File 770 reports that the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction is going to publish an actual fascist:
David A. Riley announced to readers of his blog on June 19 that his 11,600 word sword and sorcery novelette “Ossani the Healer and the Beautiful Homunculus” “has been accepted for publication – and by one of the most prestigious markets I have ever appeared in.” On July 5 he revealed that the story “will be published sometime later this year in The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction.”
[…]
David A. Riley’s history with the UK’s National Front became common knowledge in 2016 after Riley was included on HWA’s Bram Stoker Award Jury. The HWA appointment became news at a time when questions were already being asked of Riley due to his involvement in the relaunch of Weirdbook. Riley reportedly answered in a no-longer-available Facebook thread.
The news was broken by a tweet from Christopher Rowe, in which he quoted the editor, Sheree Renée Thomas, while its publisher, Gordon Van Gelder, has stayed conspicuously silent. Much of the ire about this decision therefore has taken aim at Thomas. And to be honest, if as an editor you think not withdrawing a publication offer is more ethical than not publishing an actual fascist, you are due some criticism.
However, there are other circumstances in play. Thomas is a Black woman and as tonia ransom points out, the consequences of her deciding to cancel her offer might involve a little bit more than just online criticism:
I can not IMAGINE what Sheree is feeling like right now, but I’ll tell you what would be going through my mind:
– If I publish this guy, it hurts me and pisses off some readers.
– If I don’t publish him, I will get doxxed and me AND MY FUCKING FAMILY are in danger.
You cannot blame Thomas for not knowing who Riley was, you can blame her for not rescinding her offer but who is far more to blame is Gordon Van Gelder, who should not have left it to her to take the heat by staying silent himself. He has a duty as a publisher to a) not publish fascists and b) defend and protect his employees from fascists. The moment it became known who Riley was, he should’ve taken the lead in explaining why he would or would not publish Riley. Because he didn’t, it’s Thomas who is now getting both (deserved) criticism for the decision and hateful attacks by the far right. It’s doubly unfair because it’s also not clear whether this really was her decision to not retract the offer.
We should do better as a community, we should demand transparancy and honesty from Van Gelder as well.
No Comments