Is It Because He Is (Quite Probably) White?

Yet again a home-brewed explosives case doesn’t get the full-on terrorist treatment:

Man hurt by home-made explosive

A building in north Devon has been sealed off after a home-made explosive went off, injuring a man.

The Royal Navy’s bomb disposal team also carried out a controlled explosion on a second device found at the flat in Barnstaple on Sunday afternoon.

Police said a 47-year-old man was being treated for hand injuries, apparently caused by the first explosive.

Neighbouring flats at the property in St George’s Road were evacuated. Police have ruled out any terrorist links.

Have they? So soon? Really, I thought the police needed at least 42 days to decide that?

It being Barnstaple, I realise the accused is probably white and probably not Moslem and therefore considered innocent of any terrorist intent – as per usual – but that does seem rather hasty to me.

The traffic cam works for Uncle Sam

If there’s one group that’s done well out of “9/11” is the collective security and intelligence services of the United States and Europe, who have been able to justify ever increasing demands for data collecting and sharing and the accompanying invasions of privacy in the name of fighting terror. You’re already fair game if you’re flying to (or even near) the US, or if you make an international bank payment, not to mention that on both sides of the Atlantic your internet and telephone traffic is monitored as well. But now it seems that even car journeys will be monitored by the CIA, as it seems that enforcement agencies in the US and elsewhere have access to British traffic camera data:

The certificate specifically sets out the level of data that can be sent to enforcement authorities outside the European Economic Area (the EU plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) by anti-terrorist officers from the Metropolitan Police. It says:

“The certificate relates to the processing of the images taken by the camera, personal data derived from the images, including vehicle registration mark, date, time and camera location.”

A spokesman for Richard Thomas, the information commissioner, confirmed that the certificate had been worded so that the images of private cars, as well as registration numbers, could be sent outside to countries such as the USA.

Officers from the Metropolitan Police have been given the right to view in “real time” any CCTV images from cameras that are meant to be enforcing the congestion charge.

Sources said that officers would access the cameras on behalf of overseas authorities if they were informed about a terrorism threat in the UK or elsewhere. They would then share the images, which can be held for five years before being destroyed, if necessary.

I can’t imagine anything useful will ever come out of this or what the reasoning behind this granting of access is, other than doing it just because it’s possible. Even having local police have access to traffic camera data is questionable, as unless they have a pretty good idea who they’re looking, it isn’t going to help them catch terrorists or other bad guys, except by accident.

A License To Break The Law

If there is any one thing that lays bare the rottenness of the British political system for all to see it’s the news that following the court’s excorating decision on the Saudi Arms for Oil and bribery deal yesterday, the Tories are to support Labour in giving the Attorney General powers to shut down politically sensitive criminal investigations just by citing ‘national security’.

As with the attempt to censor coroners’ courts in the matter of soldiers’ deaths by inadequate equipment in Afghanistan, not only do they want to cover up their own past lawbreaking they want to print themselves a license to break the law in the future.

We cannot question or protest, it because it is secret. Why is it secret? Because it’s secret. Shut up, it’s national security.

But national security has little to do with this nor do the jobs of arms industry workers, though the profits of the arms companies is certainly a consideration. What’s really at stake is the personal security of the great and the good in parliament, the cabinet, the civil service, diplomacy and finance, who have committed crimes not just of political expediency but greed, trading others’ human rights for their own personal aggrandisement in order to mainstain the arms and oil industries and their longterm collusion with a vicious theocratic dynasty that tortures and beheads its own people (and sometimes ours, too)to maintain its power.

The Al-Yamamah deal and the corruption around it well precedes the current administration – Thatcher set it in motion – but New Labour joined in with enthusiasm once they had a taste of Saudi largesse themselves. New Labour’s starry eyed petty-bourgeois, tempted by riches and power, were easily persuaded that to reveal and prosecute in the Al-Yamamah deal could bring down the entire edifice of British government – and worse prominent politicians of both parties could go to jail. That there’s a revolving door between government and the the arms and oil industries has been a standing political joke for decades. .

Few hands are clean in any party and then of course, if the SFO pursues Al-Yamamah, then it must pursue Bush the CIA and the US government, since the deal was handled through Bush family vehicle Riggs Bank. the US justice department is considering a investigation, but if it’s shut down here, then what will there be to investigate?

For the sake of saving their own skins and Bush’s both parties are handing a future government and Prime Minister – and who knows what or who that’ll be in ten years, given the current fashion for repression – the power to commit whatever crimes they like under cover of protecting us. They mustn’t be allowed to get away with it.

So much for the “bottom up” theory of torture

When the first reports about the use of torture and worse came out it was dismissed by the Bush administration as just the work of a few rotten apples. Once that story became untenable, an alternate defence was brought out. Supposedly the use of torture, sorry, “enhanced interrogation techniques had not been approved by the top, but had been invented by agents in the field desperate to get information from high level Al Quida and Taliban members. As far as I know this defence is still being maintained, despit the mountain of evidence to the contrary.

but now ABC news has revealed what should be the final nail in the coffin of that defence: Bush’s top advisors met regularly to discuss torture:

In dozens of top-secret talks and meetings in the White House, the most senior Bush administration officials discussed and approved specific details of how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the Central Intelligence Agency, sources tell ABC News.

The so-called Principals who participated in the meetings also approved the use of “combined” interrogation techniques — using different techniques during interrogations, instead of using one method at a time — on terrorist suspects who proved difficult to break, sources said.

Highly placed sources said a handful of top advisers signed off on how the CIA would interrogate top al Qaeda suspects — whether they would be slapped, pushed, deprived of sleep or subjected to simulated drowning, called waterboarding.

The high-level discussions about these “enhanced interrogation techniques” were so detailed, these sources said, some of the interrogation sessions were almost choreographed — down to the number of times CIA agents could use a specific tactic.

The advisers were members of the National Security Council’s Principals Committee, a select group of senior officials who met frequently to advise President Bush on issues of national security policy.

At the time, the Principals Committee included Vice President Cheney, former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell, as well as CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft.

As the national security adviser, Rice chaired the meetings, which took place in the White House Situation Room and were typically attended by most of the principals or their deputies.

I Suppose He Should Think Himself Lucky

BBC News England:

Police ‘terror’ swoop on BBC man

A BBC radio reporter was held to the ground and searched by police under the Terrorism Act after his transmitter equipment was mistaken for a bomb.

Six officers forced BBC Radio Stoke’s Max Khan to his knees and held him face down in the city on Monday.

Police were told an “Arabic-looking man was acting suspiciously” outside a shopping centre, Mr Khan said.

He was wearing a backpack with protruding wires and aerials. Staffordshire Police has apologised.

Mr Khan’s backpack contained equipment that is regularly used to allow reporters to broadcast from locations around the city centre.

He was outside the Potteries Shopping Centre in Hanley on his way back from a story about the recently-moved Post Office.

He said the officers came at him from several directions at about 1100 BST and shouted for him “get down on the floor”.

More…

Why ‘lucky’?

Because usually that’s the point when you get 7 bullets in your head.