Border Incidents

As the British government once again attempts to prove the futility of borders in a globalised economy, let’s see how other countries are getting on, shall we?

Video shows Polish traveler dying after Canadian police use Taser

US guards prevent Canadian volunteers from answering an alarm call just over the border because one of the firefighters has a funny name.

Croatian Serb arrested for war crimes on US/Canada border: Goran Pavic, a 42-year-old Croatian Serb, was crossing the Ambassador Bridge from the Canadian town of Windsor enroute to Detroit when he was stopped.

Shoppers complain customs posts are overwhelmed and allege victimisationas the declining US dollar sends Canadians on a US spending spree.

The charges of smuggling illegal immigrants made by Canada against Janet Hinshaw-Thomas, an American refugee rights worker arrested in September at a Quebec border crossing while helping 12 Haitians seek asylum, have been dropped.

Comment of the Day – A Consummation Devoutly To Be Wished

In comments to Nick Cohen’s Observer column this morning:

conorfoley
November 11, 2007 2:37 AM

The day that we finally meet I am going to beat the shit out of you Nick.

Hmmm, how about Euston as a venue?

Euston seems highly appropriate for the comeuppance of the beyond odious Observer hack Nick Cohen who’s long deserved a good slap. But who’s going to adminster it? Someone who’s actually been in a warzone, unlike Cohen, who merely sits on his ass and cheerleads while others do the dying.

It’s not some outraged Dave Spartalike doing the threatening – said Conor Foley is one of Cohen’s fellow Guardian/Observer columnists:

Conor Foley is a humanitarian aid worker. He has worked for a variety of human rights and humanitarian aid organizations, including Liberty, Amnesty International and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. He currently lives and works in Brazil, and is a research fellow at the Human Rights Law Centre at the University of Nottingham.

I can’t imagine threatening other writers with violence is a usual thing for Foley, as angrily critical as he has been of Cohen in the past.

But is it really Foley, or a sockpuppet?

Granted this is the comments section to an online newspaper but it’s there in black and white; as the comments are moderated and commenters registered and it’s been up there 7 hours or so without being deleted, I think it’s reasonable to say, without seeing his IP, that Foley is who he says he is.

But it wasn’t just that one-liner; Foley follows up an hour later:

conorfoley

November 11, 2007 3:46 AM

Incidentally moderator I think that, in context, my above comment does not breach the talk policy (or at least no more than the original article).

I have lost several friends in Afghanistan, including Bettina Goislard whose anniversary is this week. She was shot dead at point-blank range while driving in a clearly marked, but unguarded, humanitarian vehicle. Several more of my friends and colleagues have died in similar circumstances, while others have been kidnapped.

I am also likely to return to Afghanistan in the near future and so the sentiments expressed here have a direct impact on my own health and safety.

Nick Cohen ‘feels strongly about things’ and expresses his views in ways that other people ‘might find extremely offensive or threatening’. He has, for example, criticised those involved in human rights and humanitarian work in ways that are factually inaccurate and harmful.

Since this particular article is on the threats of physical danger facing those working in conflict zones, I think that the views of one such person about its author are ‘on topic’ and make a relevant contribution to a ‘hearty debate’. Let me also, again, extend an invitation to Nick to discuss this topic with me directly here, something he has, so far, been rather reluctant to do.

Cohen’s quick enough to advocate violence as long it suits his political purpose and it’s kept at a safe physical and political distance from his comfy metropolitan life. I wonder, does he have the guts to even debate Foley online or in the pages of his own paper, let alone meet him in the flesh?

Well, I don’t wonder at all really. That’s just a rhetorical device. What I do know is that Cohen, like his fellow chickenhawks and Eustonites, lacks both courage and conviction and will bottle out rather than ever riisk his precious skin putting his so-called principles into practice.

Foley’s balls are out on the table, if I may be so indelicate. Where’re Cohen’s?

UPDATE

Foley’s original comment has been deleted :

conorfoley

November 11, 2007 2:37 AM

This comment and those referring to it removed by moderator.

I guess that’s Cohen’s response then. Like I said he would, he bottled it.

Foley has followed up again:

conorfoley

November 11, 2007 11:41 AM

Darkhorse: It is an emotional subject and my guess is that the moderator’s have recognised it as such.

I spent almost a year and a half in Afghanistan. Around 40 aid and reconstruction workers were killed while I was there and I had several narrow escapes, which probably left me with mild PTSD. I turned down a job in Iraq to go there and several of my former colleagues from Kosovo were killed in the bombing of the UN compound in Baghdad. Everyone agrees that the major reason for the decline in security in Afghanistan was linked to the invasion of Iraq (diversion of troops and resources and propaganda boost for the Taliban) and that is one of the reasons I was so strongly opposed to it.

Since the invasion of Iraq Nick Cohen has written a string of extremely inflammatory articles on the issues of torture, human rights and humanitarian intervention. I have responded to some of them, but this piece just brings forth a howl of outrage.

More….

UPDATE: The entire thread seems to have disappeared or maybe it’s my crappy browser or connection, though if, as one commenter claims, Cohen moderates his own comment threads then he really did bottle it, diidn’t he?

Luckily I saved ithe whole exchange in a text file: If anyone wants it, email or drop a note in comments.

More Creeping Stasification

Prepatented and preclassified technology

A Cold War chill is descending on academia, according to Wired:

FBI Calls on Universities to Guard Against Spies
By Kim Zetter November 07, 2007 | 3:43:23 PMCategories: Surveillance

The FBI’s relationship with university students and academics has never been one of wine and roses — see the agency’s covert campaign to discredit Albert Einstein. Therefore, it might be a bit surprising to know that some university presidents are now embracing the agency and are perhaps even willing to become its eyes and ears on campus.

The National Security Higher Education Advisory Board, launched in 2005, consists of 20 university presidents around the country who are working with the FBI on matters of campus security and counter-terrorism to identify threats to students and staff. But the board is also being asked to guard against campus spies who might be out to steal not-yet-secret secrets. According to this report from NPR, the presidents are being advised to think like “Cold War-riors” and be mindful of professors and students who may not be on campus for purposes of learning but, instead, for spying, stealing research and recruiting people who are sympathetic to an anti-U.S. cause.

Speaking this week at Penn State University, FBI Director Robert Mueller told an audience that universities need to guard against spies who are out to acquire bits and pieces of technology and research and said he’s worried that “pre-classified and pre-patented” technologies could fall into the wrong hands.

More….

“Pre-classified and pre-patented” technology – WTF? Does that mean they’re giving patents to things that haven’t even beeninvented yet, just in case they are? The mind boggles.

It’s sad to see universities succumbing so easily to becoming government enforcement agents, but it’s not very surprising – academic, economic and defence interests often co-incide: many universities’ science departments wouldn’t exist at all without defence funding and there are revolving doors between private military technology companies, government and academia. There’s profit to be made from technology and many are doing very nicely out iof it, thanks. There’s no such thing as a free exchange of ideas in a corporate state. Ideas are worth money.

The joke is the US government warning universities against foreign spies, while it’s the government that’s mostly doing the spying.

Does This Man Know How Lucky He Is?

AFP/Raw Story:

Man angry with son-in-law fingers him as terrorist to FBI

Published: Friday November 2, 2007

A man in Sweden who was angry with his daughter’s husband has been charged with libel for telling the FBI that the son-in-law had links to al-Qaeda, Swedish media reported on Friday.

The man, who admitted sending the email, said he did not think the US authorities would stupid enough to believe him.

The 40-year-old son-in-law and his wife were in the process of divorcing when the husband had to travel to the United States for business.

The wife didn’t want him to travel since she was sick and wanted him to help care for their children, regional daily Sydsvenska Dagbladet said without disclosing the couple’s names.

When the husband refused to stay home, his father-in-law wrote an email to the FBI saying the son-in-law had links to al-Qaeda in Sweden and that he was travelling to the US to meet his contacts.

He provided information on the flight number and date of arrival in the US.

The son-in-law was arrested upon landing in Florida. He was placed in handcuffs, interrogated and placed in a cell for 11 hours before being put on a flight back to Europe, the paper said.

The FBI contacted Swedish intelligence agency Saepo, which discovered that the email tipping off the FBI had been sent from the father-in-law’s computer.

The father-in-law has been charged with aggravated libel.

He has admitted sending the email, but said he didn’t think “the authorities were so stupid that they would believe anything. But apparently they are.”

He said he “couldn’t help the US authorities’ paranoid reaction”.

So why is he lucky? He got to go home, unlike so many others in Gitmo and elsewhere, denounced for revenge or for money.

Mind you his being Swedish probably helped too.

What a bastard of a father-in-law to do such a thing, and what a bastard of a world where it’s possible to do it.