I care, you care for healthcare

The US political blogosphere for months has been consumed by the healthcare “debate”, which I’ve only sporadically read about nor blogged about because it really wasn’t much of my business, but a purely domestic political issue. The main impression I got was that all the wingnuts seem to think it will bring slavery back to the US, the sort of moderate left/mainline Democrats think the bills on offer were okay but not great but needed to be passed because something needed to be done while those on the left of the Democrats were skeptical of it as it still provided too much power to insurance companies, amongst other objections. I think the latter may well be right, that it’s (partially) still a sellout to corporate interests, but ironically the fervent opposition to it by the wingnuts means it still is a triumph for leftwing values. If it actually works as intended it will be another of those government programmes even wingnuts don’t dare tamper with, like medicare and perhaps a stepping stone to proper healthcare.

If nothing else, the healthcare bill means that your favourite science fiction and fantasy authors, not to mention comic book writers and artists might finally get some decent insurance they can afford. Let George R. R. Martin explain the reality of healthcare in the US before the bill:

I’ve been a full-time freelance writer since 1979, and I’ve been fortunate enough to do very well at it, thank you. As a result, I have health insurance. But even for me, it hasn’t been easy. I remember, when I first moved to Santa Fe and went full time as a writer, I was coming off three years teaching college, when my health insurance had been covered by my job. Now I had to find my own. I was young and healthy back then… even slim and fit, believe it or not… but I didn’t have a lot of money, and when I went looking for an individual policy, everything I found cost way more than I could afford and covered way less than my group insurance with the college had. To get affordable insurance, I had to join a group: the Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce. As a “small business,” I joined the CofC and signed up for their group coverage. It was not great insurance, by any means, but it gave me some protection for a few years. But that was in 1980 or so. In a more recent decade, when the Writer’s Guild policy that had covered me during my Hollywood years expired, I tried the same dodge… only to discover that while I could still join the Chamber of Commerce as a sole proprietorship, I could no longer get their health insurance. That was now available only to members who had two full-time employees. The insurance company had… you guessed it… changed the rules.

From 1997-1998 I served as vice-president of SFWA, the Science Fiction Writers of America, in the administration of Michael Capobianco, one of SFWA’s most outstanding leaders. A LOT of freelance writers had no health insurance, and Capo did what no other president before him had been able to do: find a decent, affordable group policy for SFWA members. It was through Aetna, and while it wasn’t as good as some other policies — the WGA policy was much better –it was good enough, and certainly both cheaper and better than anything any writer could find as an individual. I signed up, as did a couple hundred other SFWAns, and for a couple of years we had the peace of mind that having such insurance brings.

And then Aetna dropped us. No particular reason was ever given. Guess we weren’t profitable enough for them. They just cancelled the entire group. That wasn’t allowed in New York State, where state laws required them to continue insuring policy holders resident in that state. But those of us in the other forty-nine states were out of luck. Nor were SFWA’s officers (Capo and I were out of office by that time) able to find ANY other insurance company willing to step in and take Aetna’s place. We were a group with fourteen hundred members, a couple hundred of whom had showed themselves willing and able to purchase group insurance (the rest, presumably, had policies from day jobs or through spouses, or were unable to afford any insurance whatsover)… and yet no one would insure us.

Like I said, I am one of the lucky ones. I was able to go back to the WGA for a few years, and from them to COBRA, and thanks to our state laws in New Mexico, I could purchase insurance through the New Mexico Health Insurance Alliance coming off COBRA without fear of being refused for pre-existing conditions. So I’m covered.

But I have a lot of friends who are not nearly so fortunate.

Now compare that to what I wrote a month ago about our own medical situation:

We will never get the bill for this, never will have to worry whether this emergency operation or the cost of S.’s lifelong immunosuppressant drugs treatment would bankrupt us, never even will have to worry whether it will put our insurance costs up or whether the costs of the transplant will be balanced out by the savings in not having to have dialysis anymore.

And that matters a lot. If there’s any time when you don’t need more worries, it’s when you’re seriously ill. We didn’t have to worry about money; had we been in the same situation in the US, even with healthcare insurance we would have.

The cost of treatment was never an issue

It may be as early as the middle of next week that S. is finally discharged from the hospital and able to come home. It’s been a long and hard road since our operation on 22 December last year and she has stayed in the hospital for the better part of two months… I can’t deny it’s been hard and tiring for the both of us, for me to see her so ill and weak, for her to be the that week, to actually wake up after the first crisis had finally passed and realise that she couldn’t remember anything that had happened since the day before the operation. Worse, like DC Comics in the past few years, she couldn’t stick to one crisis and actually had to go back to the hospital after she was discharged too soon. What she at first thought was some stomach or bowel problems got worse and worse, we went to the emergency department of the hospital, she was taken in again and the next day they had to do an emergency operation, re-opening the wound to drain more than a litre of infected fluid from around the kidney. It was this that had caused the stomach upsets, literally compressing her guts. Awful, awful, stress filled days and sleepless nights, but there was one worry we never had.

Whether we could afford to pay for all this. We will never get the bill for this, never will have to worry whether this emergency operation or the cost of S.’s lifelong immunosuppressant drugs treatment would bankrupt us, never even will have to worry whether it will put our insurance costs up or whether the costs of the transplant will be balanced out by the savings in not having to have dialysis anymore (In case you’re wondering, the NHS thinks the cost of a transplant is only slightly more than half the cost of a year’s worth of dialysis). Never an issue, never even something that entered my head to worry about, though S., who has spent a couple of years in the US, did every now and again. Even associated costs, like the transport to and from the hospital for the trice-weekly dialysis sessions, were never something we had to pay.

Which is an experience that people in most of the richer countries in the world will recognise, and something most citizens and governments in less rich countries want to emulate. Everywhere in the world it is taken for granted that free or cheap healthcare is a Good Thing — except it seems in the US. What everywhere else is seen as a liberation, is sold in the US as slavery, with the very real possibility of either being bankrupted by medical costs or dying because you can’t afford treatment presented as freedom of choice! You have people like Matt Welch opposing public healthcare while knowing it’s superior to the American “health care” system simply because it would put their taxes up sand they’re rich enough to buy what they need and screw everybody else. How shit hasn’t been burned down yet I’ll never know…

Your Happening World (7)

Bwahaha! Texan anti-gay marriage legislation may actually outlaw all marriages there. Serves the fuckers right.

When a Canadian diplomate favourably compares the Dutch and English treatment of prisoners in Aghanistan with his own country’s policies, how bad must they be? Answer: quite bad, but the government doesn’t want to know.

Any suggestions for the 10 Popular science books SF writers would benefit from having read?

Thierry Henry audits for the Feench handball team:



You can’t blame the Irish for being livid, nor the French for being disgusted but philosophical. Bad refereeing is an intrinsic part of football and had the shoe been on the other foot (the ball on the other hand) the reactions would have been the exact opposite. But I thought better of Thierry Henry.

Neither Blair nor Balkenende is EU president. Thank ghu, even if it means we have to keep Balkenende longer. Bet the British tabloids are eagerly awaiting any hint of a sex scandal on the part of Herman van Rompuy, if only to be able to pun on rompuy-pompuy…

Lieberman is the Democratic Sarah Palin.

Ideas I wish I’d had: Nobody’s Favorites, a look at comics’ worst characters, the ones that nobody likes. Some I agree with, some not and some are so obscure nobody even knows them.

Ideas I wish I’d had, part II:Thursday WHO’s WHO.

Friday bitchfest: Professionalism.

Your Happening World (3)

Read:

A reasonable definition of Hipsterism, of which Trainspotting, though it will have no cache among hipsters themselves, is a formative work, is the assumption that there is no position which the middle class subject can not occupy, both class and identity politics have been overcome, or at least class has been subsumed into identity and identity is for the other. The middle class assumes a kind of transcendent, post-historical emptiness into which all cultures can be incorporated. This is not simply hyper-consumerism it’s also a metaphysical claim, a claim to superiority, thus while others are bounded by ethnicity, class, gender; limited, objects, with a finite set of facets and characteristics, the hipster, viewing everything as simply a lifestyle choice, views her own not just as one lifestyle among many but the lifestyle of lifestyles.

Read. That the American rightwing is loony and over the top is a given as is liberal outrage towards the messenger if not so much the message. Remember: America is not Chile. America is not Chile. America is not Chile. Is it?

“THE…. [Sodomite] Hal Duncan”.

Listen.

Nobody asked for this. Did they?

Americans. Thick as shit. (But don’t flatter yourself your country is any better).

Chickens coming home

Can we treat the Republicans as a normal political party, a party that went off the rails during the last eight (actually sixteen) years but which can still be rescued from its more self destructive, hard right tendencies through engaging its more moderate elements. Is it possible to remake it, as Paul Krugman and other liberal commentators still seem to believe, into something on the level of the Tories or the various Christian Democratic parties in Europe; rightwing but nor reactionary? Not according to the Stiftung Leo Strauss, who explains just what the Republicans have turned into in the past three decades:

It wasn’t always like this, of course. The Republican Party as an independent actor and entity was able to keep the Movement within bounds. But after Reagan, and especially the Bush debacle in ‘92, the Movement learned to seize power on its own within and without the Republican Party. As a sign of their increased power, the Movement’s rage, paranoia, and conspiracy fever in 1993 seemed novel. By 1994 and certainly 2000. the Movement had completed its subversion of the Republican Party.

Wonder why after Obama the ferocity is turned up to 11? The answer is intrinsic to the Movement as functional social, cultural and political creature. It governed for 6 years and hung on for 2 more. Its Counter-Enlightenment, racial, authoritarian /hierarchical impulse was the official American government. With Obama’s victory its rejection is not only personal but for the first time, in 2006 and 2008, it as dominant political force (not as a minor coalition partner within the Republican Party) was rejected.

The Movement Is Not Playing For Liberal Democracy

For the Movement, as we said, politics is existential. And when survival is on the line, pluralistic compromise is for chumps. Democrats still are playing for political advantage within the confines of traditional two party politics. How to give a concrete example? When the other side’s world view is existential, then the stakes are higher than something so trite as the Constitution, etc. We saw this in part through Addington, Cheney et al. with their view on the Unitary Executive. As I wrote a while ago, during a lunch with John Ashcroft after his tenure as AG, he quite blithely said the President is entitled to ignore Congress and its laws — the only thing that matters is the plebiscite on a president because it is national. He then added if the president is re-elected that by definition means the country ratified everything he has done, even secret stuff the nation doesn’t know about.

Existential combat in ideological struggle for survival with a natural affinity for hierarchical organizations and militarized speech and thought patterns. Do you see now why to the Movement any criticism of Bush as Warlord was akin to treason? It’s not only mere warfare for any given news cycle, but deeply rooted in the non-liberal democratic, pre-Enlightenment agenda.

What the Stiftung is describing is immediately recognisable to anybody familiar with US foreign policy during the Cold War and how anti-communism was used to overrule any considerations of democracy and freedom. The normalisation of torture, election fraud, rightwing militias, political assassinations (what else would you call the murder of doctor Tiller), the mass hysteria whipped up over what Obama is going to do to the country and how this justifies anything that can stop it all of it has been used with great succes in South America and elsewhere to destroy governments and countries Washington does not like. It was only a matter of time before these techniques were re-imported into the US.