More on Pim Fortuyn

When something as shocking as this happens, it always takes some time for people to adjust, to absorb what happened and to react to it. Today was a day of reaction. Lots of coverage on tv, in the newspapers, weblogs and Usenet of course. Out from all the noise and chaos a few patterns emerge.

Holland is afraid, is angry. Again and again I saw people saying on tv or in newspaper reports:

Pim Fortuyn was killed for his beliefs … If Pim couldn’t say what he wanted, what chance do we have? … He said the things we couldn’t say and now they killed them. It’s the media’s fault for demonizing him … It’s the politicians’ fault for attacking him …. It’s you lefties who killed him.

It’s scarey and frightening to hear so many people voice this — there were already riots near Parliament in Den Haag last night, just after his death. Today things have fortunately calmed down. There are long rows for the condeolance registrers at City Hall in Rotterdam, as well as people laying flowers at the murder site and his house.

And it’s not just been Fortuyn voters. It seems about fifty percent of people interviewed did not agree with his views, did not plan to vote for him, did not even like him.

One woman, asked for why she was going to put flowers in front of his house:

Ik zou nooit op hem hebben gestemd. Maar er is iemand op grond van zijn denkbeelden neergeknald. Dáár protesteer ik tegen.
I would never have voted for him. But somebody was blown away because of his beliefs. That’s what I protest against. [1]

It’s still not known whether or not she’s right on this, but it’s far the most likely motive. And I agree with her. Pim Fortuyn did not deserve to die because of his political beliefs, no matter how repulsive I find them. He should’ve been dealt with via normal democratic channels, by engaging him on issues, by showing his supporters how he’s wrong.

[1] Nrc Handelsblad “Pim Fortuyn zei wat wij denken”

Pim Fortuyn killed

Rightwing politician Pim Fortuyn, who was on course to win the general elections on May the 15th has just been shot and killed. It’s not clear who killed him or why he actually was killed, though a lot of people here are speculating about whether or not it was politically motivated. I hope it wasn’t, because that would irrevocably change our democracy for the worse.

He was a dangerous, spiteful man but he didn’t deserve to be murdered. It’s not a good day for a democracy when dangerous people cannot be stopped by democratic means.

The big question is, what now? What does this mean for our democracy, for our way of life?

The BBC has a short article up on their website.

What I fight for

This was quoted at Avedon Carol’s weblog, which is required reading for anybody wanting a liberal perspective on US politics. The three paragraphs below I’ve taken from this article because they express eloquently how I feel about being a Socialist.

The first thing we stand for is freedom, not just the freedom to speak our minds, but the freedom to act on our beliefs. The freedom to worship as we see fit, or not to worship anything at all. The freedom to have any kind of relationship we want with other consenting adults, be it political, financial, or sexual. The freedom to serve our country, whether it be in the military or as a public servant, or not to serve it at all. These freedoms are not exclusive to a particular race, religion, or group of people, they belong to everyone.

The second thing we stand for is responsibility, not just for ourselves and our well-being, but for the well-being of the community at large: from the local school district, the nation, to the world as a whole. We must recognize that we are more than just entities unto ourselves, but a part of a vast and complex world, and that everything we do affects the world we live in in some way, and to use the freedoms we so greatly value to ensure that future generations will be able to have that freedom.

And finally, but most importantly, we stand for the truth, the truth above all; the truth of our vision and our desire to make a better world not just for ourselves, but for our enemies, even when they can’t or won’t see it. Our enemies are blinded to the truth by their ignorance, and by their arrogance, viewing the battle itself as the truth, seeking one enemy after another for no other reason than to justify their existence and manipulate others into supporting them. What we stand for is something greater, and we should never forget that no matter how hard we fight.

The above is not complete by a longshot, but it does express two core beliefs of mine, the belief that we have both rights and responsibilities as individuals and the belief that the truth matters. If “my side” wins by deceit, by foul means, we won’t have won, we’d just become our enemies.

Related to this, earlier this evening I posted the following to Usenet, about what I think is the core of true socialism:

The whole point of socialism is that power is not in the hands of a small clique or a single dictaror, but in the hands of the people, i.e. everybody.

You can follow the teachings of Marx and Engels and all the other great socialist thinkers all you like, but without that one crucial point, you’re not socialist. The liutmus test for any country that calls itself socialist is whether people are free to disagree with socialism without fear for their life.

Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Castro’s Cuba, Stalin’s Russia and Mao’s China never were socialist. Any party that talks about the Vanguard of the Revolution leading the Poor Oppressed Masses (who cannot possibly free themselves, the poor sods) is not a socialist party.

The revolution can not be directed top down, it will come bottom up.

Election time!

Local elections last week here in the Netherlands. We’re also having national elections in two months time, so all the pundits in the media were treating this a bit as a poll for the parliamentary elections.

Me, I’ve done my bit for the SP, though not in the town I’m living in, as we’re not taking part in the elections there. Instead, I’ve been helping out in Amsterdam, doing the usual election stuff. Quite good fun.

It looks like we came out about even compared with last time. In quite a few districts where we were already part of the city council we lost seats, but we also gained seats in districts where we took part for the first time. And we went up one seat here in Amsterdam, from 3 to 4 seats, which is good.

The results of all the elections the SP took part in.