Official: writing poetry isn’t terrorism

I blogged about the socalled “lyrical terrorist”last year, who was arrested an prosecuted for writing bad jihadi poetry as well as having some dodgy books on her bookshelves. Eventually she was convicted under the 2000 terrorism act, but appealed and now she has had her conviction quashed:

Samina Malik, 24, was given a nine-month suspended jail sentence at the Old Bailey last December after she became the first woman to be found guilty of storing material likely to be of use for terrorism.

Malik, of Southall, west London, adopted her nickname because of extremist lyrics she wrote on till receipts, but was never prosecuted over her poetry.

The lord chief justice, Lord Phillips, sitting in the court of appeal with Mr Justice Goldring and Mr Justice Plender, quashed the conviction after the Crown conceded that it was unsafe. In his judgment, Lord Phillips said the court decided that an offence would only be committed if the material concerned was likely to have provided practical assistance to a person either committing or preparing for terrorism. Propagandist or theological material did not fall within the legislation, he said.

“We consider that there is a very real danger that the jury became confused and that the prosecution have rightly conceded that this conviction is unsafe.”

In other words, once again it’s the judges that have to clean up the mess New Labour made passing badly drafted laws.

Books are terrorist material now?

It seems like, judging from the press reports on the conviction of the socalled “lyrical terrorist, in real life a not too bright 23 year old woman working in a WH Smiths at Heathrow:

In a box file in the family lounge was a printed version of the “declaration of war” by Osama bin Laden.

One of Malik’s poems, entitled The Living Martyrs, said: “Let us make Jihad/ Move to the front line/
To chop chop head of kuffar swine”.

A second poem was called How to Behead. “It’s not as messy or as hard as some may think/ It’s all about the flow of the wrist,” it read.

The Mujaheddin Poisoner’s Handbook, Encyclopaedia Jihad, How To Win In Hand To Hand Combat, and How To Make Bombs and Sniper Manual were found on her computer.

The court heard Malik joined an extremist organisation called Jihad Way, set up explicitly to disseminate terrorist propaganda and support for al Qaida.

Jonathan Sharp, prosecuting, said she was an “unlikely” but “committed” Islamic extremist: “She had a library of material that she had collected for terrorist purposes. That collection would be extremely useful for someone planning terrorist activity.”

Do something for me, willya? Just put these titles mentioned above in Google and see what comes up? Take “How To Make Bombs” for example: quite a few hits there. That’s because this whole conviction is utter bollocks, in which this confused young woman who gets just a bit too involved in playing muhajedin is just
railroaded as an example of how tough British justice is on terrorism. This doesn’t make the country any safer.

Why protect the identity of murderers?

As you know bob, the Metropolitian Police currently is on trial for breaching the health and safety laws when they murdered Jean Charles De Menezes. One of the more ridiculous features of this trial is the parade of police witnesses only indetified by their code names. Roobin at Through the Scary Door wonders: “Who on earth are the police officers identities being protected from? What do they imagine is going to happen?

Good question. Perhaps they imagine angry De Menezes taking the law in their own hands, as they haven’t gottne justice through the normal channels, but more likely it’s the usual security bollarks. “the terrorists must not know their identity” and all that. the worse thing is, we all just accept this, just like we accept that there are super sekrit police squads who can blow us away on the street with impunity, if somebody somewhere thinks we might be a terrorist. And if we’re not, hey, the police do a difficult job and we should be understanding of any little errors they make.

Comics scholar denied entry to US

Via Marc “not the Beastmaster” Singer, comes the news that comics scholar Ernesto Priego has been denied entry into the US. He was supposed to present a paper at the International Comic Arts Forum which is going to be held later this year. Marc wondered “what sort of security or immigration risk” Priego posed, personally I doubt there was any real reason for it, other than that somebody in the immigration/border service took a dislike to him for some reason or other. Just a random act of assholery, but as Marc also noted, not a standalone incident: quite a few scholars have been refused entry recently.

The US has long had a reputation for being welcoming to foreign scholars, its universities more than eager to attract top talent from all over the world. Part of the US wealth, scientific and technological prowess is built through the labour of hardworking foreign scientists. If this is changing, if these are now discouraged from coming over, then this can only bode ill for the country. Of course, it may be good for Europe, as all that top talent might come over here…

Our Orwellian world

Item one: a man is jailed for three-and-a-half years for carrying a blueprint of a rocket through Luton Airport:

British man who was found with blueprints for a rocket in his luggage at Luton Airport has been jailed for three-and-a-half years.

Yassin Nassari, 28, from Ealing, west London, was earlier found guilty at the Old Bailey of possessing documents likely to be useful to a terrorist.

[…]

Sentencing him, Judge Gerald Gordon said: “I have come to the conclusion that, sadly, like a number of young Muslims, you have somehow been indoctrinated into beliefs supporting terrorism by others.

“I have no doubt you wanted to immerse yourself in this fundamentalist trash, but in the material available to me there is nothing to indicate that any actual terrorist use would have been made of it by anyone.”

Nassari’s hard drive contained documents about martyrdom and weapons training, as well as instructions on how to construct the Qassam artillery rocket – a home-made steel rocket used by terrorist groups in the Middle-East.

So even though there was no evidence that this guy was involved with any terrorist organisation or intended to perform any terrorist acts himself, the mere fact of possessing documents that are a bit dodgy landed him in jail. Really, you don’t need to be an evil terrorist to be interested in the sort of material described in the last quoted paragraph; who hasn’t downloaded The Anarchist Cookbook at one point or another out of curiosity? There are plenty of people interested in weapons, guns, warfare etc. who aren’t terrorists or even terrorist sympathisers; remember Gareth the T.A. nerd from the Office?

Item two: The Metropolitian Police is given real-time access to London’s congestion charge cameras:

Police are to be given live access to London’s congestion charge cameras – allowing them to track all vehicles entering and leaving the zone.

Anti-terror officers will be exempted from parts of the Data Protection Act to allow them to see the date, time and location of vehicles in real time.

They previously had to apply for access on a case-by-case basis.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the “enduring vehicle-borne terrorist threat to London” for the change.

The thing is, a) the only true “vehicle-borne terrorist threat to London” was organised by the Keystone Cops branch of Al Queda, b) you cannot tell from the outside if a car is a terrorist car c) if you know enough to know which car to track, you also could’ve gotten permission to do so anyway under the old rules. In his science fiction thriller Whole Wide World Paul J. McAuley predicted that ultimately, all of the UK’s CCTV cameras would be linked up into one giant network, controlled by police computers; this seems like a step in that direction. The Met says this capacity will only be used to fight terrorist activity, but once a capability is there, other uses will be found for it, as the internet itself has shown us.

Item three: The association of Chief Police Officers wants unlimited detention without charge, again for the noble cause of fighting terrorism. And again the question crops up, what is the purpose of locking people up if you don’t have the evidence to charge them, let alone convict them?

Item four: the Dutch police can now keep records of anybody who interacts with them — detainees, suspects, victims, witnesses, literally anybody– for up to five years (Dutch). In the first year, any police officer can look into these records, afterwards it’s only accesible to those who have “a good reason” to do so. But that’s not all, as it’s not just the police who can view these records, but also other parties with a vested interest: social workers, housing societies, even shopowners. All in the name of fighting crime.