Your Happening World (3)

Read:

A reasonable definition of Hipsterism, of which Trainspotting, though it will have no cache among hipsters themselves, is a formative work, is the assumption that there is no position which the middle class subject can not occupy, both class and identity politics have been overcome, or at least class has been subsumed into identity and identity is for the other. The middle class assumes a kind of transcendent, post-historical emptiness into which all cultures can be incorporated. This is not simply hyper-consumerism it’s also a metaphysical claim, a claim to superiority, thus while others are bounded by ethnicity, class, gender; limited, objects, with a finite set of facets and characteristics, the hipster, viewing everything as simply a lifestyle choice, views her own not just as one lifestyle among many but the lifestyle of lifestyles.

Read. That the American rightwing is loony and over the top is a given as is liberal outrage towards the messenger if not so much the message. Remember: America is not Chile. America is not Chile. America is not Chile. Is it?

“THE…. [Sodomite] Hal Duncan”.

Listen.

Nobody asked for this. Did they?

Americans. Thick as shit. (But don’t flatter yourself your country is any better).

Upgrade Me

Upgrade Me looked interesting, but unfortunately went something like this:

“Hi, I’m Simon Armitage a succesful poet and completely unqualified to actually talk about this subject, but I love gadgets and the BBC loves “name” presenters. I’m on my tenth phone already and while I love gadgets, I feel a vague unease about it all. Let me go to John Lewis and talk about how John Lewis completely revamps their John Lewis product lines in their John Lewis stores every six months. Now I’m talking to some kids of some nicely multicultural London school and see how many technogadgets they have. They all would love to have an IPhone. Oh look, I’m showing them my generation’s portable media player — a battery operated turntable. Now onwards to the future, courtesy of Samsung, as I travel to South Korea, home of Samsung, to talk about the Samsung future. It’s a bit scary and not very English and although I can set up a Skype videocall with my wife, I don’t use the internet enough to find what Manchester United did yesterday. So let’s go home and meet a lovely English eccentric that has lived without gadgets or indeed electricity for years. It’s very nice and I think I could live that way too, but I do need my e-mail and mobile phone, not so much the washing machine. This woman is a modern day Luddite and I make it clear I have no clue what motivates the real Luddites but ascribe to them my own vague sense of discomfort about material things, just like I keep assuming the seventies when I grew up was much less gadget obsessed than today. Anway, the conclusion is that it’s all very difficult and there are two sides to every story but I had fun meeting all sorts of people on the BBC’s tab.”

John Mullan is a silly ass

Booker Prize judge made a bit of a silly ass of himself responding to Kim Stanley Robinson’s challenge to the Booker Prize about the lack of science fiction on its short lists, by saying:

John Mullan, Naughtie’s fellow judge for this year’s prize and professor of English at University College London, said that he “was not aware of science fiction,” arguing that science fiction has become a “self-enclosed world”.

“When I was 18 it was a genre as accepted as other genres,” he said, but now “it is in a special room in book shops, bought by a special kind of person who has special weird things they go to and meet each other.”

He’s so wrong. Science fiction has always been “in a special room in book shops, bought by a special kind of person who has special weird things they go to and meet each other”! Even when he was eighteen this was the case unless he was that age sometime in the early thirties or so, science fiction cons have been around longer than he has. It has never been fully seen as acceptable literature by the sort of people who sit in Booker Prize juries and there has never been “a genre as accepted as other genres” though admittedly there have been times when mainstream authors and critics have been more in tune with it than others.

The responses to such backhanded snobbery are predictable. As seen in the comments to Ken’s post on this, many science fiction fans are defensive and hurt and respond like a teenager bounced from the Kool Kids Klub — “I don’t want to join your smelly club anyway”. Some, as seen on Torque Control ignore the insults and earnestly try to explore the question of why the Bookers boycott science fiction and what to do to change it. Finally, there are the people who’ve seen it all before, amused both by the snobbery and the philistine defensiveness of many fans.

For myself, I’ve sort of lost that reflexive defensiveness, where you take out your annoyance at the casual dismission of science fiction by erm casually dismissing everything else, but I don’t like to entirely dismiss this reflex either as seem to be the trend amongst sections of online fandom. Look at how grownup and above it all we can be, not like those stinky nerds still living in their mommy’s basement who actually take all that stuff seriously. In the high school reenactment society that’s fandom, that’s just pandering to the jocks by making fun of your fellow nerds, not realising they’re laughing at you as much as with you…

The Killing Joke

In retrospect, Dorian Wright doesn’t like The Killing Joke:

In the long run, it was probably a mistake. While it’s still a masterfully crafted story, and Brian Bolland’s art is exceptional, the overall trend towards “darkening” Batman did serious damage, I feel, to the character and the comics industry as a whole. It was an attempt to chase a post-adolescent audience’s brief, media-driven flirtation with comics, but it froze out younger and more casual audiences. The audiences comics really needed to grow as a medium. It’s only lately, with the The Brave and The Bold cartoon and Grant Morrison’s Batman work, that a serious attempt to rehabilitate Batman from the brooding, angsty loner with mommy issues has been made.

Hear, hear.

Killing Joke always felt cynical to me, an attempt by Moore and DC to cash in on his surface reputation as a mature superhero writer, where mature equals R-rated sex and violence, for those readers who thought the nudity and brutality in Watchmen and Miracle Man were “deep” and missed anything more subtle. Even Moore at his most cynical offers glimmers of interest so it’s not completely bad, certainly not as bad as the glut of post-Watchmen, post-Dark Knight “mature” superhero titles that crowded the shelves in the late eighties/early nineties.

and yet it’s still awfully superficial and glib in its philisophy, the loveingly and lingering depiction of the the crippling and implied rape of Barbara “Batgirl” Gordon as a device to “break” Batman not that different from any such seen in a revenge movie like the “Deathwish” series, a device to propel the hero into action but only seen as an affront to the hero’s honour rather than as what it does to the victim, just a broken toy in this context. The ending where supposed hero and supposed villain meet in the middle and laugh it all off is annoying as well, as is its trite message, that all it can take is one bad day for a normal man to become a monster.

But the Bolland art is gorgeous.

Teardrop Manoeuvres in the Dark

Owen on Julian Cope’s autobiography, Head-on, his abilities as a writer and how wrong his musical preferences seen in retrospect: Part of what is interesting in it is in seeing just how wrong the Liverpool in-crowd (of which Cope was unabashedly one) were, how their coolness and their talent were in inverse proportion. As a rule, if the young Cope dismisses a band – John Foxx’s Ultravox, Visage, Japan, Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark – they will be very interesting, but if he takes them seriously – Echo and the Bunnymen, Wah!, his own group – then it’s Merseybombast all the way. .

Of course, even at the time Echo and the Bunnymen were a punchline on The Young Ones… Like Depeche Mode, they were a band always trying slightly too hard to be convincing. Cope’s own band, The Teardrop Explodes at least had the saving grace of having a sense of humour — how could it not, Cope having named it after a specific panel of a specific Daredevil comic? Cope could get awfully seriously and was convinced of his own importance as musical genius at the time, but it was always balanced by a certain playfullness his more poofaced rivals didn’t have. This is best seen in Kilimanjaro, the 1980 debut album and the Teardrops’ best, one of the best albums of the first half of the eighties: with all its punk and post-punk influences it also has a sparkling, natural lightness to it, cheerful keyboards and brass section, sort of hinting of what Paul Weller would do much later much more bombastically. There’s more than Merseybombast there.

(And isn’t that, or “Madchester” or Bristolian blagging just a localised version of second or even third city syndrome, where to even be noticed by the juggernaut that’s London you need to shout seven times louder? It’s not something we really have in the Netherlands, where Amsterdam may be the biggest city in the country, but is not much bigger than Rotterdam or Utrecht and while it may be so arrogant as to assume it’s the centre of all arts, the reality is that it’s just as provincial as any sleepy town out in the boondocks, endlessly gazing its navel, letting the other cities go on with actually doing things. But I digress.)

Fortunately Owen didn’t write this post just to slag off Cope and his pals, but to praise another of my favourite albums of that time, OMD’s Dazzle Ships:

If Dazzle Ships is a concept album, the concept seems to be communication, travel and distribution as enabled by technology, something usually carried out dispassionately, but here made overwhelmingly romantic, a pathetic fallacy for obsolete machinery, with an underlying terror at the prospect of turning ourselves over to abstractions, whether technology or capital. So there’s a willed innocence to much of it, with ‘Telegram’ making this wholly superseded technology wildly exciting – ‘I’ve got a telegram!’ he sings, attempting to tap into the joy of its early discovery. Elsewhere, it’s about deception as much as communication. The Dazzle Ships of the title are perfectly chosen, as this experiment in warpaint for Great War battleships was, until after 1945 Britain’s only major experiment with Modernist abstraction in public life, a utopian idea utilised for depressingly, if impressively atavistic purposes. The title track, with its collage of empty space, foghorns, forlorn drones and sudden, panicked alarms, is almost synaesthetic in its evocation of a locked-down landscape controlled by the defence industries, a blank lullaby to Cold War big tech.

What Dazzle Ships evokes in me is a feeling of retrofuturism. It sounds like it could be the sidetrack to one of those mid-seventies distopian big budget movies like Rollerball or Logan’s Run where most of the interest is in the set building, but unlike those movies aware that this future won’t happen. There’s an element of both repellance and fascination about technology in Dazzle Ships. On the one hand there’s that seventies view of modern technology as being inherently alienating through its use by big business and big government as tools to oppress and regimentise the life of its workers and citizen. By teh time Dazzle Ships came out this view was already oldfashioned, as both government and business were busily shedding their paternalism for other ways to screw us over. On the other hand, as Owen writes, OMD sings about these technologies with a sense of innocence, “overwhelmingly romantic”. Robots might put car workers out of work, they’re still fascinating pieces of equipment, as any twelve year old knows.

All of which evokes a certain continental view of the future as seen in the rearview mirror, of a time when it was possible to imagine the Cold War would stay semi-thawed forever and we would keep continue to have to imagine our futures under the shadow of World War III, with limited room for imagination but quite safe in a way.