perfectly valid and acceptable options. There are no questions asked about legality or even morality – the issues just don’t arise for them.

It’s as though, faced with what GB has said time and time again and in no uncertain terms – that he intends to have his own way on Iraq whatever anyone says – the nation has just collectively thrown up its hands and gone “Oh, whatever. Look, over there, Al Qaeda! Sexy airstrikes in Somalia!”

Americans can’t keep on acting alternately as though either a] this is a movie they can switch on and off at will or b] wringing their hands that it’s all those evil Republicans fault and not their responsibilty and that they’ve been hijacked by some shadowy neocon cabal and “it’s nothing to do with me, man, I voted for Gore. “

Every minute they and their elected representatives allow this administration to continue to flout the country’s own constitution and international law. every US citizen becomes more complicit, whether they opposed the war, voted against Bush or not.

Let’s face it, if America really wanted rid of him, they’d’ve read the Declaration of Independence :

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it
is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers
in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and
Happiness””

and then marched on DC with metaphorical pitchforks long since. It’s their sons and dusghters that’ll be dying after all.

But no, because of national self-interest and greed the citizenry have shirked their responsibility to their nation and the world. This vain and self-obsessed psychopath and his plan for a Middle East in nuclear flames is the result.

The Responsibility by Peter Appleton

I am the man who gives the word,

If it should come, to use the Bomb.

I am the man who spreads the word

From him to them if it should come.

I am the man who gets the word

From him who spreads the word from him.

I am the man who drops the Bomb

If ordered by the one who’s heard

From him who merely spreads the word

The first one gives if it should come.

I am the man who loads the Bomb

That he must drop should orders come

From him who gets the word passed on

By one who waits to hear from him.

I am the man who makes the Bomb

That he must load for him to drop

If told by one who gets the word

From one who passes it from him.

I am the man who fills the till,

Who pays the tax, who foots the bill

That guarantees the Bomb he makes

For him to load for him to drop

If orders come from one who gets

The word passed on to him by one

Who waits to hear it from the man

Who gives the word to use the Bomb.

I am the man behind it all

I am the one responsible.

Read more: Iraq, Iran, War, Nuclear bombs, Surge, Bush, Responsibilty, War poetry

Why Can’t Life Imitate Art?

I’d’ve posted this yesterday, but Blogger was playing silly buggers with Blogger Beta again and was completely inaccessible. (We have the blog all set up on typepad and ready to switch, but it just takes the will. Honestly we will do it. Soon.)

Anyhow I did a double-take when I saw this headline from from yesterday’s Evening Standard:

Blair in the dock for TV war crimes ‘trial’

By Alexa Baracaia, Evening Standard 09.01.07

Trials and tribulations: Robert Lindsay as Tony Blair

Channel 4 is to screen a hardhitting drama which portrays Tony Blair facing an international tribunal charged with war crimes. Robert Lindsay plays the Prime Minister, who is shown becoming increasingly unhinged.

In dramatic scenes shown at a private screening today Mr Blair hallucinates about dead Iraqi children, sees the coffin of a British soldier on his kitchen table and believes he is to be murdered by a suicide bomber.

The Prime Minister has a waking nightmare that he is found dead. In sinister echoes of Dr David Kelly’s death, he hallucinates that a newsreader announces that “it appears the former Prime Minister had gone for a walk on his own”.

The 72-minute film The Trial Of Tony Blair will be screened on Monday on digital channel More4.

Written by Alistair Beaton, who also wrote A Very Social Secretary about David Blunkett, it opens in 2010 with the vision of a distressed Blair, having converted to Catholicism, about to make confession for his “mortal sins””.

In Beaton’s account, the US and British forces have declared war on Iran, there has been a second terror attack in London and George Bush, deposed by Hillary Clinton, has entered rehab after being found comatose on his ranch.

Today, Beaton insisted he had no qualms about screening a film which could affect public opinion while a leader of state is still in power.

He said: That would be terrific if I’d contributed to the public perception of Blair having done something he must pay a price for.

I did set out, however, from the position of Blair as being fundamentally a man who cares but whose decisions have backfired and he is struggling to live with that.””

I really really want to see this, if only for the vicarious satisfaction of watching a fictional Blair getting his comeuppance. Bittorrenters and YouTubers, those of us without More4 are relying on you; don’t let us down.

Read more: UK, TV, Drama, Channel 4, Tony Blair, Iraq War Crimes Trial

Into The Valley Of Death…

Life is imitating art again. There’s this from The Guardian, saying that Bush can’t send troops to Iraq that he hasn’t got:

A short-term surge could create a window for Iraqi forces to develop and take over, but it would have to be temporary. In any case, the US does not have enough troops to sustain a surge for long. Sending back troops who have only just returned from Iraq will be catastrophic for morale and rushing troops in without extensive training would preclude them from developing the new mindset that Petraeus advocates. If US troop levels are raised, it really would be the last throw of the dice.

And then there’s this from the BBC:

US Army urges dead to re-enlist

The US Army is to apologise to the families of officers killed or wounded in action who were sent letters urging them to return to active duty.

The letters were sent to more than 5,100 Army officers listed as recently having left the military.

But this figure included about 75 officers killed in action and about 200 wounded in action.

Does it by chance remind you of anything?

A horror film with a political message, HOMECOMING comes from director Joe Dante (GREMLINS, THE HOWLING). With a war going on abroad and an election coming up, the Republican party is anxious about getting enough votes to seal the deal. But when they wish for the soldiers who died in the war to come back to life and speak on their behalf, they never expect it to actually happen. Rising from their graves, the undead men and women set out to tell their own version of events, and to get revenge by voting the party that sent them to war out of office.

The Bush administration’d better be careful what they ask for, they might just get it.

More erudite discussion of the role of zombie movies in the antiwar movement here.

Read more: Iraq war, Bush, Troops, Surge, Movies, Zombies

Unfair & Unbalanced

Whilst we’re on the subject of nasty attacks on prominent women, Fox News has referred to US antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan (who let us not forget, lost her son to the Bush Iraq disaster that the Fox channel pushed for so desperately) as “The Infamous Cindy Sheehan” .

Even from the abyssal depths of an umpty-years-old law degree I’d call that actively defamatory.

Infamous:

  • Having an exceedingly bad reputation; notorious.
  • Causing or deserving infamy; heinous: an infamous deed.
  • Law.
    • Punishable by severe measures, such as death, long imprisonment, or loss of civil rights.
    • Convicted of a crime, such as treason or felony, that carries such a punishment.

infamous adjective

Known widely and unfavorably: common, notorious. See knowledge/ignorance. So objectionable as to elicit despisal or deserve condemnation: abhorrent, abominable, antipathetic, contemptible, despicable, despisable, detestable, disgusting, filthy, foul, loathsome, lousy, low, mean2, nasty, nefarious, obnoxious, odious, repugnant, rotten, shabby, vile, wretched. See good/bad.

I think we can be reasonably sure that word was not chosen by accident. How long before it becmes a regular appendage to Sheehan’s name on rightwing media outlets?

Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News is also available in the UK, where libel laws are notoriously easier to negotiate than in the US.

Is there an ambitious young legal team somewhere who’d like, given Sheehan’s permission, to take Fox to court for libel and a peace-loving billionaire who’d like to fund them? It could make the lawyers’ career, a la the McLibel trial, and the philanthropist would have the eternal gratitude of the world’s population for giving media megalomaniac Murdoch a big poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

Read more: US media, Fox News, UK courts, Defamation, Cindy Sheehan

And You Thought Condi Was Bad Enough…

Yahoo News is reporting that John “Death Squad’ Negroponte is to become No 2 at the US State department, directly deputising for Condoleeza Rice.

I simply cannot wait for the confirmation hearings, with a newly sworn-in Democratic majority in Congress. Finally they’ll have an opportunity – with subpoena power – to take the lid off Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney & Negroponte’s Iraq death squad initiative, if they only choose to take it.

Do you think they’ll bring up Negroponte’s time in Honduras this time?

During the Reagan administration, and while Negroponte was ambassador to the country, “Contra” militias were trained in Honduras. The Contras had hitherto made relatively small attacks across the border into Nicaragua until in 1982 thousands of marines arrived with up to 200 military advisers — airstrips were built, arms supplied and radar stations erected, all courtesy of the US taxpayer.

The Contras were trained in some of the most gruesome guerrilla war techniques. Some were trained by military officers from Argentina’s dirty war who knew nothing about the jungle but plenty about torture and execution. Others were trained in Florida and California while many others, like Honduras’ military dictator, General Gustavo Alvarez Martinez, were educated in torture techniques, execution and combat at the School of the Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia. While it was purported by Reagan that the Contras were fighting the evil scourge of communism, referring to them as “freedom fighters,” the Contras raped, tortured and terrorised the civilian population throughout the subsequent decade, leaving the destroying the civilian infrastructure, leaving tens of thousands dead and many more displaced.

Negroponte’s role in Honduras was crucial as it meant maintaining US dominance in the region. Jeane Kirkpatrick, Negroponte’s predecessor at the UN once declared that “Central America is the most important place in the world for the United States today.” Maintaining political control of the region meant controlling its vast and rich natural resources. The Sandinistas were beginning to take matters into their own hands and started to redistribute wealth and land in Nicaragua, thus threatening US dominance in the region. Panic in the Reagan administration reached feverish and sometimes surreal levels, with the president declaring that the Sandinistas were on the verge of invading the United States. The real cause for alarm among Reaganite neo-conservatives (including the virulent anti-communist Negroponte) was that the Sandinista revolution would spread throughout El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. It had nothing to do with communism, just as the invasion of Iraq has nothing to do with preventing terrorism. More, it was that the economic system the US had maintained in Central America since 1945 was falling apart — it was simply untenable for the impoverished masses who barely had enough to eat. Washington’s solution, like its present incarnation in the Middle East, was one of force and overwhelming military power in order to maintain US hegemony. Just as Negroponte acted as the strong arm of US imperialism in Central America in the 1980s he will protect US business and political interests in the Middle East, now the “most important place in the world for the United States today.”

So what about his sterling work in Iraq? Will the confirmation hearings consider that? Let’s hope so:

El Salvador-style ‘death squads’ to be deployed by US against Iraq militants

From Roland Watson in Washington

John Negroponte was in Honduras when American money was used to train Contras to fight Nicaragua’s Sandinista regime. (AL-RAYA/AP)

THE Pentagon is considering forming hit squads of Kurdish and Shia fighters to target leaders of the Iraqi insurgency in a strategic shift borrowed from the American struggle against left-wing guerrillas in Central America 20 years ago.

Under the so-called “El Salvador option”, Iraqi and American forces would be sent to kill or kidnap insurgency leaders, even in Syria, where some are thought to shelter.

The plans are reported in this week’s Newsweek magazine as part of Pentagon efforts to get US forces in Iraq on to the front foot against an enemy that is apparently getting the better of them.

Iyad Allawi, the interim Iraqi Prime Minister, was said to be one of the most vigorous supporters of the plan.

The Pentagon declined to comment, but one insider told Newsweek: “What everyone agrees is that we can’t just go on as we are. We have to find a way to take the offensive against the insurgents. Right now, we are playing defence. And we are losing.”

Hit squads would be controversial and would probably be kept secret.

The experience of the so-called “death squads” in Central America remains raw for many even now and helped to sully the image of the United States in the region.

Then, the Reagan Administration funded and trained teams of nationalist forces to neutralise Salvadorean rebel leaders and sympathisers. Supporters credit the policy with calming the insurgency, although it left a bitter legacy and stirred anti-American sentiment.

John Negroponte, the US Ambassador in Baghdad, had a front-row seat at the time as Ambassador to Honduras from 1981-85.

Death squads were a brutal feature of Latin American politics of the time. In Argentina in the 1970s and Guatemala in the 1980s, soldiers wore uniform by day but used unmarked cars by night to kidnap and kill those hostile to the regime or their suspected sympathisers.

[….]

The thrust of the Pentagon proposal in Iraq, according to Newsweek, is to follow that model and direct US special forces teams to advise, support and train Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shia militiamen to target leaders of the Sunni insurgency.

It is unclear whether the main aim of the missions would be to assassinate the rebels or kidnap them and take them away for interrogation. Any mission in Syria would probably be undertaken by US Special Forces.

Nor is it clear who would take responsibility for such a programme — the Pentagon or the Central Intelligence Agency. Such covert operations have traditionally been run by the CIA at arm’s length from the administration in power, giving US officials the ability to deny knowledge of it.

Will they ask Negroponte about the Wolf Brigade, I wonder?

The very existence of the Wolf Brigade underscores the criminality of the US occupation and the utter fraud of the Bush administration claims to be bringing “liberation” and “democracy” to Iraq. Many of the commandos would have been involved in murder and torture on behalf of Saddam Hussein’s regime. The American military deliberately recruited them in order to make use of their experience in mass repression and has directly modeled their operations on those of right-wing death squads in Central America.

The main US advisor to the Wolf Brigade from the time of its formation until April 2005 was James Steele. Steele’s own biography, promoting him for the US lecture circuit, states that “he commanded the US military group in El Salvador during the height of the guerilla war” and “was credited with training and equipping what was acknowledged to be the best counter-terrorist force in the region”. In a 12-year campaign of murder and repression, the Salvadoran units, trained and advised by people like Steele, killed over 70,000 people.

Media outlets like the WaPo can gloss the death squads over as

…how Iraqi Interior Ministry commando and police units have been infiltrated by two Shiite militias, which have been conducting ethnic cleansing and rounding up Sunnis suspected of supporting the insurgency.

But the ‘Salvador Option’ was deliberate US policy in Iraq, just as in Central America: that the psychopaths recruited, licensed and trained by Negroponte and his aides have now gone totally feral and out of US control in no way negates that original responsibility.

Of the memories of death and mutilation I witnessed in El Salvador, the sight of six Jesuit priests, their cook and her 16-year-old daughter with their brains blown across the neatly cropped lawn of their house, is the one that still haunts the most. They were among the country’s leading intellectuals, and I knew them well.

~

Hassan an-Ni’ami, an outspoken anti-occupation cleric, was seized by police commandos in Baghdad in late May. His hideously tortured body was dumped at a morgue 12 hours later, with police handcuffs still attached to his wrist. His chest had been burned, possibly with cigarettes. He had been whipped. His nose and one arm were broken. Horrifically, his kneecaps had been drilled through with what appeared to have been an electric drill. Finally, he had been shot multiple times in the chest and head.

Another man, Tahar Mohammed Suleiman al-Mashhadani, was detained by commandos in west Baghdad. His body was found 20 days later, “tortured almost beyond recognition” according to his family. A man calling himself “Abu Ali” told Beaumont he was detained by commandos in mid-May. He said he was beaten on his feet, hung by his arms from the ceiling and threatened with being sodomised with a bottle if he did not confess to being a “terrorist”.

Congressional Democrats can bring Bush and his entire cabal of armongers and ghouls down if they use the Negroponte hearings correctly: the evidence is all there if only they choose to grow a spine and call for it, if they not only subpoena winesses and evidence but take the bastards all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to.

If they do – and it’s a big if – appointing Negroponte could be turn out to be one of the dumbest things Bush has ever done, and he’s done quite a few.

Read more: US politics, Negroponte, State Department, Iraq, Central America, Death Squads. Confirmation hearings