What now?

Even if the killing of Fortuyn wasn’t politically motivated, things will never be the same again, to use the same hoary cliche all the newspapers have been using. Holland has always been an country where the politicians may have been a self selected elite, but you would still find them standing next to you at the herring car, downing a Hollandse Nieuwe. You want to know when the last Dutch politician was assasinated? 1672…

I’m afraid this openess soon will not exist anymore. There have been other attacks on politicians the last two decades -a minister’s house blown up in 1991, the hotel where the extreme rightwing Centrumpartij was meeting being torched, but never anything that justified the amount of security heads of state drag around with them in countries like Germany or France, let alone the USA. I really couldn’t blame politicians if they wanted to be more protected now, but it’s a pity. Something precious will be lost if our politicians become the same as every other country’s.

The other main thing on my mind right now is what will happen in the elections on may the fifteenth. The government has decided, after conferring with the leaders of the Lijst Pim Fortuyn to at least let them go through –constitutionally they had little real choice anyway–but there won’t be any campaigning anymore [1]. The various partyleaders had already decided to stop their campaigns out of respect for Pim’s death, as a sign of their outrage about his killing, including how it damages our democracy.

That latter is what concerns most of us now, both Fortuyn supporters and opponents: this is unique in our history, this is totally and wholly undutch, something which foreigners probably won’t understand. This will be our 11 september, our day the world changed forever. We see ourself as tolerant, rational and enlightened, as somewhat smugly superior to other countries –now we’ll have to review this view of ourselves. Holland, it turns out, is not special, bad things can and will happen here.

[1] The Lijst Pim Fortuyn won’t be appointing a new leader before the elections, probably hoping to pick up some more voters that way as well as a sign of their respect for him.

More on Pim Fortuyn

When something as shocking as this happens, it always takes some time for people to adjust, to absorb what happened and to react to it. Today was a day of reaction. Lots of coverage on tv, in the newspapers, weblogs and Usenet of course. Out from all the noise and chaos a few patterns emerge.

Holland is afraid, is angry. Again and again I saw people saying on tv or in newspaper reports:

Pim Fortuyn was killed for his beliefs … If Pim couldn’t say what he wanted, what chance do we have? … He said the things we couldn’t say and now they killed them. It’s the media’s fault for demonizing him … It’s the politicians’ fault for attacking him …. It’s you lefties who killed him.

It’s scarey and frightening to hear so many people voice this — there were already riots near Parliament in Den Haag last night, just after his death. Today things have fortunately calmed down. There are long rows for the condeolance registrers at City Hall in Rotterdam, as well as people laying flowers at the murder site and his house.

And it’s not just been Fortuyn voters. It seems about fifty percent of people interviewed did not agree with his views, did not plan to vote for him, did not even like him.

One woman, asked for why she was going to put flowers in front of his house:

Ik zou nooit op hem hebben gestemd. Maar er is iemand op grond van zijn denkbeelden neergeknald. Dáár protesteer ik tegen.
I would never have voted for him. But somebody was blown away because of his beliefs. That’s what I protest against. [1]

It’s still not known whether or not she’s right on this, but it’s far the most likely motive. And I agree with her. Pim Fortuyn did not deserve to die because of his political beliefs, no matter how repulsive I find them. He should’ve been dealt with via normal democratic channels, by engaging him on issues, by showing his supporters how he’s wrong.

[1] Nrc Handelsblad “Pim Fortuyn zei wat wij denken”

Pim Fortuyn killed

Rightwing politician Pim Fortuyn, who was on course to win the general elections on May the 15th has just been shot and killed. It’s not clear who killed him or why he actually was killed, though a lot of people here are speculating about whether or not it was politically motivated. I hope it wasn’t, because that would irrevocably change our democracy for the worse.

He was a dangerous, spiteful man but he didn’t deserve to be murdered. It’s not a good day for a democracy when dangerous people cannot be stopped by democratic means.

The big question is, what now? What does this mean for our democracy, for our way of life?

The BBC has a short article up on their website.

What I fight for

This was quoted at Avedon Carol’s weblog, which is required reading for anybody wanting a liberal perspective on US politics. The three paragraphs below I’ve taken from this article because they express eloquently how I feel about being a Socialist.

The first thing we stand for is freedom, not just the freedom to speak our minds, but the freedom to act on our beliefs. The freedom to worship as we see fit, or not to worship anything at all. The freedom to have any kind of relationship we want with other consenting adults, be it political, financial, or sexual. The freedom to serve our country, whether it be in the military or as a public servant, or not to serve it at all. These freedoms are not exclusive to a particular race, religion, or group of people, they belong to everyone.

The second thing we stand for is responsibility, not just for ourselves and our well-being, but for the well-being of the community at large: from the local school district, the nation, to the world as a whole. We must recognize that we are more than just entities unto ourselves, but a part of a vast and complex world, and that everything we do affects the world we live in in some way, and to use the freedoms we so greatly value to ensure that future generations will be able to have that freedom.

And finally, but most importantly, we stand for the truth, the truth above all; the truth of our vision and our desire to make a better world not just for ourselves, but for our enemies, even when they can’t or won’t see it. Our enemies are blinded to the truth by their ignorance, and by their arrogance, viewing the battle itself as the truth, seeking one enemy after another for no other reason than to justify their existence and manipulate others into supporting them. What we stand for is something greater, and we should never forget that no matter how hard we fight.

The above is not complete by a longshot, but it does express two core beliefs of mine, the belief that we have both rights and responsibilities as individuals and the belief that the truth matters. If “my side” wins by deceit, by foul means, we won’t have won, we’d just become our enemies.

Related to this, earlier this evening I posted the following to Usenet, about what I think is the core of true socialism:

The whole point of socialism is that power is not in the hands of a small clique or a single dictaror, but in the hands of the people, i.e. everybody.

You can follow the teachings of Marx and Engels and all the other great socialist thinkers all you like, but without that one crucial point, you’re not socialist. The liutmus test for any country that calls itself socialist is whether people are free to disagree with socialism without fear for their life.

Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Castro’s Cuba, Stalin’s Russia and Mao’s China never were socialist. Any party that talks about the Vanguard of the Revolution leading the Poor Oppressed Masses (who cannot possibly free themselves, the poor sods) is not a socialist party.

The revolution can not be directed top down, it will come bottom up.