April is the month of the graphic novel

But only in the Netherlands. Which is a bit odd, because “graphic novel” as either a gerne or an upmarket term for comics has not been used much here. It’s an American term after all and the Dutch comics scene has always looked towards Belgium and France, with US comics being seen as childish pulp, though there have of course always been exceptions. Mature comics readers have never had problems buying strips, not being trapped in the superhero ghetto, though as almost everywhere, it’s still seen as a somewhat nerdy hobby, capes or no capes. There’s been “comics for adults” for decades, but they’re still largely sold through the comics shop.

What’s new is the interest of “proper” book publishers in comics, both domestic and translations which started in the late nineties and early naughties. I’m not quite sure why and how that happened, but it might’ve been a combination of a new generation of alternative cartoonists like Maaike Hartjes or Barbara Stok finding an audience outside of the traditional stripzines, (Hartjes e.g. did a regular strip for women’s magazine Viva) and more established masters tackling serious literary works — especially Dick Matena and his series of adaptations of classic novels. Perhaps it’s just a matter that enough singular, breakthrough works had been published over the years (Maus, Persopolis, you know the drill) for book publishers to notice the market for intelligent comics that looked like and could be bought like normal books.

In any case, there’s clearly a market for “graphic novels” now, with the press release for the month of the graphic novel talking about sales of 10,000 copies of Logicomics and Robert Crumb’s Genesis, which is certainly not bad for a small country like the Netherlands. There’s a sound commercial motive than behind this promotion of the graphic novel, an attempt to get people to try graphic novels by offering nine classics for a lower price than usual. It’s a good idea, but disappointing in that amongst the nine chosen works there is no original Dutch work.

the nine graphic novels offered in the month of the graphic novel

Instead there’s translations of various classic American graphic novels, like Art Spiegelman’s Maus, Bryan Talbot’s Tale of One Bad Rat, Charles Burns’ Black Hole, as well as Y the Last Man. There’s also the graphic novel version of Walsh with Bashir, as well as several other translations of Serious Works about war and the mafia, but no original Dutch graphic novels. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good list, with some impressive books on it, but by only offering translations it has missed a trick.

I’m not sure why no Dutch graphic novels were offered in this promotion, though it might be that the three publishers involved, De Vliegende Hollander, Oog en Blik and Silvester Strips had no suitable items in print for this promotion, which is damning enough if true. I hope that if this initiative is succesful, it will be repeated next year but include some worthy Dutch authors as well — a new collected edition of Lian Ong’s Horizon perhaps?

Taking Captain America into strange places

Tom Spurgeon reviews Captain America: the Truth:

While this move/development/whatever takes away the juice of creating Captain America himself from the Tuskegee Experiment-style set-up, it also places the spotlight even more directly on the treatment of African-American soldiers during that period, with the American upper-class embrace of eugenics as a minor undercurrent. History tells us the treatment of black soldiers was routinely abominable, and in The Truth those abuses become the relentless, dour drumbeat of the narrative. In other words, Marvel traded an imaginary story that might have made a black man the first Captain America for an in-continuity one that super-sizes some of the worst behavior of the US government in its long history. Captain America is safe, but the government for which he works has a truckload of explaining to do. The better and more observant histories tell us the real-world abuses were horrible, but I don’t think they were quite as over-the-top horrifying as the exploding bodies and entire units massacred for the control of minor state secrets we see here.

[…]

In the end, this is a hard story to parse because it’s really about the history involved — and the notion of retroactive continuity as it gets portrayed in the press — more than it is a tight, well-paced story of its own. It’s fun to read something this ruthlessly negative about American history coming out during the Bush years, and some of the ideas are enjoyable to mull over, but it’s not something I regret having missed the first time around. It’s admirably odd, that’s for sure.

There’s at least one thesis to be had in analysing Captain America in the Bush years, especially after 9/11. The Truth was one response, the other was seen in Ed Brubaker’s “realistic” approach, a third in the last story in Captain America – Red, White & Blue, tackling the aftermath of 9/11 directly. In general I’ve found Marvel to have become very rightwing post-Bush, the outcome of Civil War going against everything Marvel always stood for (in so far as a obviously commerce driven company universe could stand for anything of course) and Cap shoved up to the right as well. That pseudorealism, with its acceptance of the evil in the world, is a rightwing look at the world, even if the hero is shown as a shining knight in a corrupt world. It’s a far cry from the idealism of the premature anti-fascism of the original Cap…

Which is not the case with The Truth, where as Tom notices, the corruption in the background doesn’t infect Captain America himself. It respected what Captain America always stood for: the myth of America, rather than the sordid reality.

Your Happening World (16)

Stuff of interest (to me anyway) of Friday 16th April 2010.

  • Hal Duncan wants to see more fluffy, entertaining gay movies and fewer serious gay movies. Not one to just moan he has written his own: a revamp of As You Like It as a gay highschool musical.
  • Andrew Wheeler has the list of bestselling genre novels of 2009. Quite a lot of shitty sf and fantasy books sold really really well last year.
  • “I do not believe that the man possesses so much as a single grain of insight into human character, more than a thumbnail understanding of politics or society, or even a base theoretical comprehension of women and their interior lives. His worldview is customarily infantile, occasionally rising to the level of juvenile. His preoccupations are, therefore, those of infants and juveniles”. Tim O’Neil on the Tao of Miller.
  • Personally I liked Miller’s eighties work (Daredevil: Born Again, Batman: Year One, Ronin etc.) because while they were juvenile power fantasies, at least they were juvenile power fantasies in which the hero could break his ribs or get his lungs punctured. That was new back then. Now? Not so much.
  • Imagine this: you’re the sole Dutch survivor of Sobibor, manage to escape the camp with the Polish man you’ve come to love, hide out in the Polish countryside for months, get rescued by the Russians, get married, go back to Holland via the
    Meditterraean, lose your baby in the process and when you finally make it back you’re threatened with deportation as an illegal alien! No wonder Selma Wijnberg, having emigrated to the US, refused to visit her home country until only this week, the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Dutch concentration camp Westerbork.
  • In general, the treatment of Jews during the war is a dark page in Dutch history. Despite early resistance to anti-Jewish measures here, the Netherlands was the Western European country from which the highest percentage of Jews (> 75 %) was deported. Though after the war everybody had been in the resistance all along, plenty of Dutch officials had to cooperate with this deportation to make it that succesful — and quite a few people profited from it. There’s many a house in Amsterdam that’s been acquired through dodgy means during the war.
  • On a lighter note: Be A Sex-Writing Strumpet.

A blog written just for me

It’s like somebody looked into my brain and made a blog especially for me: Captain America’s Been Torn Apart, devoted to reading and commenting on Mark Gruenwald’s entire ten year run on Captain America. David Fiore is a veteran comics blogger and he gets both Gruenwald:

One thing I do want to stress, re: Gruenwald, is how much I appreciate his refusal to join the “Comics Aren’t Just For Kids” sweepstakes of the mid-1980s. We can all agree how dumb that was, can’t we? What I love about these books (and about Squadron Supreme in particular) is the way they wade into the same contested super-political waters that Miller and Moore were then “braving,” without swaddling these ambitions in the cloak of the medium’s much-trumpeted “coming of age.” Basically, Gruenwald is saying that the genre was always concerned with these questions–damn the “prestige format,” full speed ahead!

And Captain America:

So… created by Jack Kirby and Joe Simon in late 1940, Cap was (and is) the preeminent symbol of “premature anti-fascism” (to use HUAC terminology) in the history of American literature. He is, quite simply, THE Popular Front (that’s a New Deal era coalition of communists, socialists and others leftists) icon. There cannot be any dispute about that. Punching out Hitler meant something very different in December 1940 than it means when today’s Neocons cum in their PJs while dreaming about it…

There have of course been quite a few writers attempting liberal superheroics: Steve Gerber, Don McGregor Mike Friedrich, Steve Englehart are examples that spring to mind, but Gruenwald is in a class apart. Nobody was as consistent in their approach as Gruenwald, whose favoured protagonists like Cap, or Quasar were liberal, friendly and approachable heroes whose politics were portrayed through their day to day adventures, rather than by doing Very Special Issues about the Klan or womens’ lib or whatever. Cap especially pays more than just lip service to the idea his opponents can be reformed, rather than are intrinsincly evil, and this during the Reagan Era when every other superhero title seemingly moved to the right, becoming “gritty” and “realistic” by depicting criminals as subhuman scum for the hero to blast away. It’s therefore great to see somebody willing to spent substained critical effort on showcasing Gruenwald’s run on Cap.

Nerd-r-I

Just saw the new Dr Who, with Matt Smith as the doctor and Steven “Coupling” Moffat as the lead writer. After several seasons with David Tennant and Russel T. Davies in the same roles Dr Who had become stale and somewhat boring, obsessed as it was with telling the same stories over and over. The teasers at the end of the last season already promised a new, lighter approach and I was glad to see this episode making good on this promise. As per usual at the start of a new seaosn much of it was spent showcasing the doctor again, with Matt Smith having the same sort of manic energy as Tennant and some of his mannerisms, but slightly wittier. The alien menace du jour looked cool and different, there were some nice hints about the overarching theme of the rest of the season and a good balance between tension and humour, we got a new companion and surprise surprise it’s another young woman already obsessed by the doctor and there’s nothing creepy about this, honest. All in all, quite an enjoyable episode, if slight.

I’m at my parents for Easter weekend btw. S. came out of hospital on Tuesday and had her son coming round for the holidays, so I could bugger off to Middelburg for some r&r. Which gave me the chance to sort through my comics collection again. I was a serious collector from about 1987 to about 2000, when I just stopped. It left me with some ten thousand or so comics, most in storage at my parents. As S. keeps telling me, we don’t have the storage to keep them all so I need to cull what I got.

Which has been …interesting, a sort of personal archaeology. So much shit I’ve bought over the years. No clue of what was good or not, just looking for a new superhero or following a favourite character and no matter it has crappy art and worse writing. It didn’t help that I started seriously collecting at a time the direct market went crazy, what with Image and Valiant and eight million copies of X-Men #1. So many comics bought because they were hyped up in Wizard or Previews, so many comics bought because they were cheap at a con and looked interesting, so many comics bought thanks to rec.arts.comics.misc or Comix-L. Then end result was a huge sprawling mess, which definitely needed culling.

But it’s hard. Getting rid of the shit comics is easy, but to get beyond that and cull the ones that are sort of okay, or even good, but just don’t fit — so many miniseries I only have two out of four issues of– that’s harder. I managed to lose about a thousand-two thousand comics in a first pass, but doubt I could do more at the moment…