Hugo Awards: podcasts

I’m not a big follower of podcasts, but it’s been a pleasure to follow the nominated ones this past week. The Podcast category is fairly new to the Hugo Awards but at least judging from this year’s candidates the average quality is high. The differences between the various podcasts are small and a win for any of at least the first four listed would make me happy.

Below are the candidates in the order I’ll vote for them:

  1. The Writer and the Critic – Kirstyn McDermott and Ian Mond: insightful, reviews books I actually read.
  2. The Skiffy and Fanty Show – Shaun Duke, Jen Zink, Julia Rios, Paul Weimer, David Annandale, Mike Underwood, and Stina Leicht: nice chemistry, great subjects
  3. Galactic Suburbia Podcast – Alisa Krasnostein, Alexandra Pierce, Tansy Rayner Roberts (Presenters) and Andrew Finch (Producer): interesting, broad ranging.
  4. The Coode Street Podcast – Jonathan Strahan and Gary K. Wolfe: Jonathan and Gary are amiable, chatty and knowledgeable about science fiction
  5. Verity! – Deborah Stanish, Erika Ensign, Katrina Griffiths, L.M. Myles, Lynne M. Thomas, and Tansy Rayner Roberts: Doctor Who is not my thing, but what this podcast does, it does well.
  6. Tea and Jeopardy – Emma Newman and Peter Newman: A decent steampunk setup, but not for me.
  7. SF Signal Podcast Patrick Hester: the least interesting of the bunch.

One thing I noticed and liked is how many women were involved in this category.

Hugo Awards: Best professional and fan artists

Two categories in today’s Hugo Awards post: best professional and best fan artist. First up, best professional artist:

  1. Fiona Staples: I know her artwork from Saga and love the way she can make the outrageous look mundane without losing the ability to awe you with her artwork.
  2. Julie Dillon: I love the bulk she gives her art.
  3. John Harris: has a very seventies, Chris Fossian with New Wave influences art style which I like if only for nostalgic reasons.
  4. Galen Dara: slightly too twee for me. Nothing wrong with her artwork, just not for me.
  5. John Picacio: great artwork, but there are stronger contenders.
  6. Daniel Dos Santos: eh. Decent artwork and not a shame if he wins, but it was all too conventionally pretty and unimaginative for me.

Best fan artist:

  1. Sarah Webb: great looking fantasy art and she’s only 19 years old? Bloody hell.
  2. Mandie Manzano: I like those glass in lead paintings a lot.
  3. Spring Schoenhuth: Great looking sfnal jewelry
  4. Steve Stiles: Steve has been doing fanart for a long time now and it’s nicely cartoonish. Not surprising, considering he’s a comic book artist.
  5. Brad W. Foster: very traditional (ie dull) fanart. Eh.

Next post: but what about the Retro Hugos?

Hugo Awards: Best Novel

Let’s start with an easy one. The best novel award. Nominees are:

  • Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie
  • Neptune’s Brood by Charles Stross
  • Parasite by Mira Grant
  • Warbound, Book III of the Grimnoir Chronicles by Larry Correia
  • The Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson

As I said monday, I won’t vote for either Correia or the Wheel of Time, so those fall off immediately. Of the three remaining novels I haven’t read Mira Grant’s Parasite yet, but I’m not sure reading it will change my voting. Tentatively my voting order will be:

  1. Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie
  2. Neptune’s Brood by Charles Stross
  3. Parasite by Mira Grant
  4. No Award

Ancillary Justice is head and shoulders above any of the other nominees, one of the two best novels published last year (the other). The Charlie Stross was a good novel, but nothing special compared to Leckie and the same goes for Mira Grant’s entry. None of them would be an embarassment for the Hugos of course, so I’m happy to leave my order like this.

The Hugo Awards: things I won’t consider (II): categories

For Loncon3 there are sixteen Hugo Award categories, plus the not a Hugo John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer, to vote in. That’s a lot to be knowledgeable about. They reflect the history of the award, as categories came and went:

  • Best Novel
  • Best Novella
  • Best Novelette
  • Best Short Story
  • Best Related Work
  • Best Graphic Story
  • Best Dramatic Presentation (Long Form)
  • Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form)
  • Best Editor – Short form
  • Best Editor – Long form
  • Best Professional Artist

Those are all what you might call the professional awards, the ones most like other literary awards. The first four are perhaps the core Hugos, though the distinction between novella and especially the novelette and short story is more of historic than actual importance and nobody outside fandom pays attention to anything but the novel award anyway. Best professional artist in one way or another has been around since the beginning as well; illustrations, especially cover paintings have of course always been important in science fiction.

Meanwhile the editor and dynamic presentation –basically anything that isn’t written science fiction– awards are split up the way they are because voters over time thought that e.g. writing a single episode of a tv series is slightly different from writing a movie and the same for editing short stories vs novels. Best graphic story is for comics.

The next category is sort of a transition category, where the smaller commercial magazines mix with the bigger fanzines, always a bit of a mess. Beyond that there are the fan awards, awarded for work inside of fandom. It’s always a bit of a surprise for newcomers to discover that yes, professional writers too can be eligible for these awards, as long as they are active in fandom in some way or another. That I think is the real charm of the Hugos: they’re for all of us, not just fans voting for their favourite “celebrities”.

  • Best Semiprozine
  • Best Fanzine
  • Best Fancast
  • Best Fan Writer
  • Best Fan Artist

In short, there’s a split in awards categories that deal in the business of science fiction and awards that deal in the business of science fiction fandom, but pros can be nominated and win in fan categories and vice versa. It’s one of those things that are utterly charming about sf fandom even if it made a lot more sense back in 1953 when every other fan was a pro writer and the rest were aspiring pro writers. There is still much less of a pro-fan distinction than there is in related fandoms like media sf or comics.

Now, if I’m completely honest, the only two Hugo categories I’m truly interested in are the Best Novel and the Best Fan Writer ones; these are the only ones I can form opinions about without the help of the Hugo Voter Package. But thanks to the voter package I can at least make a stab at rating the candidates for the other categories too. Which I’m going to do with the following exceptions: I won’t vote in either of the dramatic presentation categories, nor in the graphic story one, because I don’t believe the Hugo is suited for them. These are not where this fandom’s strengths and interests lie and they always default to already well known, well established works.

The two other categories I’m wavering about are the editorial categories. It’s not the awards themselves so much that are the problem, but rather my ability to judge them. Editing is a largely invisible art to me as a reader, not helped by the lack of editorial acknowledgement in most sf books. And since I don’t read sf magazines, where the role of the editor is much greater in shaping the magazine as a whole, it’s hard to judge those kind of editors too. Some editors have been thoughtful enough to include samples of the stories/books they’ve edited, but just because I like a story doesn’t mean the editing was any good, nor the other way around. Therefore I probably will take a look at these categories and decide later if to vote on them.

All other categories I will be voting on, which means a lot of reading and thanks again for the Hugo Voters Package for making this so easy. I think I’ll be blogging about the various awards throughout July and aim to have made my choices by August. For some that will be easy; for others, not so much.

The Hugo Awards: things I won’t consider (I)

I’d been dithering about going to the Worldcon this year, even though it’s rare that it’s held inside Europe, partially because it’s been such a long time that I’ve been to a proper con and would I not feel uncomfortable going to the biggest of them all. However when Rose Fox turned out not to be able to go and offered their membership for sale I took the chance. So now I just need to book a hotel and a train journey and I’m there.

Oh, and I have slightly longer than a month to decide what to vote for in the Hugo Awards.

Here’s how I’m going to do this: I’m of course going to blog about it, so I’m laying down some ground rules. First, I’ll have to address the rightwing attempt to turn the Hugos into a propagandafest. That’s easily solved: everybody on this slate is disqualified and won’t appear on my ballot.

This includes:

  • Best Novel: Warbound, Book III of the Grimnoir Chronicles by Larry Correia (Baen Books)
  • Best novella: The Butcher of Khardov by Dan Wells (Privateer Press)
  • Best novella: The Chaplain’s Legacy by Brad Torgersen (Analog, Jul-Aug 2013)
  • Best Novelette: The Exchange Officers by Brad Torgersen (Analog, Jan-Feb 2013)
  • Best Novelette: Opera Vita Aeterna by Vox Day (The Last Witchking, Marcher Lord Hinterlands)
  • Best editor Long form: Toni Weisskopf
  • Best fanzine: Elitist Book Reviews edited by Steven Diamond

All these won’t be taken into consideration, won’t be read, won’t appear on my ballot.

There’s one other borderline entry on the Hugo ballots,The Wheel of Time series, which is slightly dodgy for two reasons. One, it’s a complete series put on the novel ballot under the idea that it’s one single book split up in parts and two, people campaigned for it in honour of Robert Jordan. The latter I have no problems with, as the people who nominated it did it out of a genuine appreciation of Jordan and his work. Remains the question, is it a single book?

Not to me. I find this stretches the definition of single book too far and hence won’t be putting it on my ballot. To be fair, even if had put it on the ballot I’ve read enough of the series to know it would’ve finished dead last. I like Jordan and will always appreciate The Wheel of Time for getting me through some dark times, but it’s not good enough for a Hugo Award.

So those are the works that drop off immediately for me. In the next post: which categories to exclude. I have opinions.

(Updated for pronoun errors.)