The Goblin Emperor — Katherine Addison

Cover of The Goblin Emperor


The Goblin Emperor
Katherine Addison
502 pages
published in 2014

One of the dirty little secrets of book reviewing is that the circumstances under which you read any given book can massively influence how you feel about it. Since I read the first half of The Goblin Emperor on a sunny Thursday afternoon while drinking a nice IPA sitting at an Amsterdam terrace and the other half sitting in my garden on the Friday afternoon following, drinking an even nicer IPA, it’s no wonder I feel quite mellow about it. But in this case I would’ve enjoyed it even had I read it during one of the grey, dull, wet afternoons that you normally get in Amsterdam in early April. This is a great novel and well deserves its Hugo nomination. It’s also the sort of novel you can’t help but read fast, a true page turner.

The Goblin Emperor at heart is a very traditional power fantasy, about the boy of humble origins who becomes emperor by happenstance and now has to very quickly learn how to survive in a world of political intrigue he’s completely unprepared for, filled with people who either want to manipulate him or replace him with a better figurehead. It’s one of those fantasy scenarios other writers can write multiple trilogies about to get to that point, but Katherine Addison has her goblin hero confirmed as the emperor within five pages, the rest of the novel being about him getting to grips with his new job, woefully inadequate though he feels.

Read more

Sad Puppies: what to do?

The more I think about the whole Puppies situation, the more I think my initial reaction during the Emergency Hugo Panel at Dysprosium this weekend is correct: the people driving the Puppy slates do not care for fandom or science fiction, even if they call themselves fans and SF writers, they’re political operators who jumped on science fiction fandom as an easy target for their kulturwars. As Nicholas Whyte succincintly said: this is a political act that needs a political response.

And the first thing to remember is that these people for all their rhetoric aren’t conservatives, but radicals. They have a vision of what they want fandom and science to be and no respect for its values or history. What the Puppies have instead are massive entitlement issues and equally massive egos. They know they’re supposed to be the popular kids, that they have a right to the Hugos, that only a conspiracies of critics and other leftists is stopping their inevitable domination of science fiction.

All of which is pure projection on their part. Because they are the sort of people who lie and manipulate to get their slate on the Hugo ballot, they naturally assume anything they don’t like is the result of similar manipulation. Their own actions therefore are done in self defence against the shadowy conspiracy of Social Justice Warriors. It’s bogstandard rightwing conspiracy thinking that’s motivating the Puppies, the same sort of logic behind the idea that Barack Obama isn’t really the president because he wasn’t born in America, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

Engaging them therefore is pointless. They don’t care about anybody who isn’t like them, don’t think anybody who doesn’t share their politics is legitamite. What to do instead?

This year, all we can do is contain the damage. There are basically three short term responses to their wrecking of the Hugos: 1) business as normal, ignoring the slate and just voting on merit, as Geri Sullivan proposed at the Hugo Emergency Panel discussion and also preferred by John Scalzi, 2) No Award everybody on the slate, innocent or otherwise and vote normally otherwise, which is what I did last year with the previous slate and 3), the most radical, No Awarding everything because the intrusion of the Puppies is so massive it’s an unfair advantage for even non-puppies to get normal consideration. This is an option Erik V. Olson explained on Metafilter:

I feel that this year’s awards are fundamentally compromised, and that maybe a better solution is this.

Vote No Award on *everything*.

Why? Because if we honestly No Award every award, then, well, no awards are given in 2015. We now have a mechanism in place to fix them — the Retro Hugos. Normally, we have to wait some large number of years (50, IIRC) to do that, but the other critera is that we only do Retro Hugo’s when there were no Hugo’s awarded.

So, if we No-Award this year, and change the constitution a bit, we could run the 2015 Retro Hugos in 2017.

It’s not a perfect answer — but it could be a better answer than most. It’ll be an award for 2015. It’ll let everyone have a fair shot again. It won’t affect the next years award like an all-kill and extend eligibility would.

There’s no good answer, but maybe that’s the least bad. But I’m personally not willing to vote for the few non S/RP nominees, because they’re not running against the works they should be running against. They’re basically getting a free ride if I do that. It’s not fair to them or to the works that were shoved off by the slate.

Which I’m honestly starting to lean towards, considering how many categories have been tainted. It’s the strongest possible rejecting of slate voting and the puppies, it could provide a fresh new start, but it would depend on enough people joining in, otherwise it’s pointless.

But at the very least all puppy candidates should be No Awarded, should be taught the lesson that if you’re on the slate, you may get nominated, but never win and now your name is mud. This should be done across the board, even for things like the various movies put on the slate, even if these were only put in as a cover. The same goes for the socalled “innocent” or “pressganged” puppy nominees, be they high profile authors who could’ve arguably had a shot at a Hugo on their own like Jim Butcher, or naive fools like Kary English. They cannot win in any category, they must be rejected entirely. Fandom must show it rejects slate voting and it rejects the attempt to make the Hugos into a partisan political mud fight.

And for those who are on the Puppy slate against their will, they should do the honourable thing: withdraw themselves from consideration.

Sounds ominous…

Teresa Nielsen Hayden hears distant rumblings of discontent in fandom, possibly having to do with the Hugo Award nominations this year. It might just be that the Sad Puppies campaigners — happy to function as foot soldiers on another front in the right wing’s kulturkampf — has gotten its act together and managed to bulk vote its slate onto the ballots. The question is, given that this is true, is this a problem?

In the short term, yes, as it will mean other, more deserving candidates get excluded from the ballot, which in most categories is limited to five places, occassionally one or two more when multiple nominations get the same amount of votes. Slate voting like this, even if it can only get one or two candidates in each category and they have no real chance at the Hugo itself, means others will lose out on these places. And Hugo nominations can be important, especially for new writers, to establish a reputation as being worthwhile to pay attention to. Losing out on this because somebody thought making a political point is more important than actually rewarding good writers is bitter.

In the slightly longer term, if those who oppose the Sad Puppies are tempted to do the same as they, the damage may be greater. The Hugo Awards have been problematic for a long time, voted on by what you could uncharitably call a clique of ageing fans, but was starting to evolve away from this in recent years, the backlash against which erupted last year with the first Puppies slate. Remaking the Hugos into a popularity contest of warring politically motivated slates will put an end to this evolution. The same if we attempt to invent rules that makes this sort of slate pushing illegal.

Normally I’m not one to say we should just ignore the trolls, but perhaps in this instance we should. Voting in the Hugo costs money and to keep it up year after year in such a way as to be effective even more so. This campaign will run out of steam sooner or later but can do some real damage if we let them in the meantime. In this case what we need to do is to keep nominating and voting those writers and books we genuinely think are worthy of a Hugo, not engage the Puppies on their own level.

Imagicon report

looking out over the main hall of Imagicon

Imagicon was the first Dutch science fiction convention I’ve gone to in well over a decade. It’s a new, one day con running for the second year and wasn’t quite what I expected. Before we get to the meat of my con experience, first a couple of (minor) criticisms. First up, as you can see from the picture above (barely) the main room, with all the dealer and other stands, had to be reached down a spiral staircase which was a bit awkward even for me, but I couldn’t spot quite how people unable to take those stairs could get down. The panel rooms too had to be navigated by stairs. Since I saw at least one person in a wheelchair pootling around the con this wasn’t an insurmountable problem, but a bit more sign posting at least would’ve helped. That in fact was my second issue with the con: lack of easily accesible information and hype about the guests of honour. It was great meeting Alastair Reynolds, but he seemed remarkably sparsly attended and the con didn’t seem to have publicised his coming that much.

Terry Pratchet - Going Postal cosplay

But than what the majority of congoers seemed to be going to the con for wasn’t authors or panels, but cosplay. Now cosplay isn’t quite my thing, in that I’m far from knowledgable about that part of fandom, but it was great seeing so many people doing wonderful things with costumes and dressing up. What struck me was how friendly and genuinely welcoming all these cosplayers seemed, both to each other and the people pestering them for pictures, even at the end of the con. This in fact could be said of the whole con. The staff and volunteers were efficient and helpful, there didn’t seem to have been any awkward incidents and the con was on the ball enough to have its code of conduct rules up bright and visible. There was a weapons check station immediately after the entrance frex; another sign of how cosplay orientated the con is?

One of several proper Thors

In the cosplay several themes dominated. There was a surfeit of Doctors, plenty of superhero movie & game cosplayers, including three Jokers and at least two Black Widows (but oddly enough only one Hawkeye) as well as several Lokis and Thors, like the one to the left. All of which incidentally cosplayed by women — considering the new, female Thor outsells the old, male one not that surprising perhaps. But there were also more idiosyncratic choices, like Moist from Lipwig above. I’m not quite sure about the gender mix of the cosplayers, but it seemed to me the women were in a slight majority, though the all male Ghostbuster squad made up a lot. Most of the cosplayers seemed to be in their early twenties or even younger, (though there was also one elderly Pratchett wizard walking around), a good sign for a new convention. If Imagicon can keep hold off and expand on this audience, it should be in for a long run. It’s also good for fandom as a whole to have such a successful convention of course. Perhaps next year it could expand for an entire weekend?

Helsinki in 2017

There were pockets of old skool fandom as well amongst all the cosplay. The NCSF, the oldest existing fan organisation in the Netherlands was represented with a stand, as was the Worldcon, as you can see above. It’s not so much that you expect hordes of people to sign up on the spot, but it helps to be visible, explain to people who only vaguely know about Worldcon what it’s all about and hopefully get some enthusiasm going for Helsinki in 2017. I put a stint in as well, for roughly an hour; I also met up with Emma England, from Dublin 2019 and may have agreed to volunteer.

diversity in fandom panel

The highlight of the con for me was the diversity in fandom panel, which featured, from left to right Rochita Loenen-Ruiz, Carolyn Chang, Marieke Nijkamp as moderator, Corinne Duyvis & Marilyn Monster. Diversity is of course something fandom is struggling with and it was good to see it tackled even at a con like this, not the first place I’d expected it. The panel was lively, with everybody contributing in a relative equal matter and it was good to hear so many different perspectives. The audience was engaged as well, asking some good questions, with no nitwits to drone about some irrelevancy. The moderation was done with a deft hand, a serious of loose questions guiding the panel and with a good eye for audience questions.

a drama of cosplayers

Quite a contrast to the other panel I went through, which was undermanned as it was only two blokes, talking about a similar subject, Fandoms: a Critical Eye, supposedly about the schisms and fighting between and within various fandoms. They meant well, but with no moderator and too limited a spectrum of opinion it never quite came of the ground. That one of the panelists was the classic older pedant didn’t help. Again, he meant well, but put his foot in his mouth several times. It needed moderation to keep to the subject and a wider range of people to actually be on the panel. A bigger audience would’ve helped as well..

Umbrella, Hawkeye, Black Widow, Leia

On the whole this was a great convention to kickstart my con season; Eastercon’s beckoning in two weeks. I bought some books, volunteered a bit, met up with a friend, got to meet some interesting new people all too briefly, had a chat with Alastair Reynolds who recognised me from Twitter, all in all a good con. Can’t wait for next year.

Who ya gonna call? Ghostbusters!

For more cosplay and other pictures, take a look at Willem Hilhorst’s Facebook page.

Wolfhound Century — Peter Higgins

Cover of Wolfhound Century


Wolfhound Century
Peter Higgins
303 pages
published in 2013

Despite buying more books than’s probably good for me, I still keep a library membership and thanks to that I still end up finding science fiction or fantasy writers and books I wouldn’t encounter otherwise. Case in point: Peter Higgins Wolfhound Century, which I saw lying on the pile of new fiction books near the entrance and whose cover drew my attention. Reading the back cover blurb and the first few pages was enough to take a punt on it. They confirmed what the cover artwork seemed to suggest, that this was a fantasy novel inspired by Soviet Russia, not a setting you see much in fantasy.

The protagonist, investigator Vissation Lom, is the classic honest cop in a totalitarian system and his honesty has of course made him enemies. Nevertheless he’s one of the best investigators in Vlast, which is why he has been summoned to the capital Mirgorod by the head of the secret police. He is to stop and catch Josef Kantor, a terrorist protected by powerful forces from within the Vlast security apparatus itself. Without ties to any of the political factions in the capital or the security services, Lom is hoped to have a better chance at getting Kantor.

Read more