Antiracism is a crime in Bolton

From Socialist Worker’s rolling update on the anti-EDL protests:

angry scenes in Victoria Square #uafbolton on Twitpic

1.10pm: From Bolton, Victoria Square

Police have broken up an entirely peaceful UAF rally in the square and seized organiser Weyman Bennett. Trade unionists are trying to speak but have been stopped.

12.55pm: From Bolton, Victoria Square

Police are preventing hundreds of anti-fascist protesters from entering Victoria Square. Those inside are chanting “Let them in”. They have had to link arms to block the police and defend the UAF speakers. Riot police have repeatedly pushed into the crowd.

Weyman Bennett of Unite Against Fascism address the crowd, saying, “Police are rioting and are out of control.

“Anti-racism is not a crime, and it’s about time the police stopped treating it as such.

“I say to the police, if you can turn this number of officers out here today, why could you not stop the EDL running riot through Stoke last month?”

The EDL, the socalled English Defence League is the sort of acceptable side of the BNP, supposedly non-racist but just concerned about the “loss” of Englishness. In practice of course they are a bunch of white racist thugs just using the fact that mainstream politics has made islamophobia largely acceptable. The constant stream of scaremongering news items and editorials about the danger of “Muslim terrorism”, combined with the lack of the same sort of attention for “white terrorism”, has lead to a climate where Paki-bashing has become acceptable again. Everytime the EDL gets to march through a city unopposed helps strenghtened this climate, especially when it’s the police who make it possible by attacking the antifascist, antiracist counterdemonstrations.

The police of course always present that as a neutral problem of keeping public order, with the argument that allowing counterdemonstrations would lead to violence, yet as Weyman Bennett points out, where were the police when the EDL rioted in Stoke, unopposed?

The Kingdom of the Hittites – Trevor Bryce

Cover of The Kingdom of the Hittites


The Kingdom of the Hittites
Trevor Bryce
554 pages including index
published in 2005

The nice thing about history is that there’s so much of it, and so much still barely known. The Hittites are a case in point. Their existence was largely unsuspected until the late nineteenth century, when the first of their sites were uncovered in what is now Turkey and Syria. Here was a major Late Bronze Age civilisation and Near East superpower, an empire on par with Ancient Egypt or Assyria that lasted almost fivehundred years and nobody had a clue it existed. The sole cluess to their existence then known were some vague references in the Old Testament, from which they gotten their name as well as some mentions in the official correspondence of their rivals in Egypt, Assyria and Babylon but these were still largely untranslated when the first Hittite sites were found. The rediscovery of the Hittites is but one example of how much more complex ancient history is compared to the caricature we get of it in pop culture, which largely goes Sumeria > Egypt > Greece > Rome, with a sidestep to Israel.

What’s also nice about history is how fluid it is. We think we know the history of given region or country until a chance archeological discovery turns everything upside down again. Especially with subjects as far removed in time from us as the Hittite Empire, which existed roughly from 1650 BCE until about 1200 BCE, our views of it can change surprisingly quickly, as can be seen in The Kingdom of the Hittites. Originally published in 1998, the second, 2005 edition has been thoroughly revised with sections of every chapter having been rewritten, based on new discoveries and other advances since the original publication. If less than a decade of progress can make such a difference in a textbook like this it’s no wonder its author, Trevor Bryce, stresses that this is still only a preliminary history of the Hittites, subject to further revision.

As a textbook The Kingdom of the Hittites is firmly of the “kings and battles” school of history writing, with a companion volume dealing with society and daily life of the Hittites. Sadly the Amsterdam library didn’t seem to have that in its stacks. No matter, this was enough to be going on with on its own as well. The book is set up in chronological order, it starts with the origins of the Hittites and an overview of the history of Anatolia just before the Hittite kingdom was established and ends with the last known Hittite king. The reign of each known Hittite king is looked at, but as Bryce makes clear throughout, of some kings much less is known than others. Indeed, for several kings not even the approximate dates of their reigns are known. Two appendixes, on the chronology of Hittite history and the sources available to historians, make this problem even more clear.

Read more

Insult to injury

Police officer who altered evidence in the murder of Jean Charles de Menezes has been cleared of “deliberate deception”:

The Special Branch officer deleted text from his computer note before speaking to the inquest in October last year.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission said he was not guilty of “deliberate deception”.

Mr de Menezes, 27, was shot dead by police at Stockwell Tube station in south London in July 2005.

The IPCC said the officer, known as “Owen”, had acted naively, but found no evidence of deliberate deception.

Last October, the officer told the inquest he deleted a line from computer notes which quoted Deputy Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick.

The note had originally claimed Dick had initially said the electrician could “run onto Tube as not carrying anything”.

But at the inquest he said: “On reflection, I looked at that and thought ‘I cannot actually say that.'”

The officer, a supervisor in the operations room at Scotland Yard, told the court he had removed the line because he believed it was “wrong and gave a totally false impression.”

The IPCC found Owen “acted alone” in failing to disclose the note and then deleting it.

Its report concluded the officer had shown a “lack of understanding” of how he should behave, but had not committed an offence.

Unbelievable, but not surprising. The socalled “Independent” Police Complaints Commission has shown time and again in the de Menezes case to be toothless or unwilling to actually prosecute the police. The IPCC is too much a part of the police establishment to do its job, either unwilling or unable to handle these sort of cases. As with parliament we once again see that self regulation does not work.

Hell freezes over: Daily Mail turns on police

Now here’s a headline and article you never expect to see in the Daily Mail: body in charge of UK policing policy is now an £18m-a-year brand charging the public £70 for a 60p criminal records check.

Normally the Daily Mail is the first to defend the police against the slurs of dangerously longhaired protestors or loony lawyers, but this is more like how it usually deals with socalled “dole scum” or suspciously foreign asylum seekers. The murder of Ian Tomlinson seems to have been a wakeup call and it’s interesting to see how the Mail‘s views on the Tomlinson case developed over time.

Via Alex.

What’s it like to be in a police kettle

A bit late, but it was stuck in my mailbox’s spam queueueue: a firsthand account of what it’s like to be stuck in a police kettle.

And then twenty minutes in, we realised we couldn’t get out. We walked up to a couple of cordons and asked nicely. The police told us they weren’t allowed to let anyone out, wouldn’t say why and that we’d be released when the organisers declared the demo over, but they didn’t know when that was. We were directed to another cordon which would let us through. Which sent us straight into the middle of two cordons where we both had the personal privilege of being shoved by the police. I was starting to regret having Hannah with me. A, perhaps more honest, policeman told us that it was policy to send people seeking to leave to the next cordon, and the next, etc.

We wandered around fruitlessly looking for an exit. There were a lot of people like us and the police were having to explain over and over again that they weren’t allowed to let anyone out. Some people who were trying to get back to work, to doctor’s appointments, etc., got upset with the police, who responded in a very calm manner. Plods don’t get paid enough to do this shit.

[…]

Later on I went to the peaceful sounding Climate Camp up the road on Bishopsgate to detox. It was very relaxed, there was a communal kitchen and it was all good. Until the riot police penned everyone in. I lied my way through the cordon and managed to pull an office worker out with me.

I am still upset. I feel my right to peaceful protest has been abrogated. The whole thing was so bizarre and unnecessary. I go round and round in my head and I can’t make sense of the police tactics in detaining peaceful protesters for hours without food or water or toilet facilities.

From my perch I overheard a man saying to a police officer, “I wasn’t angry when I came here, but I am now.”